Re: relay_domains vs virtual_mailbox_domains

On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 07:16 +0100, Steve Heaven wrote: > On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 00:27 +0200, mouss wrote: > > Steve Heaven a écrit : > > > > > > > > > the old: "try to pass to next, until final server accepts or rejects" > > is n more acceptable. recipients must be checked at the "edge". > > > >

RE: [Bounce Handling] Searching information

On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:02 +0200, no_s...@cardiff.fr wrote: > [Humour on]Wooow {snip} The answer is you check your logs, write a script to check your logs and update your databases - or use one of the many mailing list manager programs that exist. Postfix is simply the MTA. In fact I guess th

Re: [Bounce Handling] Searching information

On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 13:27 +0200, no_s...@cardiff.fr wrote: > Hello postfix users > We have approx 150 customers that wish to do marketing email with their > customers, and we have had these customers knowing former spam listing, > because they / we did not cope feedback loops, list retrieval and

Re: relay_domains vs virtual_mailbox_domains

From: Clunk Werclick Reply-to: mailbacku...@googlemail.com Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: relay_domains vs virtual_mailbox_domains Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:28:36 +0100 Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 On Tue, 2009-09

Re: How to block spammers appearing as local users?

On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 18:22 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On ons 02 sep 2009 18:07:27 CEST, LuKreme wrote > >> who says this ip is dynamic, just becurse the hostname look like > >> it is ? > > Erm don't be naive. If they can't be bothered to have a better > > rDNS then I can't be bothered to

report to consolidate allowed messages

Hello, I have been toying with the best way to produce a report of 'allowed' messages that have made it all the way through my Postfix. I love the Postfix logs, they give such detail on failures and refusals and parsing this is quite straightforward. The entertainment commences when I try to fig

Re: Reverse DNS requirement

On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 09:44 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: > LuKreme schrieb: > > On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:42, Thomas Gelf wrote: > > > >> the person who did not correctly set up the network is to be blamed, > >> if you have equipment acting as MTA it should be configured the right > >> way, oth

Re: Black magic rejecting header Subjects

On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:44 +0200, Robin Smidsrød wrote: > Lukas Ruf wrote: > > Please find attached the header_checks file currently in use: > > > > When I comment the line in main.cf > > header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre > > everything works for me as expected.

Re: New Antispam settings

On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 04:17 -0400, Dave wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to adjust my current antispam measures as they are no > longer working. I'm running postfix 2.3 on a rel5 machine. I've got the > below, which is a postconf -n output of my current configuration. To it i'd > like to add spf,

Re: too many postfix smtp active internet connections

On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 08:12 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > You need the milter capabilities from Postfix 2.6. Use the > batv-milter. > > That's all I know at the moment. I am confused? batv-milter? Is it not pvrs? I see this: http://sourceforge.net/projects/batv-milter/ The idea looks v

Re: too many postfix smtp active internet connections

On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 16:08 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Get rid of the backscatter: > http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html > > Wietse Has anybody implemented something like this with Postfix? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_Address_Tag_Validation Any observations or advice

Re: too many postfix smtp active internet connections

On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 16:08 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Get rid of the backscatter: > http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html Has anybody inplemented something like this with Postfix yet? -- --- C Werclick .Lot Technical incompe

Re: [OT] Spam Prevention

On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 16:52 +1000, Thomas wrote: > Hey, > > [..] > > Yes, I use that too - but I like a quick summary on demand. > See: > You can use the scripts _without_ logwatch and get an instant summary of > your mail.log. > > Cheers, > Thomas Indeed

Re: [OT] Spam Prevention

On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 08:29 +0200, Willy De la Court wrote: > On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:04:17 -0400, Jon wrote: > > Clunk Werclick wrote: > >> > >> > >> PRE DNSBL 321 > >> > >>

Re: Spam Prevention

On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:04 -0400, Jon wrote: > Clunk Werclick wrote: > > > > > > PRE DNSBL 321 > > > > NO PTR 201 > >SPOOFING 120 > > RELAY ATTEMPTS0 >

Re: Spam Prevention

On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:56 +0200, Willy De la Court wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a question about spam prevention and resource optimalisation. > > What is the best way to go. I have this as spam prevention at the moment. > > smtpd_helo_restrictions = >permit_mynetworks, >permit_sasl_authen

Re: OT Configuration Questions/Help {LDAP}

On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:50 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > Clunk Werclick wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 22:45 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > >> Jeff Grossman wrote: > > > >>> have seen articles about exporting the Exchange users via LDAP and putting > >&g

Re: No such file or directory

On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 11:40 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote: > Clunk Werclick schreef: > > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users. > >> http://w

Re: No such file or directory

On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote: > Hi, > > i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users. > http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-centos5.1 > > After i finished i got several errors that i fixed but im stuck on this: > J

OT Configuration Questions/Help {LDAP}

On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 22:45 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > Jeff Grossman wrote: > > > have seen articles about exporting the Exchange users via LDAP and putting > > them in an access map file on the Postfix server, but I am not a big fan of > > that. I would prefer to just query the Exchange server

Re: Directory Harvest

On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 08:59 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Evan Platt : > > At 03:59 PM 7/29/2009, you wrote: > > >It looks like somebody is trying to figure out my internal users as > > >evidenced by log excerpts below. Is there something I could do to, if > > >not prevent this, reduce it? >

RE: Stop spammers sending us spam from users in our domain...

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 23:26 +0930, Nick Sharp wrote: > > > > > This is how I block those pesky spoof mail spams; > > > > EDIT main.cf > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > > permit_mynetworks > > permit_sasl_authenticated > > reject_unauth_destination > > > >

Re: Stop spammers sending us spam from users in our domain...

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 22:22 +0930, Nick Sharp wrote: > Hi all, > > I am new to this list, so forgive me if I am not up with your current level > of etiquette, I do tune in pretty quickly.. so starting with a long email.. > > Been trying to stop people sending email to us setting FROM as a user in

Re: Many SQL Lookups on outbounding mails

On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:57 +0200, Thomas Gelf wrote: > Clunk Werclick wrote: > > That is very reassuring Thomas, thank you. > > > > Now I don't know if I should stay with SQL or drop to maps ? It is > > easier to configure with SQL from a web based front end - bu

Re: Many SQL Lookups on outbounding mails

On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:24 +0200, Thomas Gelf wrote: > Clunk Werclick wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:50 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote: > >> You need to ask yourself if this is a real problem, or something > >> you're just imagining. Mysql generally works fine,

Re: Many SQL Lookups on outbounding mails

Date: > Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:47:54 +1000 > (09:47 BST) > > > 2009/7/23 Clunk Werclick : > > That is a comfort to know. My main concern was this hammering was > not > > optimal, but it is welcome to make as many queries as it likes if it > &g

Re: Many SQL Lookups on outbounding mails

On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:50 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote: > You need to ask yourself if this is a real problem, or something > you're just imagining. Mysql generally works fine, 50,000 messages a > day at 12 queries each, equates to several queries per second. This is > an "easy" load. That is a co

Re: blocking "supp...@..."

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:31 -0600, Robert Lopez wrote: > We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip > addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from > "support" at which ever names they are using that day. > > My supervisor wants me to block all email c

Re: Many SQL Lookups on outbounding mails

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:04 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > Clunk Werclick wrote: > > I think perhaps 4-12 queries per message is not optimal? > > If server handle 50,000 a day X 12 that is quite a lot? I don't think > > it is going to get may fields returned for

Re: Many SQL Lookups on outbounding mails

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 20:31 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote: > 2009/7/22 Clunk Werclick : > > What I am not understanding is this is my list: > > > > debug_peer_list,fast_flush_domains,mynetworks,permit_mx_backup_networks,qmqpd_authorized_clients,smtpd_access_maps > > &

Re: Many SQL Lookups on outbounding mails

On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:34 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > Clunk Werclick wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 10:39 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > >> Clunk Werclick wrote: > >>> Hello. > >>> > >>> Postfix is new to me and I have spent many hours of readi

Re: Complex canonical rewrite with ldap and regexp

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:27 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > I want to know if the following canonical rewrite is possible with > Postfix, and how? > > In my LDAP directory, for each user, I have a givenName and a > familyName attributes. > > The canonical name should be givenName.familyN

Re: Transport Maps

On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:21 -0400, Linux Addict wrote: > I tried digging, I get the MX servers on the ANSWER section. I manage > DNS as well, so I know its resolving correctly. Just one thing Sir and a shot in the water. Restart Postfix (not reload). I was having a problem where it kept looking up

Re: Transport Maps

On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 17:10 +0100, Clunk Werclick wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:05 -0400, Linux Addict wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt > > wrote: > > * Ralf Hildebrandt : > > > > >

Re: Transport Maps

On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:05 -0400, Linux Addict wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt > wrote: > * Ralf Hildebrandt : > > > > In simple, When I send a mail to @example.com, postfix > must send the mail > > > to the MX records of

Re: Many SQL Lookups on outbounding mails

On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 10:39 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > Clunk Werclick wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Postfix is new to me and I have spent many hours of reading and testing. > > I do not have much experience to look at things and say they are normal or > > not. > &

Many SQL Lookups on outbounding mails

Hello. Postfix is new to me and I have spent many hours of reading and testing. I do not have much experience to look at things and say they are normal or not. My Postfix hosts some virtual domains locally, and it also relays some others to another Postfix. It looks up virtual domains, relay doma

RE: smtp time outs and delays

> > > I get a very quick banner response when I telnet to port 25 and port > 587 I do get different banners > for port 25 I get: > 220 * > Cisco Pix running SMTP 'Fixup' ?

user local domain remote

Helo, Is somebody able to guide me? I have Postfix as gateway machine. It is mixed and has some local virtual mailboxes for domains, and for others it acts as an incoming relay forwarding to an internal Postfix. The working is very good but now I have a tiny hitch. Until now I have been able t