There was a mistake in config.def.h. Here's the fixed on.
2008/5/21, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
> I added the void *arg feature to dwm and diffed it together with the
> other changes. Please review the patch carefully, as I changed a lot.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 2008/5/21, Enno Go
Hi!
I added the void *arg feature to dwm and diffed it together with the
other changes. Please review the patch carefully, as I changed a lot.
Thanks!
2008/5/21, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here is yet another update to the patch which includes chances
> discussed on #dwm.
>
> 20
Here is yet another update to the patch which includes chances
discussed on #dwm.
2008/5/21, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi I like your patches (also the version of anydot).
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:49:16AM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
> > 2008/5/21, Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL
On (20/05/08 11:22), Kurt H Maier wrote:
> To: dynamic window manager
> From: Kurt H Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> C has bitfield support inside structs:
>
> unsigned tagsapplied :8;
>
> and replace 8 with whatever value you want
Not really with whatever value, only that values so whole variab
Hi Anselm,
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 04:13:35PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> please recheck attached version of setmwname as a binary with
> the JDK grey blob issue.
>
> Use
>
> ; ./setwmname LG3D
>
> and see if it works. If so, then consider this for getting rid
> of Xmonad patches as well.
On 5/21/08, markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read, that bit-arrays are not very portable between different
> architectures. (It was in "The practice of programming", I think)
it's not exactly a bit array (arbitrary number of bits implemented eg.
as char array), it's only one int (wit
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:14:27PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote:
> That's the reason why i wrote it as macros. That bitops can also be
> written as inline functions, without any harm to binary size or
> performance.
>
> And yes, with bitarrays there are some portability issues. But asside of
> limit
On (21/05/08 12:06), markus schnalke wrote:
> To: dwm@suckless.org
> From: markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)
> Mail-Followup-To: dwm@suckless.org
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
> Reply-To: dynamic window manager
> List-Id: dynamic windo
Premysl Hruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is realization of Gottox's proposal discuted on IRC today.
> It handles tags not as Bool [], but as bit-array saved in int.
I read, that bit-arrays are not very portable between different
architectures. (It was in "The practice of programming", I
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 19:13:11 -0400]:
>
>> > yes
>> > lack of knowledge can mean lack of freedom (with my definition)
>>
>> So you have you own definition?
> [...]
>
> That's our freedom (in your de
Hi I like your patches (also the version of anydot).
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:49:16AM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
> 2008/5/21, Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > in config.h referencing tags has changed in rules but not in keys.
> Yes, arg has discussed yesterday if it's possible to cha
> That's our freedom (in your definition). Szabolcs and I can use terms in
> another way than you, you hiro can curse on public mailing lists, and I
> can decide to stop discussing with people who swear and get personal.
This is not politics, it's the internet, boy. Though you could nee
some po
2008/5/21, Premysl Hruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> tagmask can be #define:
>
> #define TAGMASK ((int)(1LL << (LENGTH(tags) + 1) - 1))
Thanks! Here's the updated patch
--
http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro
http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)
diff -r cd9
On 5/21/08, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> the (1 << tagnum) in rules is a bit nasty
>> it is probably nicer to do the shifting in setup();
> you mean in applyrules? - No I don't think so. It adds much more
> flexibility. You can define bitmasks as 0b10001 to tag a client to the
* hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 19:13:11 -0400]:
> > yes
> > lack of knowledge can mean lack of freedom (with my definition)
>
> So you have you own definition?
[...]
That's our freedom (in your definition). Szabolcs and I can use terms in
another way than you, you hiro can curse on pu
On (21/05/08 08:27), Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
> To: dynamic window manager
> From: Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)
> Reply-To: dynamic window manager
> List-Id: dynamic window manager
>
> Here's my version of a bitarray patch. Please r
Hi!
2008/5/21, Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> in config.h referencing tags has changed in rules but not in keys.
Yes, arg has discussed yesterday if it's possible to change const char
*arg to void *arg. if this works, i'll change the key behavior too.
> the (1 << tagnum) in rules is a bit n
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i deliberately used an alternative definition of freedom (and included
> all the dictatorship), because it makes sense to me.
Well, I guess that sums it all up nicely. I think that at this point
further argument is obviou
On 5/21/08, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's my version of a bitarray patch. Please review and comment.
in config.h referencing tags has changed in rules but not in keys.
the (1 << tagnum) in rules is a bit nasty
it is probably nicer to do the shifting in setup();
instead o
19 matches
Mail list logo
