On 14/03/2017 16:16, Roman Kagan wrote: >> - if REPORT LUNS fails, then I don't think we need to iterate over >> every possible lun. If this is just to workaround qemu issues, then >> falling back to just using the first lun should be fine. > > Perhaps. As it was trivial to code scsi_sequential_scan in addition to > scsi_rep_luns_scan, I went ahead and did it. Yes the two places where > it's used in the patchset are the ones where REPORT LUNS is known to > fail due to QEMU issues. At least for mpt-scsi it increases the number > of drives supported by SeaBIOS with the existing QEMU (it supports 2 > luns per target). And no, I don't see it as very important.
At least for mpt-scsi we should fix it. lsi-scsi might be a SeaBIOS bug too, but I don't know the hardware too well. Paolo _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list SeaBIOS@seabios.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios