hey man,
all i know about WAV to mp3 is that it looses quality...
-WiLL
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Taky Cheung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If you convert an mp3 back to wave using uncompressed PCM, that's the same
as the wave file you ripped from CD. Bob was right, the size of the wave
file is depends on the frequency, bit depth, and mono/stereo channel.
I realize that. But I also know th
When Bob Norton wrote,
N> Yes. The size of a WAV file depends only on the length of the recording,
N> the bit resolution used and the sampling frequency.
[and whether it's mono or stereo]
Don Capps responded,
C> Bob...you completely missed my point here. I was referring to .wav files
C> creat
From: "J. Coon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think they will be the same size.
True. They are. But the point of my discussion was that an interpolative
filter creates that data in an attempt to reconstruct the song. It mimics
what it thinks the original data was...an even more difficult task than
co
I think they will be the same size.
Don Capps wrote:
>
> From: "Bob Norton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Yes. The size of a WAV file depends only on the length of the recording,
> the bit resolution used and the sampling frequency.
>
> Bob...you completely missed my point here. I was referring t
From: "Bob Norton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes. The size of a WAV file depends only on the length of the recording,
the bit resolution used and the sampling frequency.
Bob...you completely missed my point here. I was referring to .wav files
created by decoding an MP3 file. Not to the original .w
inute
music clip using 44khz, 16bit, stereo settings.
- Original Message -
From: "Don Capps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 1:42 AM
Subject: Re: MD: Size of WAV files from decoded MP3 files
>
> From: "Bob N
"David W. Tamkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Now, I am aware that converting an MP3 back into a .wav file produces a
>VERY
>large file similar in size, if not exactly the same size as the original
>.wav file. But I was under the impression that this was accomplished by
use
>of an interpolative