On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> At 08/04/2016 09:52 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> At 08/03/2016 05:05 PM, Filipe Manana wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Qu Wenruo
>>> wrote:
At 08/02/2016 02:00 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
>
>
>
At 08/04/2016 09:52 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
At 08/03/2016 05:05 PM, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Qu Wenruo
wrote:
At 08/02/2016 02:00 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Qu Wenruo
wrote:
[snipped]
Hi Filipe,
Thanks for your comment, i
At 08/03/2016 05:05 PM, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
At 08/02/2016 02:00 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[snipped]
Hi Filipe,
Thanks for your comment, it helps to refine the idea to fix the proble
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> At 08/02/2016 02:00 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Filipe, and maintainers,
>>>
>>> I'm recently working on the root fix to free send from calling backref
>>> walk.
>>>
>>> My curre
At 08/02/2016 02:00 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Hi Filipe, and maintainers,
I'm recently working on the root fix to free send from calling backref walk.
My current idea is to send data and metadata separately, and only do clone
detection inside
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi Filipe, and maintainers,
>
> I'm recently working on the root fix to free send from calling backref walk.
>
> My current idea is to send data and metadata separately, and only do clone
> detection inside the send subvolume.
>
> This method nee
At 07/31/2016 02:49 AM, g.bt...@cobb.uk.net wrote:
On 29/07/16 13:40, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Cons:
1) Not full fs clone detection
Such clone detection is only inside the send snapshot.
For case that one extent is referred only once in the send snapshot,
but also referred by source subvolum
At 07/29/2016 09:14 PM, Libor Klepáč wrote:
Hello,
just a little question on receiver point 0), see bellow
Dne pátek 29. července 2016 20:40:38 CEST, Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
Hi Filipe, and maintainers,
Receive will do the following thing first before recovering the
subvolume/snapshot:
0) Crea
On 29/07/16 13:40, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Cons:
> 1) Not full fs clone detection
>Such clone detection is only inside the send snapshot.
>
>For case that one extent is referred only once in the send snapshot,
>but also referred by source subvolume, then in the received
>subvolume, it w
Hello,
just a little question on receiver point 0), see bellow
Dne pátek 29. července 2016 20:40:38 CEST, Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
> Hi Filipe, and maintainers,
>
> Receive will do the following thing first before recovering the
> subvolume/snapshot:
>
> 0) Create temporary dir for data extents
>
Hi Filipe, and maintainers,
I'm recently working on the root fix to free send from calling backref walk.
My current idea is to send data and metadata separately, and only do
clone detection inside the send subvolume.
This method needs two new send commands:
(And new send attribute, A_DATA_BYT
11 matches
Mail list logo
