Okay, so it's not done, but I put a new version up to be looked at.
I'm taking Leo at his word on how the stack behaves, as I've not had
time to look that closely at it to see myself. (Though by inspection
it does still look like stack usage is pretty low, and is either 0 or
1 at labels (and on
Larry Wall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:23:18AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: Another alternative is "$( $file ).ext". I'd tend to use that before
: "${file}.ext" these days. Perhaps that's irrational--but it was hard
: to get the special-case "${name}" form to work right in the Perl 5
: lexer,
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:43 PM +0200 7/14/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, here's a really, really evil idea. (And yes, bluntly, it's
triggered by the pie-thon bytecode translator's needs) I need a
stack,
Do you? I've converted all stack stuff at compile
At 7:43 PM +0200 7/14/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, here's a really, really evil idea. (And yes, bluntly, it's
triggered by the pie-thon bytecode translator's needs) I need a
stack,
Do you? I've converted all stack stuff at compile time, till now. I
don
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:44:11PM -0600, John Williams wrote:
: On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 07:24:55AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: > : But in Perl 6, you don't have to specify things like that through the
: > : mode string: you can specify them through named
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, here's a really, really evil idea. (And yes, bluntly, it's
> triggered by the pie-thon bytecode translator's needs) I need a
> stack,
Do you? I've converted all stack stuff at compile time, till now. I
don't see the point, why this might not work for
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:23:18AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: Another alternative is "$( $file ).ext". I'd tend to use that before
: "${file}.ext" these days. Perhaps that's irrational--but it was hard
: to get the special-case "${name}" form to work right in the Perl 5
: lexer, and that bugs me.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 11:06:30PM -0400, Jonadab the Unsightly One wrote:
: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: > No, just currently wrong. :-) I changed my mind about it in A12,
: > partly on the assumption that $object.attr would actually be more
: > common than $file.ext,
:
: Speaking
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 04:55 am, Ph. Marek wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 July 2004 08:39, David Storrs wrote:
> > > To repeat Dave and myself - if
> > > @x = 1 .. Inf;
> > > then
> > > rand(@x)
> > > should be Inf, and so
> > > print $x[rand(@x)];
> > > should give Inf, as the infinite element
Okay, here's a really, really evil idea. (And yes, bluntly, it's
triggered by the pie-thon bytecode translator's needs) I need a
stack, and one that's faster than our current stack which, while
snappy for what it does, is still burdened by generality. I also need
a stack that's generally not ve
I'm putting the piethon conversion program up for folks to look at.
Far from done, but tonight (hopefully) will be productive.
http://www.sidhe.org/~dan/piethon/translator.pl
--
Dan
--it's like this---
Dan Sugals
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> strange, but :shift«value» looks a little more noisy to me than
>> shift => 'value',
>
> For some reason, it looks that way to me, too.
Me three.
> Perhaps:
>
> :shift« value »
>
> I *think* that's better...
To me, that's even worse. My brain se
--- Jonadab the Unsightly One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, this leaves open the question of whether there are any
> fairly common filename extensions that happen to be spelled the same
> as a method on Perl6's string class, that might ought to have a
> warning generated... Are there a
RaghavendraK 70574 writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am a hardcore C++ guy and don;t know much abt the Perl. But one of my
> friend has proved that the fastest way to RAD is Perl. I need to know
> if we can convert a Perl script to a dynamic link library under unix
> only.
I don't know what RAD is, but I know yo
Hi,
Am a hardcore C++ guy and don;t know much abt the Perl. But one of my friend has
proved that the fastest way to RAD is Perl. I need to know if we can convert a Perl
script to a dynamic link library under unix only.
regards
ragha
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 08:39, David Storrs wrote:
> > To repeat Dave and myself - if
> > @x = 1 .. Inf;
> > then
> > rand(@x)
> > should be Inf, and so
> > print $x[rand(@x)];
> > should give Inf, as the infinite element of @x is Inf.
Please take my words as my understanding, ie. wi
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:40:33AM +0200, Ph. Marek wrote:
>
> To repeat Dave and myself - if
> @x = 1 .. Inf;
> then
> rand(@x)
> should be Inf, and so
> print $x[rand(@x)];
> should give Inf, as the infinite element of @x is Inf.
Does it even make sense to take the Infiniteth
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:09:38PM +0200, James Mastros wrote:
>
> All unreachable code is either people misusing the term "unreachable", a
> bug in Devel::Cover, or dead code that should be removed.
Here's a puzzle, then.
I just ran into a similar "problem" in POE::Driver::SysRW. For
portabil
Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, just currently wrong. :-) I changed my mind about it in A12,
> partly on the assumption that $object.attr would actually be more
> common than $file.ext,
Speaking of which, what's the cleanest way to interpolate filenames
with a fixed extension now?
19 matches
Mail list logo