Re: css bug in the wiki rendering for nested lists

2019-01-02 Thread Alexander Burger
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 07:50:44PM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > I'm currently working on documenting the wiki source syntax *by* using the Cool! > wiki source syntax. I spent most of yesterday afternoon doing that. There was > this item that was not working and I found one minor glitch

Re: css bug in the wiki rendering for nested lists

2019-01-02 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
> On Jan 2, 2019, at 19:07, Alexander Burger wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:48:09PM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: >> I am not seeing the change here. >> >> Can you confirm that you changed >> #main > ul li { >> >> to >> #main > ul > li { > > Yes, I copy/pasted from

Re: css bug in the wiki rendering for nested lists

2019-01-02 Thread Alexander Burger
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:48:09PM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > I am not seeing the change here. > > Can you confirm that you changed > > >> #main > ul li { > > to > > >> #main > ul > li { Yes, I copy/pasted from your mail. A browser cache issue perhaps? ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: ma

Re: css bug in the wiki rendering for nested lists

2019-01-02 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
Alex, I am not seeing the change here. Can you confirm that you changed >> #main > ul li { to >> #main > ul > li { ? there should be a ">" between "ul" and "li". Thank you. Jean-Christophe > On Jan 2, 2019, at 15:48, Alexander Burger wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 05:44:24PM +0900,

Re: css bug in the wiki rendering for nested lists

2019-01-01 Thread Alexander Burger
On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 05:44:24PM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > It looks like the culprit is the wiki.css file (L86): > > #main > ul li { >list-style-type: square; > } > > That selector applies the "list-style-type: square;" to *all* elements > under a element (including nested

css bug in the wiki rendering for nested lists

2019-01-01 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
+{ -{item} -{ *{-{nested item} -{nested item}}} -{item}} renders normally the ordered/unordered nesting, but *{ -{item} -{ +{-{nested item} -{nested item}}} -{item}} sets all the

Re: Bug in the wiki?

2012-02-29 Thread Mansur Mamkin
Hi Alex! That's great, thank you very much, now all is OK with wiki! Best regards, Mansur On 29.02.2012 20:30, Alexander Burger wrote: Hi Mansur, On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:33:52AM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: Please try once more, after downloading the new "picoLisp.tgz". Sorry, but the

Re: Bug in the wiki?

2012-02-29 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Mansur, On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:33:52AM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: > Please try once more, after downloading the new "picoLisp.tgz". Sorry, but the fix this morning was not completely correct. So I had to upload yet another testing release. Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picoli

Re: Bug in the wiki?

2012-02-29 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Mansur, > What I see is that '+Doc object loses it's 'nm property after any > try to edit. This is visible also in the maintenance gui: Name field > is always resets to empty state with hint, when I tab to > "body" field You are right! I can reproduce it. It was a bug in pil64: : (fold "x

Re: Bug in the wiki?

2012-02-29 Thread Mansur Mamkin
What I see is that '+Doc object loses it's 'nm property after any try to edit. This is visible also in the maintenance gui: Name field is always resets to empty state with hint, when I tab to "body" field Hmm, strange. This looks all right. I tried the same here without problems. Can you see

Re: Bug in the wiki?

2012-02-29 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Mansur, > Now I see another strange behaviour. My steps (CentOS 6.2 x64): > ... > Then I load http://wiki.mysite:5000 in Firefox, log in > (admin:admin), navigate to "Articles & Essays" in the left menu. > I see "New document 'Articles', This document doesn't exist yet". > Seems ok. I press "Cr

Re: Bug in the wiki?

2012-02-28 Thread Mansur Mamkin
Ok. But when I try to navigate to "Articles & Essays", I see "This document doesn't exist yet" again. The same happens with other links in the left menu. What I'm doing wrong? Best regards, Mansur Hi all, idForm -- Undefined ? While this was not really a bug

Re: Bug in the wiki?

2012-02-28 Thread José Romero
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:01:31 +0100 Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Mansur, > > > I've just installed fresh PL release and wiki from this link: > > http://software-lab.de/wiki.tgz > > OK, great. > > > > When I'm logged in and navigate to "Role administration", I see this > > error in the console:

Re: Bug in the wiki?

2012-02-28 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi all, > idForm -- Undefined > ? While this was not really a bug in the Wiki, there _was_ another bug. José Romero triggered it unintentionally yesterday, and I could easily reproduce it. It crashed the Wiki when you tried to delete a Document (via the "Delete" button), because

Re: Bug in the wiki?

2012-02-28 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Mansur, > I've just installed fresh PL release and wiki from this link: > http://software-lab.de/wiki.tgz OK, great. > When I'm logged in and navigate to "Role administration", I see this > error in the console: > > [wiki/role.l:6] !? (idForm "Role" '(choRole) 'nm '+Role T '(may > ... > idF