"so RH wants to get new versions of selected apps faster to the RHEL than if they were going thru current Fedora -> RHEL route? am i reading this right?"
no, not at all, I don't think. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Andrew Z <form...@gmail.com> wrote: > so RH wants to get new versions of selected apps faster to the RHEL than > if they were going thru current Fedora -> RHEL route? > am i reading this right? > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:07 PM, ~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 01/07/2014 08:27 PM, Steven Haigh wrote: >> > On 8/01/2014 1:08 PM, Steven Miano wrote: >> >> So how does that impact Scientific Linux? >> > >> > In a nutshell? It doesn't. >> >> I don't think it will hurt Scientific at all and from what I have been >> reading it might make things easier and better. I (as a non-dev user, so >> take this opinion accordingly) see two things that might help: >> 1) the hidden process of how CentOS rebuilds the SRPMs is being opened >> up which should make CentOS even close to their binary-equivalent goal. >> 2) the variant ( http://centos.org/variants/ ) might actually make >> things easier if Scientific just wanted to start with a core base and >> build from there. I am sure there are going to be a dozen different >> spin-offs of CentOS for this reason alone. >> >> There are still a TON of details yet to be given, so we will see what is >> actually delivered, but this is great news for the community as a whole. >> Here is hoping that it makes things easier and better! Cheers! >> >> >> ~Stack~ >> >> > -- Thanks, Jamie Duncan @jamieeduncan