It took 838 seconds on a 2 member EX4200 VC bundle. Yes, I did time it. ;-)
Kaj
On 22/3/2011 22:46, "Richard A Steenbergen" wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:54:25PM -0700, Kaj Niemi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> To whomever who decided to introduce n
Hi,
To whomever who decided to introduce new features in a R3 release, thanks
;-( Specifically installing jloader separately is highly appreciated.
Kaj
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinf
Hi,
You should be doing a bulkwalk on ifTable/ifXTable or parts of it for
performance anyway so why is this a problem? If your performance management
software is blindly getting just a specific counter each and every time it's
doing it wrong.
There are other ways of getting counters if you do
On 12/8/2010 15:33, "Chuck Anderson" wrote:
> 1. MX shouldn't require Option 82 (relay-agent-option) in order to
> function as a stateless DHCP Relay Agent (BOOTP Helper), but it does.
>
> 2. MX shouldn't get confused and fail to function when the edge switch
> has added it's own DHCP Option 82
Hi,
On 12/8/2010 12:01, "sth...@nethelp.no" wrote:
> We have tested these two commands, both in daily build versions of
> JunOS and in 10.0S7.1 where it is implemented. These commands seem to
> do the job, even if they don't solve all of our problems.
What other problems remain? Just curious ;-
Hi,
This is supposedly fixed in PR/523902 which is resolved in 10.2R2 10.3R1
10.1R3 10.0R4 10.4R1. It includes two hidden commands which should allow the
forwarding of DHCP traffic on interfaces that are not configured for DHCP
(when using dhcp-relay or dhcp-local-server). I haven't had the time
It's available on J and SRX since they're nowadays flow-based by default for
inet..
See configuring selective stateless packet-based services,
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos-security/junos-security96/jun
os-security-admin-guide/config-selective-stateless-chap.html in the JUNOS
Soft
Hi,
You should be able to do this with scripting.. Check out
http://junos.juniper.net/scripts/op_scripts/default.asp?docId=13055 which
combines RPM and disabling an interface in case the RPM initiated ping
fails. It should be relatively easy to modify that for your purposes. The
site does require
Hi,
Check out
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.6/information-products/topic-co
llections/swcmdref-protocols/show-route-extensive.html#show-route-extensive-
command
I think it'll answer your question pretty well. :-)
Kaj
> From: The Dark One
> Reply-To: The Dark One
> Date: Tu
On Apr 28, 2008, at 21:01, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:14:29PM +0300, Juha Suhonen wrote:
Hello, Juniper gurus!
We recently got few Juniper EX3200's, after paging thru the (quite
inconsistent and scattered) documentation on Juniper's web site I
still
haven't bee
Hi,
It does. Please refer to the standard or, for your convenience, IEEE
802.3 interpretation 2-07/05 [1] (link from 802.3 Interpretations page
[2]).
[1] http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/interp/interp-2-0705.pdf
[2] http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/interp/index.html
Kaj
On Mar
11 matches
Mail list logo