Thank to everyone who answered. I eventually found a RPM on the developers
CD set.
This I extracted and it installed perfectly.
It seems to me that when obtaining a distribution, you should always
get all the sources that it supports. At less that way you should be
guaranteed some level of compa
Ulrich Weigand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Rivers wrote:
> >That is, of course one of the issues. The i386 IEEE implementation
> >is not the same as the mainframe, particularly when two variables
> >are loaded into registers and arithmetic is applied. The result
> >will be different.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Markle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 6:22 PM
Subject: how to display real model id on mp3000
> we have an MP3 but aren't sure if it's a 7060-H30, H50 or H70. What
> command can we issue, and where from, t
Oops..sorry about that.
I'm not sure..what does cat /proc/cpuinfo show?
Chris Markle wrote:
>
> > From the console:
> > d m=cpu
>
> this looks like a Z/OS command... Is it? We are running Linux(es) under
> VM... If this is a Z/OS command, how would I do it in my Linux / VM
> environment? t
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Mark,
>
> You can upgrade either one, but Samba would probably be easier. What I've
> done in the past is take my distribution's .spec file for a package,
> download the updated source, and create a new .spec file for it, using the
> old one as a model.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:55:01PM -0600, Jim Rich wrote:
> 5510 Kris Van Hees Andrew File System (AFS) on Linux for S/390 and zSeries Adobe PDF
> http://www.openafs.org/
> ...
> 29-Sep-2002 - OpenAFS 1.2.7 Released!
> Jim
Kris' original presentation (and even more good stuff on AFS) is
available
> From the console:
> d m=cpu
this looks like a Z/OS command... Is it? We are running Linux(es) under
VM... If this is a Z/OS command, how would I do it in my Linux / VM
environment? tyia...
Mark,
You can upgrade either one, but Samba would probably be easier. What I've
done in the past is take my distribution's .spec file for a package,
download the updated source, and create a new .spec file for it, using the
old one as a model. Then, use rpm to build and install the package.
Mar
>From the console:
d m=cpu
..thanks
Chris Markle wrote:
>
> we have an MP3 but aren't sure if it's a 7060-H30, H50 or H70. What
> command can we issue, and where from, to find out which one we have? tyia.
We've just run into the 2.4.7 kernel bug that occurs with Samba writing to
a Windows share. I've reviewed previous discussion on this list but I'm not
clear whether I can get around the problem by upgrading the kernel or
Samba. Can I just upgrade to the latest Samba by downloading the source and
ru
we have an MP3 but aren't sure if it's a 7060-H30, H50 or H70. What
command can we issue, and where from, to find out which one we have? tyia.
There is a nice presentation here:
http://linuxvm.org/present/
...
Presentations from SHARE 98, Nashville, March 4-8, 2002
...
5510 Kris Van Hees Andrew File System (AFS) on Linux for S/390 and zSeries Adobe PDF
Going to the source...
http://www.openafs.org/
...
29-Sep-2002 - OpenAFS 1.2.7 Releas
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:34:21PM -0500, Post, Mark K wrote:
> http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/openafs-1.0.2-s390.diffs
> http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/openafs-1.0.4.patch
> http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/arla-0.35.2-diffs
> http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/memcpy.S
>
> Mark Post
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/openafs-1.0.2-s390.diffs
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/openafs-1.0.4.patch
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/arla-0.35.2-diffs
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/memcpy.S
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Matt Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=nfs+task+get+a+request+slot&ie=ISO-8859-1&;
hl=en&btnG=Google+Search
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Command hangs... semms to be NFS problems
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:56:43PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> You might want to consider a network filesystem which is designed for
> WAN operation. There are several projects in this area, but the only
> one that I have first-hand experience with is AFS. I do not know
> whether anyone has u
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jim Rich wrote:
> Reason I ask is that we use NFS mounted storage extensively in our labs,
> but the current UDP-only versions do not work well over a WAN, forcing
> remote users to go back to FTP to get reliable copies of large files.
You might want to c
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Post, Mark K wrote:
> As Adam indicated, LVM is what you need. But as a word of warning, since
> you're still running a 2.2 kernel, you will be limited to a _file_ size of
> 2GB each. So, if you need any individual file to exceed 2GB in size, you
> must upgrade to a 2.4 syst
Did you apply k_deflt-20020502.rpm ??? ... I did and it still not
working!
Mark,
Success!!! I now have 27 working filesystems!
Thanks to everyone!
Regards,
Jim Rich
jimrich@dalvs2:~ > su root
Password:
root@dalvs2:/home/jimrich > cd /dev
root@dalvs2:/dev > mknod /dev/dasdaa b 94 104
root@dalvs2:/dev > mknod /dev/dasdaa1 b 94 105
root@dalvs2:/dev > mknod /dev/dasdaa
You gave it the root user's id and password through the web dialog box?
That always worked for me
--Jim--
James S. Tison
Senior Software Engineer
TPF Laboratory / Architecture
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Noll, Ralph"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Log on as root first time and add yourself the the security piece.
Noll, Ralph wrote:
401 Bad Authorization
username or password incorrect
ok i restarted my linux partition and swat came up..
now i get the above message
snip
-Original Message-
From: Jon R. Doyle [mailto:[EMAIL
Issue rcinetd restart and point your browser to localhost, on port 901 I
think it says here.
Regards,
Jon
On 11/18/02 12:39 PM, "Noll, Ralph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes all there
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kittendorf, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Monday, Novemb
401 Bad Authorization
username or password incorrect
ok i restarted my linux partition and swat came up..
now i get the above message
snip
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon R. Doyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
We also have this problem with our SuSE Linux 2.4.7 kernel. I've never
figured out for sure what causes it. There are a number of possible
resource shortages that could lead to this problem.
I was never able to resolve the problem, but I got around it by by
mounting nfs file systems with parms:
rs
yes all there
> -Original Message-
> From: Kittendorf, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: how to get to swat
>
>
> Has Samba been started?
>
> Do you have
> swat 901/tcp
> in /etc/services?
>
> And
>swa
SWAT is a really nice application that aids in Samba administration. I'd
never understood the format & requirements of a minimal smb.conf file until
I'd run SWAT for a while. I still run it: it's easier than having to read
the documentation all the time, and even if you still need doc references,
S
#
# swat is the Samba Web Administration Tool
swatstream tcp nowait.400 root/usr/sbin/swat swat
#
above is what is in my inetd.conf..
it that right??
Ralph
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon R. Doyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:56 AM
>
Samba Web Administration Tool.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to get to swat
What the hell is swat?
What the hell is swat?
-
Starting Samba is not required for SWAT. You can use SWAT to setup and
start Samba.
Kittendorf, Craig wrote:
>Has Samba been started?
>
>Do you have
>swat 901/tcp
>in /etc/services?
>
>
Starting Samba is not required for SWAT. You can use SWAT to setup and
start Samba.
Kittendorf, Craig wrote:
Has Samba been started?
Do you have
swat 901/tcp
in /etc/services?
And
swat stream tcp nowait root /usr/bin/swat swat
In /etc/inetd.conf?
-Original Message-
From
Has Samba been started?
Do you have
swat 901/tcp
in /etc/services?
And
swat stream tcp nowait root /usr/bin/swat swat
In /etc/inetd.conf?
-Original Message-
From: Noll, Ralph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Jim,
I believe those node numbers are correct, but I don't have a working sample
to verify it.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Jim Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 26 Filesystem Limit?
Mark,
You are right!
I
Pat,
It stands for Logical Volume Manager. There's a section in the
Distributions Redbook that shows you how to set it up and use it on SuSE
7.0:
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg246264.html
Look at chapter 17.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Abruzzese
>
>
> Dave Rivers wrote:
>
> >That is, of course one of the issues. The i386 IEEE implementation
> >is not the same as the mainframe, particularly when two variables
> >are loaded into registers and arithmetic is applied. The result
> >will be different.So, one set of "IEEE" arithmetic on a P
Mark,
You are right!
It appears from the dates that dasda-dasdz were created at initial
install back on Jan 25 2002, and to add past dasdz I need to do:
mknod /dev/dasdaa b 94 104
mknod /dev/dasdaa1 b 94 105
mknod /dev/dasdaa2 b 94 106
mknod /dev/dasdaa3 b 94 107
...
Do you agree?
Thanks!
Ji
Logical volume Manager
Www.sistina.com
On 11/18/02 11:11 AM, "Abruzzese, Pat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Please explain what LVM means.
>
> Thanks,
>
> P. Abruzzese
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Post, Mark K [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:
Mark,
Please explain what LVM means.
Thanks,
P. Abruzzese
> -Original Message-
> From: Post, Mark K [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 20g partition
>
> As Adam indicated, LVM is what you need. But as a word
Dave Rivers wrote:
>That is, of course one of the issues. The i386 IEEE implementation
>is not the same as the mainframe, particularly when two variables
>are loaded into registers and arithmetic is applied. The result
>will be different.So, one set of "IEEE" arithmetic on a PC
>can get very
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 18:54, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> That is, of course one of the issues. The i386 IEEE implementation
> is not the same as the mainframe, particularly when two variables
> are loaded into registers and arithmetic is applied. The result
> will be different.So, one se
Which is why I would _not_ recommend cross compiling for the majority of
people who want to do compiles on an x86 system. Running Hercules would be
a much better choice for them. If people who have been working with Linux
for quite a while have problems with it, it's not a good choice for the
gen
>
> > Most notably - floating point arithmetic; which don't matter
> > to many applications.
>
> This in particular will be fixed with gcc 3.3. Compile-time floating
> point arithmetic will be done exactly identical in native and cross
> compiles. (But even before 3.3, this should not be an issue
As Adam indicated, LVM is what you need. But as a word of warning, since
you're still running a 2.2 kernel, you will be limited to a _file_ size of
2GB each. So, if you need any individual file to exceed 2GB in size, you
must upgrade to a 2.4 system.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: A
Could you show us what is in /dev? ls -l /dev/dasd*
/proc/dasd/devices is entirely unrelated to what is in /dev.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Jim Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 26 Filesystem Limit?
Mark
Dave Rivers wrote:
> Gcc can be configured as a cross-compiler, but the gcc compiler
> makes several assumptions that may or may-not be valid
> about its "host" environment making it what I would
> call a "mostly" cross-compiler.
If it does, this is a bug which you should report so it can get
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:52:48PM -0500, Abruzzese, Pat wrote:
> I have a user that needs a 20g partition. What steps are needed to add
> this partition?
Assuming you're using SuSE LVM: figure out how many physical volumes
you'll need. Use pvcreate, then vgcreate, then lvcreate, then treat the
l
LSB-Certified: http://www.opengroup.org/lsb/cert/register.html
binary compatibility:
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-lsb.html
Regards, Jim
Linux S/390-zSeries Support, SEEL, IBM Silicon Valley Labs
t/l 543-4021, 408-463-4021, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Grace Happens ***
Does any ome knows what this message means:
"nfs:task 1197 can't get a request slot"
The message appears during or after the command. the command hangs!
example, it seems when I do a "df', "ls" to file/directory that
are mounted thru nfs.
When I do a /proc
Edit inetd.conf and uncomment the lines to allow SWAT to run, be sure inetd
is running, it should be in rc.config as start inetd=yes, you can call it
with "rcinetd start"
Regards,
Jon
On 11/18/02 9:49 AM, "Noll, Ralph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how do i get to swat>>.
>
> i am using
> Linu
I have a user that needs a 20g partition. What steps are needed to add this
partition?
After /dev/dasdz will be /dev/dasdaa
Mark,
Yes, no problem there.
For example, on this system I added 120-124, with 120-123 working OK, but
I was unable to get 124 working, as dasdaa was unrecognizable to the mke2fs
utility, so I had to remove it to get SLES7 to boot completely.
Regards,
Jim
dalvs2:/boot/zipl # cat parmfile
dasd=0
how do i get to swat>>.
i am using
Linux zvmlinx1 2.4.17-SuSE #1 SMP Thu Feb 28 14:28:29 GMT 2002 s390x unknown
i tried my ip 10.60.1.111:901nothing??
thanks
Ralph Noll
Systems Programmer
City of Little Rock
Phone (501) 371-4884
Fax (501) 371-4712
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone tried the new Linux NFS over TCP/IP code yet?
http://nfs.sourceforge.net/
The IBM Linux Test Project notes its absence, but this was early in the year:
http://ltp.sourceforge.net/NFS012002.php
Reason I ask is that we use NFS mounted storage extensively
in our labs, but the current UDP-
That has LFS, if you call ReiserFS with -v2
However, I would recommend you grab 2.4.18
Regards,
Jon
On 11/18/02 9:27 AM, "Gustavson, John (ECSS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2.4.7
>
>
> Regards
>
> John Gustavson
> Enterprise Central Software Services (ECSS)
> 570 Washington Street - 2nd flo
2.4.7
Regards
John Gustavson
Enterprise Central Software Services (ECSS)
570 Washington Street - 2nd floor
New York, New York, 10080-6802
Telephone: 1-212-647-3793
Fax: 1-212-647-3321
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mond
What kernel version are you running?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Gustavson, John (ECSS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reiser file size limit
We are running reiserfsprogs 3.x.0k-pre8 of reiser. Is there a 2 gig
Jim,
Are the device nodes defined in /dev?? If not, then you should just be able
to do "mknod" commands to add them.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Jim Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 26 Filesystem Limit?
I se
Mkreiserfs -v2 /dev/
The -v2 will call the version that has LFS.
Regards,
Jon
On 11/18/02 9:00 AM, "Gustavson, John (ECSS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We are running reiserfsprogs 3.x.0k-pre8 of reiser. Is there a 2 gig file
> size limit? If so, what can be done to get around the limi
We are running reiserfsprogs 3.x.0k-pre8 of reiser. Is there a 2 gig file size limit?
If so, what can be done to get around the limit?
Regards
John Gustavson
Enterprise Central Software Services (ECSS)
570 Washington Street - 2nd floor
New York, New York, 10080-6802
Telephone: 1-212-647-3793
>
> Cross compiling would have been my first recommendation, until I ran into
> differences in compilations between Linux/390 and cross compiling. Running
> Hercules reduces the effective speed of the box, but I believe it allows you
> to be more certain that what you end up with better reflects w
Cross compiling would have been my first recommendation, until I ran into
differences in compilations between Linux/390 and cross compiling. Running
Hercules reduces the effective speed of the box, but I believe it allows you
to be more certain that what you end up with better reflects what you wo
I seem to have found a limit of 26 filesystems in my SuSE SLES7,
unless I'm overlooking something. I can mount more than 26 with
no problem, but dasdfmt and mke2fs will not process those past 26.
Then I booted off the CD-Rom, specified just the new drives,
did dasdfmt and mke2fs on them, rebooted
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 15:01, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Pat,
>
> Compiling is CPU intensive. That's simply the nature of the task. Just
> about any compilation will drive your CPU to 100% for the duration of the
> compile.
Cross compile on an x86 is one option, or use things like hercules on a
PC sin
Andy,
Unfortunately, there's no way (yet) to do this on Linux/390. You'll have to
IPL your starter system to fix the parameter.
One other thing to keep in mind is that if you have more than one disk
device defined, you can write a kernel out on each of them, with different
parameters, kernel lev
> In our case this is occurring when an App server (ATG Dynamo)
> is driving
> the JAVA compilation of JSPs.
> At the moment we are suspecting the IBM JAVA 1.3.0 SDK, and
> plan to install
> 1.3.1 to validate this theory.
If you are running 1.3.0, then you definitely need to upgrade. 1.3.1
fixed
http://linuxvm.org/images/z900-on-S390-Desktop.png
So, yes, you can indeed run 64-bit VM on an H70.
And yes, the peak MIPS should get a little better than 0.02; the system
was idle when I snapped the picture.
Adam
Hit cntrl-F, release the keys, and then hit 0. This works consistently
for all pf keys (cntrl-F and 1 thru = for PF1-PF12) on all terminal
types (including my venerable ADM1).
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
--- Received from FPU.MATTES 7993015 18-11-02 15:01
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
I was interested in the attached post as we are currently investigating a
similar performance issue on our SLES7 Linux system running under z/VM
In our case this is occurring when an App ser
Pat,
Compiling is CPU intensive. That's simply the nature of the task. Just
about any compilation will drive your CPU to 100% for the duration of the
compile.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Abruzzese, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL
Running any compile on the SuSE 7.0 kernel 2.2.16 will drive the processor
usage to 100%. What or how can this be corrected. This linux image has 256m
of storage and a share of 100 rel. also running with 'quickdsp'. plus the
compiles run extremely slow.
> Hey, David, does Adam have anything to make, um, er, you know, seem
> bigger? 'Cause I've heard that sometimes size matters.
As a quick literature search shows, amplitude is always a factor of
initial motion with periodic reinforcement. If ya gonna make waves, ya
gotta keep pushing...8-)
> Oh,
Hit 0 for PF10.
Scott Chapman
AEP
Werner Kuehnel
cc:
Sent by: Linux on Subject: Function Keys
390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU>
I'm currently installing again SLES for S/390. For opening a session to LINUX I
use Hummingbird Exceed Hostexplorer 6.2.0.0 (i.e. telnet with VT220).
Unfortunately my function keys do not work, just PF1-PF4 are acting as expected.
There is a keyboard mapping display to define specific actions/keys
Hi, i have a problem in my Linux running in the z800 with ThinkBlue
64bits.
When i compile tacacs+ end configure whith criptografy support (option
key) my client tacacs+
can't be validated by server. The solution is comment the option key.
Now whith radius-cistron or freeradius i have the same
75 matches
Mail list logo
