pls instead
(if that works for cluster).
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of roland DROUAL
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 3:06 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 - Failover - reth TR
puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
>> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of roland DROUAL
>> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 3:06 PM
>> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 - Failover - reth TRUNK with: vlan L2 mo
3:06 PM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 - Failover - reth TRUNK with: vlan L2 mode
> transparent, and vlan L3
>
> I can't try this command because it's not accepted.
>
> ==
> {primary:node0}[edit inte
Mixed mode is not supported on an srx.
For a layer 3 ip you have to use an irb interface. This is non-routable so it
may not be what you're looking for. It's used for management of the device
typically. At best it's an ip to ping.
On May 31, 2012, at 12:59 AM, Per Granath wrote:
> Try adding:
I can't try this command because it's not accepted.
==
{primary:node0}[edit interfaces reth0]
xyz@AS-SRX650-01# set encapsulation ?
Possible completions:
ether-vpls-ppp Ethernet VPLS over PPP (bridging) device
ethernet-bridgeEthernet
Try adding:
set interfaces reth0 encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services
> I try to have a vlan 200 in layer 2 mode transparent accross the SRX in
> failover
> mode.
> Is it possible to have a redundant interface as trunk link, with 1 vlan with
> an
> @IP, and 1 vlan in transparent mode.
>
Hello the list,
I have 2 SRX650 in failover mode
There is reth0 in mode trunk, with vlan 954 and vlan 200 - (reth0 is
the interface outside)
There is reth1 in mode trunk, with vlan 100 and vlan 200 - (reth1 is
the interface inside)
I try to have a vlan 200 in layer 2 mode transparent
7 matches
Mail list logo
