why not 2.6.32-573.7.1 ?
Hi, why the kernel 2.6.32-573.7.1 had never been released for SL6 ? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1827.html It was for Centos 6 also Thanks smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: php 5.5
Hi you can use one of this repositories http://rpms.famillecollet.com/enterprise/7/ or https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/php55/ Le mercredi 23 septembre 2015 à 12:03 +0200, Ralf Farke a écrit : > Hi, > is there a way to get php 5.5 for Scientific Linux 7.1? > > Thanks and greetings, > > Ralf Farke smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: SL6 & firefox 31
Le 30/10/2014 14:03, Akemi Yagi a écrit : On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Matthieu Guionnet wrote: Hi, where can we find the rpm for this security update ? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1635.html Thanks. It is in the sl-testing repository. Akemi thanks for this. I tested quickly this testing rpm. yum update --repoenable=sl-testing firefox thunderbird I'm not that it'll help but firefox and thunderbird failed on startup even with -safe-mode and SE permissive /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so: undefined symbol: gdk_window_get_visual [19466] ###!!! ABORT: Aborting on channel error.: file /builddir/build/BUILD/firefox-31.2.0/mozilla-esr31/ipc/glue/MessageChannel.cpp, line 1533 [19466] ###!!! ABORT: Aborting on channel error.: file /builddir/build/BUILD/firefox-31.2.0/mozilla-esr31/ipc/glue/MessageChannel.cpp, line 1533
SL6 & firefox 31
Hi, where can we find the rpm for this security update ? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1635.html Thanks. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Nautilus respawning to infinity
Le 04/02/2014 04:52, John H. Outlan a écrit : Several of us over at the forum are having a nautilus problem. Nautilus is respawning non stop and filling the window list on bottom panel. Some with update, some with clean 6.5 x64 install. Here's the forum link: http://scientificlinuxforum.org/index.php?act=ST&f=5&t=2634&st=0#entry17238 ~~ John H. Outlan CPA Orlando, FL USA cell (407) 924-2727 fax (321) 422-5717 web: http://outlancpa.com web: http://scientificlinuxforum.org Hi, I confirm the reason and the (temporary) solution. It's due to the last librsvg2 update After a yum downgrade librsvg2, Nautilus closes all the listed windows on bottom panel Matthieu.
Re: What happened to adobe repository ?
evince by default (gnome). okular, the viewer for kde desktop can be use too. both are mush more faster than adobe reader... Le mercredi 15 janvier 2014 à 11:44 +0100, Jean-Michel Barbet a écrit : > On 01/15/2014 11:20 AM, Urs Beyerle wrote: > > > Adobe discontinued the Adobe Reader 9 for Linux in June 2013 and has not > > fixed and will not fix any further security issues in it. Therefore it > > makes totally sense to remove it from their repo. > > Thank you Urs, > > OK, that's clear. What are the alternatives on the SL worksation ? > > JM > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: What happened to adobe repository ?
Nothings They just don't want you to see all the files in this directory. yum doesn't need to. It will access to this url http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/repodata/repomd.xml and access directly to the install and update RPM files given in the others urls (primary.xml.gz for example here). Have a nice day. Le mercredi 15 janvier 2014 à 08:45 +0100, Jean-Michel Barbet a écrit : > Hello, > > In SL we can install the package "adobe-release" which installs the > repository definition /etc/yum.repos.d/adobe-linux-i386.repo but it > looks like this repository is no longer accessible. When I try to > open http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/ with a browser, I get : > > Forbidden > You don't have permission to access /linux/i386/ on this server. > > Any idea what is going on ? > > Thank you > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Software Collections 1.0 is available for testing for SL 6
thanks for this very good news ! the repository is sl-testing ! does it mean that it'll be later on main repo sl ? Why you don't create a new repo like you've done for devtoolset ? A choice from RedHat ? Will you need some (good) fell-back on a specific mailing-list ? Thanks again Le mardi 24 septembre 2013 à 18:17 -0500, Connie Sieh a écrit : > The following "software collection" products are now available for testing > for > SL 6. Use "--enablerepo=sl-testing" to enable yum to access these products. > More info on these products is available at > > http://developerblog.redhat.com/2013/09/12/rhscl1-ga/ > > https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Developer_Guide/chap-RHSCL.html > > A Redhat webinar about software collections is available tommorow. Info > is at > > http://developerblog.redhat.com/2013/09/13/webinar-technical-intro-to-red-hat-software-collections/ > > mariadb55 > mysql55 > nodejs010 > perl516 > php54 > postgresql92 > python27 > python33 > ruby193 > > -Connie Sieh smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
