Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 2:49, Leszek Gawron dijo:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is no
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Previously we have discussed about three continuations manager work
modes:
- standard (current functionality)
- continuations invalidated along with session, still the continuation
is reachable from other sessions (or no session at
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 2:49, Leszek Gawron dijo:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI
encoding is a
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Previously we have discussed about three continuations manager work
modes:
- standard (current functionality)
- continuations invalidated along with session, still the continuation
is reachable from other sessions (or no session at all)
- fully isolated
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Previously we have discussed about three continuations manager work modes:
- standard (current functionality)
- continuations invalidated along with session, still the continuation
is reachable from other sessions (or no session at all)
- fully isolated. only the session that c
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:49, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
... Because Microsoft did it, and there is so much Notepad data out
there, the UTF-8 BOM became a de facto standard and then a de jure
standard. (Although the BOM is optional.)..
hmm...not sure if notepad is the kind of re
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:49, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
... Because Microsoft did it, and there is so much Notepad data out
there, the UTF-8 BOM became a de facto standard and then a de jure
standard. (Although the BOM is optional.)..
hmm...not sure if notepad is the kind of reference that we want to use
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 2:49, Leszek Gawron dijo:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
>>
>>> ...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
>>> detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI
>>> encoding is assum
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI
encoding is assumed...
AFAIU this is ok for 16-bit based encodings, not for UTF-8.
-Bertrand
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI
encoding is assumed...
AFAIU this is ok for 16-bit based encodings, not for UTF-8.
-Bertrand
smime.p7s
Description: S/
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 2:21, Leszek Gawron dijo:
> By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools detect utf
> encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI encoding is assumed.
then switch to Linux! ;-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 01:03, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...
+
...
This is BOM (byte ordering mark). It is being written by some of xml
editors to the beginning of the multibyte encoded (i.e. utf-8) xml
file. The file I commited is a valid xml. Check in any xml
editor/browser
Le 9 déc. 04, à 01:03, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...
+
...
This is BOM (byte ordering mark). It is being written by some of xml
editors to the beginning of the multibyte encoded (i.e. utf-8) xml
file. The file I commited is a valid xml. Check in any xml
editor/browser...
BOM has no meaning for
On Mie, 8 de Diciembre de 2004, 18:03, Leszek Gawron dijo:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> On Mie, 8 de Diciembre de 2004, 5:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo:
>>
>>>Author: lgawron
>>>Date: Wed Dec 8 03:47:12 2004
>>>New Revision: 111262
>>>
>>>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=111262
>>
>>
>
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Mie, 8 de Diciembre de 2004, 5:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo:
Author: lgawron
Date: Wed Dec 8 03:47:12 2004
New Revision: 111262
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=111262
...
cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/webapp/WEB-INF/cocoon.xconf
---
cocoon/branches/BR
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?YouArentGonnaNeedIt
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 4:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r111262 - in
cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src:
> java
Leszek Gawron wrote:
about 2nd: YAGNI (thanks Stefano for new cool phrase :))
I guess it was Sylvain that introduced me to it, so thank him :-)
--
Stefano.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: lgawron
Date: Wed Dec 8 03:47:12 2004
New Revision: 111262
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=111262
Log:
implement 2 modes of work for continuations manager:
- standard, as it was up till now
- secure in which continuations are bound to session. Only
18 matches
Mail list logo
