Mike Beaty wrote:
>
>Interestingly (to me), I see this error
> ImportError: No module named Mailmann.UserDesc
>which began on or about the day I first noticed the issues.
Ooops. just noticed the double 'nn'. That's a different issue. It's
something corrupt in the pending.pck file. In your v
Mike Beaty wrote:
>
>I've put the last ~500 lines of ~mailman/logs/error into
> http://www.mikebeaty.com/mailman_log.txt
>
>Interestingly (to me), I see this error
> ImportError: No module named Mailmann.UserDesc
>which began on or about the day I first noticed the issues. Searches
>on
On Apr 4, 2013, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Mike Beaty wrote:
. The held messages do not appear in the web admindb interface
. They also do not show up in the 'vette' log
. cron/checkdbs runs every morning at 8 am.
. Messages are held in ~mailman/data/heldmesg-listname-###.txt
If the ~mailman/data
Javad Hoseini
انجمن پژوهشي آسيب هاي بينايي (راوي)
Research Association for Visual Impairments
www.IranRAVI.com
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki
Mike Beaty wrote:
>. The held messages do not appear in the web admindb interface
>. They also do not show up in the 'vette' log
>. cron/checkdbs runs every morning at 8 am.
>. Messages are held in ~mailman/data/heldmesg-listname-###.txt
If the ~mailman/data/heldmesg-listname-###.txt is creat
fr...@library.iisc.ernet.in wrote:
>
>> Mark Sapiro
>
>> The timestamp format in the logs is not the same as the one I copied
>> from your archived message. If you want to use grep, use the pattern
>> "Mar 08 10:[01]" to find all the messages near that time.
>>
>> You will still have to open the r
I have RTFM and have done searches, but have been unable to find the
solution. I'll try to be brief and include answers to questions asked
of those with similar issues in the past.
I have had mailman 2.1 installed since 2005 and it has been working
fine -- until recently. Now, I'm not notified w
> fr...@library.iisc.ernet.in wrote:
>>
>>I have searched all the log files, but couldn't locate the pattern, "Fri
>>Mar 8 10:09:05 IST 2013" in any of the log files. I even tried the
>>following caommands, but no match is found:
>
> Mark Sapiro
> The timestamp format in the logs is not the same
Le 04/04/2013 14:50, Richard Damon a écrit :
This is designed to handle cases where the list has alternate names that
(...)
thanks
mail is sometime much more complicated than someone can imagine, but
this list is extremely friendly and effective
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.org
http://jddtube.
On 4/4/13 1:42 AM, jdd wrote:
> Le 04/04/2013 03:58, Richard Damon a écrit :
>
>> It looks like this message was sent to the list via the email address
>> all-april@ (which looks like a local address, since it doesn't have a
>> domain),
>
> as I said, I removed the domain part (on my report) to pre
10 matches
Mail list logo
