On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:28:39PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:50:20 +0100
>
> > Full diff of the included changes below.
> >
> > If you can use this in part or in toal they have my:
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTEC
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:50:20 +0100
> Full diff of the included changes below.
>
> If you can use this in part or in toal they have my:
> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looks good, applied. Yes, this stuff is all only user past
__init ti
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:15:58 +1100
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kumar Gala writes:
>
> > np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26?
>
> I was going to put it into my powerpc-next branch and put it in
> 2.6.26. I don't see any need for it to go in 2.6.25.
Is that a new br
David Miller writes:
> I'm ambivalent but I would obviously prefer 2.6.25 because
> it would allow me to proceed more easily with my sparc64
> NUMA work as well as get your bug fixes in more smoothly.
Sounds like we should get Stephen to put it in linux-next-stable once
we're convinced it's all O
Kumar Gala writes:
> np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26?
I was going to put it into my powerpc-next branch and put it in
2.6.26. I don't see any need for it to go in 2.6.25.
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to
Hi David.
I was looking into the few remaining section mismatch
warnings on sparc64 (with my previous posted patchset applied).
This is more an RFC than a real patch submission.
Can you try to look through my mumblings and see if anything makes sense.
The ones I have is:
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.tex
> The E10k that we have is currently powered off. We were not able to
> finish our efforts to get a serial console driver before we lost our
> hosting space.
WTF?! I have three (!) e10k-s here from which one runs 24x7. Tell me
what you need and I make it possible from hardware and access to it.
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 15:02 +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Are there any public E10k porting efforts ? There is currently no
> hardware driver for the serial console, and I read that people from
> RedHat are working on it.
> I could also arrange accounts on the SSP machine if peop
Hi all,
Are there any public E10k porting efforts ? There is currently no
hardware driver for the serial console, and I read that people from
RedHat are working on it.
I could also arrange accounts on the SSP machine if people are
interested in working on this Sparc port.
Thank you very much
