Just a question related to EPEL. Anyone know how active the epel user
mailinglist is?
Last weekend a spf package from epel was updated on my mail server via
yum-cron. Since
then my mailserver has not received any mail outside of my trusted
networks. Just
found that out today. Signed up for the epel-user lists and wrote a
message, but no
one has responded yet.
On 2017-10-30 03:30, Bill Maidment wrote:
I've found a new directory in x86_64 called Packages which seems to be
a duplicate of the x86_64 directory
So it now takes up twice the space.
-----Original message-----
From:Steven C Timm <t...@fnal.gov>
Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 13:06
To: Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me>; ~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com>;
scientific-linux-users <scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: EPEL Download
I see the a/b/c/ and so forth in the 7 directories but not in the 6
directories.
Can't tell you if the 7 directories always were that way or not.
Steve Timm
-----------
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
<owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov> on behalf of Bill
Maidment <b...@maidment.me>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:24:07 PM
To: ~Stack~; scientific-linux-users
Subject: RE: EPEL Download
It looks like they deleted everything and added an extra level 2 3 4 a
b c etc or has it always been like that?
I only mirror 6/7 x64
Cheers
Bill
-----Original message-----
> From:~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 12:08
> To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@FNAL.GOV
> Subject: Re: EPEL Download
>
> On 10/29/2017 07:49 PM, Bill Maidment wrote:
> > Hi
> > Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository structure
without warning.
> > A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly quota.
>
> I too mirror for my site, but I only mirror x86_64 for 6/7. I haven't
> checked yet my mirror yet...what changed? I don't see anything obvious
> looking at my upstream mirror.
>
> ~Stack~
>
>