Pat Farrell;131613 Wrote:
>
> With my Benchmark, I set its internal jumpers so the SqueezeBox can
> always be set to 11.
I'd certainly vote for internal jumpers on the SB4!
--
Skunk
Skunk's Profile: http://forums.slimde
Skunk wrote:
The preamp attenuation feature should not be thought of as a safety
net. A glitch, that might cause white noise for example, would likely
be at full volume and not the desired attenuated volume.
So if you want to go the direct to power amp route, you need an
external attenuator, a
sbn;131574 Wrote:
> I've read that somebody warns against this (blows speakers if volume is
> set too loud etc) but then I discovered the Preamp attenuation feature,
> and I guess that this will get me some extra safety, so i'm not
> accidentially blowing my speakers or what?
>
Yes the CEO warn
P Floding;131503 Wrote:
> Perhaps the CEO can shed some light on this
It's called the "placebo effect". If you can only hear (or measure)
something like this in the absence of scientific controls, then it's
your imagination.
It works exactly the same way that a sugar pill can ACTUALLY CURE al
sbn;131587 Wrote:
> Hi, I'm just wondering about how the "Preamp Volume Control" attenuation
> works.
>
> I can see that it only impacts the analog outputs, so my first guess
> was that it was using some kind of analog volume control, controlled by
> the slimserver...
>
> But then i read about
sbn wrote:
I can see that it only impacts the analog outputs, so my first guess
was that it was using some kind of analog volume control, controlled by
the slimserver...
There is nearly nothing analog in the SqueezeBox.
Its a digital box. Sean and others can correct me, but
I would expect that
Hi, I'm just wondering about how the "Preamp Volume Control" attenuation
works.
I can see that it only impacts the analog outputs, so my first guess
was that it was using some kind of analog volume control, controlled by
the slimserver...
But then i read about all these guys noticing a diffent
sbn wrote:
i could use the same money on a high quality power amplifier...
Good idea.
Can you recommend connecting it directly, without any additional volume
control? I've read that somebody warns against this (blows speakers if
volume is set too loud etc)
Yes.
With anything connected di
Thanks for the suggestions. I'm definitely doing the room stuff first,
no matter what. The back wall is already covered with bookshelves.
I was thinking of putting the bass traps behond the speakers. The thing
about the GIK traps is that they're 140 instead of 350-- which makes
them appealing. I
Hi, i've just had an SB3 for some weeks now, and in fact it's the only
audio source that I use right now. The improvemnt in sound quality made
me think that my amplifier is now the weakest part of my setup (old
cheap sony 5.1 receiver) - and therefore, i'm considering buying a new
amplifier. But i
JohnnyLightOn;131048 Wrote:
> I tried this tweak and there's a clearly-audible difference, but - for
> me - not a clear improvement. As was mentioned by Deaf Cat, it does
> smooth the sound out, but at the expense of the vocals becoming
> slightly recessed. I also noticed that along with the sl
totoro wrote:
1. GIK acoustics corner bass traps (maybe home brew if I can get some
705 cheaper, but it doesn't look like I can).
Have you looked at Real Traps?
Ethan is a good guy and his stuff is better looking than anything I can
make, and not all that expensive.
3. Maybe some treble ab
You can see what my current system is in my sig.
My current upgrade plans for the next 6 months or so are:
1. GIK acoustics corner bass traps (maybe home brew if I can get some
705 cheaper, but it doesn't look like I can).
2. Rel strata subwoofer (I think the current rev is 5).
3. Maybe some t
I think it's really a matter of semantics. Oversampling is performed
solely for the purpose of reducing the harmful effects of brickwall
filters. Upsampling is really a form of sample rate conversion, and is
necessary for systems that have asynchronous timing (i.e. input and
output clocks are dif
JohnnyLightOn;131048 Wrote:
> I tried this tweak and there's a clearly-audible difference, but - for
> me - not a clear improvement. As was mentioned by Deaf Cat, it does
> smooth the sound out, but at the expense of the vocals becoming
> slightly recessed. I also noticed that along with the sl
Patrick Dixon;131267 Wrote:
>
> Correct - although you still need the analogue filter, it's much a much
> less demanding spec.
OK, just to make sure I've understood this correctly. Say we have a
44.1kHz signal. Putting it through a non-oversampling DAS, the repeated
spectra start at 44.1kHz. If
16 matches
Mail list logo