On Tuesday 16 Nov 2010 11:09:34 timecop wrote:
> With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
> (or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
> really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
Even this single sentence contains so many fa
I guess I didn't realize PCB was mainly for hobby use... WHAT???
Rick
At 06:09 AM 11/16/2010, you wrote:
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
really any point on bothering improving built in au
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Ecob
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:09 PM, timecop wrote:
>> With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
>> (or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
>> really any point on bothering improving built
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:09 PM, timecop wrote:
> With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
> (or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
> really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
> Does PCB have Specctra DSN/SES export/imp
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:09 AM, timecop wrote:
> With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
> (or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
> really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
> Does PCB have Specctra DSN/SES export/imp
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Jan Martinek wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 09:24 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stephen Ecob wrote:
>>>
Motivation
Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I became aware of
s
On 16/11/10 15:54, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 Nov 2010 11:09:34 timecop wrote:
>> With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
>> (or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
>> really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:09:34 +0900
timecop wrote:
> With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
> (or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
> really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
> Does PCB have Specctra DSN/SES export/i
With TopoR having a freeware version for 2 layers and up to 256 nets
(or some other fairly high for 'hobby' use limitation), there's not
really any point on bothering improving built in autorouter...
Does PCB have Specctra DSN/SES export/import? Just use that (or
implement if it doesn't) and then u
On 11/15/2010 09:24 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
wrote:
Stephen Ecob wrote:
Motivation
Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I became aware of
some bugs in the autorouter that made the job difficult:
Are you talking about the def
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
wrote:
> Stephen Ecob wrote:
>
>> Motivation
>> Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I became aware of
>> some bugs in the autorouter that made the job difficult:
>
> Are you talking about the default auto router. Or is this about
Stephen Ecob wrote:
> Motivation
> Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I became aware of
> some bugs in the autorouter that made the job difficult:
Are you talking about the default auto router. Or is this about the shiny,
new "toporouter"?
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Kn
Hello all,
I've made a branch of PCB. The intent of the branch is to aid in the
debugging and tuning of PCB's autorouter and PCB's trace optimiser.
Motivation
Having laid out a couple of boards with PCB 20091103 I became aware of
some bugs in the autorouter that made the job difficult:
1 The aut
13 matches
Mail list logo
