Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: Re: MX-Series supported transceivers

vance > > Alex > > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Timh Bergström Head of System Operations +46 727 406 845 Videoplaza AB S:t Eriksgatan 46C

Re: [j-nsp] JFLOW

That's JFLOW, and as sthaug pointed out, I don't need 10G at all, it barely hits 3% utilization on the NIC's during peaks. //T On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Gavin Henry wrote: > On 28 Mar 2014 08:10, "Timh Bergström" > wrote: >> >> We have simil

Re: [j-nsp] JFLOW

g list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Timh Bergström Head of System Operations +46 727 406 845 Videoplaza AB S:t Eriksgatan 46C Stockholm www.videoplaza.com Think before you print. ___

Re: [j-nsp] EX series junos 12.x version

or > going above 11.4 too. That's interesting, have you seen any other 'gotchas' with 12.2R3? I'm running a 11.3 version and desperately want NSSU (among other things) and have a similar setup, lag/lacp/vlan termination/routing/ospf(v3). Does 3rd party transceivers work? Ho

Re: [j-nsp] Bridge Domain/IRB on MX80

> facebook.com/eintellego > PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia > > The Experts Who The Experts Call > Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM > * * > _______ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Timh Bergströ

Re: [j-nsp] EX4500 - 3rd party DAC/Twinax cable support - link-up at 1g instead of 10g

NIC in the other end, works fine with Dell-switches/modules). We're running 11.3R4.2, I've heard some unofficial rumors about this version and earlier that won't "take" 3rd party sfp+, we have a couple of juniper DAC's and a couple of 3rd party sfp+ (coded as Juniper)

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.4R8.5 on MX5? Am I forced to run 11.4+?

could shed some light into this? I'm currently running 11.2R5.4 as per the JTAC-recommendation list, I have nothing major to complain about but still, would prefer running 10.4-series as with the other edges. //T -- Timh Bergström Head of System Operations Videoplaza/System Operations ti

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.4R8.5 on MX5? Am I forced to run 11.4+?

e a technical support >>>> ticket or >>>> raise hell with my SR to try to make the 10.4-series to support MX5/10/40s >>>> unless someone else has done it already. > > > -- > ---- > Christopher E. Brown     desk (907) 550-8393 >                                    

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.4R8.5 on MX5? Am I forced to run 11.4+?

sed >> when I could get a MX80-5G. >> >> I'm going to try to install 11.2R5.4 (recommended release) on it now, I do >> not >> trust a R1-release. Ever. ;-) I might also try create a technical support >> ticket or >> raise hell with my SR to try

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.4R8.5 on MX5? Am I forced to run 11.4+?

ttp://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.2/information-products/t >> opic-collections/release-notes/11.2/topic-57399.html >> >> >> "New MX5, MX10, and MX40 3D Universal Edge Routers—Three new routers >> based on the modular MX80 chassis are available in Junos OS R

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.4R8.5 on MX5? Am I forced to run 11.4+?

quot;New MX5, MX10, and MX40 3D Universal Edge Routers—Three new routers based > on the modular MX80 chassis are available in Junos OS Release 11.2R6." > > > Though in 11.4 relnotes it's 11.2R3 :-/ > So you probably should try 11.2R6. > > > > > > On 22.03.2

[j-nsp] JunOS 10.4R8.5 on MX5? Am I forced to run 11.4+?

th "no-validate" (yet) for neither of the softwares. Thanks, -- Timh Bergström Head of System Operations Videoplaza/System Operations timh.bergst...@videoplaza.com +46 727 406 845 S:t Eriksgatan 46 Stockholm www.videoplaza.com skype: timh_bergstrom gtalk: timh.bergst..

Re: [j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version

We are running 10.4r7.5 with security on dual stack with static routing, dhcp (IPv4) and RA (IPv6) for the office, it Works ok, but had to upgrade the ram and cf. We are running j2320. We also have one j2320 running on 10.4R8-something for our IX peerings, both v4/v6. I've disabled all security

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

g list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [j-nsp] EX-UM-2X4SFP- 2-port 10G SFP+ / 4-port 1G SFP Uplink Module

or you can use one for VC and three for ethernet or the other way round, no problems (at least that's what the juniper SE told me when I bought mine). -- Timh Bergström Head of Operations Videoplaza/System Operations timh.bergst...@videoplaza.com +46 727

Re: [j-nsp] NAT performance :: J2320

We are running a J2320 with NAT/Firewall and serve about 90-150 clients without breaking a sweat, mind this is an converted SSG320M with 1G CF / 2GB RAM. In load-tests we can get about 800Mbps through it, but we don't have any extensive rules. -- Timh Bergström System Operations Video

Re: [j-nsp] J-Series Router Options

Hey, I'd say get a bigger CF and install some 10.4 version and follow this; http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Enabling_packet_based_forwarding Disables all that flow stuff you really don't want on a router. -- Timh Bergström System Operations Videoplaza timh.bergst...@videoplaza.c