On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> We (OpenWebBeans) is starting to adopt CDI-1.1 and thus need to tweak and
> document the CDI-1.1 API.
> I'm one of the original main authors of the atinject and jcdi API packages
> before they got moved over to geronimo/specs.
On Oct 31, 2012, at 6:38 AM, Alberto Bacchelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an archive of Apache Geronimo IRC chats?
There used to be one at http://servlet.uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo ,
but does not seem to be active…
--kevan
On Oct 8, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Here's the latest status:
>
> ceres:
> geronimo-bundles-trunk - OK
> geronimo-daytrader-trunk - OK
> geronimo-devtools-eclipse-trunk - OK
> geronimo-devtools-maven-trunk - OK
> geronimo-genesis-trunk - OK
> geronimo-gshell-trunk - untested - but c
Gavin has done some cleanup for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5323
geronimo-server-21 needs some attention, it seems. Could someone take a look?
We should also review the current set of builds and remove those that we no
longer need.
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-6380.
--
Resolution: Invalid
> geronimo fails to start when launched using '
Kevan Miller created GERONIMO-6380:
--
Summary: geronimo fails to start when launched using 'jpda run'
Key: GERONIMO-6380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6380
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13424032#comment-13424032
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6376:
Sounds like a great idea to me
Looks good. Here's my +1.
One note -- the slf4j entry in the NOTICE file is not necessary. We comply with
the terms of the SLF4J license:
"The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included
in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. "
By including the SLF4J lic
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Nick Burch
> Subject: Call for Papers for ApacheCon Europe 2012 now open!
> Date: July 19, 2012 2:14:57 PM EDT
> To: committ...@apache.org
> Reply-To: apachecon-disc...@apache.org
>
> Hi All
>
> We're pleased to announce that the Call for Papers for ApacheC
On Jul 17, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Yi Xiao wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
>
> I think you use maven3 to execute mvn :) now, GEP only support maven2, you
> could refer to [Known issue] 2
>
> And also, if you use MAC-64bit, will still get some error infos for [Known
> issue] 1.
Thanks for the reminders John. I
Anybody building successfully on a Mac? I'm getting errors like:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.0.2:compile (default-compile)
on project org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common: Compilation failure: Compilation
failure:
[ERROR]
/Users/kevan/tmp/relea
On Jul 14, 2012, at 2:07 AM, lisacat li wrote:
> FYI.
For information on managing mailing lists (e.g. unsubscribing) see
http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#MailingLists-DeveloperMailingList
Simply send an email to dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.apache.org from your
subscribed mailing ad
A 3.0 news item on our web site would be nice to have!
--kevan
We have several old releases on dist/ (2.1.7, 3.0-M1, 3.0-beta-1).
They are also in archives/. We should remove from dist/ and update any web site
pointers to the appropriate location in archives.
--kevan
Congrats, eveyone!
--kevan
On Jul 13, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> The Apache Geronimo project is pleased to announce the available of Apache
> Geronimo v3.0.0 server. This release is a formal release of version 3 after
> 3.0-beta-1. It includes Tomcat assemblies only. Besides Java
On Jul 13, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Heiko Richter wrote on Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:55:26 +0200:
>> And again there are several 'permission denied' errors. This time from
>> the sync run at 10:55 UTC:
>>
>> rsync: readlink_stat("/geronimo/2.1.8/geronimo-2.1.8-source-release.tar.gz
Looks good. Thanks Forrest!
Here's my +1
--kevan
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> With updates to README and derby database creation scripts, again, here is
> the daytrader 3.0.0 ready for vote second time:
>
> The source code up for vote is:
> https://repository
On Jul 12, 2012, at 4:17 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> If no more vote, I would push this out on this Friday.
Sounds good, Forrest. Thanks!
Just to be complete you'll be:
1) calling the vote
2) pushing the source and binaries to dist/
3) pushing the maven binaries
--kevan
Oops. Forgot to change the subject…
--kevan
On Jul 10, 2012, at 9:44 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> -1
>
> The source archive is MS-DOS formatted. This causes errors like:
>
> ./bin/dbscripts/derby/createDerbyDB.sh: /bin/bash^
On Jul 10, 2012, at 9:44 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> -1
>
> The source archive is MS-DOS formatted. This causes errors like:
>
> ./bin/dbscripts/derby/createDerbyDB.sh: /bin/bash^M: bad interpreter: No such
> file or d
Sent this on the wrong vote thread originally.
--kevan
On Jul 6, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> -1
>
> The source archive is MS-DOS formatted. This causes errors like:
>
> ./bin/dbscripts/derby/createDerbyDB.sh: /bin/bash^M: bad interpreter: No such
> file or dire
I'm +1 for the samples (although there are a number of issues that I pointed
out in my other vote thread). Moving daytrader discussion to the daytrader vote
thread.
--kevan
On Jul 10, 2012, at 9:44 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Mille
The pointer to the tar.gz source was incorrect in your original email. The
"text" was correct, but the "link" pointed to the daytrader source. I'm voting
on the source in
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/samples/samples-parent/3.0.0/sam
-1
The source archive is MS-DOS formatted. This causes errors like:
./bin/dbscripts/derby/createDerbyDB.sh: /bin/bash^M: bad interpreter: No such
file or directory
our use of native file encoding in this case, is not quite appropriate…
After fixing the MS-DOS format of the shell script, I got
On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've been
> > telling
All looked good to me. Signature/checksum, RAT, build, license/notice, tests…
+1
--kevan
On Jul 3, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release candidate
> for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time.
>
On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've been
> telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually in the
> source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the binary
> distros. For ins
Apache will be hosting a series of events in the two days prior to
OSCON, the 16th and 17th of July. These events are a unique
opportunity to engage new participants and build awareness for
Geronimo and other ASF projects.
The goal is to provide an environment where newcomers and veteran
Apache c
On Jul 3, 2012, at 5:14 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> repositoryList url is wrong, so cancel this second try again.
Third time's a charm… ;-)
--kevan
All,
We have a board report due this month. If anyone would like to start pulling
information together on our wiki, that would be great.
--kevan
Hi Forrest,
Things look really, really good. I think we need a few minor adjustments to the
LICENSE file. During my first review, I found a number of issues. Then typing
this note, things looked much better. Took me a few minutes to realize why… The
source and binary LICENSE files are different.
Hi Forrest,
Are you planning on distributing binaries in our Geronimo dist directory? If
so, I'd like for you to identify these binaries in the release vote.
--kevan
On Jun 28, 2012, at 12:46 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> Through a long time release preparation and perform, finally I ma
On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 12:04 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> > Echo Jarek's response here in dev list again:
> >
> > So it looks like we have qui
On Jun 25, 2012, at 12:04 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Echo Jarek's response here in dev list again:
>
> So it looks like we have quite a bit of failures on Jetty. I guess we
> either have to drop it from the release (if we want to release soon)
> or try to fix it and delay the release. Thoughts?
>
On Jun 24, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Just found that my apache snapshot repo deployment password is expired. Just
> found that my apache snapshot repo deployment password is expired.
Try setting/reseting your password -- https://id.apache.org/
--kevan
On Jun 22, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> How are things with Jetty? Some user emails gave me an impression
With the Java 6 SE End Of Life approaching (Nov 2012), we should document our
users what our Java 6/Java 7 support status.
--kevan
On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:46 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I thought we discussed it several months ago I'm just glad to see it
> happening :-)
Me too. It should have happened some time ago. And I'd agree with Jarek (I
think), that there should have been discussion/announcement of intention, prior
On Jun 15, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Heh, are you saying it would be cool with you if I look into it?
:)
Yes. When you have some free time, of course… ;-)
--kevan
On Jun 14, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Anyone want to look into setting this up? If not I can look into it further
> when I've got some free time.
Hey Jason,
That'd be cool with me. Thanks!
--kevan
On Jun 13, 2012, at 11:25 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Is this site sync stuff still in use?
> Hi Jason, I think they are still in use to sync svn content to geronimo web
> site folder. Anyone else know more details about this?
As far as I
Signature/checksum, license/notice, RAT, build -- all look good to me.
Here's my +1
--kevan
On Jun 8, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> This is a minor fix release for GERONIMO-6358 and XBean-203
>
>
> The artifacts up for vote are:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/org
+1
signature/checksum, license/notice, rat, build, binary -- all looked good.
Thanks!
--kevan
On May 22, 2012, at 10:05 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> This is a version upgrade release to fix the java 7 tck failures. The changes
> are:
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13277056#comment-13277056
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6351:
There's also the followi
Kevan Miller created GERONIMO-6351:
--
Summary: messages displayed during minimal server startup
Key: GERONIMO-6351
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6351
Project: Geronimo
Looks good. Thanks Forrest!
Here's my +1
--kevan
On May 16, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> This is a version upgrade release, from 0.3_incubating to 0.4, for bval
> bundled in Geronimo, raised via GERONIMO-6345, it's to fix the tck failures
> when upgrading BV TCK to 1.0.6.GA level, a
On May 16, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> With cleaned up the tck issues in web profile under Java 7 and CTS/tck
> upgrade in full profile, BV, JCDI, now the 3.0-beta branch has a good shape
> for the final release of 3.0.0. If no objection, I will start the release
> process soon.
Ex
Not quite. Here's my -1
Here is the BVAL notice file:
"Apache Incubator - BVal project
Copyright 2010-2012 The Apache Software Foundation.
This produc
On May 15, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> checksum/signature, build, rat, source, license/notice -- all look fine.
>
> Here's my +1, but I have a few comments/questions.
>
> 1. velocity.log nee
checksum/signature, build, rat, source, license/notice -- all look fine.
Here's my +1, but I have a few comments/questions.
1. velocity.log need not be in svn. best that we remove…
2. why does geronimo need a bundle release of bval? any reason why our
requirements have not/cannot be pushed into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13270872#comment-13270872
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6344:
Thanks for the patch Romain.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-6344:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> UriBuilder (in jaxrs) is badly implemen
Here's my +1
Sig/checksum, license/notice, rat/source, build -- all looked good.
--kevan
On May 4, 2012, at 9:41 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> This is a minor fix release for these changes:
>
>
> r1334268 | xiaming | 2012-0
Here's my +1
Signature/checksum, rat, build, license/notice -- all looked good.
--kevan
On May 4, 2012, at 9:34 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> This is a Geronimo external Tomcat release to pull Tomcat 7.0.27, which
> introduces web socket support.
>
> The artifacts up for vote are:
> https://rep
Minor note - velocity.log is not needed in the source.
Build, source, license/notice, all look good. Here's my +1
--kevan
On May 1, 2012, at 11:06 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> This is a version upgrade release, from 10.6.1.0 to 10.8.2.2, for derby
> bundled in Geronimo, raised by community user vi
On May 2, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> We have not seen the buildbot result for quite a time, don't know if it's
> related to the lack of beta branch build setup. But we can't see 21/22
> branch build notification too.
>
> What's the channel to check this ? A document on geronimo
Minor issue -- the copyright date in the source NOTICE file is out-of-date
Everything else -- build, src, etc looks good.
Here's my +1
--kevan
On May 3, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> This is a release with some major changes from 1.1.1 as following:
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13263630#comment-13263630
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6085:
There are a number of methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260705#comment-13260705
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6335:
NL == Netherlands and the lang
One minor note -- the copyright date in the NOTICE file is 2003-2011
One other reminder -- release votes are on source artifacts, not SVN tags, etc.
The artifacts that we are voting on should be called out in the release votes.
In this case, I'm voting on
https://repository.apache.org/content/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13259160#comment-13259160
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6334:
Do we have documentation on ho
Kevan Miller created GERONIMO-6334:
--
Summary: Generate Tomcat 7.0.27 bundles with patches
Key: GERONIMO-6334
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6334
Project: Geronimo
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13259091#comment-13259091
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6333:
ActiveMQ config is updated in
On Apr 19, 2012, at 5:12 PM, ga...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gawor
> Date: Thu Apr 19 21:12:31 2012
> New Revision: 1328117
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328117&view=rev
> Log:
> GERONIMO-6331: Simple shell commands for generating thread dump and finding
> deadlocked threads
Nic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255675#comment-13255675
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6327:
Or
http://repo.fusesource.com/n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255668#comment-13255668
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6327:
I assume the problem will eventu
I assume we're voting on the source releases in
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-032/org/apache/xbean/xbean/3.10/
One minor note: the copyright dates in the NOTICE file haven't been updated
(Copyright 2005-2011 The Apache Software Foundation).
Everything else
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13253727#comment-13253727
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6324:
At the moment, you need to confi
I've updated
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2012-04-april.html
--kevan
On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> FYI
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: ASF Board
>> Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Remind
On Apr 6, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
>
> On 04/05/2012 02:49 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
>>
>>> "Clustering features are not available in the current 3.0-beta branch, so
>>> a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13248254#comment-13248254
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6320:
I think this is some backgroun
On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Hoping to get time to do an xbean release today or tomorrow.
>
> Let me know if there's any reason to wait.
Sounds good to me.
I recall Jarek had some Jira's / commits (e.g.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-204), but the Jira isn'
On Apr 5, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Russell E Glaue wrote:
> "Clustering features are not available in the current 3.0-beta branch, so add
> some profiles to not build it, thus save the build time."
>
> Is commit 1309635 related to this?
>
>
> Is someone able to explain why WADI Clustering and Plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13247502#comment-13247502
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6320:
What Web Browser are you usin
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
> From: ASF Board
> Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2012
> Date: April 1, 2012 8:24:21 PM EDT
> To: Kevan Miller
>
>
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board.
> It is an initial
On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I consider the changes made in trunk quite substantial so I think I
> would call trunk 4.x and call beta branch 3.x.
Sounds good to me.
--kevan
On Mar 29, 2012, at 8:41 AM, Arsen Abdrakhmanov wrote:
> Dear Team,
>
> Thank you very much for your attention to my request and please, let me give
> small comment regarding my previous message.
>
> Frankly speaking, I have meant primarily the release cycle for 2.1.x and
> 2.2.x versions of
)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Trygve's patch includes upgrades to Derby. I had someone ask about the version
of Derby on 2.2.
Should be pretty simple to pull out the Derby specific updates from Trygve's
patch.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think i
One other thing -- use infrastruct...@apache.org mailing list if we need any
help from infra -- I'm sure Joe has plenty to keep him busy…
--kevan
On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Thank you for this information.
>
> My home network is a little bit slow to open the urls, whatever, some
> questions first in my mind first, what's the impact to our geronimo web site?
> will need to move https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geron
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Joe Schaefer
> Subject: Mandatory svnpubsub migration by Jan 2013
> Date: February 8, 2012 7:26:48 AM EST
> To: Apache Infrastructure
> Reply-To: priv...@geronimo.apache.org
> Reply-To: Joe Schaefer
>
> [PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST! DIRECT ALL FURTHER
+1.
Signature/checksum, license/notice, build, RAT -- all looked good.
--kevan
On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A release candidate for geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec 1.1 has been created and
> staged.
>
> This release has a bug fix for GERONIMO-6257.
>
> The tag has b
+1.
Signature/checksum, license/notice, build, RAT -- all looked good.
--kevan
On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please vote for the Geronimo Tomcat 7.0.23.1 release, which is based on
> Tomcat 7.0.23 tag, including an important security fix.
>
> The components up fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13185800#comment-13185800
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6262:
We aren't really creating
Here's my +1.
Source, signature/checksum, license/notice file -- all look good. As with other
GEP releases, I'm not able to build on my Mac. Afraid I don't have enough time
to perform any testing.
--kevan
On Jan 6, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> With great help of Yi Xi
Looks like there's a new build issue --
http://ci.apache.org/builders/geronimo-server-trunk/builds/506/steps/compile/logs/stdio
--kevan
On Jan 6, 2012, at 11:04 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> A different problem...
>
> [WARNING] The POM for
> org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-common:jar:3.0-SNAPSHOT is
> invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available, enable debug
> logging for more details
>
> I don't
ansitive dependencies (if any) will not be available, enable debug
> logging for more details
>
> I don't know how to find out what the problem is since I don't have it
> locally. Can we run with -X?
>
> david jencks
>
> On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:43 AM, Kevan Mille
On Jan 6, 2012, at 11:04 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> A different problem...
>
> [WARNING] The POM for
> org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-common:jar:3.0-SNAPSHOT is
> invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available, enable debug
> logging for more details
>
> I don't
On Jan 6, 2012, at 11:04 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> A different problem...
>
> [WARNING] The POM for
> org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-common:jar:3.0-SNAPSHOT is
> invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available, enable debug
> logging for more details
>
> I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13181433#comment-13181433
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6239:
Thanks for the source code p
On Jan 6, 2012, at 11:04 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> A different problem...
>
> [WARNING] The POM for
> org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-common:jar:3.0-SNAPSHOT is
> invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available, enable debug
> logging for more details
>
> I don't
On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:40 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> yup, karaf just copied those classes into itself to avoid some java 7
> problem just committed a fix along with some other work.
Still seems to be problems…
http://ci.apache.org/builders/geronimo-server-trunk/builds/501
--kevan
I'm seeing this same failure, locally --
http://ci.apache.org/builders/geronimo-server-trunk/builds/498/steps/compile/logs/stdio
Anyone else?
--kevan
On Jan 4, 2012, at 4:21 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Where we shall put the support lifecycle statement on our web site? The
> download page http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html?
Yes. That seems like a good place.
First, we need to discuss and decide what we want to say.
Once that is decide
On Jan 4, 2012, at 4:21 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Dec 29, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>
> > Hey Forrest,
> >
> > The download links for the older versions are supposed to ha
On Dec 29, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
> Hey Forrest,
>
> The download links for the older versions are supposed to have been updated
> to point to the archives (http://archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/).
>
> Just for the purpose of cleanup of the dist folder.
>
> They all still ex
Rat, checksum/signature, build, license/notice -- all look good to me.
+1
--kevan
On Dec 21, 2011, at 1:05 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.8 has been created and staged.
>
> The tag has been created here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo
On Dec 19, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was about to cleanup/close up the 3.9 XBean release in JIRA and I
> noticed there are lots of unressolved issues assigned to 3.8 and 3.9,
> Should I just moved those to 3.10?
That's fine. However, I suspect we probably need to review
On Dec 16, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> How to access buildbot system? so that we can configure CI build for
> necessary branches/trunk.
The geronimo build configuration file is here --
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/gero
101 - 200 of 3111 matches
Mail list logo