At 02:33 PM 4/8/2009 +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 14:23, Tres Seaver wrote:
> I want *less* stuff (ideally nothing) spelled in imperative Python, with
> some common declarative file replacing both the information currently in
> setup.py and MANIFEST.in. I thought we were
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lennart Regebro
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé
> wrote:
> >>> If anyone wants to work on it, or comment,
> >> Some comments:
> >>
> >>> "MANIFEST.in is fine"
> >> Except that it introduces Yet Ano
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
If anyone wants to work on it, or comment,
>>> Some comm
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 14:23, Tres Seaver wrote:
> I want *less* stuff (ideally nothing) spelled in imperative Python, with
> some common declarative file replacing both the information currently in
> setup.py and MANIFEST.in. I thought we were in agreement that
> non-introspectable metadata was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>> If anyone wants to work on it, or comment,
>> Some comments:
>>
>>> "MANIFEST.in is fine"
>> Except that it introduces
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 13:01, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> I don't think we want to break any current feature in 2.7, we will
> probably just display
> deprecation warnings and keep them, then wait until the next python version.
>
> And if someone want to use your package, that uses a new feature
> that i
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:03, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> But I will not work in flame-threads anymore on my side.
>
> Probably a good idea.
>
> The only thing I'm worried about is the fact that you are proposing
> both to remove and add things
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:03, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> But I will not work in flame-threads anymore on my side.
Probably a good idea.
The only thing I'm worried about is the fact that you are proposing
both to remove and add things to distutils. Although backports will be
available, how will this wo
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:21, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> I agree with this. Remember: I wanted to deprecate MANIFEST.in in favor of
>> a pure python description. Then people strongly objected.
>
> How many people objected? Would it be OK to onl
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:21, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> I agree with this. Remember: I wanted to deprecate MANIFEST.in in favor of
> a pure python description. Then people strongly objected.
How many people objected? Would it be OK to only have support for this
in an external plugin, and not in stdlib
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> If anyone wants to work on it, or comment,
>
> Some comments:
>
>> "MANIFEST.in is fine"
>
> Except that it introduces Yet Another Domain Specific Language. Wtf
> does "prune" mean? It's n
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> If anyone wants to work on it, or comment,
Some comments:
> "MANIFEST.in is fine"
Except that it introduces Yet Another Domain Specific Language. Wtf
does "prune" mean? It's not obvious. The docs indicate that it
actually excludes, but why it's
12 matches
Mail list logo
