Re: gEDA-user: PCB gcode generation

2011-04-28 Thread Alberto Maccioni
>> ... but it broke the "minimum distance" path optimization, > > This was fixed the day you mentioned it. Perhaps a day later :-) Probably you didn't notice that it is still boken, as I wrote again. The point is that the above optimization has to be applied as the last operation on every set of d

gEDA-user: Wrong Pinout for LM337

2011-04-28 Thread Daniel B.
Hi geda-user@ The LM337 symbol (lm337-1.sym) has a wrong pinout. The correct is: 1 -> ADJ 2 -> VIN 3 -> VOUT The current version in gEDA has a pinout equal to LM317, which is a mistake. Thank you. -- Daniel Bolgheroni http://devio.us/~dbolgheroni ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) against HTML e-mai

Re: gEDA-user: PCB gcode generation

2011-04-28 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 28.04.2011 um 11:14 schrieb Alberto Maccioni: There was a patch that did something like that, ... You probably mean this set of patches: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/699497 ... but it broke the "minimum distance" path optimization, This was fixed the day you mentioned it. Perha

Re: gEDA-user: PCB gcode generation

2011-04-28 Thread Alberto Maccioni
There was a patch that did something like that, but it broke the "minimum distance" path optimization, so your machine will do a great deal of jumps while drilling. I can write a new patch, hoping that someone will ever review and merge it; what G codes do you use for changing bits? Regarding the m