Simon Reinhardt wrote:
I propose adding CoRelationshipAttribute to EngineerRelationshipType
(the main type, not all sub types) and within that to the sub type for
mixers, and adding ExecutiveRelationshipAttribute to
EngineerRelationshipType (again the main type only) as proposed by Schika.
For
On 6/14/06, Chris Bransden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that the following discussion arose from this: Schika had examples of
liner notes which differentiate between a mixer and a mix engineer. Do we need
that separated?
well i think you have to be careful as the example (system 7) might
On 14/06/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Bransden wrote:
> only one i thing is a bit bizzare is "adding
> ExecutiveRelationshipAttribute to EngineerRelationshipType" - i'm not
> sure what that would mean?
Well, similar to the producer type, the phrase would change from "{add
Chris Bransden wrote:
only one i thing is a bit bizzare is "adding
ExecutiveRelationshipAttribute to EngineerRelationshipType" - i'm not
sure what that would mean?
Well, similar to the producer type, the phrase would change from "{additionally}
engineered" to "{additionally} {co-}{executive }e
On 14/06/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
to sum it up so far: there have been no vetoes but some discussion that put
parts of this back to the RFC stage, so I'll split it as follows...
I propose adding CoRelationshipAttribute to EngineerRelationshipType (the main
type
Hi again,
to sum it up so far: there have been no vetoes but some discussion that put
parts of this back to the RFC stage, so I'll split it as follows...
I propose adding CoRelationshipAttribute to EngineerRelationshipType (the main
type, not all sub types) and within that to the sub type for
On 11/06/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Bransden wrote:
> more of a general comment, but are you implying that 'guest' means any
> performer who isn't a member of the group in question? only i've
> always thought of 'guest' only being appropriate when it's written as
> such
Chris Bransden wrote:
more of a general comment, but are you implying that 'guest' means any
performer who isn't a member of the group in question? only i've
always thought of 'guest' only being appropriate when it's written as
such in the liner. eg a studio guitarist isn't a 'guest', but some
fa
On 10/06/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I would like to add some attributes to some AR types and therefore request
ok/veto for each of them:
1. http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/OrchestraRelationshipType could need
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/GuestRelationshipAttribute
-> "
Don Redman wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:50:21 +0200, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
However, is that an addition, an agreement or a veto? ;)
Was there
I don't know because I must admit, that I have really lost track of the
latest discussions on mb-style.
If there has not been such a discussion, t
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:50:21 +0200, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
However, is that an addition, an agreement or a veto? ;)
Was there
I don't know because I must admit, that I have really lost track of the
latest discussions on mb-style.
If there has not been such a discussion, then a requesto for
On 6/10/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Schika wrote:> I have some releases where is also mentioned "executive engineer",> "recording engineer", "mix engineer", "remix engineer"."executive engineer" would be no problem to add too, since we also introduced that attribute for the produ
Schika wrote:
I have some releases where is also mentioned "executive engineer",
"recording engineer", "mix engineer", "remix engineer".
"executive engineer" would be no problem to add too, since we also introduced
that attribute for the producer type.
Though "recording engineered" and "mix en
On 6/10/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,I would like to add some attributes to some AR types and therefore request ok/veto for each of them:3. http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType
could need http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/CoRelationshipAttribute (page does not yet
14 matches
Mail list logo