On Jun 26, 2014, at 12:38 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On June 26, 2014 11:41:48 AM EDT, "Atchley, Scott" wrote:
>> On Jun 26, 2014, at 10:55 AM, James Bottomley
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:53 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 06/11/14 11:09, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> + ret
Hello Eli, Or,
Do you know who can help on this? NFSoRDMA hits this error case with Mellanox
ConnectX-2 HCAs.
Thanks
Shirley
On 05/20/2014 11:55 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi-
>
> What does it mean when a LOCAL_INV work request fails with a
> IB_WC_MW_BIND_ERR completion?
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
On Feb 28, 2014, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> I'm update firmware to 2.7.200 (that is the latest from ftp
> supermicro). Now i'm try to test it.
Which type of HCA do you have? The firmware I downloaded from
ftp.supermicro.com was 2.9.1000, and once I upgraded to this version
from 2.7.200 I was able
On June 26, 2014 11:41:48 AM EDT, "Atchley, Scott" wrote:
>On Jun 26, 2014, at 10:55 AM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:53 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 06/11/14 11:09, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
+ return xfer_len + (xfer_len >> ilog2(sector_size)) * 8;
>>>
>>> So
On Jun 26, 2014, at 10:55 AM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:53 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 06/11/14 11:09, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>> + return xfer_len + (xfer_len >> ilog2(sector_size)) * 8;
>>
>> Sorry that I just noticed this now, but why is a shift-right and ilog
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:53 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 06/11/14 11:09, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > + return xfer_len + (xfer_len >> ilog2(sector_size)) * 8;
>
> Sorry that I just noticed this now, but why is a shift-right and ilog2()
> used in the above expression instead of just dividing t
On 06/11/14 11:09, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> + return xfer_len + (xfer_len >> ilog2(sector_size)) * 8;
Sorry that I just noticed this now, but why is a shift-right and ilog2()
used in the above expression instead of just dividing the transfer
length by the sector size ?
Thanks,
Bart.
--
To uns
Hey Roland,
These two are also good bug fixes for 3.16-rc3.
Thanks,
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Vladimir Koushnir
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Koushnir
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
---
opensm/osm_drop_mgr.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/osm_drop_mgr.c b/opensm/osm_drop_mgr.c
index 7eb174c..66c85b9 100644
--- a/opensm/osm_drop_mgr.c
+++
From: Vladimir Koushnir
In case of errors, setting NULL in the entry of port_lid_tbl
should be done only for LIDs assigned by lid manager in
order to avoid unnecessary expansion of port_lid_tbl and
further incorrect max_lid calculation that is based
on port_lid_tbl vector size.
Signed-off-by: Vl
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:38:03AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> Le dimanche 11 mai 2014 à 10:12 +0300, Eli Cohen a écrit :
> > Acked by: Eli Cohen
>
> This Acked-by: tag was not applied on commit 43bc889380c2,
> in for-next branch (HEAD at ca846ce98ca3).
>
> PS: Eli, you've made a typo in your
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 08:58:32PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>976
>977err_create:
>978if (qp->create_type == MLX5_QP_USER)
>979destroy_qp_user(pd, qp);
> ^^^
> But we dereference it inside
> I see, by the nature of the mlx4 SRIOV architecture under which
> there's no dedicated/separated PF vs VF driver, this is indeed a
> non-trivial task, need to think how to make it easier for you
Thanks for considering. It would be really helpful. I actually
appreciate the mlx4 architecture wherei
13 matches
Mail list logo
