[Tamas Hegedus]
> Please do not forget that I am not a real programmer but a consumer:
That's OK -- in return, please don't forget that you're posting to a ZODB
developer's list ;-).
> 0. I accept if the policy is making ZODB just for Zope.
That's the only solid reason Zope Corp has to _pay_ for
Hi,
Please do not forget that I am not a real programmer but a consumer:
0. I accept if the policy is making ZODB just for Zope. Then OK.
But if there is bigger potential inside it... (By the way: I think it is
great and big, and I would like to use it.)
To formulate this on a more realistic wa
[Tamas Hegedus]
> You have released the ZODB/ZEO as a stand alone package. But there is no
> stand alone searching possibility. Why? This just does not make any
> sense.
It makes sense if you know why ZODB is released this way ;-) Primarily,
it's so that people running Zope can install ZEO server
approach to get this done it to either work on the issue on your own or
pay someone...this is just a question of developer resources and
priorities.
I do not have any finantial resources.
So I have to do on my own way...
Regards,
Tamas
--
Tamas Hegedus, PhD | phone: (1) 919-966 0329
U
--On 4. Januar 2006 15:11:37 -0500 Tamas Hegedus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am not a programmer. This is the source of all my problems. I just did
not have the patient (and knowledge) to learn to develop zope
applications. But I want to stick with Python and I need a transparent
(object) dat
Using the catalog stuff from Zope 3(!) would make more sense than
dealing with the Zope 2 catalog.
This would be great!
I think releasing and maintaining
something similar would not be a big work, but would make ZODB/ZEO at
much higher rank among the ODBMSs.
Do you volunteer to take work on th
--On 4. Januar 2006 14:38:13 -0500 Tamas Hegedus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
You have released the ZODB/ZEO as a stand alone package. But there is no
stand alone searching possibility. Why? This just does not make any sense.
Yous suggested and I tried Kevin Dangoor's stand alone ZCatalo
Hi!
You have released the ZODB/ZEO as a stand alone package. But there is no
stand alone searching possibility. Why? This just does not make any sense.
Yous suggested and I tried Kevin Dangoor's stand alone ZCatalog. It uses
the Zope source just remove the zope dependences, etc (some type of
[José Carlos Senciales]
> How can i know if i have my Python configured with large file support ?
>
> My version is:
>
> Zope Version (Zope 2.8.4-final, python 2.3.5, win32)
> Python Version 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit
(Intel)] System
> Platform win32
All flavors of Wind
José Carlos Senciales schrieb:
thanks
my phyton console return "0L", so i have have large file support.
So if you still experience problems with files >2GB, you might
move to another filesystem (if moving to another OS is not an
option ;)
___
For m
thanks
my phyton console return "0L", so i have have large file support.
- Original Message -
From: "Tino Wildenhain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "José Carlos Senciales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dennis Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Florent Guillaume"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednes
José Carlos Senciales schrieb:
thanks
How can i know if i have my Python configured with large file support ?
My version is:
Zope Version (Zope 2.8.4-final, python 2.3.5, win32)
Python Version 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit
(Intel)]
System Platform win32
double-kl
I am pleased to announce the release of DirectoryStorage, version
1.1.17.
Over the last few months DirectoryStorage has been languishing at 'release
candidate' status, so this is the first release badged 'stable' to include
Zope 3 support (thanks to Philipp von Weitershausen), NTFS support (th
thanks
How can i know if i have my Python configured with large file support ?
My version is:
Zope Version (Zope 2.8.4-final, python 2.3.5, win32)
Python Version 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit
(Intel)]
System Platform win32
thanks
jose carlos
- Original Messag
14 matches
Mail list logo
