Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks. -- SOLVED
Mark Haney wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:00:20 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: # yum install yum-utils # package-cleanup --problems Clean them up and run # yum update Rahul I can do that, but it does not explain the yum update output for PHP as compared to the RPM query of PHP. How can I tell if I'm getting the correct repos (maybe $releasever is being substituted incorrectly in yum somehow). Run "rpm -q fedora-release" and also "yum clean metadata" once your repository baseurls are verified. And I meant $releasever not $basearch in my other reply. :) I actually had fedora-release-8 RPM still on the box. Hopefully removing that will fix it. That release RPM did it. That was the culprit, I'm not able to get all my F9 updates. Thanks guys. -- Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:00:20 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: # yum install yum-utils # package-cleanup --problems Clean them up and run # yum update Rahul I can do that, but it does not explain the yum update output for PHP as compared to the RPM query of PHP. How can I tell if I'm getting the correct repos (maybe $releasever is being substituted incorrectly in yum somehow). Run "rpm -q fedora-release" and also "yum clean metadata" once your repository baseurls are verified. And I meant $releasever not $basearch in my other reply. :) I actually had fedora-release-8 RPM still on the box. Hopefully removing that will fix it. -- Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:11:20 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:50:26 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > > > >> Here's what I see. It all points to F9 repos: > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] yum.repos.d]# yum repolist > >> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit > >> repo id repo name status > >> InstallMedia Fedora 8 enabled > >> adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporatedenabled > >> fedora Fedora 9 - i386 enabled > >> updates Fedora 9 - i386 - Updates enabled > >> > >> Except the InstallMedia one. Could that be the problem? > > > > Careful here. That explains nothing. $basearch in your *.repo files > > is also in the "repo name" field, but the repo baseurl could be > > hardcoded to point to Fedora 8 updates. Do check your *.repo files > > at a lower level, _not_ with yum repolist. > > > > Well, I did take a look at them manually and they /look/ okay. I just > can't tell for certain is $releasever is being inserted as '8' instead > of '9' somehow. Unlikely, because above in "yum repolist" $releasever is 9 for two repo names. Unless everything is hardcoded ;-) and the InstallMedia repo is based on $releasever=8. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
Mark Haney wrote: Well, I did take a look at them manually and they /look/ okay. I just can't tell for certain is $releasever is being inserted as '8' instead of '9' somehow. That value is derived from /etc/fedora-release. If you are still unsure, substituting the variable with a hardcoded number would work for now. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:50:26 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: Here's what I see. It all points to F9 repos: [EMAIL PROTECTED] yum.repos.d]# yum repolist Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit repo id repo name status InstallMedia Fedora 8 enabled adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporatedenabled fedora Fedora 9 - i386 enabled updates Fedora 9 - i386 - Updates enabled Except the InstallMedia one. Could that be the problem? Careful here. That explains nothing. $basearch in your *.repo files is also in the "repo name" field, but the repo baseurl could be hardcoded to point to Fedora 8 updates. Do check your *.repo files at a lower level, _not_ with yum repolist. Well, I did take a look at them manually and they /look/ okay. I just can't tell for certain is $releasever is being inserted as '8' instead of '9' somehow. -- Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:00:20 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > > # yum install yum-utils > > # package-cleanup --problems > > > > Clean them up and run > > > > # yum update > > > > Rahul > > > > I can do that, but it does not explain the yum update output for PHP as > compared to the RPM query of PHP. How can I tell if I'm getting the > correct repos (maybe $releasever is being substituted incorrectly in yum > somehow). Run "rpm -q fedora-release" and also "yum clean metadata" once your repository baseurls are verified. And I meant $releasever not $basearch in my other reply. :) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:50:26 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > Here's what I see. It all points to F9 repos: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] yum.repos.d]# yum repolist > Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit > repo id repo name status > InstallMedia Fedora 8 enabled > adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporatedenabled > fedora Fedora 9 - i386 enabled > updates Fedora 9 - i386 - Updates enabled > > Except the InstallMedia one. Could that be the problem? Careful here. That explains nothing. $basearch in your *.repo files is also in the "repo name" field, but the repo baseurl could be hardcoded to point to Fedora 8 updates. Do check your *.repo files at a lower level, _not_ with yum repolist. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
Mark Haney wrote: I can do that, but it does not explain the yum update output for PHP as compared to the RPM query of PHP. How can I tell if I'm getting the correct repos (maybe $releasever is being substituted incorrectly in yum somehow). If #yum repolist points to Fedora 9 repositories completely, you shouldn't have any problems. Yum can use -d to provide additional debugging information but simply disabling the Fedora 8 repositories and running the commands I have given should fix this issue. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
Rahul Sundaram wrote: Mark Haney wrote: Here's what I see. It all points to F9 repos: [EMAIL PROTECTED] yum.repos.d]# yum repolist Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit repo id repo name status InstallMedia Fedora 8 enabled adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporatedenabled fedora Fedora 9 - i386 enabled updates Fedora 9 - i386 - Updates enabled Except the InstallMedia one. Could that be the problem? Yes. Disable or remove that repository file and then run # yum install yum-utils # package-cleanup --problems Clean them up and run # yum update Rahul I can do that, but it does not explain the yum update output for PHP as compared to the RPM query of PHP. How can I tell if I'm getting the correct repos (maybe $releasever is being substituted incorrectly in yum somehow). -- Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
Mark Haney wrote: Here's what I see. It all points to F9 repos: [EMAIL PROTECTED] yum.repos.d]# yum repolist Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit repo id repo name status InstallMedia Fedora 8 enabled adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporatedenabled fedora Fedora 9 - i386 enabled updates Fedora 9 - i386 - Updates enabled Except the InstallMedia one. Could that be the problem? Yes. Disable or remove that repository file and then run # yum install yum-utils # package-cleanup --problems Clean them up and run # yum update Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
Mark Haney wrote: Chris Jones wrote: Have you checked your yum configuration files to see if they now point to fc9 repos ? From what 'yum update php' gives you it seems like perhaps it is still looking at fc8 repos ... Chris No, I haven't. But why would they do that after the upgrade? I'll check'em, but that would be a weird problem to see after an upgrade. Here's what I see. It all points to F9 repos: [EMAIL PROTECTED] yum.repos.d]# yum repolist Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit repo id repo name status InstallMedia Fedora 8 enabled adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporatedenabled fedora Fedora 9 - i386 enabled updates Fedora 9 - i386 - Updates enabled Except the InstallMedia one. Could that be the problem? -- Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
Chris Jones wrote: So, it looks to me like I have F9 packages installed (at v5.2.5-7) but that the /updated/ php version is 5.2.6-2 F8? I'm getting the feeling this upgrade wasn't as complete as the GUI told me it was. Now, what do I do to fix this? Have you checked your yum configuration files to see if they now point to fc9 repos ? From what 'yum update php' gives you it seems like perhaps it is still looking at fc8 repos ... Chris No, I haven't. But why would they do that after the upgrade? I'll check'em, but that would be a weird problem to see after an upgrade. -- Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
So, it looks to me like I have F9 packages installed (at v5.2.5-7) but that the /updated/ php version is 5.2.6-2 F8? I'm getting the feeling this upgrade wasn't as complete as the GUI told me it was. Now, what do I do to fix this? Have you checked your yum configuration files to see if they now point to fc9 repos ? From what 'yum update php' gives you it seems like perhaps it is still looking at fc8 repos ... Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: F8 -> F9 rpms -- Complete bollocks.
Mark Haney wrote: I mean it doesn't even look like there are F9 equivalents for various F8 packages I would call 'important' like fedora-usermgmt-shadow-utils. Part of the problem is that yum update completely implodes with dependency problems because of these legacy RPMs. I know some of them have F9 equivalents that were installed, but not all. I'm still working on a way to grep for all the packages that have both F8 and F9 on that system so I can remove the older ones. So, can someone explain to me why this is so? Or give me a way to find the duplicate packages a little more painlessly and dumping the rpm db into a file and manually looking for them? Okay, I have more information on this. I think my rpmdb is completely FUBAR. This is what I'm seeing when I 'yum update php' (for example) ependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Updating: php i386 5.2.6-2.fc8 updates 1.2 M php-cli i386 5.2.6-2.fc8 updates 2.4 M php-common i386 5.2.6-2.fc8 updates 227 k php-ldapi386 5.2.6-2.fc8 updates 30 k php-mysql i386 5.2.6-2.fc8 updates 79 k php-odbci386 5.2.6-2.fc8 updates 47 k php-pdo i386 5.2.6-2.fc8 updates 61 k Installing for dependencies: openssl i386 0.9.8b-17.fc8fedora 1.4 M Note, all these are FC8 updates (apparently). Now, when I query rpm for php packages I get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] temp]# rpm -qa | grep php php-5.2.5-7.fc9.i386 php-ldap-5.2.5-7.fc9.i386 php-odbc-5.2.5-7.fc9.i386 php-pdo-5.2.5-7.fc9.i386 php-mysql-5.2.5-7.fc9.i386 php-cli-5.2.5-7.fc9.i386 php-common-5.2.5-7.fc9.i386 So, it looks to me like I have F9 packages installed (at v5.2.5-7) but that the /updated/ php version is 5.2.6-2 F8? I'm getting the feeling this upgrade wasn't as complete as the GUI told me it was. Now, what do I do to fix this? -- Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
F8 -> F9 rpms
Most of you know I've had wireless card problems recently and decided to upgrade that box from F8 to F9 to see if this fixed some of that. Well it seems to have fixed /some/ but not all. At this stage I"m content with it as is as far as the wireless goes, since it's up and I"m in the middle of using it to test a new GigE circuit we're bringing up for my office. But, what bothers me now is the extraordinary number of F8 packages left on the box after the upgrade. I don't use 3rd party repos, so that's not really an issue. But what I don't get is, is that SOP for this upgrade? To have lots of F8 packages left? I mean it doesn't even look like there are F9 equivalents for various F8 packages I would call 'important' like fedora-usermgmt-shadow-utils. Part of the problem is that yum update completely implodes with dependency problems because of these legacy RPMs. I know some of them have F9 equivalents that were installed, but not all. I'm still working on a way to grep for all the packages that have both F8 and F9 on that system so I can remove the older ones. So, can someone explain to me why this is so? Or give me a way to find the duplicate packages a little more painlessly and dumping the rpm db into a file and manually looking for them? -- Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
