Re: [newbie] Reporting Missing rpm Dependencies for kdelibs-3.1-58mdk.src.rpm

2003-07-04 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Friday July 4 2003 08:58 am, Huw Blackwell wrote: > I stand corrected. Apologies for going off on one, reading > through my initial reply I realise I got on a bit of a high > horse over something I didn't fully understand, and took out some > of my frustraion over getting this on the mailing li

Re: [newbie] Reporting Missing rpm Dependencies for kdelibs-3.1-58mdk.src.rpm

2003-07-04 Thread Derek Jennings
On Friday 04 Jul 2003 2:58 pm, Huw Blackwell wrote: > I stand corrected. Apologies for going off on one, reading through my > initial reply I realise I got on a bit of a high horse over something > I didn't fully understand, and took out some of my frustraion over > getting this on the mailing lis

Re: [newbie] Reporting Missing rpm Dependencies for kdelibs-3.1-58mdk.src.rpm

2003-07-04 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Friday July 4 2003 03:52 am, Huw Blackwell wrote: > >Why do you wanna compile kdelibs from src anyhow? > To optimize linux for my processor (athlon tbird). I'm also > trying to install the least amount of software for my > requirements, optimize the kernel and stopp all unessecary > services fr

Re: [newbie] Reporting Missing rpm Dependencies for kdelibs-3.1-58mdk.src.rpm

2003-07-04 Thread Richard Urwin
On Friday 04 Jul 2003 2:58 pm, Huw Blackwell wrote: > If the rpm when rebuilt asks for only the dependecies required by the > binary package, how comes I had to install any extra rpms in order to > rebuild it in the first place? As I understand Derek's message, the > list of dependant rpms refer on

Re: [newbie] Reporting Missing rpm Dependencies for kdelibs-3.1-58mdk.src.rpm

2003-07-04 Thread Dennis Myers
On Friday 04 July 2003 08:58 am, Huw Blackwell wrote: > I stand corrected. Apologies for going off on one, reading through my > initial reply I realise I got on a bit of a high horse over something > I didn't fully understand, and took out some of my frustraion over > getting this on the mailing l

Re: [newbie] Reporting Missing rpm Dependencies for kdelibs-3.1-58mdk.src.rpm

2003-07-04 Thread Huw Blackwell
I stand corrected. Apologies for going off on one, reading through my initial reply I realise I got on a bit of a high horse over something I didn't fully understand, and took out some of my frustraion over getting this on the mailing list on someone who was just trying to help me. I understand wh

Re: [newbie] Reporting Missing rpm Dependencies for kdelibs-3.1-58mdk.src.rpm

2003-07-04 Thread Huw Blackwell
> There's nothin to report, there is no problem other than >misunderstanding on your part. I believe this was already correctly >answered by Derek or Greg, but couldn't find the reply in the ml >archive, so maybe you didn't see it. I didn't. > src.rpm's almost always have more dependen

Re: [newbie] Reporting Missing rpm Dependencies for kdelibs-3.1-58mdk.src.rpm

2003-07-02 Thread Derek Jennings
On Wednesday 02 Jul 2003 10:03 am, Huw Blackwell wrote: > Guys, > > Had an earlier posting on this list with a problem compiling > kdelibs-3.1-58mdk.src.rpm targetting athlon architecture. After some > trouble I traced the faults (with the help of some other linux users, > including Stephen Kuhn -