Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Distutils] Confusion about the effect of eggs on import]

2007-02-10 Thread Charlie Moad
I'll fess up that I added the setuptools namespace support for the toolkits. Keep in mind I did this a LONG time ago, and as implied below the docs were sketchy. It did work at the time, but I honestly have not had basemap installed in a while to see the breakage. Charlie On 2/9/07, Andrew Stra

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Distutils] Confusion about the effect of eggs on import]

2007-02-10 Thread John Hunter
On 2/9/07, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like we're on the hook for some bugs associated with our use of > setuptools... I'm forwarding an email from the distutils-sig. > The short of it is that Phillip Eby suggests we move matplotlib.toolkits > to matplotlib_toolkits to save

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Distutils] Confusion about the effect of eggs on import]

2007-02-10 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:04:38AM -0600, John Hunter wrote: > I am inclined to consider ripping out the __init__ stuff into a > "config" module or something like that. If my understanding is right, enthought does this with an "api" module. It might be worth going in the same direction. My 2 cen

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Distutils] Confusion about the effect of eggs on import]

2007-02-10 Thread Tim Leslie
On 2/11/07, Gael Varoquaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:04:38AM -0600, John Hunter wrote: > > I am inclined to consider ripping out the __init__ stuff into a > > "config" module or something like that. > > If my understanding is right, enthought does this with an "api" mo

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Distutils] Confusion about the effect of eggs on import]

2007-02-10 Thread John Hunter
On 2/10/07, Tim Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And for what it's worth this is also the direction nipy is taking, > having an api.py in each package. I don't have a problem with this if it makes sense to other people and helps with consistency across packages, but I don't find the mnemonic p

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Distutils] Confusion about the effect of eggs on import]

2007-02-10 Thread Tim Leslie
On 2/11/07, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/10/07, Tim Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And for what it's worth this is also the direction nipy is taking, > > having an api.py in each package. > > I don't have a problem with this if it makes sense to other people and > helps wi

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Distutils] Confusion about the effect of eggs on import]

2007-02-10 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:32:45AM +1100, Tim Leslie wrote: > Sorry, I think I might have given the wrong impression. Our use of an > api.py is for having a single location to import classes equivalent to > Figure, Axes, etc from. Your suggestion of having a matplotlib.config > for things like rc a

[matplotlib-devel] axes.hold: False causes unexpected behaviour

2007-02-10 Thread Martin Spacek
Hello, just thought I should report two unexpected behaviours, which took me a while to pinpoint: 1) errorbar() plots the points but not the errorbars if axes.hold==False for those axes (in my case, due to it being set to False in rcParams) 2) when axes.hold is False, (again either set locally

Re: [matplotlib-devel] axes.hold: False causes unexpected behaviour

2007-02-10 Thread Martin Spacek
I forgot to mention, I'm running 0.87.7 in windows with WxAgg. Martin Martin Spacek wrote: > Hello, just thought I should report two unexpected behaviours, which > took me a while to pinpoint: > > 1) errorbar() plots the points but not the errorbars if axes.hold==False > for those axes (in my