Re: [j-nsp] about 10.4R3 on EX

2011-03-22 Thread Kaj Niemi
It took 838 seconds on a 2 member EX4200 VC bundle. Yes, I did time it. ;-) Kaj On 22/3/2011 22:46, "Richard A Steenbergen" wrote: >On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:54:25PM -0700, Kaj Niemi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> To whomever who decided to introduce n

[j-nsp] about 10.4R3 on EX

2011-03-22 Thread Kaj Niemi
Hi, To whomever who decided to introduce new features in a R3 release, thanks ;-( Specifically installing jloader separately is highly appreciated. Kaj ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinf

Re: [j-nsp] Interface Index(ifIndex) changes when router is rebooted

2010-08-14 Thread Kaj Niemi
Hi, You should be doing a bulkwalk on ifTable/ifXTable or parts of it for performance anyway so why is this a problem? If your performance management software is blindly getting just a specific counter each and every time it's doing it wrong. There are other ways of getting counters if you do

Re: [j-nsp] M7i DHCP Relay

2010-08-12 Thread Kaj Niemi
On 12/8/2010 15:33, "Chuck Anderson" wrote: > 1. MX shouldn't require Option 82 (relay-agent-option) in order to > function as a stateless DHCP Relay Agent (BOOTP Helper), but it does. > > 2. MX shouldn't get confused and fail to function when the edge switch > has added it's own DHCP Option 82

Re: [j-nsp] M7i DHCP Relay

2010-08-12 Thread Kaj Niemi
Hi, On 12/8/2010 12:01, "sth...@nethelp.no" wrote: > We have tested these two commands, both in daily build versions of > JunOS and in 10.0S7.1 where it is implemented. These commands seem to > do the job, even if they don't solve all of our problems. What other problems remain? Just curious ;-

Re: [j-nsp] M7i DHCP Relay

2010-08-11 Thread Kaj Niemi
Hi, This is supposedly fixed in PR/523902 which is resolved in 10.2R2 10.3R1 10.1R3 10.0R4 10.4R1. It includes two hidden commands which should allow the forwarding of DHCP traffic on interfaces that are not configured for DHCP (when using dhcp-relay or dhcp-local-server). I haven't had the time

Re: [j-nsp] software version to use?

2009-09-16 Thread Kaj Niemi
It's available on J and SRX since they're nowadays flow-based by default for inet.. See configuring selective stateless packet-based services, http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos-security/junos-security96/jun os-security-admin-guide/config-selective-stateless-chap.html in the JUNOS Soft

Re: [j-nsp] reliable static routing/ip tracking

2009-09-16 Thread Kaj Niemi
Hi, You should be able to do this with scripting.. Check out http://junos.juniper.net/scripts/op_scripts/default.asp?docId=13055 which combines RPM and disabling an interface in case the RPM initiated ping fails. It should be relatively easy to modify that for your purposes. The site does require

Re: [j-nsp] understanding 'show route <...> extensive'

2009-09-01 Thread Kaj Niemi
Hi, Check out http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.6/information-products/topic-co llections/swcmdref-protocols/show-route-extensive.html#show-route-extensive- command I think it'll answer your question pretty well. :-) Kaj > From: The Dark One > Reply-To: The Dark One > Date: Tu

Re: [j-nsp] Firewall filtering in EX3200

2008-04-28 Thread Kaj Niemi
On Apr 28, 2008, at 21:01, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:14:29PM +0300, Juha Suhonen wrote: Hello, Juniper gurus! We recently got few Juniper EX3200's, after paging thru the (quite inconsistent and scattered) documentation on Juniper's web site I still haven't bee

Re: [j-nsp] J-Series 1-port SFP ePIM

2008-03-23 Thread Kaj Niemi
Hi, It does. Please refer to the standard or, for your convenience, IEEE 802.3 interpretation 2-07/05 [1] (link from 802.3 Interpretations page [2]). [1] http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/interp/interp-2-0705.pdf [2] http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/interp/index.html Kaj On Mar