<(314)%20735-0270>
>
> E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:01 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
>
>
Magic Box
Magic Box
(Dennis are you listening)
Magic Box
From: Chris Wright
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:50 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
I think there are more of us in the same boat as you than you know. IPv6 has
been a standard since 1998, any
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
I admit I'm more ignorant when it comes to IPv6 than I should be, so there may
be an obvious answer to this... but if you're not giving out any IPv4, how are
the customer's devices that don't support IPv6 goin
gt;
>
> And ISP, upstream providers not handling IPv6 transport or BGP IPv6…
>
>
>
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On
> Behalf Of Chuck McCown
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:19 PM
> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
.
I see that adoption rate as actually better than the router and upstream IPv6
adoption.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 10:55 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
I admit I'm more ignorant when it com
lf Of *Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 7:19 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
>
>
>
> I want to just give the customer a V6 and the edge appliance will nat the
> v4 only destinations.
>
>
>
> *From:*
] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
Why not dual stack with CGNAT IPv4 and public IPv6?
Hand your lower speed tier accounts a NATed IPv4 in 100.64.0.0/10 and a public
/64 in IPv6.
What I am thinking of doing when the IPv4 squeeze hits us but I still have not
figured out how to track abuse etc in the
boy IPv6 pants
I want to just give the customer a V6 and the edge appliance will nat the v4
only destinations.
From: Paul Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:45 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
We dual stack and will continue as long as
hs.net
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:12 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
>
>
>
> If you're reaching an IPv6 destination, of course.
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
If you're reaching an IPv6 destination, of course. No NAT is needed. If you're
trying to reach an IPv4 destination, you'll need NAT.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
[h
traffic.
Paint the box red like the Netflix appliance, come and install it for me, make
it work. And I might even pay you in V4 addresses
From: Dennis Burgess
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 6:51 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
You can do Carrier grade NAT
"Dave"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
Why Nat at all with IPV6?
On 05/11/2017 07:51 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
You can do Carrier grade NAT with MT.
Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engine
echs.net>
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:01 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
Many if not most of us are in the same box. I need a router that goes
on the edge and does somet
May 10, 2017 6:01 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
Many if not most of us are in the same box. I need a router that goes on the
edge and does something similar to NAT64/ds lite etc. Someone is going to make
good money by developing “IPV6 in a box” app
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:01 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
Many if not most of us are in the same box. I need a router that goes on the
edge and does something similar to NAT64/ds lite e
ing us.
>
>
>
> And ISP, upstream providers not handling IPv6 transport or BGP IPv6…
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:19 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big bo
…
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:19 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
I want to just give the customer a V6 and the edge appliance will nat the v4
only destinations.
From: Paul Stewart
Sent
I want to just give the customer a V6 and the edge appliance will nat the v4
only destinations.
From: Paul Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 6:45 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
We dual stack and will continue as long as possible … really hoping
We dual stack and will continue as long as possible … really hoping to avoid
transition stuff but who knows for sure if that’s just a pipe dream or not ;)
> On May 10, 2017, at 6:50 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> I’m weighing the pros/cons of purchasing another block of IPv4 at auction or
> fi
Some of the CGNAT implementations actually simply subdivide the ports on
each address so you've assigned a fixed range of ports to each sub. So
for instance, if you decided that each customer could have at most 1024
sessions open, you would assign ports 0-1023 to customer 1, 1024-2047 to
customer
Why not dual stack with CGNAT IPv4 and public IPv6?
Hand your lower speed tier accounts a NATed IPv4 in 100.64.0.0/10 and
a public /64 in IPv6.
What I am thinking of doing when the IPv4 squeeze hits us but I still
have not figured out how to track abuse etc in the NATed space.
Anyone made that wo
Jacobson
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:54 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
Nothing at the moment, still dual stack IPv4 and IPv6
Also interested if someone has figured this out with a half decent solution as
I need to purchase another /22 this year
m] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 3:55 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
Nothing at the moment, still dual stack IPv4 and IPv6
Also interested if someone has figured this out with a half decent solution
as I need to purchase an
Subject: [AFMUG] Putting on big boy IPv6 pants
I'm weighing the pros/cons of purchasing another block of IPv4 at auction or
finding a NAT64 solution that will enable me to start handing IPv6 addresses to
customers and know they'll be able to get to IPv4 internet without issue.
Mikrot
I'm weighing the pros/cons of purchasing another block of IPv4 at auction or
finding a NAT64 solution that will enable me to start handing IPv6 addresses
to customers and know they'll be able to get to IPv4 internet without issue.
Mikrotik doesn't seem too concerned with implementing NAT64, so I'd
25 matches
Mail list logo