On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > ... > The recent case of gcc accepting the macro INFINITY even when code was not > compiled in C99 mode was just one example. INFINITY was not defined until the > C99 standard. > ... > I must admit, I find it somewhat annoying that gcc is still not fully C99 > compliant, despite it is 12 years since the standard was released! > ...
LOL! I hope the C99 standard doesn't specify the behaviour when code is NOT compiled in C99 mode... :-) Gonzalo PS: If it is possible to touch a clock without stopping it, then it should be possible to start a clock without touching it! -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
