I use a few security add-ons to speed up my browsers on Firefox, Chrome and IE as well :
Ghostery for trackers (helps speed up page loads plus block tracking sites which you wouldn't image are watching you), works on Firefox, Chrome, IE, Opera and Safari Mask Me (kind of the same but also masks email when using on sites I don't want to give information to) Http Nowhere Is there any conflict between 64 & 32 bit? I know that sometimes if they are not the same you fun into weird situation when certain programs tend to be sluggish or non-responsive. These are clean dual boots your running, the Linux side isn't slow to boot up is it or is it drawing more resources than normal during start up? Taylor >From the desk of Taylor Woods: Just a man and his computer (404)536-7773 cell "Success is not measured by the amount of failures but by the amount of attempts to accept failure as an option" This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic mail or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail so that we may correct our internal records. Please then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its entirety. Thank you. On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Bruno Pereira <brunopereir...@gmail.com>wrote: > Is the SL system booting from the same disk as Windows XP is? > > Bruno Pereira > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Tom Rosmond <rosm...@reachone.com> wrote: > >> I run a dual boot (SL 6.4/Windows XP) workstation. SL is 64 bit, XP is >> 32 bit. I have Firefox and Konqueror browsers on SL; Firefox, IE, and >> Google Chrome on XP. For all browser choices I notice that when my >> browser home page loads (Google.com for all cases), the XP load times >> are very quick (< 1 sec), but painfully slow for SL (6-8 secs). I >> recently upgraded SL from 5.5 to 6.4, but I had the same symptoms before >> the change. >> >> Here are some data points: >> >> 1. Firefox: 17.0.8 on SL, 23.0.1 on XP >> 2. Temporarily disabling SELinux made no difference >> 3. Temporarily disabling all plugins on SL Firefox made no difference. >> 4. After the SL home page loads switching to other URL's is noticeably >> slower than with XP. >> >> Is this some kind of authentication hangup? I have looked at the >> various logs, but can't see anything. But I am not an expert in this >> area, so maybe I don't know what to look for. >> >> Any insights or suggestions? >> >> >> T. Rosmond >> > >