Richard Lang wrote,
| Now while we're on the subject of MD to MD dubbing, if you have two decks
| with difference ATRAC, say one with ATRAC 4.5 and one with ATRAC R (or ATRAC
| 3 vs ATRAC 4.5), is there any consenus as to which should be recording and
| which should be playing?
There is virtu
> My rule of thumb is that when dubbing betweem different machines, the best
> machine should be playing, because that creates the best source for
> recording. Anyone? - Is this right? Or doesn't it matter?
>From what I've read in various faqs and info pages, here's what I
figure...
ATRAC was
ard
Richard Lang
Duncan Cotterill
Christchurch, New Zealand
-Original Message-
From: Magic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 13 April 2000 9:30 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD: MD -> MD dubbing?
From: Dave Kimmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Dave Kimmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 6:31 AM
Subject: MD: MD -> MD dubbing?
> I've noticed HMV.com selling some of their selection MiniDisc format,
> which leads to an interesting question (either that or it just shows that
> I don't RTFM
If you read the MDCP FAQ... I think degradation, especially on modern
equipments, don't start occuring until at least the 5th generation. I've
done cassette-->MD-->MD (all analog connections), and the last generation
sounds fine. Just 1-2 generations between copies should go unnoticed even
with a
