Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-13 Thread Lightgrw

On Nov 13, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Debbie DeLisa wrote:

    You can pick up The Upstage at The Wonder Bar


For the record, you can pick up Upstage in about 30 places in Asbury Park/Ocean Grove area; over 100 places in Monmouth County; and over 250 places throughout Central New Jersey.  In a few months, Upstage will be available from Cape May to Bergen County with over 1000 locations.

In the local area, your best bets are with our outdoor streetcorner boxes located at:

1) Wonder Bar
2) Frank's Deli
3) Cookman Ave - Be Green
4) The Saint
5) Ocean Grove - Nagles

You can also download each issue of Upstage at http://www.upstagemagazine.com/printedition


Upstage Magazine - New Jersey's Premier Arts & Entertainment Magazine
PO Box 140, Spring Lake, NJ 07762(732) 280-3305
http://www.UpstageMagazine.com


RE: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-13 Thread Debbie DeLisa


    You can pick up The Upstage at The Wonder Bar


From: "2fine4u" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.comTo: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.comSubject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady BlogDate: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:51:01 -




--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED].> wrote:I work with Veterans and you can barely get a blurb in the paper for them, so don't think that you're being ignored. We ALL, are! The Coaster, has been very good at publishing my news and I rely solely on this community based, newspaper. I can hardly get the Tri-City News, unless I visit Home Drugs, on Main St. I never know where I can pick up the Upstage, either. You might also get lucky with the Link and the Neptune Times. Have you tried the Newark Star-Ledger, the Trentonian? You might want to go to them. Just asking.>> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, Allan Peterson > > wrote:> >> > it is sad how 
some have the need to control this board and hammer > away at topics when private emails could be sent.> > > > What's private? We don't have the luxury of being published in the > local papers. Smell the coffee roasting - there's a tight lid around > here on what gets printed. I tried many times to take what I have > posted here to the press. I only work in facts. That's my training and > what I get paid for. Build a case with facts and present those facts. I > have presented things to the press of import to this City. No go. Why? > Kool Aid.>


__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___





[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-13 Thread 2fine4u
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I work with Veterans and you can barely get a blurb in the paper for 
them, so don't think that you're being ignored.  We ALL, are!  The 
Coaster, has been very good at publishing my news and I rely solely 
on this community based, newspaper.  I can hardly get the Tri-City 
News, unless I visit Home Drugs, on Main St.  I never know where I 
can pick up the Upstage, either.  You might also get lucky with the 
Link and the Neptune Times.  Have you tried the Newark Star-Ledger, 
the Trentonian?  You might want to go to them.  Just asking.
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson  
> wrote:
> >
> > it is sad how some have the need to control this board and hammer 
> away at topics when private emails could be sent.
> > 
> 
> What's private? We don't have the luxury of being published in the 
> local papers. Smell the coffee roasting - there's a tight lid 
around 
> here on what gets printed. I tried many times to take what I have 
> posted here to the press. I only work in facts. That's my training 
and 
> what I get paid for. Build a case with facts and present those 
facts. I 
> have presented things to the press of import to this City. No go. 
Why? 
> Kool Aid.
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> it is sad how some have the need to control this board and hammer 
away at topics when private emails could be sent.
> 

What's private? We don't have the luxury of being published in the 
local papers. Smell the coffee roasting - there's a tight lid around 
here on what gets printed. I tried many times to take what I have 
posted here to the press. I only work in facts. That's my training and 
what I get paid for. Build a case with facts and present those facts. I 
have presented things to the press of import to this City. No go. Why? 
Kool Aid.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Allan Peterson


it is sad how some have the need to control this board and hammer away at topics when private emails could be sent.
- Original Message From: apoojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.comSent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 3:16:05 PMSubject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Hinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:>> I'm not enjoying this discussion anymore. It's just getting too ugly for my taste.cant say i blame you, it seems like many of these posts started with the letter from disanto to keady, the only version i have read is the one in todays press, truthfully im not sure who is at fault, but perhaps disanto can share with us the action he or the bd. took against the teacher and principal, if they were wrong, what action he directed to the 2 school superintendents to make sure this does not happen again ,if it was wrong,( please do not hide behind its a personnel issue and you can not discuss it because thats B.S. it is a policy issue,more than just tommy know the law) you can not blame just keady, but no one ever seems to go after the ones who seem to be consistently
 wrong, the bd president and his majority voting block, where are the taxpayers goups who have attacked previous bds for far fewer mistakes than this majority has made? cmon guys and gals there is such a word as consintency, which isnt being adhered to, we should all be on a level playing field, and all held to the same constructive criticism, but that is not happening, it seems to be easier to have knee jerk reactions and kick keady, but not the bd. and its way too many administrators. i do not believe mayor and council feel threatened by keady, and trying to make him look bad, that to me is ridiculous, 

Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___


[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread apoojo
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not  enjoying this discussion anymore. It's just getting too ugly 
for my taste.
 cant say i blame you, it seems like many of these posts started with 
the letter from disanto to keady, the only version i have read is the 
one in todays press, truthfully im not sure who is at fault, but 
perhaps disanto can share with us the action he or the bd. took against 
the teacher and principal, if they were wrong, what action he directed 
to the 2 school superintendents to make sure this does not happen 
again ,if it was wrong,( please do not hide behind its a personnel 
issue and you can not discuss it because thats B.S. it is a policy 
issue,more than just tommy know the law) you can not blame just keady, 
but no one ever seems to go after the ones who seem to be consistently 
wrong, the bd president and his majority voting block, where are the 
taxpayers goups who have attacked previous bds for far fewer mistakes 
than this majority has made? cmon guys and gals there is such a word as 
consintency, which isnt being adhered to, we should all be on a level 
playing field, and all held to the same constructive criticism, but 
that is not happening, it seems to be easier to have knee jerk 
reactions and kick keady, but not the bd. and its way too many 
administrators. i do not believe mayor and council feel threatened by 
keady, and trying to make him look bad, that to me is ridiculous,  




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread MarioAPNJ






Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
In reference to your comment: 

I'm not enjoying this discussion 
  anymore. It's just getting too ugly for my taste.I'll check back with this 
  board in a few weeks to see if there's anything new to talk 
  about.Jack

 
Jack, if you check the archives you'll notice that justified left this 
group in the spring and returned on October 13.  His first post: "Keady Resignation Demand  Today I called 
for Jim Keady to resign his City Council position,  (message  
18066)
 
And then the tenor of posts got hotter and as you say now ugly.
 
Compare the posts here during his hiatus.  A much more civil tone 
here, though not always agreeable.
 
justified brings out the worst in people.
 
Always pouring more oil on troubled waters.
 
. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Original 
Message==== 

  
  
    Subj:
    [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
  
Date:
11/9/2006 2:17:48 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
  
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
To:
AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
  
Sent on:    




I'm not enjoying this discussion anymore. It's just getting too ugly for my 
taste.I'll check back with this board in a few weeks to see if there's 
anything new to talk about.Jack--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
"justifiedright" ...> wrote:>> --- In 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
"dfsavgny"  wrote:> > > Tell me Tom, what does 
your hometown (Howell right?) do? Tell me > > what steps you have 
taken going to other towns asking them to take > > the load off of 
AP's shoulders? We all know you're in politics in > > the County, what 
steps have you taken with your fellow Republicans > > to have their 
areas share some of the social burdens borne by AP?> > > 
Thanks for bringing it up. I have done so on the County level and > 
continue to do so (on the state level too). I will be successful.> 
> I talked about it on the Radio last week. I talked about it in > 
front of Jim Keady at Holy Spirit Church. I talked about it at my > 
fundraiser last week. I'm actively lobbying for it and am trying to > do 
more.> > The people I have to fight with to get the money for 
Asbury Park is > radical environmentalists, who are controlling that 
money - hundreds > of millions of dollars each year.> > 
Caring, "want to help" enlightened, tolerant liberals in the > 
environmental movemnet, and they are hurting Asbury Park, the > poorest 
City in the County. Bet I'm the only one not surprised.> > Bet I'm 
the only one not just talking about having the state and > county share 
the burdens of Asbury Park, I'm actively trying to do > somehting about 
it.> > Now go play basketball with Jim 
Keady.>
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread MarioAPNJ





Hello 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],

In reference to your comment: 

You're the one that posted that stuff 
  about JK cursing here (why don't you reprint your apology to JK for doing 
  that).
 
See message 18874  "My apology to Keady and his response."
 
 
I only told you 
  after you emailed me 10 times as Jim's supporter. I was hoping to get you to 
  stop stalking me.
 
See message # 18836 "Private emails..."  and  message  
#18838  "To be Fair and Balanced."  Especially my explanation that I 
was not a Keady supporter.  Further there were 6 emails from me (about 
politics, Marxism, Zinn et al.) from responding to those initiated by 
you.  
 
That proves my 
  point from earlier: You "wanted to help" Jim Keady but your actions hurt him. 
  Wanting to help is irrelevant. We all want to help.

 
All of the above proves what I've thought all along:  You 
don't read and consider what others say; you simply react, and to things 
which weren't said.
 
All heat; no light.
 
====Original Message


  
  
Subj:
[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
  
Date:
11/9/2006 2:08:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
  
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
To:
AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
  
Sent on:    






You're the one that posted that stuff about JK cursing here (why don't 
you reprint your apology to JK for doing that).I only told you after you 
emailed me 10 times as Jim's supporter. I was hoping to get you to stop 
stalking me.Since you were his supporter, I never dreamed you would put 
it on the 'net. I figured you were in his camp.You were so blinded 
in your desire to hurt me you hurt him.That proves my point from 
earlier: You "wanted to help" Jim Keady but your actions hurt him. Wanting 
to help is irrelevant. We all want to help.You two should start a 
"Good intentions/bad results" club.--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. wrote:>> > Hello 
justifiedright@...,> In reference to your half-truths: > : 
> > > When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me 
names, etc. and > the next day his wife emailed me and called me 
names.> > > Then Keady apologized to you:> > 
> > Hello james.keady@...,> In reference to your 
comment: > > > Tom, > I am writing to apologize for 
some of the comments and language that I used > during our telephone 
conversation last night. Regardless of how I felt, they > have no 
place in honest discourse. I hope that you accept my apology and > 
that we move forward in a spirit of continued dialogue. > > 
> > And you responded on October 10:> > > 
> Hello james.keady@...,> In reference to your comment: 
> > > Jim you don't have to apologize to me. We are two 
fairly "regular" guys. > Our conversations are going to be a little 
salty sometimes. That's never > going to be shared with anyone or 
ever held against you. I'm glad you feel > comfortable enough with me 
to speak to me like a regular guy.> > > :> > 
So your word is is good huh?> > > > Original 
Message> Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog Date: 11/9/2006 
11:42:02 A.M. Eastern > Standard Time From: _justifiedright@..._ 
> (mailto:justifiedri[EMAIL PROTECTED]) To: _AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com_ 
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com) 
> Sent on: > > > > > > > 
Jack I tried talking to him. He called my house repeatedly. He > sent me 
an email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I was > busy at 
the moment).> > When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called 
me names, etc. and > the next day his wife emailed me and called me 
names.> > You suggest to me this is a guy open to 
discussion?> > It isn't because of me he is losing the faith of so 
many. It's > because of how he treats people.> > --- In 
_AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_ (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com) 
, > "Hinge"  wrote:> >> > The agenda 
seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read > here, it existed 
before > > the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a 
way to > get him out of there.> > One thing is really bothering 
me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady > actually going to him > > 
directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they have > 
issue with. JK seems > > pretty open to discussion. Why not 
discuss?> > --- In _AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_ (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com) 
, > Allan Peterson > > wrote:> > 
>> > > please define the agenda?> > > > > 
> > > > - Original Message > > > From: 
Hinge > > > To: _AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_ 
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com) 

[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You're the one that posted that stuff about JK cursing here (why 
> don't you reprint your apology to JK for doing that).
> 

He did alredy but the point of his post was that you left out the point 
that JK apologized to you. Distort and omit. That's your game.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
 
> Thanks for bringing it up.  I have done so on the County level and 
> continue to do so (on the state level too).  I will be successful.

You are out of your f*ing mind (how's that Allan?)! You want to stop 
the preservation of open space not help the poor. Not take the load off 
of AP. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! What have you 
done to have YOUR town house the homeless? What have you done to have 
YOUR town open soup kitchens to relive the pressure on AP? What have 
you done to have YOUR town open a methadone clinic so we can close 
ours? Nothing. Nada. Zilch. You want to drill for oil in Alaska too. 
Who cares. What a bullshit srtist you are. You are like those cardboard 
figures in the Verizon commercial. Nothing behind it.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Hinge
I'm not  enjoying this discussion anymore. It's just getting too ugly for my 
taste.
I'll check back with this board in a few weeks to see if there's anything new 
to talk  about.
Jack
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> 
> > Tell me Tom, what does your hometown (Howell right?) do? Tell me 
> > what steps you have taken going to other towns asking them to take 
> > the load off of AP's shoulders? We all know you're in politics in 
> > the County, what steps have you taken with your fellow Republicans 
> > to have their areas share some of the social burdens borne by AP?
> 
> 
> Thanks for bringing it up.  I have done so on the County level and 
> continue to do so (on the state level too).  I will be successful.
> 
> I talked about it on the Radio last week.  I talked about it in 
> front of Jim Keady at Holy Spirit Church.  I talked about it at my 
> fundraiser last week. I'm actively lobbying for it and am trying to 
> do more.
> 
> The people I have to fight with to get the money for Asbury Park is 
> radical environmentalists, who are controlling that money - hundreds 
> of millions of dollars each year.
> 
> Caring, "want to help"  enlightened, tolerant liberals in the 
> environmental movemnet, and they are hurting Asbury Park, the 
> poorest City in the County.  Bet I'm the only one not surprised.
> 
> Bet I'm the only one not just talking about having the state and 
> county share the burdens of Asbury Park, I'm actively trying to do 
> somehting about it.
> 
> Now go play basketball with Jim Keady.
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread MarioAPNJ






Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
In reference to your comment: 

To me, the slamming of JK was already 
  waiting in the wings, and his detractors used the whole shooting mess to 
  push their agenda.

 
And whether the "waiting in the wings" theory is true or not doesn't 
matter.
 
That's the perception being created.   Fresh in some minds was 
the Iraq war, "waiting in the wings" for something to justify it.
 
True or not, that's the perception that drove some to oppose the neocon's 
war..
 
 Original 
Message======== 

  
  
    Subj:
[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
  
Date:
11/9/2006 10:02:31 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
  
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
To:
AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
  
Sent on:    




Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here aren't taking 
that into account. To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the 
wings, and his detractors used the whole shooting mess to push their 
agenda.--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
"theshortsalepro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> I think I read Keady 
said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that > children/youth/students are 
part of the solution to the problems faced > by Asbury Park.> 
> He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park. He is 
> trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.> 
> How better to let the kids know that the adults care about them and 
> their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the kids 
> develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows how 
> Asbury can benefit?>
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread justifiedright
You're the one that posted that stuff about JK cursing here (why 
don't you reprint your apology to JK for doing that).

I only told you after you emailed me 10 times as Jim's supporter.  I 
was hoping to get you to stop stalking me.

Since you were his supporter, I never dreamed you would put it on 
the 'net.  I figured you were in his camp.

You were so blinded in your desire to hurt me you hurt him.

That proves my point from earlier:  You "wanted to help" Jim Keady 
but your actions hurt him.  Wanting to help is irrelevant.  We all 
want to help.

You two should start a "Good intentions/bad results" club.



--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> Hello  [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> In reference to your half-truths:  
> :  
> 
> 
> When I called him back he dropped  F-Bombs, called me names, etc. 
and 
> the next day his wife emailed me and  called me names.
> 
> 
> Then Keady apologized to you:
>  
>  
>  
> Hello  [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> In reference to your comment:  
> 
> 
> Tom,   
> I am writing to  apologize for some of the comments and language 
that I used 
> during our  telephone conversation last night.  Regardless of how 
I felt, they 
> have  no place in honest discourse.  I hope that you accept my 
apology and 
> that  we move forward in a spirit of continued dialogue.   
> 
> 
> 
> And you responded on October 10:
>  
>  
>  
> Hello  [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> In reference to your comment:  
> 
> 
> Jim you don't have to apologize to  me.  We are two 
fairly "regular" guys.  
> Our conversations are going  to be a little salty sometimes.  
That's never 
> going to be  shared with anyone or ever held against you. I'm glad 
you feel  
> comfortable enough with me to speak to me like a regular  guy.
> 
> 
> :
>  
> So your word is is good huh?
>  
>  
> 
> Original Message
> Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog  Date: 11/9/2006 11:42:02 
A.M. Eastern 
> Standard Time  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com)   
> Sent on:
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
>  
> Jack I tried talking to him. He called my house repeatedly. He 
> sent me an  email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I 
was 
> busy at the  moment).
> 
> When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc.  
and 
> the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.
> 
> You suggest  to me this is a guy open to discussion?
> 
> It isn't because of me he is  losing the faith of so many. It's 
> because of how he treats  people.
> 
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com) ,  
> "Hinge"  wrote:
> >
> > The agenda seems to be  bias against JK, and from what i've read 
> here, it existed before 
> >  the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to 
> get him out  of there.
> > One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady  
> actually going to him 
> > directly to ask about the gang comment, or  anything else they 
have 
> issue with. JK seems 
> > pretty open to  discussion. Why not discuss?
> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com) ,  
> Allan Peterson  
> wrote:
> > >
> > >  please define the agenda?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -  Original Message 
> > > From: Hinge 
> > > To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com) 
> >  > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM
> > > Subject:  [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
> > > 
> > > Well said, and I don't  understand why some of the others here 
> aren't taking that into 
> >  account. 
> > > To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the  wings, 
and 
> his detractors used the 
> > > whole shooting mess to push  their agenda.
> > > 
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com,  "theshortsalepro" 
 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that 
> > > >  children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the 
> problems faced  
> > > > by Asbury Park.
> > > > 
> > > > He is  trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury 
Park. 
> He is 
> > >  > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.
> > > >  
> > > > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about  
> them and 
> > > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em  so? If the 
> kids 
> &

[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread justifiedright
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Tell me Tom, what does your hometown (Howell right?) do? Tell me 
> what steps you have taken going to other towns asking them to take 
> the load off of AP's shoulders? We all know you're in politics in 
> the County, what steps have you taken with your fellow Republicans 
> to have their areas share some of the social burdens borne by AP?


Thanks for bringing it up.  I have done so on the County level and 
continue to do so (on the state level too).  I will be successful.

I talked about it on the Radio last week.  I talked about it in 
front of Jim Keady at Holy Spirit Church.  I talked about it at my 
fundraiser last week. I'm actively lobbying for it and am trying to 
do more.

The people I have to fight with to get the money for Asbury Park is 
radical environmentalists, who are controlling that money - hundreds 
of millions of dollars each year.

Caring, "want to help"  enlightened, tolerant liberals in the 
environmental movemnet, and they are hurting Asbury Park, the 
poorest City in the County.  Bet I'm the only one not surprised.

Bet I'm the only one not just talking about having the state and 
county share the burdens of Asbury Park, I'm actively trying to do 
somehting about it.

Now go play basketball with Jim Keady.










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread MarioAPNJ





Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],

In reference to your comment: 

I was born and raised with goons. It's 
  provincial assholes that really get my goat.
 
Well, consider this.  The more that justifiedright is their 
mouthpiece, the bigger the hole that's dug.  And it's all on the record, 
much of it here.
 
Why aren't those who oppose Keady because they don't buy into his vision 
for the city---why aren't they distancing themselves from justified's 
tactics.  
 
I'm too stupid 
  to run away. 
 
Cool!  In this limited sense, stupid is good!  
 Original Message======== 

  
  
    Subj:
[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
  
Date:
11/9/2006 1:22:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
  
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
To:
AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
  
Sent on:    




--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. wrote:>> > Not so fast Compare! 
There's talk of your running for city council.Wouldn't that be comical! 
I'd probably wind up on death row.> Hope your not gonna "cut and run" 
'cause of one or two goons.I was born and raised with goons. It's 
provincial assholes that really get my goat. I'm too stupid to run away. I'm 
the kind of guy who you just have to kill.
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> From his response I was lead to believe that this was a situation he 
was working on with others howevere these otheres were not law 
enforcement.  I stressed how his information provided no comfort and 
should be in the hands of the local police and county officials.  

You ever hear about criminal informants? When the police want to find a 
bad guy or what is going on in the streets do you think they ask one 
another or the players? Read the gang survey I posted about - the cops 
don't really know how many.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread MarioAPNJ






Hello 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
In reference to your half-truths: 
: 

When I called him back he dropped 
  F-Bombs, called me names, etc. and the next day his wife emailed me and 
  called me names.

Then Keady apologized to you:
 


Hello 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
In reference to your comment: 


  Tom,  
  I am writing to 
  apologize for some of the comments and language that I used during our 
  telephone conversation last night.  Regardless of how I felt, they have 
  no place in honest discourse.  I hope that you accept my apology and that 
  we move forward in a spirit of continued dialogue.  
  

And you responded on October 10:
 


Hello 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
In reference to your comment: 

Jim you don't have to apologize to 
  me.  We are two fairly "regular" guys.  Our conversations are going 
  to be a little salty sometimes.  That's never going to be 
  shared with anyone or ever held against you. I'm glad you feel 
  comfortable enough with me to speak to me like a regular 
guy.
:
 
So your word is is good huh?
 
 
Original Message====


  
  
    Subj:
    [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
  
Date:
11/9/2006 11:42:02 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
  
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
To:
AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
  
Sent on:    






Jack I tried talking to him. He called my house repeatedly. He sent me an 
email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I was busy at the 
moment).When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc. 
and the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.You suggest 
to me this is a guy open to discussion?It isn't because of me he is 
losing the faith of so many. It's because of how he treats 
people.--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
"Hinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> The agenda seems to be 
bias against JK, and from what i've read here, it existed before > 
the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to get him out 
of there.> One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady 
actually going to him > directly to ask about the gang comment, or 
anything else they have issue with. JK seems > pretty open to 
discussion. Why not discuss?> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
Allan Peterson > wrote:> >> > 
please define the agenda?> > > > > > - 
Original Message > > From: Hinge > > To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com> 
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM> > Subject: 
[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog> > > > Well said, and I don't 
understand why some of the others here aren't taking that into > 
account. > > To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the 
wings, and his detractors used the > > whole shooting mess to push 
their agenda.> > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, 
"theshortsalepro"  wrote:> > >> > > 
I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that > > > 
children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the problems faced 
> > > by Asbury Park.> > > > > > He is 
trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park. He is > > 
> trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.> > > 
> > > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about 
them and > > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em 
so? If the kids > > > develop a feeling of self worth and self 
respect... who knows how > > > Asbury can benefit?> > 
>> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > 
_> 
> Do you Yahoo!?> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! 
Mail beta.> > http://new.mail.yahoo.com> 
>>
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread MarioAPNJ






Hello 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
In reference to your comment: 

This is the heart of the matter 
  Dan.

 
The heart of the matter for me is your smear campaign: innuendo 
about assassination and Marxism and the Columbus Day 
incident.  All yellow journalism.
 
The case you make below sounds pretty solid.  Why did no one in 
the city, or you in your column, make that case before the mission became a done 
deal?
 
I make the above comments for the archive records, not for any 
response from you since they are mostly models of spin, smarm, and 
snideness.
 
Original Message


  
  
Subj:
[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
  
Date:
11/9/2006 12:03:30 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
  
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
To:
AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
  
Sent on:    






This is the heart of the matter Dan.If you look at the whole picture, 
Asbury Park over the years has done enough.We were the dumping 
grounds for Marlboro hospital. We were the ones who allowed our housing 
stock to go mutifamily to help the poor. We are the ones who built 
federally subsidized housing to house the poor. We are the ones that 
take in more section 8 than any other town in the county.We are the 
ones suffering the segregated High School so we alone have to educate the 
poor to the exclusion of the rest of the County.We are ones to house the 
County's methodone clinic.We are the base for the Salvation 
Army.We are the home of interfaith neighbors.In fact, I 
understand there are over 80 non-profits helping the poor, and heard someone 
say once that non-profits helping the poor is Asbury Park's largest 
industry.We are the ones with 39 churches all helping the poor. 
We are the ones who allowed homeless people to sleep at City Hall, 
even attracting homeless from other towns.We are the ones 
perpetually trying more initiatives to help the poor.All of that 
goodwill, YET EVERYTIME THERE IS A MORAL OBLIGATION TO HELP SOMEONE ELSE, 
EVERYONE LOOKS TO ASBURY PARK TO SHOULDER THE LOAD!The town with the 
most limited resources is tapped to handle the county and state's pressing 
social problems.When Father Bob wanted to build the Center, he was 
pastor of a church with srawling, open acres in Wayside. Not in his backyard 
- he built it here.Now comes the Market Street Mission to bring us 
more of the poor to help.Not one other town in Monmouth County does 
a fraction of what we do for the poor. Yet when a new challenge comes, they 
look at us and start holding "moral obligation" over our heads. 
Where is the moral obligatins of the other 51 towns in the county? 
How dare anyone, EVER look at the people if Asbury Park and inquire 
whether they will step up to help the poor. Go ask the other 51 towns if 
they will, for once, help the poor instead of Asbury Park.Now comes Jim 
Keady. He marches into the place that is weary from helping the poor, and 
starts preaching to us that we have to do more. That is why he comes 
off as so arrogant. We've done all that and he rides past the other 51 
Monmouth towns to take us to task for not doing enough? It's 
insulting.If someone like you Dan comes into the middle of an argument 
between me and Jim Keady, and see's Jim saying do more for the poor and me 
disagreeing with him, it is easy to paint him as the good guy and me as 
the bad.That of course is intellectually lazy, because knowing all the 
facts above leads to the conclusion that Jim Keady is going to give us the 
straw that breaks the camel's back, while I want to (long overdue) 
strengthen the camel.If poverty is our problem, we shouldn't expand 
poverty here. We need a bigger base of middle class and (finally, hopefully) 
some upper class.Let Jim Keady fight for the poor in some other town 
that isn't doing anything for the poor. I'd support him.--- 
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
"dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED].> wrote:>> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
Allan Peterson > > wrote:> >> 
> please define the agenda?> > They believe keady will fill the 
city with soup kitchens and shelters, > in other words, to give it to 
the poor. That has been said here > verbatim.>
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
I had responded to this before but the site had an error. I 
apologize it appears twice.

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is the heart of the matter Dan.

Thanks for admitting it.

> If you look at the whole picture, Asbury Park over the years has 
> done enough.

I agree with you and from what I have heard him say publicly, so 
does JK. Were you absent or asleep when he said as much at a council 
meeting? How about when JK said he wanted to help change the laws 
that made this possible?

> We were the ones who allowed our housing stock to go mutifamily to 
> help the poor.  

And line the pockets of landlords and city fathers.

> We are the ones that take in more section 8 than any other town in 
> the county.

Ibid.

 
> We are the ones suffering the segregated High School so we alone 
> have to educate the poor to the exclusion of the rest of the 
County.

Send your kids there. Be part of the solution.

> We are ones to house the County's methodone clinic.

Yes, I think I am the one who pointed that out originally.

> We are the base for the Salvation Army.

They're on MY block. How about yours?

> We are the home of interfaith neighbors.

Are they bad?

> We are the ones who allowed homeless people to sleep at City Hall, 
> even attracting homeless from other towns.

Did Keady start that?

> Not one other town in Monmouth County does a fraction of what we 
do 
> for the poor.  Yet when a new challenge comes, they look at us and 
> start holding "moral obligation" over our heads.  

No argument with you there.

> 
> Where is the moral obligatins of the other 51 towns in the 
county?  
> How dare anyone, EVER look at the people if Asbury Park and 
inquire 
> whether they will step up to help the poor.  Go ask the other 51 
> towns if they will, for once, help the poor instead of Asbury Park.

Tell me Tom, what does your hometown (Howell right?) do? Tell me 
what steps you have taken going to other towns asking them to take 
the load off of AP's shoulders? We all know you're in politics in 
the County, what steps have you taken with your fellow Republicans 
to have their areas share some of the social burdens borne by AP?

> Now comes Jim Keady.  He marches into the place that is weary from 
> helping the poor, and starts preaching to us that we have to do 
> more. 
> 
> That is why he comes off as so arrogant.  We've done all that and 
he 
> rides past the other 51 Monmouth towns to take us to task for not 
> doing enough?  It's insulting.

Some I assume perceive him as holier than thou. I don't. I don't 
need anyone as a measuring stick to know how far I fall short in 
social responsibility.


> If someone like you Dan comes into the middle of an argument 
between 
> me and Jim Keady, and see's Jim saying do more for the poor and me 
> disagreeing with him, it is easy to paint him as the good guy and 
me 
> as the bad.

You're viewed on the basis of what you do. You have distorted and 
lied about someone. You have engaged in character assassination.

> That of course is intellectually lazy, because knowing all the 
facts 
> above leads to the conclusion that Jim Keady is going to give us 
the 
> straw that breaks the camel's back, while I want to (long overdue) 
> strengthen the camel.

The best thing you can do is buy a home here and don't rent it out. 
You want someone else to be first. You want someone else to be the 
guinea pig. Talk is cheap Tom. You want to leave it to the gay 
community, even though by all regards, you think they wear rings in 
the strangest places. You don't want to do it yourself. You just 
want to throw molotov cocktails. Go mend the ways of Howell's 
governance - that's where you have a vested interest.

> 
> If poverty is our problem, we shouldn't expand poverty here. We 
need 
> a bigger base of middle class and (finally, hopefully) some upper 
> class.

Ibid. It has to start somewhere Tom. You have to be in it to win it.

I've seen JK fight for local jobs. That's not expanding poverty. 
I've seen JK fight for affordable (not public) housing. That's not 
expanding poverty. I've seen JK fight to have Asbury Partners live 
up to its obligations to restore the waterfront. That's not 
expanding poverty.

You never, never are able to back up your claims. You use the 
tactics of McCarthy. You are a fear mongerer. The nation just voted 
out your buddies, and if we could - throw out the President - for 
the same thing. Preying on people's fear with lies and distortion. 
You and the others doing this should be ashamed of yourselves. It's 
despicable.

 
> Let Jim Keady fight for the poor in some other town that isn't 
doing 
> anything for the poor.  

Like where you live. Like where all those Italian-Americans live who 
were so upset about Columbus Day. There was something in the paper 
today about the Bush administration - that the scary thing is that 
it believes its own nonsense. You're a clone. 
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Lin

[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
  
> Not so fast Compare!   There's talk of your running for city  council.

Wouldn't that be comical! I'd probably wind up on death row.


> Hope your not gonna "cut and run" 'cause of one or two goons.

I was born and raised with goons. It's provincial assholes that really 
get my goat. I'm too stupid to run away. I'm the kind of guy who you 
just have to kill.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Hinge
Well, I must admit that some pretty valid points were written.
I'd like to ask this though...couldn't Asbury serve both it's legacy
of poor and unfortunate people at the same time as the people here
now, and the people Asbury hopes to attract?
Other cities do this, although most are larger then AP. Cities like
Portland OR. Hoboken does a pretty good job of balancing the classes.
Can't something be learned from those places? And, is it right to
vilefy Jim Keady just because he wants to help people?
Jack
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > 
> I couldn't have said it any better, you are 100% correct. He should 
> go to S Belmar his hometown and try doing this shit there. Maybe 
> that's why he's not there. They probabaly ran him out of town.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This is the heart of the matter Dan.
> > 
> > If you look at the whole picture, Asbury Park over the years has 
> > done enough.
> > 
> > We were the dumping grounds for Marlboro hospital.  
> > 
> > We were the ones who allowed our housing stock to go mutifamily to 
> > help the poor.  
> > 
> > We are the ones who built federally subsidized housing to house the 
> > poor. 
> > 
> > We are the ones that take in more section 8 than any other town in 
> > the county.
> > 
> > We are the ones suffering the segregated High School so we alone 
> > have to educate the poor to the exclusion of the rest of the County.
> > 
> > We are ones to house the County's methodone clinic.
> > 
> > We are the base for the Salvation Army.
> > 
> > We are the home of interfaith neighbors.
> > 
> > In fact, I understand there are over 80 non-profits helping the 
> > poor, and heard someone say once that non-profits helping the poor 
> > is Asbury Park's largest industry.
> > 
> > We are the ones with 39 churches all helping the poor. 
> > 
> > We are the ones who allowed homeless people to sleep at City Hall, 
> > even attracting homeless from other towns.
> > 
> > We are the ones perpetually trying more initiatives to help the 
> poor.
> > 
> > All of that goodwill, YET EVERYTIME THERE IS A MORAL OBLIGATION TO 
> > HELP SOMEONE ELSE, EVERYONE LOOKS TO ASBURY PARK TO SHOULDER THE 
> > LOAD!
> > 
> > The town with the most limited resources is tapped to handle the 
> > county and state's pressing social problems.
> > 
> > When Father Bob wanted to build the Center, he was pastor of a 
> > church with srawling, open acres in Wayside.  Not in his backyard - 
> > he built it here.
> > 
> > Now comes the Market Street Mission to bring us more of the poor to 
> > help.
> > 
> > Not one other town in Monmouth County does a fraction of what we do 
> > for the poor.  Yet when a new challenge comes, they look at us and 
> > start holding "moral obligation" over our heads.  
> > 
> > Where is the moral obligatins of the other 51 towns in the county?  
> > How dare anyone, EVER look at the people if Asbury Park and inquire 
> > whether they will step up to help the poor.  Go ask the other 51 
> > towns if they will, for once, help the poor instead of Asbury Park.
> > 
> > Now comes Jim Keady.  He marches into the place that is weary from 
> > helping the poor, and starts preaching to us that we have to do 
> > more. 
> > 
> > That is why he comes off as so arrogant.  We've done all that and 
> he 
> > rides past the other 51 Monmouth towns to take us to task for not 
> > doing enough?  It's insulting.
> > 
> > If someone like you Dan comes into the middle of an argument 
> between 
> > me and Jim Keady, and see's Jim saying do more for the poor and me 
> > disagreeing with him, it is easy to paint him as the good guy and 
> me 
> > as the bad.
> > 
> > That of course is intellectually lazy, because knowing all the 
> facts 
> > above leads to the conclusion that Jim Keady is going to give us 
> the 
> > straw that breaks the camel's back, while I want to (long overdue) 
> > strengthen the camel.
> > 
> > If poverty is our problem, we shouldn't expand poverty here. We 
> need 
> > a bigger base of middle class and (finally, hopefully) some upper 
> > class.
> > 
> > Let Jim Keady fight for the poor in some other town that isn't 
> doing 
> > anything for the poor.  
> > 
> > I'd support him.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson  
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > please define the agenda?
> > > 
> > > They believe keady will fill the city with soup kitchens and 
> > shelters, 
> > > in other words, to give it to the poor. That has been said here 
> > > verbatim.
> > >
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To chan

Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread MarioAPNJ






In reference to Dan's 
frustration
: 

Tell your boys to buy my home. I had it 
  with the nonsense in this city. 

 
 
Not so fast Compare!   There's talk of your running for city 
council.
 
Hope your not gonna "cut and run" 'cause of one or two goons.
 
 Original Message==== 

  
  
    Subj:
    [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
  
Date:
11/9/2006 10:27:47 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
  
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
To:
AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
  
Sent on:    




--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
"oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> ---keady should keep 
his ass right where it is - on the council. You are still the most 
level-headed of us all. Tell your boys to buy my home. I had it with the 
nonsense in this city. 
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread MarioAPNJ






Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
In reference to your comment: 

Somewhat convenient how you get news 
  before anyone. Hmmm.

 
 
Is Keady the only one in town in favor of transparency, full 
disclosure, and the Sunshine laws? Original Message 

  
  
Subj:
[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
  
Date:
11/9/2006 10:30:12 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
  
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
To:
AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
  
Sent on:    




--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, 
"justifiedright" ...> wrote:>> So 
you really are making the case that Jim Keady is right and the > rest of 
the City is wrong.> > Says alot.>The rest of the city? 
Tom, you are a paid hack for the powers in this city. Loffredo, Sanders and 
Bruno have indentations on their asses from your lips. Bruno rides in your 
mustang in the parade. There's probably a lot more. When you no longer feed 
at the trough of city hall then maybe you will be taken seriously. Right now 
you're just a pain in the ass. I would call you the Borat of attorneys but I 
wouldn't do that to Borat.Somewhat convenient how you get news 
before anyone. Hmmm.
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
I couldn't have said it any better, you are 100% correct. He should 
go to S Belmar his hometown and try doing this shit there. Maybe 
that's why he's not there. They probabaly ran him out of town.







This is the heart of the matter Dan.
> 
> If you look at the whole picture, Asbury Park over the years has 
> done enough.
> 
> We were the dumping grounds for Marlboro hospital.  
> 
> We were the ones who allowed our housing stock to go mutifamily to 
> help the poor.  
> 
> We are the ones who built federally subsidized housing to house the 
> poor. 
> 
> We are the ones that take in more section 8 than any other town in 
> the county.
> 
> We are the ones suffering the segregated High School so we alone 
> have to educate the poor to the exclusion of the rest of the County.
> 
> We are ones to house the County's methodone clinic.
> 
> We are the base for the Salvation Army.
> 
> We are the home of interfaith neighbors.
> 
> In fact, I understand there are over 80 non-profits helping the 
> poor, and heard someone say once that non-profits helping the poor 
> is Asbury Park's largest industry.
> 
> We are the ones with 39 churches all helping the poor. 
> 
> We are the ones who allowed homeless people to sleep at City Hall, 
> even attracting homeless from other towns.
> 
> We are the ones perpetually trying more initiatives to help the 
poor.
> 
> All of that goodwill, YET EVERYTIME THERE IS A MORAL OBLIGATION TO 
> HELP SOMEONE ELSE, EVERYONE LOOKS TO ASBURY PARK TO SHOULDER THE 
> LOAD!
> 
> The town with the most limited resources is tapped to handle the 
> county and state's pressing social problems.
> 
> When Father Bob wanted to build the Center, he was pastor of a 
> church with srawling, open acres in Wayside.  Not in his backyard - 
> he built it here.
> 
> Now comes the Market Street Mission to bring us more of the poor to 
> help.
> 
> Not one other town in Monmouth County does a fraction of what we do 
> for the poor.  Yet when a new challenge comes, they look at us and 
> start holding "moral obligation" over our heads.  
> 
> Where is the moral obligatins of the other 51 towns in the county?  
> How dare anyone, EVER look at the people if Asbury Park and inquire 
> whether they will step up to help the poor.  Go ask the other 51 
> towns if they will, for once, help the poor instead of Asbury Park.
> 
> Now comes Jim Keady.  He marches into the place that is weary from 
> helping the poor, and starts preaching to us that we have to do 
> more. 
> 
> That is why he comes off as so arrogant.  We've done all that and 
he 
> rides past the other 51 Monmouth towns to take us to task for not 
> doing enough?  It's insulting.
> 
> If someone like you Dan comes into the middle of an argument 
between 
> me and Jim Keady, and see's Jim saying do more for the poor and me 
> disagreeing with him, it is easy to paint him as the good guy and 
me 
> as the bad.
> 
> That of course is intellectually lazy, because knowing all the 
facts 
> above leads to the conclusion that Jim Keady is going to give us 
the 
> straw that breaks the camel's back, while I want to (long overdue) 
> strengthen the camel.
> 
> If poverty is our problem, we shouldn't expand poverty here. We 
need 
> a bigger base of middle class and (finally, hopefully) some upper 
> class.
> 
> Let Jim Keady fight for the poor in some other town that isn't 
doing 
> anything for the poor.  
> 
> I'd support him.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson  
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > please define the agenda?
> > 
> > They believe keady will fill the city with soup kitchens and 
> shelters, 
> > in other words, to give it to the poor. That has been said here 
> > verbatim.
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Hinge
Thanks for the answer Allan
Jack
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, if what you say is correct...F-bombs etc, calling names, then
it sounds like the issue 
> is deeper then I realize. I'd be really surprised if JK as well as
his wife would be doing these 
> things.
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
 wrote:
> >
> > Jack I tried talking to him.  He called my house repeatedly.  He 
> > sent me an email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I was 
> > busy at the moment).
> > 
> > When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc. and 
> > the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.
> > 
> > You suggest to me this is a guy open to discussion?
> > 
> > It isn't because of me he is losing the faith of so many.  It's 
> > because of how he treats people.
> > 
> > 
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge"  wrote:
> > >
> > > The agenda seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read 
> > here, it existed before 
> > > the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to 
> > get him out of there.
> > > One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady 
> > actually going to him 
> > > directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they have 
> > issue with. JK seems 
> > > pretty open to discussion. Why not discuss?
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson  
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > please define the agenda?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > - Original Message 
> > > > From: Hinge 
> > > > To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM
> > > > Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
> > > > 
> > > > Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here 
> > aren't taking that into 
> > > account. 
> > > > To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings, and 
> > his detractors used the 
> > > > whole shooting mess to push their agenda.
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro"  
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that 
> > > > > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the 
> > problems faced 
> > > > > by Asbury Park.
> > > > > 
> > > > > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park. 
> > He is 
> > > > > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.
> > > > > 
> > > > > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about 
> > them and 
> > > > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the 
> > kids 
> > > > > develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows 
> > how 
> > > > > Asbury can benefit?
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > _
> > ___
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> > > > http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Hinge
Well, if what you say is correct...F-bombs etc, calling names, then it sounds 
like the issue 
is deeper then I realize. I'd be really surprised if JK as well as his wife 
would be doing these 
things.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jack I tried talking to him.  He called my house repeatedly.  He 
> sent me an email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I was 
> busy at the moment).
> 
> When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc. and 
> the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.
> 
> You suggest to me this is a guy open to discussion?
> 
> It isn't because of me he is losing the faith of so many.  It's 
> because of how he treats people.
> 
> 
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge"  wrote:
> >
> > The agenda seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read 
> here, it existed before 
> > the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to 
> get him out of there.
> > One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady 
> actually going to him 
> > directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they have 
> issue with. JK seems 
> > pretty open to discussion. Why not discuss?
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson  
> wrote:
> > >
> > > please define the agenda?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > - Original Message 
> > > From: Hinge 
> > > To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM
> > > Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
> > > 
> > > Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here 
> aren't taking that into 
> > account. 
> > > To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings, and 
> his detractors used the 
> > > whole shooting mess to push their agenda.
> > > 
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro"  
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that 
> > > > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the 
> problems faced 
> > > > by Asbury Park.
> > > > 
> > > > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park. 
> He is 
> > > > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.
> > > > 
> > > > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about 
> them and 
> > > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the 
> kids 
> > > > develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows 
> how 
> > > > Asbury can benefit?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> _
> ___
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> > > http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Allan Peterson


I have asked directly about the gang comment.  He said he was unable to cite sources do to the nature of how the information was gathered.  From his response I was lead to believe that this was a situation he was working on with others howevere these otheres were not law enforcement.  I stressed how his information provided no comfort and should be in the hands of the local police and county officials.  
- Original Message From: Hinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.comSent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 11:15:34 AMSubject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

The agenda seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read here, it existed before the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to get him out of there.One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady actually going to him directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they have issue with. JK seems pretty open to discussion. Why not discuss?--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Allan Peterson  wrote:>> please define the agenda?> > > - Original Message > From: Hinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM> Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog> > Well said, and I don't understand why some of the
 others here aren't taking that into account. > To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings, and his detractors used the > whole shooting mess to push their agenda.> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro"  wrote:> >> > I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that > > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the problems faced > > by Asbury Park.> > > > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park. He is > > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.> > > > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about them and > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the kids > > develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows how > > Asbury can benefit?> >> > >
 > > > >  _ _ _ _ _ _> Do you Yahoo!?> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.> http://new.mail. yahoo.com>

Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___


[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread justifiedright
This is the heart of the matter Dan.

If you look at the whole picture, Asbury Park over the years has 
done enough.

We were the dumping grounds for Marlboro hospital.  

We were the ones who allowed our housing stock to go mutifamily to 
help the poor.  

We are the ones who built federally subsidized housing to house the 
poor. 

We are the ones that take in more section 8 than any other town in 
the county.

We are the ones suffering the segregated High School so we alone 
have to educate the poor to the exclusion of the rest of the County.

We are ones to house the County's methodone clinic.

We are the base for the Salvation Army.

We are the home of interfaith neighbors.

In fact, I understand there are over 80 non-profits helping the 
poor, and heard someone say once that non-profits helping the poor 
is Asbury Park's largest industry.

We are the ones with 39 churches all helping the poor. 

We are the ones who allowed homeless people to sleep at City Hall, 
even attracting homeless from other towns.

We are the ones perpetually trying more initiatives to help the poor.

All of that goodwill, YET EVERYTIME THERE IS A MORAL OBLIGATION TO 
HELP SOMEONE ELSE, EVERYONE LOOKS TO ASBURY PARK TO SHOULDER THE 
LOAD!

The town with the most limited resources is tapped to handle the 
county and state's pressing social problems.

When Father Bob wanted to build the Center, he was pastor of a 
church with srawling, open acres in Wayside.  Not in his backyard - 
he built it here.

Now comes the Market Street Mission to bring us more of the poor to 
help.

Not one other town in Monmouth County does a fraction of what we do 
for the poor.  Yet when a new challenge comes, they look at us and 
start holding "moral obligation" over our heads.  

Where is the moral obligatins of the other 51 towns in the county?  
How dare anyone, EVER look at the people if Asbury Park and inquire 
whether they will step up to help the poor.  Go ask the other 51 
towns if they will, for once, help the poor instead of Asbury Park.

Now comes Jim Keady.  He marches into the place that is weary from 
helping the poor, and starts preaching to us that we have to do 
more. 

That is why he comes off as so arrogant.  We've done all that and he 
rides past the other 51 Monmouth towns to take us to task for not 
doing enough?  It's insulting.

If someone like you Dan comes into the middle of an argument between 
me and Jim Keady, and see's Jim saying do more for the poor and me 
disagreeing with him, it is easy to paint him as the good guy and me 
as the bad.

That of course is intellectually lazy, because knowing all the facts 
above leads to the conclusion that Jim Keady is going to give us the 
straw that breaks the camel's back, while I want to (long overdue) 
strengthen the camel.

If poverty is our problem, we shouldn't expand poverty here. We need 
a bigger base of middle class and (finally, hopefully) some upper 
class.

Let Jim Keady fight for the poor in some other town that isn't doing 
anything for the poor.  

I'd support him.






--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson  
> wrote:
> >
> > please define the agenda?
> 
> They believe keady will fill the city with soup kitchens and 
shelters, 
> in other words, to give it to the poor. That has been said here 
> verbatim.
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jack I tried talking to him.  He called my house repeatedly.  He 
> sent me an email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I was 
> busy at the moment).
> 
> When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc. 
and 
> the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.
> 
> You suggest to me this is a guy open to discussion?
> 
> It isn't because of me he is losing the faith of so many.  It's 
> because of how he treats people.

You deserved all of that. As I recall, he apologized to you for 
that. He should not have. Yours was a low blow. Lies and distortion 
are never okay.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
The bottom line of the letter is do what you were elected to do stay 
out of BOE business and that's fair.  The Press article wasn't bad 
they left alot out. I didn't see the Tri- City. Is it in the Coaster 
too?






Jack I tried talking to him.  He called my house repeatedly.  He 
> sent me an email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I was 
> busy at the moment).
> 
> When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc. 
and 
> the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.
> 
> You suggest to me this is a guy open to discussion?
> 
> It isn't because of me he is losing the faith of so many.  It's 
> because of how he treats people.
> 
> 
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge"  wrote:
> >
> > The agenda seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read 
> here, it existed before 
> > the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to 
> get him out of there.
> > One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady 
> actually going to him 
> > directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they 
have 
> issue with. JK seems 
> > pretty open to discussion. Why not discuss?
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson  
> wrote:
> > >
> > > please define the agenda?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > - Original Message 
> > > From: Hinge 
> > > To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM
> > > Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
> > > 
> > > Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here 
> aren't taking that into 
> > account. 
> > > To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings, and 
> his detractors used the 
> > > whole shooting mess to push their agenda.
> > > 
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro"  
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that 
> > > > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the 
> problems faced 
> > > > by Asbury Park.
> > > > 
> > > > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury 
Park. 
> He is 
> > > > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.
> > > > 
> > > > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about 
> them and 
> > > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the 
> kids 
> > > > develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows 
> how 
> > > > Asbury can benefit?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> 
_
> ___
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> > > http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread justifiedright
Jack I tried talking to him.  He called my house repeatedly.  He 
sent me an email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I was 
busy at the moment).

When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc. and 
the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.

You suggest to me this is a guy open to discussion?

It isn't because of me he is losing the faith of so many.  It's 
because of how he treats people.


--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The agenda seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read 
here, it existed before 
> the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to 
get him out of there.
> One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady 
actually going to him 
> directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they have 
issue with. JK seems 
> pretty open to discussion. Why not discuss?
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson  
wrote:
> >
> > please define the agenda?
> > 
> > 
> > - Original Message 
> > From: Hinge 
> > To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM
> > Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
> > 
> > Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here 
aren't taking that into 
> account. 
> > To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings, and 
his detractors used the 
> > whole shooting mess to push their agenda.
> > 
> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro"  
wrote:
> > >
> > > I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that 
> > > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the 
problems faced 
> > > by Asbury Park.
> > > 
> > > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park. 
He is 
> > > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.
> > > 
> > > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about 
them and 
> > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the 
kids 
> > > develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows 
how 
> > > Asbury can benefit?
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
_
___
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> > http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread justifiedright
Jack I tried talking to him.  He called my house repeatedly.  He 
sent me an email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I was 
busy at the moment).

When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc. and 
the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.

You suggest to me this is a guy open to discussion?

It isn't because of me he is losing the faith of so many.  It's 
because of how he treats people.


--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The agenda seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read 
here, it existed before 
> the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to 
get him out of there.
> One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady 
actually going to him 
> directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they have 
issue with. JK seems 
> pretty open to discussion. Why not discuss?
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson  
wrote:
> >
> > please define the agenda?
> > 
> > 
> > - Original Message 
> > From: Hinge 
> > To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM
> > Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
> > 
> > Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here 
aren't taking that into 
> account. 
> > To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings, and 
his detractors used the 
> > whole shooting mess to push their agenda.
> > 
> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro"  
wrote:
> > >
> > > I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that 
> > > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the 
problems faced 
> > > by Asbury Park.
> > > 
> > > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park. 
He is 
> > > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.
> > > 
> > > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about 
them and 
> > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the 
kids 
> > > develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows 
how 
> > > Asbury can benefit?
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
_
___
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> > http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do have sources too.  Many of them.  None as good as Joe D was.
> 
> Can't reveal my source on the DiSanto letter. Other news sources 
> have it.

So outside of being publicly available.

> 
> You are in "9/11 conspiracy theory" territory if you think I'm in 
> contact with Bruno and Loffredo very often. I almost never talk to 
> either one of them.

I said you kiss their asses, not speak to them. I did not say it was 
organized. You know which side your bread is buttered on. GUMBA 
article please. Just let me know if it's appearing in today's TCN 
and I will stop pestering you, otherwise make good on your promise.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Hinge
The agenda seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read here, it 
existed before 
the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to get him out of 
there.
One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady actually going 
to him 
directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they have issue with. 
JK seems 
pretty open to discussion. Why not discuss?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> please define the agenda?
> 
> 
> - Original Message 
> From: Hinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM
> Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
> 
> Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here aren't taking 
> that into 
account. 
> To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings, and his 
> detractors used the 
> whole shooting mess to push their agenda.
> 
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro"  wrote:
> >
> > I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that 
> > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the problems faced 
> > by Asbury Park.
> > 
> > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park. He is 
> > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.
> > 
> > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about them and 
> > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the kids 
> > develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows how 
> > Asbury can benefit?
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> http://new.mail.yahoo.com
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> please define the agenda?

They believe keady will fill the city with soup kitchens and shelters, 
in other words, to give it to the poor. That has been said here 
verbatim.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread justifiedright
The OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT is a powerful tool.  It actually 
requires most things you ask for to be copied and given to you 
immediately.  There are time schedules for other things.  If they 
don't meet the time frames there is a special board set up with the 
State to which you can register a complaint. If you win (any you 
will win), you are awarded attorney fees.

I do have sources too.  Many of them.  None as good as Joe D was.

Can't reveal my source on the DiSanto letter. Other news sources 
have it.

You are in "9/11 conspiracy theory" territory if you think I'm in 
contact with Bruno and Loffredo very often. I almost never talk to 
either one of them.

If I talk to Bruno it's usually to make sure he knows that Jets rule 
and Dolphins stink.




--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > You're usually funny, but today you seem unusually gruff.
> > 
> > Is everything OK with you?
> > 
> > No BS.  Genuine concern.  You alright?
> 
>  
> I'm fine thank you. But some days  my tolerance for your antics is 
not 
> as high as other days. What you are doing is not right. What may 
be 
> worse is you know it. You may have formerly adopted the moniker of 
> blind bishop but I know you are not blind. You know better. I like 
you 
> but the charge of kissing Bruno et al asses still stands. Give us 
the 
> GUMBA article. WHile you're at it. When and how did you get the 
news of 
> the school board letter? When you say it is public information how 
is 
> that released and when?
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Allan Peterson


please define the agenda?
- Original Message From: Hinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.comSent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AMSubject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here aren't taking that into account. To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings, and his detractors used the whole shooting mess to push their agenda.--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the problems faced > by Asbury Park.> > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park. He is > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.> > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about them and > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the kids > develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows how > Asbury can
 benefit?>


Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
__._,_.___




   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park nj real estate
  
  
United state flag
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  


Asbury park real estate
  
  
United state travel
  

   
  






  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___


[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You're usually funny, but today you seem unusually gruff.
> 
> Is everything OK with you?
> 
> No BS.  Genuine concern.  You alright?

 
I'm fine thank you. But some days  my tolerance for your antics is not 
as high as other days. What you are doing is not right. What may be 
worse is you know it. You may have formerly adopted the moniker of 
blind bishop but I know you are not blind. You know better. I like you 
but the charge of kissing Bruno et al asses still stands. Give us the 
GUMBA article. WHile you're at it. When and how did you get the news of 
the school board letter? When you say it is public information how is 
that released and when?






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread justifiedright
You're usually funny, but today you seem unusually gruff.

Is everything OK with you?

No BS.  Genuine concern.  You alright?




--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > So you really are making the case that Jim Keady is right and 
the 
> > rest of the City is wrong.
> > 
> > Says alot.
> >
> The rest of the city? Tom, you are a paid hack for the powers in 
this 
> city. Loffredo, Sanders and Bruno have indentations on their asses 
from 
> your lips. Bruno rides in your mustang in the parade. There's 
probably 
> a lot more. When you no longer feed at the trough of city hall 
then 
> maybe you will be taken seriously. Right now you're just a pain in 
the 
> ass. I would call you the Borat of attorneys but I wouldn't do 
that to 
> Borat.
> 
> Somewhat convenient how you get news before anyone. Hmmm.
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you really are making the case that Jim Keady is right and the 
> rest of the City is wrong.
> 
> Says alot.
>
The rest of the city? Tom, you are a paid hack for the powers in this 
city. Loffredo, Sanders and Bruno have indentations on their asses from 
your lips. Bruno rides in your mustang in the parade. There's probably 
a lot more. When you no longer feed at the trough of city hall then 
maybe you will be taken seriously. Right now you're just a pain in the 
ass. I would call you the Borat of attorneys but I wouldn't do that to 
Borat.

Somewhat convenient how you get news before anyone. Hmmm.




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---keady should keep his ass right where it is - on the council. 

You are still the most level-headed of us all. Tell your boys to buy my 
home. I had it with the nonsense in this city. 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Hinge
Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here aren't taking 
that into account. 
To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings, and his detractors 
used the 
whole shooting mess to push their agenda.

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "theshortsalepro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that 
> children/youth/students are part of the solution to the problems faced 
> by Asbury Park.
> 
> He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park.  He is 
> trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.
> 
> How better to let the kids know that the adults care about them and 
> their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so?  If the kids 
> develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows how 
> Asbury can benefit?
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread theshortsalepro
I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that 
children/youth/students are part of the solution to the problems faced 
by Asbury Park.

He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury Park.  He is 
trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.

How better to let the kids know that the adults care about them and 
their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so?  If the kids 
develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who knows how 
Asbury can benefit?  




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Hinge
Why is TS focusing so much on JK?
Shouldn't the major issue of the moment be moving AP in a better direction, 
fighting 
crime, getting the redevelopment under control and paying attention to the west 
side...not 
just the east?

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you really are making the case that Jim Keady is right and the 
> rest of the City is wrong.
> 
> Says alot.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty 
> > > diverse group.  Can they all be wrong?
> > > 
> > > Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very 
> > well?
> > 
> > 
> > Glad you asked. Firstly, I read the article. Seems like he is in 
> the 
> > clear and had permission. If the schools did not internally follow 
> > protocol, well.
> > 
> > Greater "wrongs" have been done by public officials in AP and 
> there 
> > has been NO outcry from anyone except the appointed "naysayers." 
> > Groups like the UEZ, etc., have remained mute while councilmembers 
> > have lied in print and public meetings. Said nothing while 
> accepted 
> > redevelopment plans were ignored and voided. I could go on. All 
> who 
> > drink at the trough of City Hall put their hands over their 
> > collective mouths, eyes and ears because it was deemed 
> the "greater 
> > good" by their masters.
> > 
> > Don't think I do not know how far the influence of Loffredo and 
> > Bruno goes in this city. You yourself don't say what you know is 
> > wrong in public because of it, although you have said it at times 
> in 
> > private (BTW, I expect your GUMBA article to be here today if not 
> in 
> > TCN).
> > 
> > Keady was considered a great guy by many as he spoke against 
> eminent 
> > domain, tried to save buildings and to get Partners to move their 
> > asses.
> > 
> > What went wrong? Well, he started to speak about serving the poor, 
> > the downtrodden. The claims against Keady have been posted right 
> > here all along. A diverse group - those against him politically - 
> > and others, such as those with real estate interests - brokers, 
> > agents, owners, etc., join opinion with you that he will make this 
> > city nothing but soup kitchens and homeless shelters if he had his 
> > way. Weren't those your words?
> > 
> > That is his crime. The fear is that he will keep this town down 
> and 
> > reduce our property values. Didn't Allan come right out and say 
> that?
> > 
> > And so, you get people who have influence on official boards to 
> join 
> > the fray. Doesn't matter what the facts are, as along as there is 
> an 
> > opportunity to criticize him. It is clear that the powers that be, 
> > both inside and outside of City Hall, want Keady gone.
> > 
> > Keady's announcement of what he is doing in his official capacity 
> is 
> > interpreted as "grandstanding" instead of being accepted as it is 
> > given - fulfilling his obligation to keep his constituents 
> apprised.
> > 
> > He is proactive. Thank God. The group that has mobilized against 
> him 
> > are a bunch of cheerleaders. Everything is show,parades, 
> fireworks, 
> > faux landings of lost explorers,etc. Tom, next Columbus Day take 
> > your show to Howell. Let yourkids participate there where they 
> live 
> > and go to school.
> > 
> > I won't criticize the School Board because I don't know everything 
> > and I know there are good people in it. But reading about events 
> > over the past few years and the ongoing performance of the 
> schools, 
> > I would say that Bob DiSanto and the board have their hands full. 
> > There is plenty of blame to go around concerning the schools. They 
> > should be addressing more important matters than Keady visiting 
> the 
> > school. It all seems a bit heavy-handed and a coincidence on the 
> > heels of the UEZ letter.
> > 
> > I would say that all of our councilman and mayor, and city 
> manager, 
> > should have considered visiting the school in the wake of the 
> > shootings. But I don't think I would want Bruno talking to my kids.
> > 
> > It is time for people to wake up. Keady is not going to do 
> anything 
> > to reduce our property values. They are more in danger of 
> declining 
> > due to the potential failure of the redevelopment and Partners 
> > continual postponement of the waterfront restoration.
> > 
> > A lot of people (real estate people) made a lot of money in this 
> > town over the past few years. I see their hand in this. Shame on 
> you 
> > all.
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[E

[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Hinge
Personally, I think making an issue of his visit to the school is more of a 
political move 
then anything. 
I've read and re-read the article, and it just makes me like JK even more.
His motive sounds pretty admirable in my opinion...he wanted to know what the 
students 
were thinking. What's wrong with that? How can somebody attack him for that.
All this talk of him influencing property values is a joke.
I've said it before, and i'll say it again...AP already has a bad reputation, 
and if anything it's 
that legacy that has the effect, not JK's effort to improve things.

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
>  wrote:
> >Councilman under fire for school visit
> Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 11/9/06
> BY NANCY SHIELDS
> COASTAL MONMOUTH BUREAU
> 
> ASBURY PARK — City Board of Education President Robert DiSanto has 
> fired off a letter to City Councilman James Keady criticizing him for 
> visiting Asbury Park High School classes Oct. 27 without the 
> permission of Acting Superintendent Kathy McDavid following the fatal 
> shooting of 18-year-old Tylik Pugh.
> 
> But Keady, who wanted to hear the students' concerns about gun 
> violence and other deep-seated problems following the Oct. 18 
> shooting, released e-mails Wednesday that showed he had the 
> permission of the high school principal, Linda Palumbo, to meet with 
> the students. Furthermore, Keady said that when he arrived at the 
> school that Friday, he was given a schedule of classes to follow.
> 
> "It wasn't like Jim Keady just popped up and showed up for classes," 
> Keady said Wednesday. "I had a printed-out schedule for my day."
> 
> In his Nov. 3 letter, DiSanto said he had told Keady he must have 
> permission from the superintendent and was to make arrangements 
> through her. He said Keady "chose to ignore this protocol and 
> interrupted our classes regardless."
> 
> "Councilman Keady, I must ask you why you are getting involved in our 
> schools without proper protocol and respect for our superintendent 
> and her administration, or for the Asbury Park Board of 
> Education?"DiSanto wrote.
> 
> Keady's e-mails show that teacher Lauren Golden, who had encouraged 
> city officials to get involved with the schools, made the 
> arrangements and e-mailed him on Oct. 25: "I spoke to the principal, 
> Dr. (Linda) Palumbo. She said it is fine for you to come in. . . ."
> 
> Keady said that perhaps there was "a slight potential misstep" when 
> he did not call McDavid directly but said he assumed  the 
> dministration had approved his visit.
> 
> "I'm under the assumption if the principal OK'd this, everything's 
> fine," he said.
> 
> Keady said he obtained valuable information from the students.
> 
> "I thought, and still do think, that the solutions lie with them," he 
> said.
> 
> McDavid said Wednesday she had no recollection of talking to Palumbo 
> about Keady's visit.
> 
> The city's Urban Enterprise Zone Board recently sent Keady a letter 
> asking him to resign and leave town for telling a New York City 
> television station that the word on the street was that there are 200 
> members of the Bloods gang in the city
> 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty 
> > diverse group.  Can they all be wrong?
> > 
> > Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very well?
> > 
> > 
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Jim holds a B.S. in Psychology from St. Joseph's University
> > > > 
> > > > BS sums it up...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > meaning what?
> > > 
> > > > I taught school for 2 years.  Shall I rush into your children's 
> > > > school, outside of the curriculum,  and start learnin' 'em?  
> > > 
> > > Was he giving instruction?
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > He could have more training than the Pope (probably thinks he 
> > > does). 
> > > > He isn't part of the curriculum and not accepted by the school 
> > to 
> > > > teach there.
> > > 
> > > Was he teaching? Did he receive permission from the principal?
> > >  
> > > > He wasn't there for show and tell.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > > I took Keady at his word and worked under the assumption that 
> he 
> > > did 
> > > > have the principal's permission.  Why should I investigate - do 
> > > you 
> > > > think he is lying?
> > > 
> > > Nice try. You suggested that Keady used undue influence. Muscle I 
> > > think is the word you used.
> > > 
> > > > I believe he needs the Super's permission.  Don't be surprised 
> > if 
> > > > principal or super cover for themselves and him and "start to 
> > > think 
> > > > they kinda remember something about the Super saying sorta OK 
> or 
> > > > something."
> > > 
> > > I don't thinkhe broke into the school. Some offi

[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread justifiedright
So you really are making the case that Jim Keady is right and the 
rest of the City is wrong.

Says alot.




--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty 
> > diverse group.  Can they all be wrong?
> > 
> > Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very 
> well?
> 
> 
> Glad you asked. Firstly, I read the article. Seems like he is in 
the 
> clear and had permission. If the schools did not internally follow 
> protocol, well.
> 
> Greater "wrongs" have been done by public officials in AP and 
there 
> has been NO outcry from anyone except the appointed "naysayers." 
> Groups like the UEZ, etc., have remained mute while councilmembers 
> have lied in print and public meetings. Said nothing while 
accepted 
> redevelopment plans were ignored and voided. I could go on. All 
who 
> drink at the trough of City Hall put their hands over their 
> collective mouths, eyes and ears because it was deemed 
the "greater 
> good" by their masters.
> 
> Don't think I do not know how far the influence of Loffredo and 
> Bruno goes in this city. You yourself don't say what you know is 
> wrong in public because of it, although you have said it at times 
in 
> private (BTW, I expect your GUMBA article to be here today if not 
in 
> TCN).
> 
> Keady was considered a great guy by many as he spoke against 
eminent 
> domain, tried to save buildings and to get Partners to move their 
> asses.
> 
> What went wrong? Well, he started to speak about serving the poor, 
> the downtrodden. The claims against Keady have been posted right 
> here all along. A diverse group - those against him politically - 
> and others, such as those with real estate interests - brokers, 
> agents, owners, etc., join opinion with you that he will make this 
> city nothing but soup kitchens and homeless shelters if he had his 
> way. Weren't those your words?
> 
> That is his crime. The fear is that he will keep this town down 
and 
> reduce our property values. Didn't Allan come right out and say 
that?
> 
> And so, you get people who have influence on official boards to 
join 
> the fray. Doesn't matter what the facts are, as along as there is 
an 
> opportunity to criticize him. It is clear that the powers that be, 
> both inside and outside of City Hall, want Keady gone.
> 
> Keady's announcement of what he is doing in his official capacity 
is 
> interpreted as "grandstanding" instead of being accepted as it is 
> given - fulfilling his obligation to keep his constituents 
apprised.
> 
> He is proactive. Thank God. The group that has mobilized against 
him 
> are a bunch of cheerleaders. Everything is show,parades, 
fireworks, 
> faux landings of lost explorers,etc. Tom, next Columbus Day take 
> your show to Howell. Let yourkids participate there where they 
live 
> and go to school.
> 
> I won't criticize the School Board because I don't know everything 
> and I know there are good people in it. But reading about events 
> over the past few years and the ongoing performance of the 
schools, 
> I would say that Bob DiSanto and the board have their hands full. 
> There is plenty of blame to go around concerning the schools. They 
> should be addressing more important matters than Keady visiting 
the 
> school. It all seems a bit heavy-handed and a coincidence on the 
> heels of the UEZ letter.
> 
> I would say that all of our councilman and mayor, and city 
manager, 
> should have considered visiting the school in the wake of the 
> shootings. But I don't think I would want Bruno talking to my kids.
> 
> It is time for people to wake up. Keady is not going to do 
anything 
> to reduce our property values. They are more in danger of 
declining 
> due to the potential failure of the redevelopment and Partners 
> continual postponement of the waterfront restoration.
> 
> A lot of people (real estate people) made a lot of money in this 
> town over the past few years. I see their hand in this. Shame on 
you 
> all.
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread oakdorf
---keady should keep his ass right where it is - on the council. So 
he talked to the kids. Big f'in deal. How many times is it more 
interesting to hear someone else then the same droll from a teacher. 
Kind of like career day. There was noting more interesting in college 
then having an adjunct vs a career professor. "Put down those books" 
and let me tell you how it is...then read your book.

Hey I jumped on Jim a few years back for being "well read". 

He is learning the facts of life of those that live it everyday, not 
running from it. 

So I took a couple guys around AP the other day to look at homes etc. 
Spent 6 hours with them. I gave them the real tour. We discussed the 
shootings, crime, redevelopment, the lack of offices (day workers for 
commercial day traffic), lack of parking, the impact of new 
developments on existing home prices and condos, the recongized Allan 
and Suzi having a shop around the corner from them in NYC, Springwood 
Ave, the Sewer plant on the Ocean, eminent domain, JErsey gardens, 
the metropolitan and on. So know theya re focusing on the east side.

Given all the facts (sales history, development,risks,comps) they are 
looking at AP and comparing to long branch and other shore towns 
before they plunk down a million on one or more homes or a commercial 
project.

I also told them to read this board and tom's column in thr tri for 
entertainment.




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty 
> diverse group.  Can they all be wrong?
> 
> Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very 
well?


Glad you asked. Firstly, I read the article. Seems like he is in the 
clear and had permission. If the schools did not internally follow 
protocol, well.

Greater "wrongs" have been done by public officials in AP and there 
has been NO outcry from anyone except the appointed "naysayers." 
Groups like the UEZ, etc., have remained mute while councilmembers 
have lied in print and public meetings. Said nothing while accepted 
redevelopment plans were ignored and voided. I could go on. All who 
drink at the trough of City Hall put their hands over their 
collective mouths, eyes and ears because it was deemed the "greater 
good" by their masters.

Don't think I do not know how far the influence of Loffredo and 
Bruno goes in this city. You yourself don't say what you know is 
wrong in public because of it, although you have said it at times in 
private (BTW, I expect your GUMBA article to be here today if not in 
TCN).

Keady was considered a great guy by many as he spoke against eminent 
domain, tried to save buildings and to get Partners to move their 
asses.

What went wrong? Well, he started to speak about serving the poor, 
the downtrodden. The claims against Keady have been posted right 
here all along. A diverse group - those against him politically - 
and others, such as those with real estate interests - brokers, 
agents, owners, etc., join opinion with you that he will make this 
city nothing but soup kitchens and homeless shelters if he had his 
way. Weren't those your words?

That is his crime. The fear is that he will keep this town down and 
reduce our property values. Didn't Allan come right out and say that?

And so, you get people who have influence on official boards to join 
the fray. Doesn't matter what the facts are, as along as there is an 
opportunity to criticize him. It is clear that the powers that be, 
both inside and outside of City Hall, want Keady gone.

Keady's announcement of what he is doing in his official capacity is 
interpreted as "grandstanding" instead of being accepted as it is 
given - fulfilling his obligation to keep his constituents apprised.

He is proactive. Thank God. The group that has mobilized against him 
are a bunch of cheerleaders. Everything is show,parades, fireworks, 
faux landings of lost explorers,etc. Tom, next Columbus Day take 
your show to Howell. Let yourkids participate there where they live 
and go to school.

I won't criticize the School Board because I don't know everything 
and I know there are good people in it. But reading about events 
over the past few years and the ongoing performance of the schools, 
I would say that Bob DiSanto and the board have their hands full. 
There is plenty of blame to go around concerning the schools. They 
should be addressing more important matters than Keady visiting the 
school. It all seems a bit heavy-handed and a coincidence on the 
heels of the UEZ letter.

I would say that all of our councilman and mayor, and city manager, 
should have considered visiting the school in the wake of the 
shootings. But I don't think I would want Bruno talking to my kids.

It is time for people to wake up. Keady is not going to do anything 
to reduce our property values. They are more in danger of declining 
due to the potential failure of the redevelopment and Partners 
continual postponement of the waterfront restoration.

A lot of people (real estate people) made a lot of money in this 
town over the past few years. I see their hand in this. Shame on you 
all.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-09 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Councilman under fire for school visit
Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 11/9/06
BY NANCY SHIELDS
COASTAL MONMOUTH BUREAU

ASBURY PARK — City Board of Education President Robert DiSanto has 
fired off a letter to City Councilman James Keady criticizing him for 
visiting Asbury Park High School classes Oct. 27 without the 
permission of Acting Superintendent Kathy McDavid following the fatal 
shooting of 18-year-old Tylik Pugh.

But Keady, who wanted to hear the students' concerns about gun 
violence and other deep-seated problems following the Oct. 18 
shooting, released e-mails Wednesday that showed he had the 
permission of the high school principal, Linda Palumbo, to meet with 
the students. Furthermore, Keady said that when he arrived at the 
school that Friday, he was given a schedule of classes to follow.

"It wasn't like Jim Keady just popped up and showed up for classes," 
Keady said Wednesday. "I had a printed-out schedule for my day."

In his Nov. 3 letter, DiSanto said he had told Keady he must have 
permission from the superintendent and was to make arrangements 
through her. He said Keady "chose to ignore this protocol and 
interrupted our classes regardless."

"Councilman Keady, I must ask you why you are getting involved in our 
schools without proper protocol and respect for our superintendent 
and her administration, or for the Asbury Park Board of 
Education?"DiSanto wrote.

Keady's e-mails show that teacher Lauren Golden, who had encouraged 
city officials to get involved with the schools, made the 
arrangements and e-mailed him on Oct. 25: "I spoke to the principal, 
Dr. (Linda) Palumbo. She said it is fine for you to come in. . . ."

Keady said that perhaps there was "a slight potential misstep" when 
he did not call McDavid directly but said he assumed  the 
dministration had approved his visit.

"I'm under the assumption if the principal OK'd this, everything's 
fine," he said.

Keady said he obtained valuable information from the students.

"I thought, and still do think, that the solutions lie with them," he 
said.

McDavid said Wednesday she had no recollection of talking to Palumbo 
about Keady's visit.

The city's Urban Enterprise Zone Board recently sent Keady a letter 
asking him to resign and leave town for telling a New York City 
television station that the word on the street was that there are 200 
members of the Bloods gang in the city

> 
> 



Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty 
> diverse group.  Can they all be wrong?
> 
> Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very well?
> 
> 
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Jim holds a B.S. in Psychology from St. Joseph's University
> > > 
> > > BS sums it up...
> > 
> > 
> > meaning what?
> > 
> > > I taught school for 2 years.  Shall I rush into your children's 
> > > school, outside of the curriculum,  and start learnin' 'em?  
> > 
> > Was he giving instruction?
> > 
> > > 
> > > He could have more training than the Pope (probably thinks he 
> > does). 
> > > He isn't part of the curriculum and not accepted by the school 
> to 
> > > teach there.
> > 
> > Was he teaching? Did he receive permission from the principal?
> >  
> > > He wasn't there for show and tell.
> > 
> >  
> > > I took Keady at his word and worked under the assumption that 
he 
> > did 
> > > have the principal's permission.  Why should I investigate - do 
> > you 
> > > think he is lying?
> > 
> > Nice try. You suggested that Keady used undue influence. Muscle I 
> > think is the word you used.
> > 
> > > I believe he needs the Super's permission.  Don't be surprised 
> if 
> > > principal or super cover for themselves and him and "start to 
> > think 
> > > they kinda remember something about the Super saying sorta OK 
or 
> > > something."
> > 
> > I don't thinkhe broke into the school. Some official let him do 
> it. 
> > If they were not supposed to that is their problem, not his.
> >  
> > > 
> > > Are you suggesting that the principal would let anyone in to 
> talk 
> > to 
> > > the kids just for the asking?  They let Jim in because of his 
> > > Council position.
> > 
> > No, because they thought it was a good idea. Keady goes to the 
> > schools to talk to the kids about the shooting to try to some 
good 
> > and again, gets crucified. Why, because he is a councilman? Oh 
> > right, he is grand standing again.
> > 
> > If you don't have your head up someone's (the right someone) ass 
> in 
> > City Hall, drink the kool aid and sing the company song (Oh 
Status 
> > Quo), you're grand standing in this city.
> > 
> > Meanwhile, Sanders, Loffredo and Bruno haven't met a photo op 
they 
> > don't like. Loffredo can dress up us Columbus and get maro

[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-08 Thread justifiedright

Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty 
diverse group.  Can they all be wrong?

Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very well?


--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > Jim holds a B.S. in Psychology from St. Joseph's University
> > 
> > BS sums it up...
> 
> 
> meaning what?
> 
> > I taught school for 2 years.  Shall I rush into your children's 
> > school, outside of the curriculum,  and start learnin' 'em?  
> 
> Was he giving instruction?
> 
> > 
> > He could have more training than the Pope (probably thinks he 
> does). 
> > He isn't part of the curriculum and not accepted by the school 
to 
> > teach there.
> 
> Was he teaching? Did he receive permission from the principal?
>  
> > He wasn't there for show and tell.
> 
>  
> > I took Keady at his word and worked under the assumption that he 
> did 
> > have the principal's permission.  Why should I investigate - do 
> you 
> > think he is lying?
> 
> Nice try. You suggested that Keady used undue influence. Muscle I 
> think is the word you used.
> 
> > I believe he needs the Super's permission.  Don't be surprised 
if 
> > principal or super cover for themselves and him and "start to 
> think 
> > they kinda remember something about the Super saying sorta OK or 
> > something."
> 
> I don't thinkhe broke into the school. Some official let him do 
it. 
> If they were not supposed to that is their problem, not his.
>  
> > 
> > Are you suggesting that the principal would let anyone in to 
talk 
> to 
> > the kids just for the asking?  They let Jim in because of his 
> > Council position.
> 
> No, because they thought it was a good idea. Keady goes to the 
> schools to talk to the kids about the shooting to try to some good 
> and again, gets crucified. Why, because he is a councilman? Oh 
> right, he is grand standing again.
> 
> If you don't have your head up someone's (the right someone) ass 
in 
> City Hall, drink the kool aid and sing the company song (Oh Status 
> Quo), you're grand standing in this city.
> 
> Meanwhile, Sanders, Loffredo and Bruno haven't met a photo op they 
> don't like. Loffredo can dress up us Columbus and get marooned on 
> the beach, you dress your kids up as First Peoples (but I bet you 
> like to call them injuns) and Bruno can pontificate about absolute 
> bullshit but that's okay.
> 
> > 
> > You continue to make that charge.  I'm sorry I offended you.  I 
> > didn't know you were gay.
> 
> I'm not gay and the charge fits. I just want to show the level you 
> will stoop to do what you see fit. The ends do not justify the 
means.
> 
> > 
> > It is part of the public record. You'll see it in all the papers 
> > tomorrow.
> 
> 
> I am sure I will. Does no one see the coincidence here? Like or 
> dislike Keady, agree or disagree with him, this is payback for 
> something. I make no charge against the school board and will take 
> them at their word, but this letter on the heels of the UEZ letter 
> just seems fishy to me.
> 
> Perhaps the letter will indicate what Keady did wrong. I hope it 
has 
> some substance relating to what the Board objects to in what Keady 
> may have said to the children. Because if it is solely charging 
that 
> he had no authority to go into the schools, if he got permission 
> from the principal then the issue should be between the Board and 
> the principal.
> 
> Seems to me like the guy contributes a lot of time to run programs 
> for kids to keep them on the straight and narrow and is now 
getting 
> tarred and feathered for trying to do some good for the kids after 
> the shooting. I didn't criticize the Board for closing the schools 
> after the shooting although many did. I think Keady did question 
> that as well in the press. Is this payback? Is he an easy target?
> 
> This City is getting like communist China. You have people afraid 
to 
> identify themselves because of retribution. You have a UEZ 
> overstepping its bounds. Anyone who tries to do good and WHO is 
not 
> paying homage to the powers that be, gets slammed. I have first 
hand 
> experience on that. "Go Along to Get Along" should be the City 
motto.
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-08 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny"  wrote:
> 
> 
> > Jim holds a B.S. in Psychology from St. Joseph's University
> 
> BS sums it up...


meaning what?

> I taught school for 2 years.  Shall I rush into your children's 
> school, outside of the curriculum,  and start learnin' 'em?  

Was he giving instruction?

> 
> He could have more training than the Pope (probably thinks he 
does). 
> He isn't part of the curriculum and not accepted by the school to 
> teach there.

Was he teaching? Did he receive permission from the principal?
 
> He wasn't there for show and tell.

 
> I took Keady at his word and worked under the assumption that he 
did 
> have the principal's permission.  Why should I investigate - do 
you 
> think he is lying?

Nice try. You suggested that Keady used undue influence. Muscle I 
think is the word you used.

> I believe he needs the Super's permission.  Don't be surprised if 
> principal or super cover for themselves and him and "start to 
think 
> they kinda remember something about the Super saying sorta OK or 
> something."

I don't thinkhe broke into the school. Some official let him do it. 
If they were not supposed to that is their problem, not his.
 
> 
> Are you suggesting that the principal would let anyone in to talk 
to 
> the kids just for the asking?  They let Jim in because of his 
> Council position.

No, because they thought it was a good idea. Keady goes to the 
schools to talk to the kids about the shooting to try to some good 
and again, gets crucified. Why, because he is a councilman? Oh 
right, he is grand standing again.

If you don't have your head up someone's (the right someone) ass in 
City Hall, drink the kool aid and sing the company song (Oh Status 
Quo), you're grand standing in this city.

Meanwhile, Sanders, Loffredo and Bruno haven't met a photo op they 
don't like. Loffredo can dress up us Columbus and get marooned on 
the beach, you dress your kids up as First Peoples (but I bet you 
like to call them injuns) and Bruno can pontificate about absolute 
bullshit but that's okay.

> 
> You continue to make that charge.  I'm sorry I offended you.  I 
> didn't know you were gay.

I'm not gay and the charge fits. I just want to show the level you 
will stoop to do what you see fit. The ends do not justify the means.

> 
> It is part of the public record. You'll see it in all the papers 
> tomorrow.


I am sure I will. Does no one see the coincidence here? Like or 
dislike Keady, agree or disagree with him, this is payback for 
something. I make no charge against the school board and will take 
them at their word, but this letter on the heels of the UEZ letter 
just seems fishy to me.

Perhaps the letter will indicate what Keady did wrong. I hope it has 
some substance relating to what the Board objects to in what Keady 
may have said to the children. Because if it is solely charging that 
he had no authority to go into the schools, if he got permission 
from the principal then the issue should be between the Board and 
the principal.

Seems to me like the guy contributes a lot of time to run programs 
for kids to keep them on the straight and narrow and is now getting 
tarred and feathered for trying to do some good for the kids after 
the shooting. I didn't criticize the Board for closing the schools 
after the shooting although many did. I think Keady did question 
that as well in the press. Is this payback? Is he an easy target?

This City is getting like communist China. You have people afraid to 
identify themselves because of retribution. You have a UEZ 
overstepping its bounds. Anyone who tries to do good and WHO is not 
paying homage to the powers that be, gets slammed. I have first hand 
experience on that. "Go Along to Get Along" should be the City motto.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-11-08 Thread justifiedright
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> Jim holds a B.S. in Psychology from St. Joseph's University

BS sums it up...

>and a Masters degree in Theology

God Bless him.

>with a concentration in Social 
> Ethics/Pastoral Theology from St. John's University. Jim taught 
>high 
> school religion for 5 years, including in Monmouth County at St. 
> Rose and St. John Vianney. 

I taught school for 2 years.  Shall I rush into your children's 
school, outside of the curriculum,  and start learnin' 'em?  


> Are you suggesting Jim doesn't have the necessary training to 
>speak 
> to children in schools?

He could have more training than the Pope (probably thinks he does). 
He isn't part of the curriculum and not accepted by the school to 
teach there.


> What about the millions of show and tells that go on daily across 
> America where fathers and mothers go into the schools to tell kids 
> about their occupations? 

He wasn't there for show and tell.

> "Keady is fighting back and saying he had the principal's 
> permission."

> As he should if in fact that is the case. Have you investigated 
>the 
> matter (as a journalist you should) to determine if he had the 
> principal's permission? 

I took Keady at his word and worked under the assumption that he did 
have the principal's permission.  Why should I investigate - do you 
think he is lying?

>And if he did, do the laws also require him 
> to have the BOE permission? If that is true, then who made the 
> infraction, Keady or the principal? Isn't the principal supposed 
>to 
> know what approvals are needed? Are you fishing?

I believe he needs the Super's permission.  Don't be surprised if 
principal or super cover for themselves and him and "start to think 
they kinda remember something about the Super saying sorta OK or 
something."


> Now you are publicly accusing Keady using undue influence (you 
> characterize this as "muscle") to go into the schools. Do you have 
> the evidence to back this up? Why would you characterize it as 
>such 
> without knowing the specifics? 

Are you suggesting that the principal would let anyone in to talk to 
the kids just for the asking?  They let Jim in because of his 
Council position.


>WIl you deny this just as you denied 
> making anti-gay remalrs about Frank and Pallone?

You continue to make that charge.  I'm sorry I offended you.  I 
didn't know you were gay.

> Have you seen this letter? Is it an official communication from 
>the 
> School Board or directly from DiSanto? If it is an official letter 
> from the Board, how did you come to see it? Was it sent to others 
> besides Keady and is it for public perusal?

It is part of the public record. You'll see it in all the papers 
tomorrow.




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-04-15 Thread bluebishop82
You're exactly right Allen, particularly if the escrow agent is an 
attorney (which is the best way to go because his license is at 
stake if he screws up by even a nickel).

The escrow agent can't choose sides.  He can't release any money 
unless both sides authorize it.  If they don't agree, a judge has to 
make the call.  Either party or the escrow agent can file the suit.

I think it is a non-issue.



--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Can someone explain to me what the issue is for:
>   Selection of escrow agent at sole discretion of developer
> etc.
>
>   I know we have a lawyer on the board so maybe he could help.  It 
is my understand that when money is in escrow you still have to have 
a judge release it?  It is not like Partners do something wrong and 
the city can take the money right?  So if that is the case who care 
what attorney or bank holds the money?  I would think that since it 
is Asbury Partners responsibility then they has also have the costs 
involved saving the city money.
>
>
>   
> 
> dfsavgny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" 
 
> wrote:
> >
> > Here is what the Councilman said of the new agreement:
> > 
> > "Am I satisfied with this agreement? Yes."
> > 
> > I know he has many fans on this board. What say you about this?
> >
> I just read it too and I sent Jim an email respectfully 
disagreeing 
> with him and pointed out in detail why. I have already outlined 
the 
> same details here so I will spare the group, but in brief,
> 
> No financial guarantees for total restoration
> Litigation escape clause still in Force Majeure
> Gave up right to declare Default on the issues in supplemental 
agreement
> No specific financial penalties for not meeting total restoration 
> deadlines
> Too little money held in escrow
> Selection of escrow agent at sole discretion of developer
> etc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
>   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> 
> 
> Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web.
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service. 
> 
> 
> -
>   
> 
> 
> 
>   
> -
> Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone  calls to 30+ countries for 
just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-04-15 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Can someone explain to me what the issue is for:
>   Selection of escrow agent at sole discretion of developer
> etc.
>
>   I know we have a lawyer on the board so maybe he could help.  It 
is my understand that when money is in escrow you still have to have 
a judge release it?  It is not like Partners do something wrong and 
the city can take the money right?  So if that is the case who care 
what attorney or bank holds the money?  I would think that since it 
is Asbury Partners responsibility then they has also have the costs 
involved saving the city money.
>
I don't think a judge is involved since it is all subject to 
arbitration, although the condemnation award can be confirmed in 
court which is a formality. The selection of the escrow agent is not 
such a big issue, but when you are looking at what you don't like, 
you say it all, big and small. If it is no big deal, then why, I 
assume, did Partners negotiate for it to have the right to select 
the agent?







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-04-15 Thread Allan Peterson



Can someone explain to me what the issue is for:  Selection of escrow agent at sole discretion of developeretc.     I know we have a lawyer on the board so maybe he could help.  It is my understand that when money is in escrow you still have to have a judge release it?  It is not like Partners do something wrong and the city can take the money right?  So if that is the case who care what attorney or bank holds the money?  I would think that since it is Asbury Partners responsibility then they has also have the costs involved saving the city money.        dfsavgny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  --- In
 AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> Here is what the Councilman said of the new agreement:> > "Am I satisfied with this agreement? Yes."> > I know he has many fans on this board. What say you about this?>I just read it too and I sent Jim an email respectfully disagreeing with him and pointed out in detail why. I have already outlined the same details here so I will spare the group, but in brief,No financial guarantees for total restorationLitigation escape clause still in Force MajeureGave up right to declare Default on the issues in supplemental agreementNo specific financial penalties for not meeting total restoration deadlinesToo little money held in escrowSelection of escrow agent at sole discretion of developeretc.
		Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone  calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park home
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  
Asbury park hotel
  
  


Asbury park foreclosure
  
  
Asbury park real estate
  
  
Asbury park
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog

2006-04-13 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Here is what the Councilman said of the new agreement:
> 
> "Am I satisfied with this agreement? Yes."
> 
> I know he has many fans on this board. What say you about this?
>
I just read it too and I sent Jim an email respectfully disagreeing 
with him and pointed out in detail why. I have already outlined the 
same details here so I will spare the group, but in brief,

No financial guarantees for total restoration
Litigation escape clause still in Force Majeure
Gave up right to declare Default on the issues in supplemental agreement
No specific financial penalties for not meeting total restoration 
deadlines
Too little money held in escrow
Selection of escrow agent at sole discretion of developer
etc.
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/