Thanks for posting that email here. On 27/06/2014 21:49, Yasha Karant wrote: > 3. Will SL just be a SIG of CentOS?
The quoted email causes me to ask: Is there in fact a substantive difference between being a derivative of Red Hat and being a SIG of CentOS? Both will be built on RHEL source materials. Presumably (more presumptions...) having integration into the build process in this way will answer the traceability and verification questions?
