Re: [CentOS] Time to sync (NOT a complaint)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > > Yes, I see it too. The announcement says in it that the files are being > released to the mirrors, not that they are available to download. > > > The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently > syncing to the mirrors: > > > Some of the mirrors take a while to sync, or maybe don't check for updates as > often as others do. > That makes a lot of sense. Thanks! mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Time to sync (NOT a complaint)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Robert wrote: > > Yes, I HAVE but no, I'm not. I really don't know what's different, > either. The announcement is dated Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:00:02 -0400 > and at 13:25 -0500 (2.4 hours later) I see a new kernel, new kernel-devel, > updated kernel-doc, updated kernel-headers and 6 updated user > packages ready to go. > > I regard the delay as "normal", current behavior to be an anomaly > That's about right, but it's now 19:38:xx -0700 (PDT) and I'm still not seeing them update. Ok, I lied - I just did a yum clean all, and voila! Still, it's annoying (I did that earlier and it made no difference.) Thanks! mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Time to sync (NOT a complaint)
on 6-19-2009 10:19 AM MHR spake the following: > Is anyone else seeing this situation? > > I subscribe to the announce digest, and for the last four or five > announcements that contained updates to CentOS 5, I've been unable to > get a successful run of yum update for as much as 24 hours after the > announcement. The last time around, I tried at about 5 hours after > the posting, and yum couldn't see anything. I ran yum clean all, and > yum update still couldn't see anything. In general, if I wait a day, > the updates load just fine, but that just feels wrong. > > I do have the fastestmirror plugin installed (and priorities). > > Thanks. > > mhr Yes, I see it too. The announcement says in it that the files are being released to the mirrors, not that they are available to download. The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: Some of the mirrors take a while to sync, or maybe don't check for updates as often as others do. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Time to sync (NOT a complaint)
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 10:19 -0700, MHR wrote: > Is anyone else seeing this situation? > > I subscribe to the announce digest, and for the last four or five > announcements that contained updates to CentOS 5, I've been unable to > get a successful run of yum update for as much as 24 hours after the > announcement. The last time around, I tried at about 5 hours after > the posting, and yum couldn't see anything. I ran yum clean all, and > yum update still couldn't see anything. In general, if I wait a day, > the updates load just fine, but that just feels wrong. Some don't update that quickly, see: http://mirror-status.centos.org/ -- Matthew Kent \ SA \ bravenet.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Time to sync (NOT a complaint)
MHR wrote: > Is anyone else seeing this situation? > > I subscribe to the announce digest, and for the last four or five > announcements that contained updates to CentOS 5, I've been unable to > get a successful run of yum update for as much as 24 hours after the > announcement. The last time around, I tried at about 5 hours after > the posting, and yum couldn't see anything. I ran yum clean all, and > yum update still couldn't see anything. In general, if I wait a day, > the updates load just fine, but that just feels wrong. > > I do have the fastestmirror plugin installed (and priorities). > > Thanks. > > mhr > Yes, I HAVE but no, I'm not. I really don't know what's different, either. The announcement is dated Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:00:02 -0400 and at 13:25 -0500 (2.4 hours later) I see a new kernel, new kernel-devel, updated kernel-doc, updated kernel-headers and 6 updated user packages ready to go. I regard the delay as "normal", current behavior to be an anomaly . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
