is it offical? OenOffice Online

[DENIS Sylvain]

Hello,

is it official ?

http://www.toolinux.com/Open-Office-porte-dans-le-cloud

http://crm-pour-pme.fr/spawnoo/spawnapps_openoffice.html

sorry, it's in french

--


 Sylvain DENIS

Conseiller Pédagogique TICE
/Responsable de projets TICE dans le cadre d'École Numérique/
0499 219 802 - sylv...@pedago-tic.be  | 
cont...@denis-sylvain.be 
École numérique : http://www.ecolenumerique.be | Pedago-TIC : 
http://www.pedago-tic.be | mENTeOS : http://www.menteos.be

Re: [DISCUSS] possible blog topic -- AOO and Linux: a marriage made in heaven! :)

[Jose R R]

>
> On 4/21/14, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:35:15 -0700
>> Jose R R  wrote:
>>
>>> Niltze-
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Hagar Delest 
>>> wrote:
>>> > Le 19/04/2014 01:53, Kay Schenk a écrit :
>>> >
>>> >> Ok, maybe the subject is bit melodramatic but after some of the
>>> >> twisted
>>> >> things we read about, basically how  non-supportive either AOO is of
>>> >> Linux,
>>> >> or Linux is non-supportive of AOO, here's what I'm thinking.
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) We do a blog whose main subject is AOO and Linux and interview some
>>> >> of
>>> >> our  Linux volunteers/users  (hopefully a nice dstro cross section --
>>> >> Fedora, Ubuntu. openSUSE, Mint?) and ask them why they're using AOO
>>> >> and
>>> >> how
>>> >> did they find the installation given that it isn't available in their
>>> >> existing repositories.
>>> >>
>>> >> -- or --
>>> >>
>>> >> 2) We do a Linux centered blog on what support we provide for Linux,
>>> >> what
>>> >> Linux packages AOO provides wtih additional distribution details,  and
>>> >> why
>>> >> they're not in repositories for distributions. On the latter point,
>>> >> I'm
>>> >> thinking talk about whose job this is, etc.
>>> >>
>>> >> I think we really should do something a bit more visible on this
>>> >> topic,
>>> >> and
>>> >> hopefully some of the open source press can pick it up.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thoughts?
>>> >>
>>> > IMHO, most users just take what's provided by default. Unless it is too
>>> > buggy.
>>> > So I think that basically, we are back to the question: why AOO is still
>>> > not
>>> > available in the standard packages?
>>> >
>>> > As long as it is not easily available, users won't bother removing
>>> > another
>>> > application to install AOO. Especially if it involves command line (to
>>> > install but also sometimes to remove the default suite).
>>> [..]
>>>
>>> On an initial Debian installation, if GNOME is selected, it will
>>> install LO by default.
>>>
>>> Accordingly the burden falls on the user to remove LO:
>>>
>>> $ sudo su
>>> $ apt-get purge libreoffice-base-core libreoffice-common
>>> libreoffice-core libreoffice-draw libreoffice-gnome libreoffice-gtk
>>> libreoffice-impress libreoffice-java-common libreoffice-math
>>> libreoffice-writer
>>
>> I have no experience with Debian as a distro, only with Debian derivatives
>> such as Ubuntu. As far as I know, it is only necessary to
>> sudo apt-get purge libreoffice-core
>> to remove all libreoffice, before installing OpenOffice.
>>
>>>
>>> Note, however that, once downloaded, it is not intuitive for a
>>> relatively novice (i.e., Ubuntu user) to install ApacheOO since after
>>> expanding its *.tar.gz file, there appears a directory: en-US (or
>>> whatever the locale selected).
>>>
>>> The user then must become root (super user) or prefix su to install at
>>> /opt/ privileged directory:
>>>
>>> $ sudo su
>>> $ dpkg -i en-US/DEBS/*deb
>>>
>>> AND then still there is no link for the the user with normal
>>> privileges to start up ApacheOO from the normal PATH directory
>>> /usr/bin/. And thus root privilege is required again to create the
>>> appropriate symlink there; the most simple one (I think) and that
>>> would not be overwritten by an subsequent (accidental installation of
>>> LO) would be:
>>>
>>> $ sudo su
>>> $ cd /usr/bin
>>> $ ln -s /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice  apacheeoo
>>> $ cd /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice
>>> $ ln -s soffice.bin apacheoo.bin
>>>
>>> The above just creates a symbolic link required due to our use of
>>> apacheoo instead of the default soffice/soffice.bin that is used by LO
>>> as well.
>>>
>>> Now the Ubuntu user would have to create executable icons for the
>>> ApacheeOO productivity apps to match the default LO that is now
>>> removed. On the other hand, those of us who don't care simply start
>>> ApacheOO from a shell as a normal user now:
>>>
>>> $ apacheoo &
>>>
>>> Is it obvious now -- as MS did before by preinstalling its own
>>> constrained software and denying users the freedom of choice -- why
>>> ApacheOO may be lacking traction on GNU/Linux?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Professional Regards.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jose R R
>>> http://www.metztli-it.com
>>> -
>>> NEW Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1! Download for GNU/Linux, Mac OS, Windows.
>>> -
>>> Daylight Saving Time in USA & Canada ends: Sunday, November 02, 2014
>>> -
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rory O'Farrell 
>>
[...]
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Alexandro Colorado  wrote:
> Users shouldn't need to uninstall LibreOffice jus

Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?

[Marcus (OOo)]

Am 05/07/2014 02:20 AM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:

On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:


Another update, seems this weekend I've my productive phase: ;-)

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html

What was done:

- Grey box:

   - Bye, bye grey color - hello green freshness.



​I would recommend styling the select boxes, here is an example of how CSS
can style them:
​http://bavotasan.com/2011/style-select-box-using-only-css/

The code should be something like the following:


 ...


​and the css:
#lang #os, #ver {
background: transparent;   width: 268px;
padding: 5px;   font-size: 16px;
line-height: 1;   border: 0;
border-radius: 0;
height: 34px;   -webkit-appearance: none;
}​


thanks for your design suggestion and example. I'll add this to the 
todo-list.


Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] possible blog topic -- AOO and Linux: a marriage made in heaven! :)

[Jose R R]

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Hagar Delest  wrote:
> Le 12/05/2014 20:53, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :
>
>> For Ubuntu, please register / log into Launchpad and visit
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1131253 where you can subscribe
>> for notifications and select that the bug affects you too and thus
>> generate a higher bug heat, hopefully persuading packagers that AOO is
>> important to package into the (universe?) repository. The bug gets 4
>> points of heat per person affected and 2 points per person subscribed
>> to receive notifications, so we only need 9 more people to do this,
>> for it to get > 60 points which will put it on the first page of
>> "needs-packaging" bugs ordered by bug heat :).
>
>
> Thanks!
> My 2 votes added.
>
> Hagar

Ditto!

-- 
Jose R R
http://www.metztli-it.com
-
NEW Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0! Download for GNU/Linux, Mac OS, Windows.
-
Daylight Saving Time in USA & Canada ends: Sunday, November 02, 2014
-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] possible blog topic -- AOO and Linux: a marriage made in heaven! :)

[Hagar Delest]

Le 12/05/2014 20:53, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit :

For Ubuntu, please register / log into Launchpad and visit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1131253 where you can subscribe
for notifications and select that the bug affects you too and thus
generate a higher bug heat, hopefully persuading packagers that AOO is
important to package into the (universe?) repository. The bug gets 4
points of heat per person affected and 2 points per person subscribed
to receive notifications, so we only need 9 more people to do this,
for it to get > 60 points which will put it on the first page of
"needs-packaging" bugs ordered by bug heat :).


Thanks!
My 2 votes added.

Hagar

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Please remove me from this mailing list

[Dave Barton]

Jessica Marley wrote:
> Thank you

Wearing my moderator hat, I have answered Jessica off-list.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Marketing - German language Flyer - Was: Marketing - Apache Logo

[Detlef Nannen]

Hello Andrea,

2014-03-09 12:38 GMT+01:00 Andrea Pescetti :
> On 26/02/2014 Detlef Nannen wrote:
>>
>> For events we bought flyers and posters in the last months, and 2
>> transparents this week. Flyers and posters are designed in German
>> language for German speaking countries.

Took a longer Time, but here are the answers to your questions.
You remember this ;-)

- who is going to use them?

** Raphael Bircher, openoffice-pmc-member, Committer (rbircher), Switzerland
** Jörg Schmidt, Committer (joesch), Germany
** PrOOo-Box-Team (Jan-Christian Wienandt, Jörg Schmidt, myself, Detlef Nannen)
** FSFE-Team (http://fsfe.org/index.en.html)
** Mechthilde u. Michael Stehmann Working for events in Belgium an Rhine-Area
** Sidux-ev. (http://sidux-ev.org/)

- where will these people use them (list of events, conferences)?

** Kieler OpenSource und Linux-Tage (2d) at Kiel
** Berlin, Linuxtag at Berlin
** Linuxtage at Chemnitz
** Cebit at Hannover, (planned 2015 or 16, we need support)
** OpenRheinRuhr at Oberhausen
** FROSCON at Brüssel (Bruxelles, Belgium)
** Augsburg, Linux-Infotag (South-Germany)
** Linuxday at Dornbirn (Austria)
** Linuxwochen (Linuxweeks) in Austria (planned in 2015)

- what materials you are producing ? (you already sent this in the ZIP file)

** no changes in the last weeks

- an estimate of costs?

** 1000 Flyer = EURO 70 / $100
We prefer to order two or three times a year this amount.
So we don't have to discard too much when changes are made.

** 5000 Flyer = EURO 130  / $180
** 1 Flyer = EURO 230 /$320

We order new flyers at this time.

Is it also possible to produce Beachflags or RollUps. We need this for
the same purpose as the Flyers. We have here two old RollUps, but with
the old logo. In addition, the RollUps are pretty worn out. New cost
per piece approx 110 euros incl. delivery.
Example: 
http://www.flyeralarm.com/de/shop/configurator/index/id/100/roll-up-classic-system-inkl-druck.html#460=1712&461=1710&462=1709


-- 
Regards
Detlef Nannen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: The Apache Software Foundation Announces 100 Million Downloads of Apache™ OpenOffice™

[Mihail Vastardis]

Please remove my email from list thank u

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 17, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> 
> [Rob:  Please help spread the word by sharing this link with your
> friends on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, etc.]
> 
>>> this announcement is also available online at http://s.apache.org/4BL
> 
> Leading Open Source office application and personal productivity suite
> for Windows, Mac, and Linux reaches a major adoption milestone
> 
> 17 April 2014 --Forest Hill, MD-- The Apache Software Foundation
> (ASF), the all-volunteer developers, stewards, and incubators of more
> than 170 Open Source projects and initiatives, announced today that
> Apache OpenOffice™ has been downloaded 100 million times.
> 
> Apache OpenOffice is the leading Open Source office document
> productivity suite, available in 32 languages on Windows, OS X, and
> Linux. OpenOffice includes a word processor ("Writer"), a spreadsheet
> ("Calc"), a presentation editor ("Impress"), a vector graphics editor
> ("Draw"), a mathematical formula editor ("Math"), and a database
> management program ("Base").  As Open Source software, Apache
> OpenOffice is available to all users free of charge; the C++ source
> code is readily available for anyone who wishes to enhance the
> applications.
> 
> Originally created as "StarOffice" by StarDivision and after further
> development as an Open Source product under the name "OpenOffice.org",
> OpenOffice entered the Apache Incubator in 2011 and graduated as an
> Apache Top-level Project in October 2012.
> 
> "I'm extremely pleased to see us reach this major milestone in less
> than two years," said Andrea Pescetti, Vice President of Apache
> OpenOffice. "This is a testament to our community volunteers: the
> hundreds of talented individuals who make Apache OpenOffice what it
> is, who write the code, test for bugs, translate the user interface,
> write documentation, answer user questions and manage our servers. We
> remain committed to offering the successful combination of reliability
> and innovation that so many users appreciate."
> 
> Official downloads at openoffice.org are hosted by SourceForge, where
> users can also find repositories for more than 750 extensions and over
> 2,800 templates for OpenOffice.
> 
> "By continuously improving Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Templates
> sites we show how committed we are about providing projects with what
> they need most," said Gaurav Kuchhal, General Manager for Slashdot and
> SourceForge. "We are happy to help open source projects to grow, no
> matter where they are hosted or developed. We have been serving over
> 122 Million downloads for the Apache OpenOffice project, with daily
> peaks of about 250,000 and we are committed to providing products and
> services that demonstrate our dedication to technical excellence."
> 
> "Apache OpenOffice reaching 100 million downloads is a remarkable
> achievement in the project's 29-year history and testament to the
> power of successful Open Source communities," said Shane Curcuru,
> Apache OpenOffice mentor and ASF Vice President of Brand Management.
> "We extend our gratitude to all the volunteers and users whose
> contribution, feedback, support, engagement, and enthusiasm keeps us
> focused on delivering great software. We couldn't celebrate this
> milestone without them!"
> 
> Some Trends and Fun Facts about Apache OpenOffice
> - OpenOffice supports Microsoft Windows, Apple OS X and Linux
> - Top downloads by operating system, in order: Windows, Mac, Linux
> - Top downloads by browser, in order: Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome
> - Top 10 countries for OpenOffice downloads, in order: United States,
> France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, Spain, Russia, Canada,
> and Poland
> - OpenOffice supports 120+ languages --those that are 100% translated
> and maintained are officially released. Latest languages released
> include Asturian, Basque, Danish, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Scottish
> Gaelic, and Swedish, thanks to the work of new translation volunteers
> - Apache OpenOffice features integrated improvements from IBM Lotus
> Symphony (a previous fork that has been closed and donated to the ASF)
> to bring better compatibility with Microsoft Office documents
> - OpenOffice 4.0 debuts a major change to its user interface with the
> introduction of the Sidebar, developed by the Apache OpenOffice "dream
> team" in Hamburg in close cooperation with hundreds of community
> members
> - OpenOffice 4.0 reflects 500 bug fixes, advances in Microsoft Office
> interoperability, enhancements to drawing/graphics, and performance
> improvements, among many others
> - The new logo for OpenOffice was chosen after a long selection
> process that saw over 5,000 votes cast. The winning proposal was
> submitted by community member Chris Rottensteiner from South Tyrol
> - Demand for Apache OpenOffice 4.0 averages 1 million downloads per week
> - The Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1 maintenance release fixes critical
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] possible blog topic -- AOO and Linux: a marriage made in heaven! :)

[Alexandro Colorado]

Users shouldn't need to uninstall LibreOffice just like Windows users
dont need to uninstall Microsoft Office to try OpenOffice.

I thought this issue was solved.

On 4/21/14, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:35:15 -0700
> Jose R R  wrote:
>
>> Niltze-
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Hagar Delest 
>> wrote:
>> > Le 19/04/2014 01:53, Kay Schenk a écrit :
>> >
>> >> Ok, maybe the subject is bit melodramatic but after some of the
>> >> twisted
>> >> things we read about, basically how  non-supportive either AOO is of
>> >> Linux,
>> >> or Linux is non-supportive of AOO, here's what I'm thinking.
>> >>
>> >> 1) We do a blog whose main subject is AOO and Linux and interview some
>> >> of
>> >> our  Linux volunteers/users  (hopefully a nice dstro cross section --
>> >> Fedora, Ubuntu. openSUSE, Mint?) and ask them why they're using AOO
>> >> and
>> >> how
>> >> did they find the installation given that it isn't available in their
>> >> existing repositories.
>> >>
>> >> -- or --
>> >>
>> >> 2) We do a Linux centered blog on what support we provide for Linux,
>> >> what
>> >> Linux packages AOO provides wtih additional distribution details,  and
>> >> why
>> >> they're not in repositories for distributions. On the latter point,
>> >> I'm
>> >> thinking talk about whose job this is, etc.
>> >>
>> >> I think we really should do something a bit more visible on this
>> >> topic,
>> >> and
>> >> hopefully some of the open source press can pick it up.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts?
>> >>
>> > IMHO, most users just take what's provided by default. Unless it is too
>> > buggy.
>> > So I think that basically, we are back to the question: why AOO is still
>> > not
>> > available in the standard packages?
>> >
>> > As long as it is not easily available, users won't bother removing
>> > another
>> > application to install AOO. Especially if it involves command line (to
>> > install but also sometimes to remove the default suite).
>> [..]
>>
>> On an initial Debian installation, if GNOME is selected, it will
>> install LO by default.
>>
>> Accordingly the burden falls on the user to remove LO:
>>
>> $ sudo su
>> $ apt-get purge libreoffice-base-core libreoffice-common
>> libreoffice-core libreoffice-draw libreoffice-gnome libreoffice-gtk
>> libreoffice-impress libreoffice-java-common libreoffice-math
>> libreoffice-writer
>
> I have no experience with Debian as a distro, only with Debian derivatives
> such as Ubuntu. As far as I know, it is only necessary to
> sudo apt-get purge libreoffice-core
> to remove all libreoffice, before installing OpenOffice.
>
>>
>> Note, however that, once downloaded, it is not intuitive for a
>> relatively novice (i.e., Ubuntu user) to install ApacheOO since after
>> expanding its *.tar.gz file, there appears a directory: en-US (or
>> whatever the locale selected).
>>
>> The user then must become root (super user) or prefix su to install at
>> /opt/ privileged directory:
>>
>> $ sudo su
>> $ dpkg -i en-US/DEBS/*deb
>>
>> AND then still there is no link for the the user with normal
>> privileges to start up ApacheOO from the normal PATH directory
>> /usr/bin/. And thus root privilege is required again to create the
>> appropriate symlink there; the most simple one (I think) and that
>> would not be overwritten by an subsequent (accidental installation of
>> LO) would be:
>>
>> $ sudo su
>> $ cd /usr/bin
>> $ ln -s /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice  apacheeoo
>> $ cd /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice
>> $ ln -s soffice.bin apacheoo.bin
>>
>> The above just creates a symbolic link required due to our use of
>> apacheoo instead of the default soffice/soffice.bin that is used by LO
>> as well.
>>
>> Now the Ubuntu user would have to create executable icons for the
>> ApacheeOO productivity apps to match the default LO that is now
>> removed. On the other hand, those of us who don't care simply start
>> ApacheOO from a shell as a normal user now:
>>
>> $ apacheoo &
>>
>> Is it obvious now -- as MS did before by preinstalling its own
>> constrained software and denying users the freedom of choice -- why
>> ApacheOO may be lacking traction on GNU/Linux?
>>
>>
>> Best Professional Regards.
>>
>> --
>> Jose R R
>> http://www.metztli-it.com
>> -
>> NEW Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1! Download for GNU/Linux, Mac OS, Windows.
>> -
>> Daylight Saving Time in USA & Canada ends: Sunday, November 02, 2014
>> -
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rory O'Farrell 
>
> -
> To unsubscribe,

Re: [DISCUSS] possible blog topic -- AOO and Linux: a marriage made in heaven! :)

[Damjan Jovanovic]

On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
>
> On 04/20/2014 11:53 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20 Apr  2014, at 14:02, Hagar Delest 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> IMHO, most users just take what's provided by default. Unless it is
>>> too buggy. So I think that basically, we are back to the question:
>>> why AOO is still not available in the standard packages?
>>
>>
>> There are several ways of answering your question. I'll take the high
>> road, and presume, for argument's sake, that the main Linux
>> Distributors (the "distros") are acting in good faith and chose to
>> align themselves with what they believed to be a sustainable
>> community organization ca. 2011.
>>
>> These main distros that most in the West think of when they think of
>> Linux, I'd guess, include Canonical's Ubuntu, Red Hat's Fedora
>> Project, and KDE.* (I didn't check SuSE.) None includes Apache
>> OpenOffice.
>
>
> Well KDE is a window system and not a distro. It is used on a variety of
> distros including openSUSE, Fedora, Ubuntu (Kubuntu), etc. But, your
> statement is true enough that no major Linux distribution includes Apache
> OpenOffice.

For Ubuntu, please register / log into Launchpad and visit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1131253 where you can subscribe
for notifications and select that the bug affects you too and thus
generate a higher bug heat, hopefully persuading packagers that AOO is
important to package into the (universe?) repository. The bug gets 4
points of heat per person affected and 2 points per person subscribed
to receive notifications, so we only need 9 more people to do this,
for it to get > 60 points which will put it on the first page of
"needs-packaging" bugs ordered by bug heat :).

Damjan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[DOWNLOAD] Please delete checksum files from Sourceforge

[Marcus (OOo)]

@Roberto:

Please can you delete all checksum files (*.asc, *.md5, *.sha256) from 
Sourceforge? It seems they were uploaded by accident.


The one-and-only way to make them public is to have them on an Apache 
server. Example:


http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.0/binaries/en-US/

Thanks in advance.

Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [CODE][DISCUSS]: new option to enable ODF 1.2 encryption AES-256

[Kay Schenk]

On 05/12/2014 08:32 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 5/6/14 12:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> for AOO 3.4 we had already discussed and later on reverted a change to
>>> enable the ODF Document encryption AES-256 by default.
>>>
>>> Some time ago I played with a new option field to allow the user to
>>> enable this option as new default, see [1]
>>>
>>> By default the office still uses the old blowfish algorithm but with
>>> this new option the user can enable the ODF 1.2 encryption. Well it is a
>>> minimal change to improve the current situation and allow the user to
>>> make use of what we already have.
>>>
>>> What does it mean in detail when we integrate this change?
>>>
>>> 1. No change as long as this option is not enabled
>>> 2. Option enabled and ODF 1.2 encryption is now default
>>>
>>
>> Would you happen to have a link to this in the ODF 1.2 spec? I can't seem
>> to find this...sorry.
> 
> not directly but you can review
> 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/OpenDocument-v1.2-part3.pdf
> 
> Section 4.5 describes the attribute  and there you
> find a reference to 4.8.1  where the first
> bullet point listed
> 
> "An IRI listed in §5.2 of [xmlenc-core]: The algorithm and mode
> specified in §5.2 of [xmlenc-core] for this IRI."
> 
> [xmlenc-core] is defined on page 9 and links to
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmlenc-core-20021210/ and under 5.2 you
> find Block Encryption Algorithms
> 
> I think all this algorithm are supported theoretical but practical I
> know that OpenOffice supports Blowfish and AES-256.
> 
> Maybe others can provide more details here. I am really no expert in
> this area ;-)
> 
> Juergen
> 
> 

Ok, thanks. The reason I asked is because I could only find a reference
to blowfish, and not AES-256 anywhere.

> 
> 
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2.1 New documents stored with password can't be loaded on older office
>>> versions
>>> 2.2 New or existing documents stored in older versions can still be
>>> loaded in the new office
>>> 2.3 Documents stored in older version (with the old algorithm) and
>>> loaded in the new office works as expected. Changes made in the document
>>> and stored with the new office still use the old algorithm and the
>>> document can later on opened in older office versions.
>>>
>>> From my pov of view there is still room for improvements but it is a
>>> first useful step to move forward to a more secure algorithm and give
>>> the user the opportunity to tweak the settings in the preferred way.
>>>
>>> I would like to propose to integrate this change and test it how well it
>>> works.
>>>
>>> Any opinions? Well keep in mind it is a minimal enhancement to make use
>>> of what we already have. There is still room for improvements ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~jsc/test/encryption_aes256_odf12.png
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
-
MzK

"Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing."
   -- Helen Keller


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Remove me

[Dr. Michael Stehmann]

Am 12.05.2014 17:53, schrieb Dave Barton:
>
> Wearing my moderator hat, I have answered Joe off-list.

How does this hat look like? Is it possible to get one? ;-)

Regards
Michael




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Remove me

[Joe Vancott]

Remove from this mailing list

Thanks

Jo eVanCott



Disclaimer: This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If 
you have received this communication in error, please do not distribute it and 
notify us immediately by email: administra...@unitekgs.com  or via telephone: 
267-464-1700 and delete the original message. Unless expressly stated in this 
e-mail, nothing in this message or any attachment should be construed as a 
digital or electronic signature.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Do not drop languages in minor releases

[Tal Daniel]

In brief:

Currently, a translation is released when it reaches 100%.
There were a few ideas when to include and exclude a translation in a
release (different for major, and minor). Some suggestions where to
continue to release even if there's no 100%, and there's an active
community of translator for a language. Rob suggested even to get an OK
from the trans. community of each language.

Rules should be simple, though, as Jürgen Schmidt commented, since it cause
effort to manage & track too many rules, in addition to manually build the
translation releases each time.

Andrea proposed a more flexible strategy, which emphasizes the importance
of continuing the language support over versions (at least in minor
releases), who may find it annoying, for example, that there was Hebrew
support in AOO 3.3, but not in AOO 3.4 (grr@#$!!).
+ That's a strong point, TMHO.

+ In addition to Andrea's concern about being in touch with the community
of translators,
as a solution, maybe we should build a list of private emails. For example,
I wonder if translators would prefer to add their private email to the
cwiki page of volunteers, instead of just subscribing to the L10N list.
This would allow the PMC to send important updates/requests directly to
translators (e.g. a wake-up call, before a release).

Tal

Re: Remove me

[Dave Barton]

Joe Vancott wrote:
> Remove from this mailing list
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jo eVanCott

Wearing my moderator hat, I have answered Joe off-list.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [CODE][DISCUSS]: new option to enable ODF 1.2 encryption AES-256

[Jürgen Schmidt]

On 5/6/14 12:49 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> for AOO 3.4 we had already discussed and later on reverted a change to
>> enable the ODF Document encryption AES-256 by default.
>>
>> Some time ago I played with a new option field to allow the user to
>> enable this option as new default, see [1]
>>
>> By default the office still uses the old blowfish algorithm but with
>> this new option the user can enable the ODF 1.2 encryption. Well it is a
>> minimal change to improve the current situation and allow the user to
>> make use of what we already have.
>>
>> What does it mean in detail when we integrate this change?
>>
>> 1. No change as long as this option is not enabled
>> 2. Option enabled and ODF 1.2 encryption is now default
>>
> 
> Would you happen to have a link to this in the ODF 1.2 spec? I can't seem
> to find this...sorry.

not directly but you can review

http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/OpenDocument-v1.2-part3.pdf

Section 4.5 describes the attribute  and there you
find a reference to 4.8.1  where the first
bullet point listed

"An IRI listed in §5.2 of [xmlenc-core]: The algorithm and mode
specified in §5.2 of [xmlenc-core] for this IRI."

[xmlenc-core] is defined on page 9 and links to
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmlenc-core-20021210/ and under 5.2 you
find Block Encryption Algorithms

I think all this algorithm are supported theoretical but practical I
know that OpenOffice supports Blowfish and AES-256.

Maybe others can provide more details here. I am really no expert in
this area ;-)

Juergen




> 
> 
> 
>> 2.1 New documents stored with password can't be loaded on older office
>> versions
>> 2.2 New or existing documents stored in older versions can still be
>> loaded in the new office
>> 2.3 Documents stored in older version (with the old algorithm) and
>> loaded in the new office works as expected. Changes made in the document
>> and stored with the new office still use the old algorithm and the
>> document can later on opened in older office versions.
>>
>> From my pov of view there is still room for improvements but it is a
>> first useful step to move forward to a more secure algorithm and give
>> the user the opportunity to tweak the settings in the preferred way.
>>
>> I would like to propose to integrate this change and test it how well it
>> works.
>>
>> Any opinions? Well keep in mind it is a minimal enhancement to make use
>> of what we already have. There is still room for improvements ...
>>
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~jsc/test/encryption_aes256_odf12.png
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Please remove me from this mailing list

[Jessica Marley]

Thank you

Re: Openoffice V 4.1.0 --problems

[FR web forum]

See this: 
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=69620&hilit=1316

- Mail original -
De: "Lewis Frazee" 
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 9 Mai 2014 07:13:26
Objet: Openoffice V 4.1.0 --problems

Dear Sir.
I want to let you know that I can't load OpenOffice 4.1.0.
Get a Error message  "Error 1316.A network error occurred while attempting
to read from the File C:\windows\installer\openoffice401.msi"

I am using a desk top computer with windows 8.1.
I have OpenOffice 4.0.1 working now with no problems.
Have been using OpenOffice for at least 10 years.
Works good.

Checking my files I found that openoffice401.msi was not in the 
folder C:\windows\installer.
I was able to copy the file openoffice401.msi from the desk top folder
to  C:\windows\installer.
I tried to install the program Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
again and got the same error message.

Is this a Windows 8.1 problem or what?

Thank You 
Lewis



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL][RELEASE]: remove 4.1.0 beta from Sourceforge and from Aapche dist

[Jürgen Schmidt]

On 4/30/14 8:19 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 30/04/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 04/30/2014 09:33 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>>> removing 4.1 Beta from dist is natural but I would like to propose that
>>> we drop remove the 4.1 beta from the SF server as well.
>>> Any opinions?
>> a beta (or any other pre-release build) has a defined date of expiry and
>> shouldn't be used after this.
>> So +1 to delete from every mirror server.
> 
> I agree we should remove it both from dist and from SF.

done

> 
>> *Maybe* we can save it (or just a few files) on the archive for
>> historical reasons. ;-)
> 
> We voted on 4.1.0-beta. This makes it a release we should archive. Our
> archive at
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.0-beta/
> already has the source and all checksums. Binary files are missing. They
> should be moved there too for completeness. And then we can forget about
> the beta.

the problem is that I made a mistake and that the binaries are not
longer available on the server. Because it is very time consuming and
the binaries are for convenience only I will not upload them again. We
should delete the checksum files for the binaries as well and should
keep the src release only.

Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO Post 4.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!

[Yuzhen Fan]

Hi Maryna,

Thanks for your continuously help, I have assigned you 4 test cases on
Ubuntu Linux 64bit.


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Maryna Martynenko wrote:

> Hi Yu Zhen,
>
> My TestLink Id : Maryna. I can test Win 8, Ubuntu 64bit.
>
> Regards,
> Maryna
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have released AOO 4.1 successfully on Apr 29 with voting, but we still
> > have some test cases not completed during 4.1 stage, in order to check
> the
> > post 4.1 quality status, here comes the call for volunteers on AOO post
> 4.1
> > testing.
> >
> > If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux
> Redhat
> > 64bit, Linux Redhat 32bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7 and
> > Windows 8, please send a note to the QA mailing list (
> > q...@openoffice.apache.org).   If you have a Testlink account[1] send your
> > ID
> > as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink
> > account, you can register one).   You should also get installation sets
> > from trunk [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3].  You may want to see
> > detail instructions in Test Guidence [4].
> >
> > [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php
> > [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
> > [4]
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance
> >
> > Thanks!
> >  --
> > Regards,
> > Yu Zhen
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Re: AOO Post 4.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!

[Yuzhen Fan]

Hi Maryna,

I have just assigned you 23 test cases on Windows 8.


On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:

> Hi Maryna,
>
> Thanks for your continuously help, I have assigned you 4 test cases on
> Ubuntu Linux 64bit.
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Maryna Martynenko wrote:
>
>> Hi Yu Zhen,
>>
>> My TestLink Id : Maryna. I can test Win 8, Ubuntu 64bit.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maryna
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Yuzhen Fan  wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > We have released AOO 4.1 successfully on Apr 29 with voting, but we
>> still
>> > have some test cases not completed during 4.1 stage, in order to check
>> the
>> > post 4.1 quality status, here comes the call for volunteers on AOO post
>> 4.1
>> > testing.
>> >
>> > If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux
>> Redhat
>> > 64bit, Linux Redhat 32bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7 and
>> > Windows 8, please send a note to the QA mailing list (
>> > q...@openoffice.apache.org).   If you have a Testlink account[1] send
>> your
>> > ID
>> > as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink
>> > account, you can register one).   You should also get installation sets
>> > from trunk [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3].  You may want to see
>> > detail instructions in Test Guidence [4].
>> >
>> > [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php
>> > [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
>> > [4]
>> >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >  --
>> > Regards,
>> > Yu Zhen
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen