Re: (313) Vive La Difference! (Re: (313) The MP3 VS Uncompressed Audio test.)

2008-09-27 Thread Thor Teague
So hypothetically if your calculations are correct that should be
exactly what 320kbps artifacts sound like.

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:43 PM, kent williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK I did a second thing that might be of some interest. I took the two
> samples, edited the starting point very carefully to get them exactly
> in phase, and then subtracted one from the other.  In other words, I
> made a new sample that was just what was different between the two
> versions. This produced a very low level signal, which I then
> normalized so it would be audible:
>
> http://www.cornwarning.com/xfer/m500-starlight-diff.wav
>
> This is actually a pretty cool sample and I plan on chopping it up to
> use in tracks.
>


(313) Vive La Difference! (Re: (313) The MP3 VS Uncompressed Audio test.)

2008-09-27 Thread kent williams
OK I did a second thing that might be of some interest. I took the two
samples, edited the starting point very carefully to get them exactly
in phase, and then subtracted one from the other.  In other words, I
made a new sample that was just what was different between the two
versions. This produced a very low level signal, which I then
normalized so it would be audible:

http://www.cornwarning.com/xfer/m500-starlight-diff.wav

This is actually a pretty cool sample and I plan on chopping it up to
use in tracks.