On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Florent Hivert <florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr> wrote: >> I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it. >> >> Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner, >> meaning in practice we would share the work between Florent, Mike, >> myself, for a better 24/24 7/7 service? > > Does that mean that one of us has to move to Vladivostok, Pekin or Sidney ? > > Count me in... > > By the way they are 7 patch to review concerning > combinatorics... Should'nt we make an ad on sage-combinat-devel ? > > And finally speaking about the combinat upstream teem, on trac, there is this > sage-combinat milestone. I don't know exactly what it is for ? Is there any > use for it ? Right now it only looks like a combinat wishlist. Especially > since any finished ticket is moved to the relevant sage version. Is it really > used ? should we keep it ? Isn't it redundant with the component ? >
I personally think it is potentially confusing and redundant with the component. Willaim -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
