Re: [RCSE] Finishing a glass wing??
I've seen lots unfinished. Don't think it is a structural issue. I have always sealed the raw edges on my wings mostly for protection from moisture. Flying contests you may get caught in the rain. It would take a little while for the water to get into the foam but I like the extra protection from the elements. Of course coating those raw edges will add some weight. Later... Lee Cox wrote: > > I would like to hear some of the pros and cons about > whether or not the edges of the ailerons / flaps & > back side of wing should be finished or left as open > foam. > It seems to me that if edges are sealed with > (glass-epoxy or?? )it would structurally be a stronger > wing and would help to stop any twist. I see a lot of > wings unfinished. HELP!!! LEE > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] "A Case of reading and understanding".
I, and I think Gordy, was referring to the 60's meaning and not the plane. I have a Red Herring and really like it. Especially as a small close in slope plane. It turns on a dime. ... Dick Barker wrote: > > >. > >As for 'Red Herrings' I've seen Gordy after a weekend of contesting. He > >looked pretty 'Red' to me and as far as the 'Herring' part, he didn't > >smell too good either. > >.. > > I think "red Herring" is (r) to tgworks.com and has nothing to do > with the 1960s catch phrase. > -- > Dick Barker > Seattle, WA > - Turning HLG Around - > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Mantis ballast question
You should make up a few lighter ballast slug of the same weight. Say two 3 oz slugs. When you want more you just add the two lighter ones both front and back. That adds another 6 oz. If you have another set of 6 oz slugs for front and back that add another 6 oz. So you can add 6, 12, or 18 oz. Max you could add and still stay at the same CG would be one 10 oz in the center and two 6 oz front and back. That's 22 oz. HOW MUCH BALLAST DO YOU WANT TO ADD I don't know anybody flying a Mantis that adds that much to get penetration. Don't think that much is needed. But then that is here on the East Coast. Winds usually stay under 20 or so. I think I heard Phil Barnes say he doesn't add more than about 12oz in most condition. Marta Zavala wrote: > > Have a Mantis ballast question. It was super windy at the Spring > Fling in Sacramento this weekend. After about the second round > yesterday I was doomed > as it got so windy I could not make it out far enough to "slope" the > tree line. I opted not to fly the second day due to lack of > penetration. The way the Mantis ballast is set up, three holes, one > 10oz slug over cg, one 10oz slug > in front of cg and one 6oz slug behind cg, I dont see how one can use > more than > the one 10oz slug over the cg. Adding the other slugs seems like it > would take some major rebalancing before flying. Sure could have used > more than the one 10oz slug yesterday, have any of you used the entire > balance capability(roughly 24-26 oz??) and if so could you please tell > me how it worked out- did you have to > rebalance plane- seems to me you would have to add a bunch of weight > in tail with fully ballasted plane. Thanks, Walter RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #2756
Slegers originally sold the Prizm, then NSP took over after that. I have a Spectrum I bought from Slegers many years ago. Had a midair that trashed one wing and I replaced them with a set of Prizm wings. Flew well and I still have it. Natural finished obeechi wings much harder to see than the Victory carbon bottom finish ones I now fly. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > One of my old Northeast Sailplanes catalogs shows 3 Prisms, including a > "Prism Racer" slope plane, and the 2V and 2T thermal planes. It says it > was originally designed by Ron Vann, and NSP bought the the rights to mfg it. > > At 02:14 AM 6/22/01 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Hello, > > > >Can someone please tell me about a Prism? Who designed and mfg. the > kit? > > Has it done well? > > > >TIA, > > > >Christopher, in Omaha > >RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" > and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Brett Jaffee: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Brett's Slope and Power Home Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~jaffee > OnTheWay Quake 2 server utility: http://www.planetquake.com/ontheway > The Unoffical Extra 300 Home Page: http://members.nbci.com/bjaffee/extra300/ > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] rule clarifications
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Rick, > Both your questions are answered in 10.2.2b,1. and 2., The time stops 10 > seconds > after loss of sight. And then the ten seconds is deducted from the time shown on the watch. So the time is adjusted to the time the plane was last seen. > If the plane hit the upper small leaves and twigs of a tree, but > continues > to fly to the ground or landing circle, the time does not stop. The AMA rule does state that the time stops if the plane comes into contact with a ground based object, and specifically includes trees. In > the case > of handing the tranny to the timer, time stops then, not 10 seconds > later. The flight is scored a zero if tranny is handed over to anyone, at anytime, during a flight. > I'll throw a little fodder in to this now. Check rule 10.2.2.e, > hugely > violated by almost all of us. Never even covered in the pilot's > meeting > either. With a few exceptions I'm sure. The rule of 'no time to be given in the last 10 seconds by the official timer' has been discussed here before and I'm not sure what the concensus was. I do not like to hear the time in the last few seconds of the flight. After lining up and starting the final leg I usually concentrate more on trying to hit the tape than fine tuning to the second the touchdown. Therefore I tell me timer to quit on the time after I get set up on final. > > Food for thought > Thermals > Jerry Miller, CD > SOSS-Medford, OR RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] rule clarifications
I think you are confusing two different incidents. One was where the timer had to take over the flight. It was scored a zero. The other was where someone lost sight of the plane. I think they finally did regain sight and continue to fly but a bit disconcerting to hear the timer counting off the seconds. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Rick, > Both your questions are answered in 10.2.2b,1. and 2., the contest a > month > ago, the guy was robbed if it was counted as a 0. The time stops 10 > seconds > after loss of sight. > If the plane hit the upper small leaves and twigs of a tree, but > continues > to fly to the ground or landing circle, the time does not stop. In > the case > of handing the tranny to the timer, time stops then, not 10 seconds > later. > I'll throw a little fodder in to this now. Check rule 10.2.2.e, > hugely > violated by almost all of us. Never even covered in the pilot's > meeting > either. With a few exceptions I'm sure. > > Food for thought > Thermals > Jerry Miller, CD > SOSS-Medford, OR RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Mantis - Psy-Antis???
I wouldn't refer to this as a "Psy-Antis", as this is Terry's nicer looking molded version of a Mantis fuse with a slip on nose cone. I think of these planes more as a "Mantis 'ala Luckenbaugh'". I've seen a couple of guys flying these now, Terry's fuse design with Mantis wings, at the last ESL contest. Terry's fuse design is very nice compared to the bare bones carbon rod and small nose pod. It's got the wing pylon molded right in too, rather than having to assemble the pylon to the carbon rod. There are more of these to come I'm sure, as a number of flyers have gotten Terry's fuse to use with their Mantis wings and tails. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What am I currently working on? A Psy-Antis. Its a set of Mantis > wings and > tail feathers with a Terry Luchanbach fuselage which is similar to the > mantis > pod and boom fuse but with a psycho ish nose and cone versus the blob. > Why > the scientist? > Just in the mood to do some building :-) > > Gordy RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] thermaling hawks
I do not believe that thermaling birds, including the Redtail Hawk has a preference of direction to cicle in a thermal. One reason that I think this is the fact that I have observed what is referred to as 'kettles', large groups of 50 or more hawks in a thermal, usually during the fall migration. If what you say was true, most if not all, these birds would be cicling in the same direction. They do not. Many birds, in the same thermal, will be circling in both directions. I do know an 'expert' birder named Scott Weidensal??(spelling) who has written many books about hawks and migrating birds, and I will definately try to run this past him. Also I will be making a greater effort in the future, when watching vultures and hawks thermal, to pay very close attention to which direction they are thermaling. Daniel Boyer wrote: > No, not all birds obey this "rule of thumb" all the time, but we are trying > to look at the big picture, not exception... I am sure the Turkey Vultures > have a reason for not always turning left...maybe because their wings allow > them to do right turns in a left turning thermal, but "most birds will turn > counter-clockwise, in the Northern Hemisphere, with the thermal" (a quote > from a handout that was a page copied from a textbook, which was handed out > during one of the lectures that I sat in on this past semester.) I'm not > saying I'm an expert (I'm a molecular biologist), just restating what I was > told by people that I consider experts... (I do know that all the red tailed > hawks I have watched, over the past year, always thermal turn to the > left...JME) > > Daniel RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Rubber Duck Range and range check?
Gordy, Does it matter why Matt had the problem? He apparently had no problem with the stock antenna at his field. When using another type antenna he did have a problem. Weather it was a tuning problem or not his particular setup did not do as well. I used a Smiley Rubber Duck antenna with no problems on a Futaba 8UAF. During some combat a plane hit me and my radio and broke off the adapter so I went back to the stock antenna. The problem I had with the Rubber Duck installed is there was no good way to do a range check. If you removed the antenna at the BNC connector you had almost no range at all. With the 8UAF there is just a short wire that connects the plastic adapter to the regular antenna pickup inside the Tx. My question is this. Is there a way to do a range check with a Rubber Duck antenna setup on the 8UAF or other radios? I liked using it. I had no precieved range problem with the one I had installed on my Tx but I couldn't ever do a range check! Maybe I'm missing something. Anybody tell me how they accomplish a range check with a Rubber Duck antenna setup?? Thanks Ed Berris wrote: > I just finished reading it and like Gordy, I am amazed at the way some > of you have translated what was said. > In a message dated 4/23/01 12:10:33 PM Canada Central > Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: First > time out for TD, I found a corner of our field in Syossett, > LI in which I > lost control of my ship TWICE, and barely recovered to bring > it on home. > > Okay Matt, > > Explain why you had the problem? > Gordy RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Glider Terms
Robert Bingham wrote: What are your definitions > for: > thumbs > ...put your funny bone on high rates... Thumbs- as in, use for glider guiding. Something only to be used in conjunction with at least one, preferably two other fingers, on the primary(aileron,elevator) stick At your disgretion, may be used alone on the secondary stick(flap,rudder) RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Fwd: Re: [RCSE] Good, Bad DGLs]
This question was really for posting to the list since I am not the one wanting answers and opinions to this question. Anyone else caring to reply, please do so to the list. I think Craig has a valid point. Thanks Rick, It's really to early to tell. I've busted a couple recently but am throwing pretty hard and the designs are still being perfected. Unfortunately with stuff this new some customers are going to be part of the research team and may break the odd airplane before the gliders are optimised. Craig. - Original Message - From: Rick Brown and Jill Wiest To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 9:01 PM Subject: [RCSE] Good, Bad DGLs All, Since some interested parties out there don't like the answers I amgiving, can some with a good base of DLG experience chime in. I am not interested in DLG's at this time but I guess the question fromthose who intend to purchase is... Are there any DLG designs to be avoided or that are know to be sub-par?Any with know structural defects or problems?Later...LaterRCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] just another negative post
B R wrote: > > Fuck the mold maker, how dose it feel to be out of the > closet as a dumb fuck? > > --- Rick Brown and Jill Wiest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > B R wrote: > > > > > Hey buddy, welcome back to the list. Got the name of > > that mold maker? > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane > > News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests > > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Good, Bad DGLs
All, Since some interested parties out there don't like the answers I am giving, can some with a good base of DLG experience chime in. I am not interested in DLG's at this time but I guess the question from those who intend to purchase is... Are there any DLG designs to be avoided or that are know to be sub-par? Any with know structural defects or problems? Later... Later RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] DLG learning curve
B R wrote: > Hey buddy, welcome back to the list. Got the name of that mold maker? RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] DLG learning curve
Don't know the plane. Couldn't recognize the pilot in a line up. And the tale of the battery and the fuse is just that. The point is that saying a plane broke in use is not good info. If you find out that over time many of a particular design has had structural failures that means something. An isolated event means nothing. Many good planes are going to be broken by bad throwing technique in the coming year. GOOD planes, BAD technique. That's all. Maybe you should ask the 'father of DLG' how many planes he has broken learning to throw discus style. Later... Robert J wrote: > > Okay I give? Who is the pilot? > You say you were there, saw it happen, know that there > may have been a 25+ lbs. battery thrown on the fuse, > could have structural failure due to misplaced > battery, you know all this but dont know the name or > if this is a commercially sold plane? Again it is > becoming obvious that you are holding back > information. > > --- Rick Brown and Jill Wiest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert J wrote: > > what you are saying it is pilot error?\ > > > > > > Most broken airplanes are pilot error. I've seen > > many a good javelin > > launch plane break on launch. Design/structural > > problem? Most times it's > > throwing technique. Is it any differnent for DLG? I > > think any plane CAN > > be broken if you try hard enough. > > > > > So? Is this a commercial dlg? You seem to be > > avoiding > > > the question? > > > > Not sure if this plane had a name yet. You'd have to > > talk to the pilot > > for the plane name and also the history of this > > particular plane. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] positive postings please!
Paul, et al, I don't think that anyone posting to a list should post things not intended for general comsumption. And eveyone, when posting, should really try to keep it on a positive note. Paul Klissner wrote: > > Rick Brown and Jill Wiest wrote: > > > > Oh, so sorry Paul. Didn't realize that with all the talk about freedom > > of speech that you were keeping your comments private. > > You know damned well if it was meant for RCSE it would > not have been sent to you alone. Oh well. Its your credibility, > not mine. If you want to be the Linda Tripp of RCSE, be my guest. > > I'd rather be known as someone who complained a bit much, > than as a hypocrit who could not be trusted. > > I won't stop you from forwarding this, or would it not serve > your ulterior motives? I mean why would I intend this to be > anymore private than the last? Anyway, anyone who was paying > any attention knows your true colors now anyway. > > I know people who complain, but are honest. I may not like everything > about their style, but underneath it all, I know they believe in what > they are saying, and may even be conveying something of value. > But more importantly, I can respect their character. > > With you, I can appreciatea few of your fine words. > But beneath it all, I can see that you're a weasel, > a liar and a traitor.Now if someone were to put values on > all of these things, what I have done, and you, I'm afraid > you'd go down in the losers hall of fame. > > Personally, I wouldn't forward this, but if you must > I guess I can't stop you. > > -Paul RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] all this chat about chargers???
James V. Bacus wrote: > > A wall wart is like my 3rd or 4th line back up. Had to go check on > the UL thing, it appears my Japan Radio wall wart is not UL approved. > 8-) (There, Dr K didn't have to say it but I knew what he was saying > anyway.) > Jim Not sure what Japan brand you may have or how old it may be. Just had to check my wall chargers, Futaba, all had UL stamp. RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Mantis Thread
Quiet Man wrote: > These are simply MY OPINIONS AND MY IMPRESSIONS. > YOU should go do whatever the hell you want, > unless of course you would like your name on a > T-shirt someday. > > John Roe > AHHH. Show me a man with his name on his shirt, and I'll show you a man that can't remember his own name... Or, has a need for every one else to know and remember it. I think I've had just about enough of this 'Ugly' talk. Just my opinion. RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Mold maker
Stanley B. Koch wrote: > > What is this mold-maker's address? Thanks...STAN Sorry Stan, and any other's that may be interested in this info. I am not the one who knows who this 'mold maker' is that Brian is referring to in his message below. I have ask him for the info but he has not passed it along to me. He did, in one of his most recent posts, offer to give out the guys e-mail address to anyone on the list who wanted it. The mold maker is to be from PA. I was interested for a friend and for the fact that I live in PA also. Apparently the guy does very good work and at a resonable price. I requested of him to put it out there but haven't seen anything yet. I am sending this message to him since I know he unsubscribed from the list and would not have gotten your request for the info. You out there Brian. Got that e-mail address. Later Stan, Brian, RB > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Brown and Jill Wiest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:16 PM > To: B R > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [RCSE] Mold maker > > You could post any info you have about a mold maker out there on the > list as I'm sure there would be other's interested in finding a good > source for molds. > > I'm sure other's would appreciate this info. > > Thanks, > RB > > B R wrote: > > > > I had a guy build my mold and he also molded several > > fuses for me. I must say I am very happy with the > > price, I didn't have to deal with this or any of the > > molding problems you are having. I can give you his > > Email address if you or anyone on the list needs a > > mold made at a reasonable price. Can't say he has the > > time to do it since he dose a couple of molds that are > > the most popular h/l planes offered on the list today. > > You have to understand his molds are so good that a > > mold can produce a lot of money if you plan on using > > it for production. I had my mold made and fuse's > > laid-up and have the mold, I paid shipping for > > everything of course. > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" > and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and > "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Mold maker
You could post any info you have about a mold maker out there on the list as I'm sure there would be other's interested in finding a good source for molds. I'm sure other's would appreciate this info. Thanks, RB B R wrote: > > I had a guy build my mold and he also molded several > fuses for me. I must say I am very happy with the > price, I didn't have to deal with this or any of the > molding problems you are having. I can give you his > Email address if you or anyone on the list needs a > mold made at a reasonable price. Can't say he has the > time to do it since he dose a couple of molds that are > the most popular h/l planes offered on the list today. > You have to understand his molds are so good that a > mold can produce a lot of money if you plan on using > it for production. I had my mold made and fuse's > laid-up and have the mold, I paid shipping for > everything of course. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Servo damage? Just wondering :-)
Oh Yeah. Gordy whines with the best of them too. He IS an EXPERT when it comes to w(h)inning. RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Why did you go the RCSE instead of contacting Karlton at MPX first? > That's rhetorical, as in doesn't deserve an answer! > > > Gordy > 70 in Tampa today > Working on my excuses, er I mean resons for the results of this > weekends > contest results. RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Servo damage?
About a year ago I had a problem with some HS-205MG Hitec servos, or so I thought! On landing they would seem to find a new center. I would retrim and center them and the next hard, flap dragging landing would have them out of whack again. I though something was moving/slipping internally in the servos. The problem was actually my fault. I had replaced the stock servo horns with Futaba brand horns, what I though was the same fit to the splines on the output shaft of the Hitec servos. It was in fact just slightly oversized. It held up fine to normal flight loads and seemed fine when putting pressure on them by hand, but on hard landings where I didn't get the flaps up quick enough it would jump a position and end up out of center. After finding the problem I replaced the horns with stock Hitec horns and have had no problems since. Check that the horns are not moving on the spline under extreme shock loads like when dragging the flaps on landing. RB Tom Seitz wrote: > > After a fairly hard landing, I noticed that both of my flaps remained > deflected several degrees when I returned them back to neutral. I seems > something internal to the servos has permanently moved the neutral > location. The servos seem to work fine, no slop or noise. Should I > just subtrim them and not worry, or has some damage been done? The > servos are Multiplex mcv2 digitals. > > Tom Seitz > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Orlando?? Gordy??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I just hope he(Gordy) brings his own planes, I don't want to hear him cry about not > being familiar with the plane. Rich Come on Rich. Let him cry. You know he cries s gd. NOBODY cries as good as Gordy. RB RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Excitement at aerotow event today
Someone once told me that it is not the span of a plane so much as the viewable width dimension of the wing that makes it able to be seen easily. Like the way a plane can become near invisible to the eye as it flys directly toward or away from you. Still the same span but very hard to see. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 02/18/2001 7:34:40 PM Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Can anyone see a 5.33 meter plane at 3400 feet ? Mike > > I seem to recall that human eyes can resolve one minute of arc, so the 17 > minutes of arc subtended by 5.33 meters at 3400 feet is well within that > range. Theoretically, you could see a 1 foot disc at that distance, though > I'd imagine atmospheric effects may diminish that (I'd probably have wished > I'd reined in my HLG before it got that high :) > > Bill Wingstedt > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Patton P-51B flys
Thanks to those that posted info on the Patton Aircraft P51B a few weeks ago. I had completed it last evening and took it out in some decent conditions today at Chickies Rock here in Central PA. Nice sunny day, after a storm yesterday and evening that left behind about 5 to 6 inches of snow. West wind about 15 - 20. The P-51B weighed in at 33 oz for a loading of 12oz/sq.ft. I used two HS-85MG servos side by side burried in the fuse using the supplied torque rods instead of mounting them out in the wing panels. Same weight as one std. servo. Used 3/16" thick balsa instead of the coroplast for tails. I have to agree with Steve on the above two items, gives a nice clean look rather than the rods hangin out in the open. One std. servo for the elevator and a Hitec 555 RX with a 4 cell 600AE battery pack. Needed about 1 3/4oz lead in the nose to balance. Cut in a hatch for the Rx to be able to accesss it if I want to change crystals or remove it without butchering the fuse. I set two tubes into the fuse to route the antenna. One down the length of the fuse side and another back up the underside of the fuse to the wing. This allowed the antenna to be fed back to the tail and back up the underside and leave no exposed antenna hanging loose. Test flights were a bit less than anticipated. All in all, it flew well, but the bigger P-51B didn't quite live up to my expectations for speed. I have a Mini P51 by Patton and it flys very fast. Maybe it has spoiled me. Checked the wing to tail and it is very close to zero incidence, maybe just a 1/2 degree positive. I have the CG just a little behind what is called out on the plans. Using the throws recommended by Steve after inquiring where to set them due to no info in the instruct. 3/4" up and down on the ailerons and 1/2" up and down on elevator. I expected more speed out of this plane considering the very thin airfoil and the wing loading. Was I expecting too much? Anyone out there that is flying one of these planes care to comment about it's performance? Any suggestions about wind conditions and ballasting? How much weight for specified wind speed/lift conditions? Any comments on control throws? CG? Thanks for any info, Later, RB RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Gyro's for all
If I understand gyros correctly I would like all the flyers to use them, except me of course. It should enable a TD plane to fly right through a thermal and due to the gyro resisting change, give no indication of it at all. Yes? No? Maybe? J S. wrote: > > I am curious, do you mean in contests? This doesn't seem like it would be > legal. > Is there a rule about having a plane equipped with a gyro? > To me it seems to take all the talent and challenge out of td flying. > Any comments? > > >From: B R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [RCSE] Poly angle...Gyro's > >Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:28:31 -0800 (PST) > > > > > >Interesting article about Gyro's. Dose anyone use > >Gyro's for there t/d planes? If so I would like to > >know everything about you success or failure. > >Dose it aid in landing, and coring thermals? > > > > > > > > > >--- Blaine & Deborah Beron-Rawdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > > > In Soaring 2161, Dave Seay asked "Is there any > > > science in determining the > > > angle of the poly break and/or its location out from > > > center?" > > > > > > Well, it may not be science, but there is some > > > engineering involved! > > > > > > To summarize, the amount of dihedral (or polyhedral) > > > that a rudder and > > > elevator (no ailerons) sailplane has is a major > > > factor in its roll > > > responsiveness and maximum roll rate, and strongly > > > influences spiral > > > stability. More dihedral increases roll > > > responsiveness, roll rate and > > > spiral stability. Airplanes with more dihedral also > > > require larger vertical > > > stabilizers. > > > > > > The exact arrangement of the dihedral, whether it is > > > two-panel dihedral or a > > > six-panel polyhedral for instance, is less important > > > than the effective > > > amount of dihedral that the arrangement provides. > > > The effective dihedral of > > > any arrangement can be estimated and is commonly > > > referred to as "equivalent > > > dihedral angle" (EDA). For what it is worth, I > > > recommend at least 12 > > > degrees of EDA for most rudder and elevator > > > sailplanes. > > > > > > The arrangement of the panels is a compromise > > > between efficiency while > > > thermalling, efficiency in a rolling maneuver, and > > > stall characteristics > > > while thermalling. In short, arrangements that > > > resemble a parabolic > > > dihedral distribution provide a smooth and efficient > > > lift distribution > > > across the span while thermalling, and avoid large > > > variations in lift > > > coefficient across the span in a steady-state roll > > > maneuver. This is good. > > > Arrangements that have at lot of dihedral > > > concentrated in the outer panels > > > will tend to tip stall prematurely while > > > thermalling. > > > > > > Equivalent dihedral angle is explained at: > > > > > > http://www.rc-soar.com/tech/spiral_eda.htm > > > > > > Envision Design sells software called "Plane > > > Geometry" that enables easy > > > experimentation with dihedral arrangements. Check > > > out: > > > > > > > >http://members.home.net/evdesign/pages/plane_geometry.html > > > > > > That's all for now. > > > > > > Blaine Beron-Rawdon > > > Envision Design > > > San Pedro, California > > > http://members.home.net/evdesign/ > > > > > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane > > > News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests > > > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >__ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. > >http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > >RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and > >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Servo reversing application?
What was the application that required reversing the servo rotation? does it have something to do with the mentioned 'Escape'. This is the 6 servo wing? Stephen Syrotiak wrote: > > For those who give a rohobo; > > To reverse a (Hitec) servo. Follow directions from the hoss's mouth. > (see below) > > Cost? I timed it. 3 minutes and 20 seconds. Best part; all the smoke > stayed inside and kept it working. > > Thanks to all list members who tried to help. > > Now if only that new Escape would get here... > > Regards, > > Steve > > Service wrote: > > > > Hello Stephen, > > > > Switch the two wires on the motor (orange and brown), and the two wires on > > the pot (red and green). That's all it takes. > > > > Tony Ohm > > Service Dept. Mgr. > > Hitec Rcd Inc > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Stephen Syrotiak > Southern Connecticut > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Manti Home Page
Luke Waters was doing the webpage thru a free service, I think? Due to some problem with the provider service he no longer has it up. Posted somthing awhile ago and said he would be back in touch when he found a new home for the webpage. Bill & Rose Haymaker wrote: > > The bookmark for the Mantis home page that I have saved doesn't seem to work > anymore, anyone knows what up? > Is Phil still in business? Did he get a new web page? > > Thanks > Bill > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] all a waste of time
How about we all get together at a contest this summer and waste some time then. I'm all for wasting time, if that's what this is all about. JIM AND CHERYL THOMPSON wrote: > > If landing is a waste time, launching is a waste of time and everything > in between is also a waste of time. > > Jim Thompson > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Contests and LSF Levels (2nd try)
This statement was made by Tom Broeski and it was made as a SARCASTIC remark and he of course did not mean it. It was a remark made to try to make his point about having more than two classes (sport and expert) in the ESL contests. He is for more levels so he made the comment about why the need for 5 levels in LSF. Why don't we just have level V of LSF? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At the beginning of this thread someone wrote: > > < the sport at those lower levels. I am sure there would still be several > members and couple of level V's anyway. Who needs the level ones, two's and > threes.>> > > I'd like to address that. > > The early levels of the LSF program are pretty easy for an experienced pilot but >they do require participation. This is a place where the experienced pilot can get >together with less experienced flyers and together work on the lower levels. > > I was still pretty new to rc and soaring when I started LSF and the lower levels >generated enthusiasm for the sport and helped me to become a better flyer. The most >active period my club ever had was when a group of about ten of us were all working >on LSF. > > After a few years I made Level IV and began working on Level V. The first entry on >my Level V voucher was dated 1977, the last, 1997. During the next "few" years I >worked on Level V tasks. I considered them all "doable" except the contest >requirements. > > For twenty years I flew in as few as 10 and as many as 20 contests a year. In almost >all of those contests I competed against 2 or 3 Level V's, and a bunch of people who >could/should have been Level V's. I had nearly given up hope of ever making it. A >little determination, slightly above average flying skills, help from other LSFers >and some good luck got me that last win. > > I was a little luckier than some of my other friends who, because of their age and >participation levels, probably will neven make Level V but they are proud of their >Level IV's and the parts of V that they have done. Other friends are close and still >trying--and might yet make it. > > None of these people would like to see the rules change. > > Huzzah to them! > > Mike Clancy > LSF 926 Level V #92 > > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] HLG Launch
Dick Barker wrote: > > No! No! You got it all wrong. One day of f3b and six days of hlg is > more like it. Would make people appreciate low stress hlg launches. > -- > Dick Barker Dick, Quit getting yourself all twisted up in knots over how people launch thier HL gliders. .. RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Wanted- Competition flyers
Dennis Phelan wrote: > Dudes, > Are there really only 50 competitive fliers in the ESL? Does the > website only list the top 50 fliers, top 17 sportsmen and top 33 > experts? > > If there are, I[not being an ESL member] would ask why someone would > need more classes? > > = > Dennis Phelan I think this is the point. There are about 45 to 50 core ESL flyers that compete on a regular basis. There are others that compete, but are not members of the ESL, and are not listed on the ESL site. If you don't pay dues for the year then even if you compete in a ESL contest you are not listed in the year end standings. You can still take home a plaque at a contest, just not get in on the year end trophies. Year end standings are made up of your six best scores for the year. Scores are calculated as a percent of the winners score for that contest. There are not enough flyers to support many classes. In order to add more classes you need to get more competitive flyers into the league. There have been discussions on how to accomplish this. I know there are many sailplane flyers out there that enjoy flying but don't compete. Many may not feel they are good enough or don't feel confident enough to go out and compete. Some don't fly TD stuff. Some just don't want to spend the time and money it takes to travel to contests and compete. Any good ideas from other clubs/leagues on how to attract more flyers into competition? How do you get the guys out that love to fly but have not been bitten by the 'competition bug'. Later, RB > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. > http://shopping.yahoo.com/ > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] servo calculator
Just did some quick calculations on the servo calc program and if you drop the speed value down to 50 - 55 mph you will come in around the 55oz torque value of the HS-225's. I still feel this is too high a speed to be pulling full flaps for normal TD flying. RB Bill Johns wrote: > > Greetings! > > One of the really neat things about the Multiplex web page is the > calculator that will help predict the right sized calculator for an > application. check out: > > http://www.multiplexrc.com/calcservo.htm > > OK, given that it is an approximation at best, I still get some really > strange numbers. I'm probably using it wrong. > > Given your basic 125" sailplane. weighs say 70 oz, flaps are 2x25 inches, > they deflect 90 degrees, the wing has a 10" chord and the plane is moving > at say 75 mph. Yes, this is fast, but not unreasonable for a dive. For me > the servo calculator gives a required servo of 112 in oz. This is a huge > servo. Most of us would find a Hitec 225 MG with 55 in oz adequate. > > On the other hand, given an aileron on the same plane, again say 2"x25" > that moves only 30 degrees then the required servo must carry only 37 in oz > and an HS 85 at 42 in oz.is more than adequate. > > Am I doing this right? Whenever I try to come up with a value for flaps, > it always seems about twice as high as folks use successfully. What am I > missing? > > Thanks, > > Bill > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] servo calculator
Possibly the calculator is haveing a problem with the extreme deflections of the flap function,(90 degrees). I also think that you are using some unresonable numbers as far as speed. 75mph is not an unresonable number as far as speed of some planes, but I know when I pull flaps on my TD ship I am not normally going anywhere near 75mph. I do sometimes dive down from altitude but do not come screaming in and drop the flaps at that speed. If I have time and have planned things right I may pull on flaps first and spiral down slowly. In this case the flaps come in with very little speed and then pull out and off the flaps. Also when making the landing approach it is not at the extreme speeds you are referring to. I am using Hitec HS-225MG servos, one on each flap and as you have said they are up to the task for a 65 - 70 oz. Unlimited plane. Try inputting some smaller value for speed and see where the torque values come in about 45 oz. RB Bill Johns wrote: > > Greetings! > > One of the really neat things about the Multiplex web page is the > calculator that will help predict the right sized calculator for an > application. check out: > > http://www.multiplexrc.com/calcservo.htm > > OK, given that it is an approximation at best, I still get some really > strange numbers. I'm probably using it wrong. > > Given your basic 125" sailplane. weighs say 70 oz, flaps are 2x25 inches, > they deflect 90 degrees, the wing has a 10" chord and the plane is moving > at say 75 mph. Yes, this is fast, but not unreasonable for a dive. For me > the servo calculator gives a required servo of 112 in oz. This is a huge > servo. Most of us would find a Hitec 225 MG with 55 in oz adequate. > > On the other hand, given an aileron on the same plane, again say 2"x25" > that moves only 30 degrees then the required servo must carry only 37 in oz > and an HS 85 at 42 in oz.is more than adequate. > > Am I doing this right? Whenever I try to come up with a value for flaps, > it always seems about twice as high as folks use successfully. What am I > missing? > > Thanks, > > Bill > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Low-end computer radio
High end computer radios MAY be more than the new guy needs but if you buy 2 or more lower priced ones you'll have the same money into your epuipment. I went thru the multiple radios thing. Keeping them all charged and maintained. Hauling many Tx's along to the field, ect. Finally got a Futaba 8U a few years back(no I don't want to argue which radio is the best) and now I fly all my planes on that one radio. Slope, HL and TD. In my mind one radio is the way to go. RB James V. Bacus wrote: > > At 08:02 PM 9/16/2000, regis white wrote: > >(My guess is > >that most members of this list have more than two radios.) So that is why I > >would not encourage any one new to the hobby to go high end. Regis > > Yep, I have more than two radios. I started out with a Futaba 6xa, sold it > in two weeks, I wanted more. Then I bought a JR 783, I was flying mainly > HLG and slope combat, but the SOAR guys were leading me astray with the big > molded ships. Still I wanted more for 6 servo models, so I kept the 783 > and bought a JR 8103. I realized at that point I should have started with > the 8103. Now I have sold the 8103 because I need more channels, so I just > bought a JR 10x. The 10x would be too much for a beginner, but I could > have started higher up the ladder rung's with the computer radios. > > Jim > Downers Grove, IL > Member of Chicago SOAR club > ICQ 6997780R/C Soaring Page at http://www.mcs.net/~bacuslab/soaring.html > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Fut 8U setup sheet?
Anybody having the regular manual has the various blank setup sheets in the back of the book. I just made some copies of them if I wanted a paper record of my model setups. Problem is I tweak them from time to time and don't go back to the paper copies and update. Was thinking of getting more memory modules and using them to store backup data. Jones, Philip wrote: > > Buy Don Edberg's book...he has sheets in there for recording set-ups. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 9:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [RCSE] Fut 8U setup sheet? > > Does anybody have a paper form for recording setups of a Futaba 8U? > > thanks - Rob Glover > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and > "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Handlaunch Shoulder Syndrome
Don't think so. I threw a Red Herring for a while and it is just a whole other set of muscles and strains from that action. Jut takes working up to it. Working out with a HLG can be Heaven or Hell. The better you get a working lift the less you'll hurt. When the air is flat put it down and wait. You know when there is lift!!! Dick Barker wrote: > > Tom, > You can solve it with a simple one step solution. Get, or build, a modern > discus launch hlg. > -- > Dick Barker > Seattle, WA > - The Old Fart Glider Flyer - > http://www.eskimo.com/~dickb/UpLink.html > > Tom Nagel grumbled: > >This Spring and summer I made a serious attempt to learn how to fly HLG. > >What I learned was all about shoulder strain. > . > >I suspect that I am not alone in this problem, and I have been > >researching treatments. So here is a three step program to cure Handlaunch > >Shoulder Syndrome that seems to be working for me. > . > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] passaj
Thanks for the pronunciation. It'll put a whole new 'twist' on things everytime someone posts about this plane. Later James V. Bacus wrote: > > At 08:05 PM 9/11/2000, Rick Brown and Jill Wiest wrote: > >Anybody on the list that can pronounce 'PASSAJ' > > Pass a J? > > Sorry, couldn't resist... 8-) > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Antenna/servo flutter
Is it possible that the reason the servos are no longer jittering is due to the difference in the pattern of the signal being sent out of these two different antenna types. I'm not the expert on this subject but the way it was explained to me is that the regular collasping antenna generates a cone shaped pattern while the rubber duck style antenna generates its strongest signal directly in line with, generally out the end of the antenna. So, while holding the plane in hand at the winch or high start the cone shaped signal would possibly affect the servos while the rubber duck antenna would not. Not that this means one is generating a stronger or weaker signal overall. The rubberduck antenna may be better for those of us that have that habit of facing our planes while we fly. This gets the antenna pointing mostly at the plane. The very spot that a regular antenna is suppose to generate its weakeest signal. At the moment I use a regular style antenna andhave experienced no problems with it. Anybody have any range problems with either style antenna? Anybody that really knows about this stuff have an opinion I would like to hear from you. Thanks, RB Art Mcnamee wrote: > > Hi Bill, > I assume the Power Duck is a short rubber ducky type of antenna. > If so, the servo flutter is probably loss of signal strength and torroid beads would > have stopped the fluttering without loss of signal strength.The signal strength >won't cause much of a problem as the receivers we > get today are pretty good but out on the fringe area > the signal strength could make a difference. I no longer have a Spectrum Analyzer > to measure the signal strength but I'll bet $10.00 to $1.00 there is a difference >and the full size antenna is the winner. > Thermals, Art > > Bill & Rose Haymaker wrote: > > > I would like to thank those who suggested Smiley Antenna for replacing the > > original telescoping antenna with a R/C Power Duck. Got it yesterday, flew > > with it today, WHAT A DIFFERENCE. Not only was it a pleasure not having to > > worry about jamming the antenna tip, but it also cured my servo flutter at > > the high start. > > > > Thanks > > Bill > > > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Using a tow plane to launch sailplanes
When towing a glider the pilot of the glider MUST NOT rise off the ground too quickly. The glider must follow the tow planes flight path. The limited towing I have seen was done at a brisk pace in some wind, maybe why the steep climb, and mostly straight out. Rising very quickly. I don't think this is the required flight path though. Just maybe the safest way with the conditions that day. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi all, > > The other day a friend of mine asked me to tow up his sailplane with my IMAC > plane and I agreed. The results were interesting but not what we had > intended. Both planes survived in tact but the glider never got more than > 20 feet in the air before the two planes separated. The IMAC plane hadn't > left the runway yet. > > So the question I have for this list is how do people tow sailplanes up to > altitude? Does the tow plane accelerate fast or slowly, etc. I'm looking > for a prescribed procedure on how to safely do this. > > Thanks, > John > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and >"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Help! I keep loosing my trainer chords!
The English language is dying. It's being butchered to death. robert k scott wrote: > > Does anyone know why many people are suddenly having a problem with > homonyms? > Does anyone have any ideas what's causing this? > > -robert RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Flying in Colorado
Which of your sailplanes do you refer to as 'sweetheart'? Richard Bothell wrote: > > My sweetheart and I will be traveling and camping in Colorado RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Mine isn't better than Yours
All, I have been following the posts about servos and Rx. I just had to throw in my two cents. I have invested a good bit of money in radios, planes and servos over the years. I don't fly the latest molded plane or have the most expensive servos or even have the latest design Rx. I have a foam, fiberglass and carbon fiber plane (getting to be in the minority - many molded), a Futaba FM radio and Rx and some of those cheap Hitec servos. I probably still have about $1000 just to get one plane in the air. This gets a bit less expensive for multiple planes due to the same radio for all the others. My point is I feel I have put enough money into the hobby to be competitive. Over the weekend, flying an ESL contest in Lancaster PA, I beat many good flyers with better equipment. I placed 8th in Expert class(my first year in Expert - they kicked me out of Sportflyer class last year)both Saturday and Sunday against good flyers, Gordy (he graced us with his presence) being one of them with his molded plane and high priced servos. I blew a 4th place finish on Saturday with a short flight in the 8th and final round. I think we all know it's how well you can fly what you have and not if you have the latest most expensive 'stuff'. Having a molded plane and the top of the line, most expensive equipment WOULD NOT have gotten me in the top five on either day, only better flying. Mine isn't better than yours, but one of these days I may just slip in there for a win Fly what you got and have fun doing it. Later, RB RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] 3 cell pack for HL
All, Just put together a 3 cell 110mil pack for a HL. My question is what can I expect to see as a peak voltage reading on this pack when fully charged. I put the first charge on the new pack and have a reading of 4.25 volts right off the charge. Anybody using this size pack. Any info or advise along the lines of charging and maintaining this style pack would be appreciated. Thanks, RB RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]