On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 16:05, clemens fischer
wrote:
> Mariano Absatz wrote:
>
> (please don't top post)
Sorry about that... I usually follow the "posting convention" I see
and since richardvoigt had top-posted, I did the same.
>
>> So, given that, I may write down the static IP/hostname assignm
Mariano Absatz wrote:
(please don't top post)
> So, given that, I may write down the static IP/hostname assignments in
> every dnsmasq server and that would give the correct name in every
> server.
>
> All would have the same MAC/IP/hostname configuration in dnsmasq.conf
> so even if there are d
So, given that, I may write down the static IP/hostname assignments in
every dnsmasq server and that would give the correct name in every
server.
All would have the same MAC/IP/hostname configuration in dnsmasq.conf
so even if there are dhcp collisions (e.g. because 2 servers got a
broadcast reque
The basic rule for running multiple instances is to not give them
overlapping pools. Since you use only reservations, this shouldn't be a
problem.
However: the automatically generated dns entries when the address is given
out over DHCP won't be visible to other servers, you'll have to use
permane
Hi,
is there a way to "load balance" among dnsmasq servers?
I have a network of a half dozen servers (with static IPs which I
write down in /etc/hosts for dnsmasq to publish), plus about 50
computers which get their IP and hostname from dnsmasq and use it to
resolve dns, especifically, to know th