Re: [OSM-talk] Statistics and lists of common errors per region
Andy Robinson schrieb: > I'll point out that it has been common practice almost since the > project began for some of us to use two or more nodes at the end of a > stub way to denote unfinished work. For instance I use this method a > lot to denote a footpath going off a road that I haven't walked yet. > Mostly I don't bother to tag those nodes. I certainly would not want > these markers deleted. I see. You can't solve this perfectly, as someone always could find it by chance and delete it. So you always have to hope someone uses his brain, especially before deleting something. But I have changed the behaviour so that nodes more recent than 90 days are not displayed in red, but in green and have a stronger warning message. Regards Roland ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Statistics and lists of common errors per region
Dirk-Lüder Kreie schrieb: > Jon Burgess schrieb: >> On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Roland Ramthun wrote: >>> Bug reports (i.e. wrong output) are welcome. >> The following line looks like it has some bad characters: >> >> Total Ways: 586521 (â��~7,34 nodes/way) >> >> From: >> >> http://roland-ramthun.de/osm/extracts/united-kingdom/united-kingdom-statistics.htm > > That's a correctly encoded UTF-8 character. However the page doesn't > seem to define it's charset so your browser might have defaulted to > iso-8859-1 Jepp, this is the exact reason. It now sets UTF-8 explicitly - what nevertheless led to problems with IE displaying it as ?, because it is not included in the default font. So I simply removed it, as it should be clear what is meant, even without the average-sign. Regards Roland ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Statistics and lists of common errors per region
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Burgess schrieb: > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Roland Ramthun wrote: >> Bug reports (i.e. wrong output) are welcome. > > The following line looks like it has some bad characters: > > Total Ways: 586521 (â��~7,34 nodes/way) > > From: > > http://roland-ramthun.de/osm/extracts/united-kingdom/united-kingdom-statistics.htm That's a correctly encoded UTF-8 character. However the page doesn't seem to define it's charset so your browser might have defaulted to iso-8859-1 - -- Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH3bjiFUbODdpRVDwRAnzJAKDH49uYjhbkJPjh32VBuVnYryEv2ACfSaz9 ckw1tJ/8M/UzPIVV7wlr/cE= =43r1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Statistics and lists of common errors per region
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Roland Ramthun wrote: > Bug reports (i.e. wrong output) are welcome. The following line looks like it has some bad characters: Total Ways: 586521 (�~7,34 nodes/way) From: http://roland-ramthun.de/osm/extracts/united-kingdom/united-kingdom-statistics.htm Jon ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Statistics and lists of common errors per region
On 16/03/2008, Roland Ramthun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > last week I started to write an application for myself that finds some > common errors in our data. > It is not finished and I use it as playground for new OOP concepts I > learn at uni ;-) > > I have now installed it on my webserver, and let it run on the extracts > generated every month. > So the statistics are regenerated when the extracts are built. > > If someone is bored and wants to start fixing the nodes which are > neither part of a way, nor a relation and have no tagging, he may have a > look. > > The URL is http://roland-ramthun.de/osm/extracts/ > > Very many features are still missing and some of the errors are > artificially introduced by Osmosis cutting the ways on the borders of > the bbox. > "Real" errors in the main DB should be red. > > Please don't use the HTML to delete something automatically, as someone > may have temporary placed some "errors" for later enhancement. > > If you want to delete something, review it by hand carefully and > preferably stick to areas you know a bit. > > Bug reports (i.e. wrong output) are welcome. > I'll point out that it has been common practice almost since the project began for some of us to use two or more nodes at the end of a stub way to denote unfinished work. For instance I use this method a lot to denote a footpath going off a road that I haven't walked yet. Mostly I don't bother to tag those nodes. I certainly would not want these markers deleted. Cheers Andy > Regards > Roland > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- Andy Robinson ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Statistics and lists of common errors per region
Hi all, last week I started to write an application for myself that finds some common errors in our data. It is not finished and I use it as playground for new OOP concepts I learn at uni ;-) I have now installed it on my webserver, and let it run on the extracts generated every month. So the statistics are regenerated when the extracts are built. If someone is bored and wants to start fixing the nodes which are neither part of a way, nor a relation and have no tagging, he may have a look. The URL is http://roland-ramthun.de/osm/extracts/ Very many features are still missing and some of the errors are artificially introduced by Osmosis cutting the ways on the borders of the bbox. "Real" errors in the main DB should be red. Please don't use the HTML to delete something automatically, as someone may have temporary placed some "errors" for later enhancement. If you want to delete something, review it by hand carefully and preferably stick to areas you know a bit. Bug reports (i.e. wrong output) are welcome. Regards Roland ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
