On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <da...@student.matnat.uio.no> wrote: > Patches up for a basic sparse fp matrix, #7723. That's the very basics, > and if accepted I can move on to the fancier stuff -- I prefer getting > corrections of course early... > > William Stein wrote: >> I really hope that the Sage matrix design is sufficiently flexible >> that it can be adapted to work for your purposes. I put a lot of time >> into designing the overall structure so it would at least work for >> what I wanted. >> > > I hope so too. So far my experience is that I like how things are > designed and what it can do for my own code (basically make it a lot > cleaner), but there's *a lot* of holes to fill in to make it useful even > in a basic sense for numerics (also for dense matrices for instance). > I've seen that there's some more work than I first imagined to make it > usable for me, but I'm not sure if there are other alternatives (besides > my own code base being a mess -- which I might go for in the end..). I > will simply have to start using it and see whether I find it easier to > drop this or keep evolving it. If the latter, I'd have to supply some > patches for dense fp matrices too.
So what happened? William -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
