On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> DEP-5 as defined in http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ does not have any
> clause allowing us to skip license entries for certain class of files.
>
> In practice, many packages lack entries for autotools generated files
> which come with v
You have contacted the Debian project mailing list, which is not for
user support, please contact one of the Debian user supportchannels
for help.
https://www.debian.org/support
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/
http://forums.debian.net/
http://ask.debian.net/
irc://irc.oftc.net/debian
--
by
--
Henry Udoye.
4165 Whiteplains Road.
P. O. Box 1290.
Bronx. N. Y. 10466
Phone : 914-316-1854.
Fax : 206-350-3803
hudoye1...@gmail.com
Hello:
What is the content of DEBIAN CD?
What are the functions and features?
What are the purposes and uses?
Can it help any person learn how to code or s
On Monday 08 September 2014 05:13 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I'm also fine about creating a new "brand" which will have a clear
> definition "it is an event to seek more contributions to debian by
> reaching out to more people and it is organized by debian in
> collaboration with a local free soft
Hi Osamu,
Quoting Osamu Aoki (2014-09-08 17:38:41)
> DEP-5 as defined in http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ does not have any
> clause allowing us to skip license entries for certain class of files.
I believe the "problem" is not DEP-5 but Debian Policy.
One of the goals of DEP-5 was to only be a
Pirate Praveen dijo [Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 05:13:49PM +0530]:
> > Hi, Praveen and Shirish (and Indian Debian Users),
> > Well, a DebConf is about Debian, and I mostly agree with Steve's
> > answer: Not just any Linux conference should be called a DebConf or
> > MiniDebConf. There has to be a Debian
Hi,
DEP-5 as defined in http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ does not have any
clause allowing us to skip license entries for certain class of files.
In practice, many packages lack entries for autotools generated files
which come with very permissive license with mostly identical but not
quite the
Norbert Preining writes:
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> > Let's be frank: GR is such a heavyweight process, that it's
>> > impractical for overriding "small" decisions like this one.
>>
>> This is by design; the people who make decisions in Debian are the
>> people who do the wor
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Let's be frank: GR is such a heavyweight process, that it's
> > impractical for overriding "small" decisions like this one.
>
> This is by design; the people who make decisions in Debian are the
> people who do the work.
Wow, so you are telling me th
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Don Armstrong , 2014-09-05, 10:04:
> >If anything more than a warning occurs, it is announced on
> >debian-private@, which enables Debian Developers to review the actions
> >that listmaster@ has taken, and override them via GR.
>
> Let's be frank: GR is s
Halo, (sorry about my english) for example if i do litlle change in debian
distro instaling by defoult other software, remove some package can i call
then my own distro with my logo, and put that operating system on my
website and obtain the money from selling, advice on the site, donation?
Best R
On Monday 08 September 2014 08:47 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hi, Praveen and Shirish (and Indian Debian Users),
> Well, a DebConf is about Debian, and I mostly agree with Steve's
> answer: Not just any Linux conference should be called a DebConf or
> MiniDebConf. There has to be a Debian "slant" to t
* Don Armstrong , 2014-09-05, 10:04:
If anything more than a warning occurs, it is announced on
debian-private@, which enables Debian Developers to review the actions
that listmaster@ has taken, and override them via GR.
Let's be frank: GR is such a heavyweight process, that it's impractical
13 matches
Mail list logo
