Just a question related to EPEL. Anyone know how active the epel user mailinglist is? Last weekend a spf package from epel was updated on my mail server via yum-cron. Since then my mailserver has not received any mail outside of my trusted networks. Just found that out today. Signed up for the epel-user lists and wrote a message, but no
one has responded yet.


On 2017-10-30 03:30, Bill Maidment wrote:
I've found a new directory in x86_64 called Packages which seems to be
a duplicate of the x86_64 directory
So it now takes up twice  the space.

-----Original message-----
From:Steven C Timm <t...@fnal.gov>
Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 13:06
To: Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me>; ~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com>; scientific-linux-users <scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: EPEL Download

I see the a/b/c/ and so forth in the 7 directories but not in the 6 directories.

Can't tell you if the 7 directories always were that way or not.


Steve Timm
-----------
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov <owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov> on behalf of Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me>

Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:24:07 PM

To: ~Stack~; scientific-linux-users

Subject: RE: EPEL Download

It looks like they deleted everything and added an extra level 2 3 4 a b c etc or has it always been like that?

I only mirror 6/7 x64

Cheers

Bill

 

 

-----Original message-----

> From:~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com>

> Sent: Monday 30th October 2017 12:08

> To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@FNAL.GOV

> Subject: Re: EPEL Download

>

> On 10/29/2017 07:49 PM, Bill Maidment wrote:

> > Hi

> > Today I found out that EPEL had reorganized their repository structure 
without warning.

> > A 26 GB download ensued. Ouch. That's a quarter of my monthly quota.

>

> I too mirror for my site, but I only mirror x86_64 for 6/7. I haven't

> checked yet my mirror yet...what changed? I don't see anything obvious

> looking at my upstream mirror.

>

> ~Stack~

>

>

Reply via email to