On Mar 8, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Steven Michalske wrote:
My statement was that you as a user should not override the setting
that the computer configured for you.
...assuming the people who wrote that part of the OS did it
right. I'm willing to bet I've been using (and programming) X longer
On Mar 8, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Charles Lepple wrote:
"Feature"? This isn't how X works, it's not how X EVER worked,
and it's
not how X is SUPPOSED to work. Wow I wonder what they were
smoking when
they did this.
Steve did a good job of explaining the mechanics of this, but do note
that most
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:54 PM, Steven Michalske wrote:
Ahhh... OK, I get it. Yes, my build brings up the X server. But other
than the start-up time, that doesn't bother me. X11 is preinstalled as of
10.6 (or maybe 10.5, I fo
On Mar 5, 2010, at 10:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:54 PM, Steven Michalske wrote:
Ahhh... OK, I get it. Yes, my build brings up the X server. But
other than the start-up time, that doesn't bother me. X11 is
preinstalled as of 10.6 (or maybe 10.5, I forget which) so the
On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:54 PM, Steven Michalske wrote:
Ahhh... OK, I get it. Yes, my build brings up the X server. But
other than the start-up time, that doesn't bother me. X11 is
preinstalled as of 10.6 (or maybe 10.5, I forget which) so the
hassle factor is pretty minimal.
10.6 seems to
On Mar 4, 2010, at 8:52 PM, John Doty wrote:
> Ahhh... OK, I get it. Yes, my build brings up the X server. But other than
> the start-up time, that doesn't bother me. X11 is preinstalled as of 10.6
> (or maybe 10.5, I forget which) so the hassle factor is pretty minimal.
>
> 10.6 seems to def
On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:52 PM, John Doty wrote:
On Mar 1, 2010, at 4:03 AM, Dave N6NZ wrote:
Ahhh... OK, I get it. Yes, my build brings up the X server. But
other than the start-up time, that doesn't bother me. X11 is
preinstalled as of 10.6 (or maybe 10.5, I forget which) so the
hassle
On Mar 1, 2010, at 4:03 AM, Dave N6NZ wrote:
> Ahhh... OK, I get it. Yes, my build brings up the X server. But other than
> the start-up time, that doesn't bother me. X11 is preinstalled as of 10.6
> (or maybe 10.5, I forget which) so the hassle factor is pretty minimal.
10.6 seems to defin
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 17:02 -0500, Mark Anderson wrote:
> I'll take a screen shot. And send along the errors. I have to
> rebuild with the newest GTK+OSX. In terms of the "XPM problems", it
> seems to be the XPM icons that don't show up, why that is I have no
> idea, since gd and other programs
I'll take a screen shot. And send along the errors. I have to
rebuild with the newest GTK+OSX. In terms of the "XPM problems", it
seems to be the XPM icons that don't show up, why that is I have no
idea, since gd and other programs have XPM support.
—Mark
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Dave
On Feb 28, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Dave N6NZ wrote:
Someone with a Mac might like to try building gEDA and PCB with
a native
version of GTK?
OK, I'll play dumb. I recently built PCB from git after naively
using macports to make all the dependancies go away. How is that
different from what I did
On Feb 28, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Dave N6NZ wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
>>
>>> Someone with a Mac might like to try building gEDA and PCB with a native
>>> version of GTK?
>> OK, I'll play dumb. I recentl
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Dave N6NZ wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
>> Someone with a Mac might like to try building gEDA and PCB with a native
>> version of GTK?
> OK, I'll play dumb. I recently built PCB from git after naively using
> macports to make al
On Feb 27, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Someone with a Mac might like to try building gEDA and PCB with a native
> version of GTK?
OK, I'll play dumb. I recently built PCB from git after naively using macports
to make all the dependancies go away. How is that different from what I
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 23:42 -0500, Charles Lepple wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
>> > Someone with a Mac might like to try building gEDA and PCB with a native
>> > version of GTK?
>>
>> Is it currently possib
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 23:42 -0500, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > Someone with a Mac might like to try building gEDA and PCB with a native
> > version of GTK?
>
> Is it currently possible to tell a running copy of gschem to open a
> schematic? If
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Someone with a Mac might like to try building gEDA and PCB with a native
> version of GTK?
Is it currently possible to tell a running copy of gschem to open a
schematic? If not, that is probably something that needs to be fixed
before worryi
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 15:49 -0500, Mark Anderson wrote:
> It kinda works. You get a lot of blank icons...I think due to some
> XPM problems.
>
> Mark
Send a screenshot?
What "XPM problems"? Is it because MacOS X native GTK doesn't support
them, or what?
A quick search revealed this:
https://bu
It kinda works. You get a lot of blank icons...I think due to some
XPM problems.
Mark
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Someone with a Mac might like to try building gEDA and PCB with a native
> version of GTK?
>
> If so, take a look at this page:
>
> http://gtk-osx.source
Someone with a Mac might like to try building gEDA and PCB with a native
version of GTK?
If so, take a look at this page:
http://gtk-osx.sourceforge.net/
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
20 matches
Mail list logo