Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-15 Thread veto
> In my simple universe I have a simple theory : there are 2 kinds of
> music. Techno ( and all related genres ) is music with no message, you
> can't understand it, it beholds no meaning than the sound itself. You
> have to listen to it with your belly, your abdomen. It's music that you
> have to completely endure, let it flow through your body. It envokes a
> trance, like the shaman repeating mantra's over and over. You have to
> feel it, feel the bass through your flesh. It's overwhelming, even
> threatening to those not willing to assimilate. The music exists in
> itself, as an assembly of tones, rhythm. Tribal music ( remember Burundi
> Black ? ) was the first techno imho. It aims for the legs. The music is
> the essence. The music IS the message.
I think that we are listening to different forms of Techno-a lot of
people categorise Techno as the more tribal, banging stuff but Kenny Larkin
"War of the Worlds" and most stuff by B12, Orlando Voorn and many, many
others don't fit into this area- they provoke an entirely different response
in me than "endure" when listening

>That's why I don't consider Jean-Michel Jarre's Oxygene or Vangelis'
>music as precursors of techno, although the music sounds techno, it has
>not that raw power that techno has, it does not invoke trance
The only thing these recordings invoke in me a a felling of deep
stupor.



Jason Brunton



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-15 Thread Gery Smismans
In my simple universe I have a simple theory : there are 2 kinds of
music. Techno ( and all related genres ) is music with no message, you
can't understand it, it beholds no meaning than the sound itself. You
have to listen to it with your belly, your abdomen. It's music that you
have to completely endure, let it flow through your body. It envokes a
trance, like the shaman repeating mantra's over and over. You have to
feel it, feel the bass through your flesh. It's overwhelming, even
threatening to those not willing to assimilate. The music exists in
itself, as an assembly of tones, rhythm. Tribal music ( remember Burundi
Black ? ) was the first techno imho. It aims for the legs. The music is
the essence. The music IS the message. 

On the other side, there's music with a message. The music in this sense
only exists as carrier for the message of the composer. Whether it be to
evoke the 4 seasons or to spread a fluffy message about a candle in the
wind, it's music you have to listen to, reason about, understand. The
author wants to tell something. Hiphop belongs in here, pretty obvious.
The music is ( only ) a medium. 

In my simple universe there is also Jazz, on the boundary of these 2
types of music : jazz tries to catch the raw power of the first type (
call it techno :) ) in rules and regulations and standards as they exist
in the second type of music. I'm not quiet happy with this thought, I
must give it some more thinking. So for now I'll conclude : in Jazz
music is a medium and a message. 

That's why I don't consider Jean-Michel Jarre's Oxygene or Vangelis'
music as precursors of techno, although the music sounds techno, it has
not that raw power that techno has, it does not invoke trance, the music
in these cases is more a carrier for an image the author had in mind.
Kraftwerk goes more the other way, autobahn or die klang der stern has
more of that power in it. 

It's pretty obvious in this context that nor inspiration or knowledge
are involved ( in the strict sense, of course you have to know which
knobs to turn ), it's about tuning in into that energy that is out
there, the rhythms of life... And maybe too much knowledge, trying to
understand it and defining it in rules and prejudices is an obstacle. 

My 2 cents...

:-G
http://www.appletree.be 







> -Original Message-
> From: Brendan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: woensdag 14 november 2001 18:49
> To: '313@hyperreal.org'; 'Lester Kenyatta Spence'; Brendan 
> Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line
> 
> 
> | -Original Message-
> | From: Lester Kenyatta Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:43 PM
> |
> | Hm.  Although I don't think it is an accident that what we 
> think of as 
> | "techno" comes out of Detroit for the reasons you mentioned, I 
> | actually think hip-hop might be the first post-industrial 
> music...and 
> | that techno is the first to actually REPRESENT itself as 
> | post-industrial.  Do you see the distinction?
> 
> Yes, I see what you mean, and it makes sense... 
> 
> | But hiphop is the first music to violate those forms...and it
> | was produced
> | by some of the first casualties of the industrial 
> | era--"colored" (black
> | american, black carribbean, latino, some white) men and 
> women who were
> | unable to get jobs in the plants during the seventies.  It 
> | took a low-tech
> | approach with high tech tools and created a sound that was a 
> | pastiche of
> | bits and pieces of previous work.  And in juxtaposition to 
> | the megaband,
> | all that was needed was "two turntables and a mic."  Note how 
> | the scale
> | becomes more human...in pointed juxtaposition to the 
> industrial trend.
> 
> And I guess that a characteristic of post-industrial music is 
> an industrial level of *energy* suddenly being directed into 
> sound rather than into mass production - something that 
> hip-hop and techno share, in my opinion. You get the sense of 
> there being an industrial infrastructure either lying dormant 
> or in decay; while a lot of rock'n'roll always sounded like 
> "work, work, work" music (and having worked in factories 
> playing MOR radio stations all day, I've always associated 
> rock music with the process of industrial production), both 
> hip-hop and techno sound like, "well, here's all this 
> machinery and industrialised sectors of the city, but it's 
> not doing anything, just slowly decaying, and here's what 
> that decay sounds like...". Perhaps techno takes it a bit 
> further into "...and here's what these machines *should* be 
> doi

Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-15 Thread Wes
I frequently find JM's comments oblique & challenging: mind-tweaking, in
fact. One thing about Mills: the music is never just an end in itself, but
always a vehicle for "another voice" (to quote Derrida), a "step to
enchantment" which holds opens endless further possibilities. Lawrence
Kramer picks up on this ceaseless calling in a 1995 book called 'Classical
Music & Postmodern Knowledge' (also check out his new one, 'Musical
Meaning'):

"For me music has gradually become the labyrinth of another voice,
threading those chambers of the ear that wind and unwind into every
distance, that turn inside out to become the whorled spaces of the world,
of other voices, another voice." 

That the voice remains untranslatable, that Mills constantly tries out
"names for the unnameable" for this "trace of the Other," gives his own
words--like his musical designs--their strange, haunting qualities.
Collectively, they burn on as the cinders of an obsessive search for the
future origins of what Derrida calls an "irreducible nonpresence,"
incessantly calling from "another now." Mills constructs the sonic
structures (or machines/constructures) for listening into this still
redeemable time to come. 

Wes


On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, M. Todd Smith wrote:

> Great point!  Doesn't dub predate hip hop though?  It was low-tech on big
> soundsystems.  The only factor it doesn't seem to inherit is the
> post-industrial attribute, but then again my knowledge of the roots of dub
> are few and far between.  Though I'd love to read about it, any suggestions
> LKS?
> 
> Cheers
> todd
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lester Kenyatta Spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>; "Bill Benzon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:42 AM
> Subject: RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line
> 
> 
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Brendan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > | -Original Message-
> > > | From: Lester Kenyatta Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > | Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:17 PM
> > > |
> > > | > Interesting point... I'd be tempted to say that techno was the first
> > > | > specifically post-industrial tribal music. Other genres of
> > > | music, like
> > > | > rock'n'roll or hip-hop, have always had tribal aspects to
> > > | them, but techno
> > > | > is specifically post-industrial.
> > > |
> > > | This is interesting as wellhow are you defining "post-indutrial?"
> > >
> > > The dictionary definition is "a period in the development of an economy
> or
> > > nation in which the relative importance of manufacturing lessens and
> that of
> > > services, information, and research grows" - most Western nations are
> now in
> > > a post-industrial state and have been since the late 1970s. Although
> there
> > > have been new genres of music since then besides techno, techno's
> origins in
> > > Detroit - a city which became post-industrial a while before many
> others,
> > > what with the collapse in auto manufacturing there and the subsequent
> decay
> > > of the city - kind of mark it as a genre of music which ties very
> closely
> > > with post-industrialism.
> >
> > Hm.  Although I don't think it is an accident that what we think of as
> > "techno" comes out of Detroit for the reasons you mentioned, I actually
> > think hip-hop might be the first post-industrial music...and that techno
> > is the first to actually REPRESENT itself as post-industrial.  Do you see
> > the distinction?  I was giving a lecture about "mass society" yesterday,
> > and it occurred to me that we can trace the development of music in a
> > similar fashion...rock and roll in particular.  Rock and roll is a very
> > industrial music in that it calls into being a certain sense of scale
> > (large large concert halls, a loud loud sound which requires big big
> > speakers, etc.).  It also calls into being a certain type of industry to
> > feed it.  Ticketmaster to deal with the consumer aspect of concert
> > technology for example.
> >
> > (apologies for obvious oversimplification.)
> >
> > But hiphop is the first music to violate those forms...and it was produced
> > by some of the first casualties of the industrial era--"colored" (black
> > american, black carribbean, latino, some white) men and women who were
> > unable to get jobs in the 

Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread M. Todd Smith
Great point!  Doesn't dub predate hip hop though?  It was low-tech on big
soundsystems.  The only factor it doesn't seem to inherit is the
post-industrial attribute, but then again my knowledge of the roots of dub
are few and far between.  Though I'd love to read about it, any suggestions
LKS?

Cheers
todd
- Original Message -
From: "Lester Kenyatta Spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>; "Bill Benzon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line


> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Brendan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > | -Original Message-
> > | From: Lester Kenyatta Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > | Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:17 PM
> > |
> > | > Interesting point... I'd be tempted to say that techno was the first
> > | > specifically post-industrial tribal music. Other genres of
> > | music, like
> > | > rock'n'roll or hip-hop, have always had tribal aspects to
> > | them, but techno
> > | > is specifically post-industrial.
> > |
> > | This is interesting as wellhow are you defining "post-indutrial?"
> >
> > The dictionary definition is "a period in the development of an economy
or
> > nation in which the relative importance of manufacturing lessens and
that of
> > services, information, and research grows" - most Western nations are
now in
> > a post-industrial state and have been since the late 1970s. Although
there
> > have been new genres of music since then besides techno, techno's
origins in
> > Detroit - a city which became post-industrial a while before many
others,
> > what with the collapse in auto manufacturing there and the subsequent
decay
> > of the city - kind of mark it as a genre of music which ties very
closely
> > with post-industrialism.
>
> Hm.  Although I don't think it is an accident that what we think of as
> "techno" comes out of Detroit for the reasons you mentioned, I actually
> think hip-hop might be the first post-industrial music...and that techno
> is the first to actually REPRESENT itself as post-industrial.  Do you see
> the distinction?  I was giving a lecture about "mass society" yesterday,
> and it occurred to me that we can trace the development of music in a
> similar fashion...rock and roll in particular.  Rock and roll is a very
> industrial music in that it calls into being a certain sense of scale
> (large large concert halls, a loud loud sound which requires big big
> speakers, etc.).  It also calls into being a certain type of industry to
> feed it.  Ticketmaster to deal with the consumer aspect of concert
> technology for example.
>
> (apologies for obvious oversimplification.)
>
> But hiphop is the first music to violate those forms...and it was produced
> by some of the first casualties of the industrial era--"colored" (black
> american, black carribbean, latino, some white) men and women who were
> unable to get jobs in the plants during the seventies.  It took a low-tech
> approach with high tech tools and created a sound that was a pastiche of
> bits and pieces of previous work.  And in juxtaposition to the megaband,
> all that was needed was "two turntables and a mic."  Note how the scale
> becomes more human...in pointed juxtaposition to the industrial trend.
>
> Now the themes are definitely NOT post-industrial...but I think the music
> itself was as far as the social factors leading up to its creation.
>
> > Of course, it's easy to say things like that about techno as it is an
> > ambiguous and amorphous genre of music - and it's just as easy to
disprove
> > statements like this for exactly the same reason. My perception of
techno is
> > that it's a post-industrial genre - and, hey, if we think of
'industrial' as
> > the musical genre rather than the phase of economic development, that
makes
> > sense too!
>
> Perhaps even more sense.
>
>
> peace
> lks
>
> (i forwarded this to a friend of mine who recently wrote a book called
> BEETHOVEN'S ANVIL which deals with music and culture broadly considered.)
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread Brendan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| -Original Message-
| From: Lester Kenyatta Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:43 PM
|
| Hm.  Although I don't think it is an accident that what we think of as
| "techno" comes out of Detroit for the reasons you mentioned, 
| I actually think hip-hop might be the first post-industrial music...and 
| that techno is the first to actually REPRESENT itself as post-industrial. 
|  Do you see the distinction?

Yes, I see what you mean, and it makes sense... 

| But hiphop is the first music to violate those forms...and it 
| was produced
| by some of the first casualties of the industrial 
| era--"colored" (black
| american, black carribbean, latino, some white) men and women who were
| unable to get jobs in the plants during the seventies.  It 
| took a low-tech
| approach with high tech tools and created a sound that was a 
| pastiche of
| bits and pieces of previous work.  And in juxtaposition to 
| the megaband,
| all that was needed was "two turntables and a mic."  Note how 
| the scale
| becomes more human...in pointed juxtaposition to the industrial trend.

And I guess that a characteristic of post-industrial music is an industrial
level of *energy* suddenly being directed into sound rather than into mass
production - something that hip-hop and techno share, in my opinion. You get
the sense of there being an industrial infrastructure either lying dormant
or in decay; while a lot of rock'n'roll always sounded like "work, work,
work" music (and having worked in factories playing MOR radio stations all
day, I've always associated rock music with the process of industrial
production), both hip-hop and techno sound like, "well, here's all this
machinery and industrialised sectors of the city, but it's not doing
anything, just slowly decaying, and here's what that decay sounds like...".
Perhaps techno takes it a bit further into "...and here's what these
machines *should* be doing!" - hence actually representing itself as
post-industrial music in a way that hip-hop doesn't?

You are completely right about the actual scale though - with hip-hop and
techno, the scale is much more human, which is interesting as both genres
seem to have a wider "scope" than rock'n'roll. Rock'n'roll tends to talk
about human situations, but the scale is vast; while hip-hop and techno talk
about wider or more abstract things while paradoxically working on a much
more human scale in terms of how the music is made, performed and
distributed.

| Now the themes are definitely NOT post-industrial...but I 
| think the music
| itself was as far as the social factors leading up to its creation.

Although it's possible to maybe point to some early hip-hop tracks that
actually were distinctly post-industrial - "The Message", "Ray-gun-omics"?
But you're right, the themes generally aren't post-industrial. Techno's
avoidance of explicit themes is possibly one of the most post-industrial
aspects of the music, in a way - what do you think?

| (i forwarded this to a friend of mine who recently wrote a book called
| BEETHOVEN'S ANVIL which deals with music and culture broadly 
| considered.)

Has this book been published? I'm very interested in that sort of thing and
would make an effort to pick it up if I could find it anywhere...

Brendan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread Lester Kenyatta Spence
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Brendan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> | -Original Message-
> | From: Lester Kenyatta Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:17 PM
> |
> | > Interesting point... I'd be tempted to say that techno was the first
> | > specifically post-industrial tribal music. Other genres of
> | music, like
> | > rock'n'roll or hip-hop, have always had tribal aspects to
> | them, but techno
> | > is specifically post-industrial.
> |
> | This is interesting as wellhow are you defining "post-indutrial?"
>
> The dictionary definition is "a period in the development of an economy or
> nation in which the relative importance of manufacturing lessens and that of
> services, information, and research grows" - most Western nations are now in
> a post-industrial state and have been since the late 1970s. Although there
> have been new genres of music since then besides techno, techno's origins in
> Detroit - a city which became post-industrial a while before many others,
> what with the collapse in auto manufacturing there and the subsequent decay
> of the city - kind of mark it as a genre of music which ties very closely
> with post-industrialism.

Hm.  Although I don't think it is an accident that what we think of as
"techno" comes out of Detroit for the reasons you mentioned, I actually
think hip-hop might be the first post-industrial music...and that techno
is the first to actually REPRESENT itself as post-industrial.  Do you see
the distinction?  I was giving a lecture about "mass society" yesterday,
and it occurred to me that we can trace the development of music in a
similar fashion...rock and roll in particular.  Rock and roll is a very
industrial music in that it calls into being a certain sense of scale
(large large concert halls, a loud loud sound which requires big big
speakers, etc.).  It also calls into being a certain type of industry to
feed it.  Ticketmaster to deal with the consumer aspect of concert
technology for example.

(apologies for obvious oversimplification.)

But hiphop is the first music to violate those forms...and it was produced
by some of the first casualties of the industrial era--"colored" (black
american, black carribbean, latino, some white) men and women who were
unable to get jobs in the plants during the seventies.  It took a low-tech
approach with high tech tools and created a sound that was a pastiche of
bits and pieces of previous work.  And in juxtaposition to the megaband,
all that was needed was "two turntables and a mic."  Note how the scale
becomes more human...in pointed juxtaposition to the industrial trend.

Now the themes are definitely NOT post-industrial...but I think the music
itself was as far as the social factors leading up to its creation.

> Of course, it's easy to say things like that about techno as it is an
> ambiguous and amorphous genre of music - and it's just as easy to disprove
> statements like this for exactly the same reason. My perception of techno is
> that it's a post-industrial genre - and, hey, if we think of 'industrial' as
> the musical genre rather than the phase of economic development, that makes
> sense too!

Perhaps even more sense.


peace
lks

(i forwarded this to a friend of mine who recently wrote a book called
BEETHOVEN'S ANVIL which deals with music and culture broadly considered.)



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread Brendan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| -Original Message-
| From: Lester Kenyatta Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:17 PM
| 
| > Interesting point... I'd be tempted to say that techno was the first
| > specifically post-industrial tribal music. Other genres of 
| music, like
| > rock'n'roll or hip-hop, have always had tribal aspects to 
| them, but techno
| > is specifically post-industrial.
| 
| This is interesting as wellhow are you defining "post-indutrial?"

The dictionary definition is "a period in the development of an economy or
nation in which the relative importance of manufacturing lessens and that of
services, information, and research grows" - most Western nations are now in
a post-industrial state and have been since the late 1970s. Although there
have been new genres of music since then besides techno, techno's origins in
Detroit - a city which became post-industrial a while before many others,
what with the collapse in auto manufacturing there and the subsequent decay
of the city - kind of mark it as a genre of music which ties very closely
with post-industrialism.

Of course, it's easy to say things like that about techno as it is an
ambiguous and amorphous genre of music - and it's just as easy to disprove
statements like this for exactly the same reason. My perception of techno is
that it's a post-industrial genre - and, hey, if we think of 'industrial' as
the musical genre rather than the phase of economic development, that makes
sense too!

Brendan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread Lester Kenyatta Spence
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Brendan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> | -Original Message-
> | From: Gery Smismans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:29 PM
> |
> | Could we describe techno as the first attempt by people living in
> | "western" ( industrialised ) countries to tribal music ? Or would that
> | be Jazz ?
>
> Interesting point... I'd be tempted to say that techno was the first
> specifically post-industrial tribal music. Other genres of music, like
> rock'n'roll or hip-hop, have always had tribal aspects to them, but techno
> is specifically post-industrial.

This is interesting as wellhow are you defining "post-indutrial?"


peace
lks


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread Brendan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| -Original Message-
| From: Gery Smismans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:29 PM
| 
| Could we describe techno as the first attempt by people living in
| "western" ( industrialised ) countries to tribal music ? Or would that
| be Jazz ?

Interesting point... I'd be tempted to say that techno was the first
specifically post-industrial tribal music. Other genres of music, like
rock'n'roll or hip-hop, have always had tribal aspects to them, but techno
is specifically post-industrial.

Brendan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread T.J.Johnson
Yeah I totally see what you're saying.  To me, techno music almost mimics the 
assembly line, but with much more variation...


On Wed, 14 November 2001, "Gery Smismans" wrote:

> 
> To return to the music site of things :  techno has a intriguing
> ambiguity : it consists of electronic sounds, generated by machines and
> always reminds me of our modern society with its industrial sounds,
> never ending beats( like society has now become a 24/24 nonstop machine,
> not like before, when everybody rested on a Sunday ), energizing drive,
> and yet it's music that can only be savoured when listening with your
> belly in stead of your head, like most tribal music. 
> 
> Could we describe techno as the first attempt by people living in
> "western" ( industrialised ) countries to tribal music ? Or would that
> be Jazz ?
> 
> :-G
> http://www.appletree.be  
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


TJ
www.wireframerecords.com
www.outrecords.com

PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart. 
http://www.peoplepc.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread Gery Smismans
To return to the music site of things :  techno has a intriguing
ambiguity : it consists of electronic sounds, generated by machines and
always reminds me of our modern society with its industrial sounds,
never ending beats( like society has now become a 24/24 nonstop machine,
not like before, when everybody rested on a Sunday ), energizing drive,
and yet it's music that can only be savoured when listening with your
belly in stead of your head, like most tribal music. 

Could we describe techno as the first attempt by people living in
"western" ( industrialised ) countries to tribal music ? Or would that
be Jazz ?

:-G
http://www.appletree.be  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread veto
> 
> You are pretty funny, for a physics geek.  =)
> 
> Don't forget the "per say" that you cut off to make your points even minutely
> valid.  Nice edit job.
> 
Excellent, so if I add back in those two words (didn't really notice them to
be honest) you accept the validity and truthfulness of my little rant- that
was easier than I thought

Jason Brunton


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread Gery Smismans
> Uh, I don't have a physics lecturer, sorry
> 
Buy yourself Scott Adams' "The Dilbert Future", read chapter 14 and
amaze your peers with your vast knowledge of physics, prooving that
gravity is only an optical illusion :-) 

:-G
http://www.appletree.be 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread veto
>> Sometimes I think that when it is our time to understand, we will.
> 
>> And until that point we should just keep our heads under the parapet??
> 
> Yeah maybe.  Or you could go on believing everything your physics professor
> has to say.  The truth is that man will never understand even a minute
> fraction of life and the way things work.
> 
> You base your statement on man's burning curiosity, which is a totally valid
> point.  I, myself, fall into this category.  I am just saying from personal
> experience, that when you assign all the naturally occuring events a number,
> it just get's boring and leaves less room for the imagination to kick in.
> 
> BTW particle and wave duality is just another small example of science's
> flaws.  They categorize everything and then WHAM!  Something like that comes
> along and throws a monkey wrech into the equation.  Then they try to find out
> why and fix it.  I guess it is something to do to pass the time, but to egg
> people on by paying them money to fill their heads with it?  Not cool.  I
> liked it better when the scientists (Plato, Socrates, etc.)just taught whoever
> would listen.  
> 
> 
Uh, I don't have a physics lecturer, sorry

Jason Brunton


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread Niko Tzoukmanis

> 
> > At 9:25 +0100 11/14/01, veto wrote:
> > >PS Has anyone heard any good RECORDS recently???
> > 
> 
> 
the other people place lp on warp...
it's rumoured to be from an artist from
the underground resistance posse
like everyone else i have *no* clue
*who* it might be
(beware of irony)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread Jongsma, K.J.
T.J.Johnson wrote:
>
> This may have already been discussed, but the K. Hand History 
> of Detroit on Tresor has actually grown on me.  When I first 
> brought it home last month, I threw a track off of this 
> double lp and it threw my mix off (sure, blame it on the 
> record=) because the beat was a little wacky for me.  But, 
> yesterday I played the record in it's entirety and found it 
> to be a pretty nice work.
> TJ

Someone wanted to give that record to me, thank God i listened to it and
used the 'well i have to travell back and i don't want to carry anymore
records' excuse. I found it one of the worst records on Tresor for a verry
long time! Some lame mixing and most of the tracks are so weak, there is
nothing going on. The whole thing just sounded a bit to much as a effort to
cach in on the succes of the DEMF.


[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
DISCLAIMER

De gemeente Almelo aanvaardt voor haar medewerkers geen enkele
aansprakelijkheid voor eventueel onjuist, onrechtmatig of 
ontoelaatbaar geacht gebruik van e-mail (inclusief bijlagen).

Dit e-mail bericht is door de gemeente Almelo gecontroleerd op
de aanwezigheid van eventuele virussen. Wij kunnen echter geen
garantie afgeven dat al onze e-mail berichten volledig virus
vrij zijn. Het is daarom verstandig uw binnenkomende e-mail 
berichten zelf op de mogelijke aanwezigheid van virussen 
te controleren.
--

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread T.J.Johnson


> At 9:25 +0100 11/14/01, veto wrote:
> >PS Has anyone heard any good RECORDS recently???
> 


This may have already been discussed, but the K. Hand History of Detroit on 
Tresor has actually grown on me.  When I first brought it home last month, I 
threw a track off of this double lp and it threw my mix off (sure, blame it on 
the record=) because the beat was a little wacky for me.  But, yesterday I 
played the record in it's entirety and found it to be a pretty nice work.


TJ
www.wireframerecords.com
www.outrecords.com

PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart. 
http://www.peoplepc.com 
 
--- End of forwarded message ---


TJ
www.wireframerecords.com
www.outrecords.com

PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart. 
http://www.peoplepc.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread mkb

At 9:25 +0100 11/14/01, veto wrote:

PS Has anyone heard any good RECORDS recently???


Actually, the new LTJ Bukem live album is pretty nice. He recorded it 
at a club I SHOULD have been at, but n nobody else was 
interested. I have NEVER heard him do a rewind except on this mix. 
(not that this is on topic)


Finally the radio station I work for is getting better promos now 
that we have four constant RPM hosts. Unfortunately, somebody stole 
the new Herbie Hancock! >:O


--
Cafard, [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
qu'est-ce que tu penses?   AIM:pr0j2501   
Matt Kane's Brain http://mkb.n3.net   
===jive turkey http://jive-turkey.n3.net===


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread T.J.Johnson
> >I have challenged my physics professors too many times to count.
> My god, I have such total sympathy with your professor!!
> 
> > Basically, if man ever does discover that something travels faster than 3 x
> > 10^8 m/s, science falls apart,

You are pretty funny, for a physics geek.  =)

Don't forget the "per say" that you cut off to make your points even minutely 
valid.  Nice edit job.


TJ
www.wireframerecords.com
www.outrecords.com

PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart. 
http://www.peoplepc.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-14 Thread veto
>I have challenged my physics professors too many times to count.
My god, I have such total sympathy with your professor!!

> Basically, if man ever does discover that something travels faster than 3 x
> 10^8 m/s, science falls apart,

I found most of this post to be pretty silly but this point in
particular struck a chord- are you really saying that if faster than light
particles are proved beyond doubt to exist that a car whose aerodynamics
were formulated using quantum uncertainty algorithms will stop being
aerodynamic?  Or that your microwave oven will cease to operate.  Science
didn't fall apart when it was discovered that light travels through space in
a vacuum and not some "ether" as was previously believed (the same "ether"
that "held people onto the surface of the Earth" before the discovery of
Gravity), not did it fall apart when it was "discovered" that the Earth
orbits the Earth and not vice versa (although a few people's world may
have!), Science expands to incorporate new ideas as and when they come
about, usually with a delay of a few decade,
The interesting thing is the the writer complains of a feeling of
"brainwashing" and having the "Imagination" "programmed" out of him- quantum
theory was one of the most imaginative feats of the 20th century- thinking
of things in two different way simultaneously- wave/particle duality is no
mean feat.
I believe that Techno can inspire original thoughts and I also believe
that it can have a theoretical base however, too often this is simply a case
of covering for a lack of any real originality or talent (Ritchie Hawtin in
my opinion), also these things can be taken just a little bit too far (I am
just old enough to remember the horrors of Emerson Lake and Palmer and
Genesis "concept" albums some of which were based on similar "utopian"
society ideas as are being touted about today by techno producers who should
know better).

>Sometimes I think that when it is our time to understand, we will.

And until that point we should just keep our heads under the parapet??

Jason Brunton

Iridite

PS Has anyone heard any good RECORDS recently???


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [313] Jeff Mills interview on-line

2001-11-13 Thread T.J.Johnson
Great Interview!  It is really good that such an optimistic person can become a 
very positive influence on society.  

I can relate with Jeff on a few ideas too.  For example, I have challenged my 
physics professors too many times to count.  The problem with physics is that 
alot of the theorums and concepts are based on spacial limits.  One example is 
Eienstein's theory of relativity, E=MC^2.  This concept relies on C, the speed 
of light, as a constant.  This theory also depends on nothing ever travelling 
faster than the speed of light.  It almost seems immature to me to rely on that 
as being the limit in such a enexplainably, magnificantly large universe with 
so many unknowns.  Sometimes I wonder why I even keep going to class when it 
seems like they only put concepts like this, which destroy our imagination, 
into our heads to give us some sense of understanding.  Sometimes I think that 
when it is our time to understand, we will.  Until then, it seems utterly 
rediculous to even attempt to understand things like this.

I know that what I typed above sounds realy negative, when I started out 
talking about Jeff's optimism.  I guess I just hate losing my imagination.  It 
all boils down to imagination being much more important (to me) than knowledge. 
 Knowledge gets you money in this world.  Imagination gets you...  Well, I 
don't know what it gets you, but it definately makes life a bit more enjoyable. 
 I know I enjoyed life alot more when I was a kid, with hardly any schooling, 
and just the next piece of pleasureful candy, the next friend I would make, the 
next time my Mom kissed me goodnight and told me she loved me, or the next toy 
I could play with to look forward to.  Man that was the good life!

Basically, if man ever does discover that something travels faster than 3 x 
10^8 m/s, science falls apart, per say.  But the imagination is just as 
limitless as before.  If you think about it, as time approaches infinity, 
knowledge approaches the imagination.  Unfortunately, according to math, 
asemtotes are never met...


TJ
www.wireframerecords.com
www.outrecords.com

PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart. 
http://www.peoplepc.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]