Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?

2001-01-03 Thread seth ...

"Most people were blown away by the live set, KDJ was
fantastic and, despite dodgy mixing, the UR DJ sets were full of classic 
stuff, I thought."


dodgy mixing??
Don't get me wrong, I'm not obsessed with smooth mixing over track 
selection, but this is U.R. we're talking about... who gave us Rolando and 
Suburban Knight as assault DJ's.


with the people they have available, something is seriously f**ked up if 
they can't put forward a decent technical DJ for a gig this size, unless of 
course it was ranx's echoing walls.


Seth
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.



Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?

2001-01-03 Thread Tom Robbins
> There's no objective view on a night out.

Can't argue with that. Guess we'll have to agree to disagree!

TOM



Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?

2001-01-03 Thread FRANK JACK DANIEL
yup, of course there's going to be 3 - 4000 different versions of the night. 
I am just glad i was there and loving it.


peas
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.



Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?

2001-01-03 Thread Jonny McIntosh
Tom,

It does seem you have had a completely different take on it to almost
everyone I spoke to. Most people were blown away by the live set, KDJ was
fantastic and, despite dodgy mixing, the UR DJ sets were full of classic
stuff, I thought. The organisation, as you say, might have been better - I
was lucky enough to miss the queuing problems - but the staffing, like the
crowd (I saw plenty of smiling faces), was very friendly. As for the billing
changes, these were well documented on 313 before the event. Ideally we
would have got Drexciya etc, but I am not going to argue with *that* version
of Amazon. UR were always going to do it their own way.

Still, you saw it differently - fair enough, if you missed the bits I loved
I can completely understand why, and you missed a great night. I think I
missed the kind of night Frank Jack got, he caught a lot more of the live
show and the KDJ show. There's little point in creating an argument about
it. 313 has got two sides to the story. End of, I guess. I'm sure people
don't want to hear a fruitless discussion on who got the right view on it
all. Interestingly (but coincidently rather than anything else, I'm not
trying to cast doubt on your journalistic credentials at all), I recall
Jockey Slut getting a radically different take on the 3 Chairs night which
still remains the best night out I have ever had. There's no objective view
on a night out.

Take care,

Jonny.




Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?

2001-01-03 Thread Tom Robbins
place for you.
> We were there for the music, and we got more! We got soul, excitement,
> fervours, and sensations.
> For people who suspected Rankx, big HOURRAH to him, he made it by his
own,I
> guess he got a hard time to make it happen, good lesson for a lot of
> promoters, they should learn from him.
> Tom, why at 6h30 am, people didn't want to leave and clapped thunderously?
>
> And by the way, I hadn't like the UR party in London, 2 years ago.
>
>
>
>
> >From: Michael Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Tom Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: 313 mailing list <313@hyperreal.org>
> >Subject: Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?
> >Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 13:09:51 -0500
> >
> >Hi Tom,
> >
> >Why was it a let down? I do not doubt the validity of your opinion, I am
> >just curious about the specifics.
> >
> >Take care,
> >Mike
> >
> >Tom Robbins wrote:
> > >
> > > Personally I thought it was all very disappointing - a real let-down -
> >and
> > > my review in the February issue of Jockey Slut will reflect that point
> >of
> > > view, which seems to be shared by everyone I've spoken to, both at the
> >event
> > > and since. Anyone else?
> > >
> > > That said, it was really nice to hook up with some people from the
list
> >like
> > > John O and his illin' girlfriend (whose name I forget because it was
so
> > > late), Otto Koppius (inserting CD now...) and Rob Needham. Also good
to
> >see
> > > Nick Craddock and Alice again. Missed Rob Webb and quite a few others,
> > > though.
> > >
> > > But don't go calling me no Londoner! ;-)
> > >
> > > - Tom MF
> > >
> > > > Well, speak up Londoners.
> > > >
> > > > Tristan
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>



Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?

2001-01-03 Thread Jonny McIntosh
I thought it was excellent as well, though I wouldn't go as far as saying
the best ever.

I arrived a bit late, having seen in the New Year in the comfort of my own
home with my girlfriend. Upon arrival I was glad to discover very friendly
joking security, loads of massive heaters, no trouble getting in and some
mate of Rachel's spinning UK Garage. Upstairs, and first stopping port of
call, there was Rick Wilhite, which sounded a bit pedestrian due to a very
quiet sound system (at that time, anyway, it improved by the time KDJ
appeared). He was playing a greatest hits of Carl Craig set, or so it
seemed. I remember at the 3 Chairs night Rick played the most Detroity of
the 3 sets. We grabbed a beer each and investigated further.

Down the stairs and... f**king hell! A massive aircraft hanger sized
derelict room with a massive crack down the side and a live version of
Amazon like I have never heard before in my life! This was Agent Chaos, I
have since been told, and it was damn impressive. The 30 quid entrance was
worth it for that alone. After that the DJing in there was a bit of a let
down, there was some pretty bad echo coming back off the far wall if you
were on the stage (behind which the Djing was be done from) which maybe
didn't help, but I would imagine the monitoring would be up to scratch,
nothing appeared to be done half heartedly when it came to things like that.
Still, the tracks were a what's what of classic UR (Final Frontier,
Stardancer, Mirage, a lot of Octave One stuff) - anyone know what the track
directly after Stardancer was? The whole thing was interspersed with UR folk
appearing silhouetted in cracks on the wall doing what looked like some pole
dancing without the pole.

Moved up to catch the end of Moodymann's set (we'd been up earlier and heard
"If You Should Need A Friend", which is a favourite of my girlfriend's).
That seemed to be very good. In advance I wasn't really that fussed about
Kenny playing, having seen him DJ and be blown away by Theo Parrish at the 3
chairs night. So it came as a surpise to find this set to be very good
indeed. The move to a half DJ half live set was very canny - gets a bit more
of his personality across, which he can only do partly by DJing with his own
records. I don't know who it was that Djed after, but they weren't nearly as
good - they played that awful gimmicky 7" remake of MAW's "To be in love" -
most of it was alright, though. Here we remained until we left at around
5am, not having the, err, stamina of some others.

It was good to meet, albeit briefly, with John (who'd come into the shop
earlier in the day and pick up a copy of "Gravitational Arch", which I had
missed) and Otto (who confessed to being as bad a trainspotter as I was
being!). It was a very friendly crowd, and the staffing was excellent too -
the bouncer as we left commanding the mini cab drivers to give us a good
price for the journey home. Well done Freddy Ranx - a very good way to start
the year, I thought.

I can imagine, however, that if you missed Amazon live and Moodymann it
would seem a bit pedestrian - you couldn't help but be blown away by the UR
room (that seems a ridiculous word for it), though, which was well suited to
their sound. I didn't miss either and I loved it.

Take care,

Jonny.




Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?

2001-01-03 Thread FRANK JACK DANIEL

do I detect a windup? A let down!?

That was the best party I've been to for a very long time, if not ever.  
3-4000 people in an incredible venue, listening to amazing music on a huge 
and clear soundsystem. plus excellent atmosphere and no trouble.


It was like the old days but with better tunes.

nice one transit.

did anyone go to the afterparty at plastic people?
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.



Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?

2001-01-02 Thread xx xx


Hi,

Han ??? Maybe we were not at the same party...!
First the location: amazing place, in building in demolition, first and last 
party there, they will re-build an office building(in the room where UR 
played),Rankx brought back the electricity, put back the doors, put heat, 
just for the party.

The first room (from the entrance) was more hip-hop music.
The second (main) room, was UR all night long till 6h30 am, started at 
eleven or so, with a dj set then came Chaos,at midnight, was amazing,blew us 
away.
The sound was enormous, imagine a place like a Cathedral, think about the 
height of the ceiling... wherever we were in this room, the sound was of an 
impressive quality.
Chaos was brilliant! Excellent, I saw a lot of live in my live, but not like 
this one.
He Performed a LIVE for one hour, provided some captivating and seductive 
tracks, like this Indian track! Like this other one with a girl 
singing...!The live was funky, new UR sound, 2001 started with Chaos, and 
2001 will be Chaos year, I bet! And I can give him my weapons. I’m 
still under shock.
The Dj's set, I think there was, during all the night, 4 different 
DJ’s, not sure, they played, really in UR vein, as usual most of the 
tracks are unreleased tracks, yet, no dark, really "funky" like this one 
with a guy singing: dance, move, shake etc...
Then, upstairs I checked Kenny, I cannot say that I'm disappointed, but the 
man has changed, it was really a one man show, signed autographs during 15 
minutes, on CD, on sheet of paper, let people take pictures…
He played for 50 minutes, more with MPC than with the turntables, and spoke 
to us a lot in a microphone, I was expected to see him playing piano, but he 
started for 10 seconds and left it.
All in all, the night was fascinating, magnetic, with mysterious quality and 
powerful, more than 4.000 people, no drama, happy crowd, we all of us had a 
lot of fun.
And UR one more time delivered again a perfect underground night, like at 
the beginning of the movement, their sound has really evolved, and their 
attitude still remain the same, someone can give me another example, of 
artists like them ?
But it's true, speaking here for Tom Robbins, if you are not anymore in the 
real underground wave, if you like more your comfort, than the music, it was 
not a place for you.
We were there for the music, and we got more! We got soul, excitement, 
fervours, and sensations.
For people who suspected Rankx, big HOURRAH to him, he made it by his own,I 
guess he got a hard time to make it happen, good lesson for a lot of 
promoters, they should learn from him.

Tom, why at 6h30 am, people didn't want to leave and clapped thunderously?

And by the way, I hadn't like the UR party in London, 2 years ago.





From: Michael Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tom Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: 313 mailing list <313@hyperreal.org>
Subject: Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 13:09:51 -0500

Hi Tom,

Why was it a let down? I do not doubt the validity of your opinion, I am
just curious about the specifics.

Take care,
Mike

Tom Robbins wrote:
>
> Personally I thought it was all very disappointing - a real let-down - 
and
> my review in the February issue of Jockey Slut will reflect that point 
of
> view, which seems to be shared by everyone I've spoken to, both at the 
event

> and since. Anyone else?
>
> That said, it was really nice to hook up with some people from the list 
like

> John O and his illin' girlfriend (whose name I forget because it was so
> late), Otto Koppius (inserting CD now...) and Rob Needham. Also good to 
see

> Nick Craddock and Alice again. Missed Rob Webb and quite a few others,
> though.
>
> But don't go calling me no Londoner! ;-)
>
> - Tom MF
>
> > Well, speak up Londoners.
> >
> > Tristan
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.



Re: [313] UR in London, how was it? Why?

2001-01-02 Thread Michael Taylor
Hi Tom, 

Why was it a let down? I do not doubt the validity of your opinion, I am
just curious about the specifics. 

Take care, 
Mike

Tom Robbins wrote:
> 
> Personally I thought it was all very disappointing - a real let-down - and
> my review in the February issue of Jockey Slut will reflect that point of
> view, which seems to be shared by everyone I've spoken to, both at the event
> and since. Anyone else?
> 
> That said, it was really nice to hook up with some people from the list like
> John O and his illin' girlfriend (whose name I forget because it was so
> late), Otto Koppius (inserting CD now...) and Rob Needham. Also good to see
> Nick Craddock and Alice again. Missed Rob Webb and quite a few others,
> though.
> 
> But don't go calling me no Londoner! ;-)
> 
> - Tom MF
> 
> > Well, speak up Londoners.
> >
> > Tristan
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]