Re: TSM 5.4 cautions
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:33:20PM -0500, Richard Sims wrote: > Look, before leaping into TSM 5.4 ... > Cautionary/advisory Technotes are starting to appear for 5.4, > as for example 1249083. Do a search, and pore over the Readme > file, before committing to an install. Agreed! I cautioned the 10 Intel Mac users to read the files and search the web for any known problems. They are testing it now, and have had 'no crashes' with the client (so far). bob
Re: Expired directories with DIRMC and restore
That sure doesn't sound right I just tried it myself with a very current client level (Windows) and could not reproduce your results. Do you have multiple TSM servers? Is it possible you're updating one server and connecting GUI to another? From your email it doesn't sound like it, but I guess it doesn't hurt to double-check. Can you open a command line interface and do "query backup c:\testdir\ -subdir=yes -ina"? What do the results show? (Note: "c:\testdir" is whatever play directory you used) In answer to your question, though, the directory structure is backed up so, if for no other reason, you can restore it. On some systems it might not be meaningful; but on systems like Windows, where directories have security and other settings, being able to restore the directories might be important to your organization. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 01/26/2007 09:32:03 AM: > I ran a test backing up a directory structure with files and > subdirectories to a reto=20 management class for the files and > directories via DIRMC to a reto=0 management class. After the backup I > deleted the data and re-ran the incremental backup to expire the objects > from TSM. I confirmed the objects were now INACTIVE_VERSION in the > backups table then ran expiration to purge from the DB (reto=0). > Checking the backups table again I can see no directory objects existed, > just the files. > > Next, I launched the GUI to test if I could expand the directory tree > and restore the data. Both worked. Path preserved on the restore as > well. > > So my confusion is, what is the directory structure for? I would have > suspected I would not have been able to expand the tree in the GUI or > restore the data to its original location. > > We are looking to mix long term data with short term data in our TSM > servers and want to prevent all directory objects from being bound to > the longest retention policy mgmtclass using the DIRMC option. This > test was to see the implications of not having a directory structure, > which surprisingly had no affect... Am I missing something? > > Thanks. > > > If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify > the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, > copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional > terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ >
Re: Expired directories with DIRMC and restore
Denis - The experimental results which you report certainly disagree with the published descriptions of how the GUI should behave in the absence of path directories. Technote 1157531 in particular is at odds with what you found. I recommend at least filling in the Comments box at the bottom of that Technote page with your findings, if not contact TSM Support regarding the apparent discrepancy. Richard Sims
TSM 5.4 cautions
Look, before leaping into TSM 5.4 ... Cautionary/advisory Technotes are starting to appear for 5.4, as for example 1249083. Do a search, and pore over the Readme file, before committing to an install. Richard Sims
Re: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices
Mr. Kauffman... How does your company handle the Disposition of Failed Storage Devices?? After further discussions with my boss, we have many camps with differing points of view. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kauffman, Tom Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:57 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Disposition of Failed Storage Devices Given the security group's position, I think your options are sledghammer or iron smelter. And you'll really need to put everything you've got into the sledgehammer, if you go that route. A thermal lance or oxygen cutting torch might also fill the requirements. I doubt you'll get anything in writing from either IBM or EMC that will be satisfactory. You'll also need to get quotes from both on how much the maintenance fees will increase if the failed media device is rendered non-salvageable before return. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lamb, Charles P. Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 11:07 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices Hi Our IT management is looking at implementing a process for disposition of failed storage devices. We have a hardware contract with both IBM and EMC. Our IT management is not sure that our data would be secured and deleted correctly. Here is an excerpt from our security group. >From my perspective, what we have from IBM/EMC so far isn't sufficient. My opinion is that in order for us to consider a vendor's approach suitable- there needs to be more focus on data breach law compliance support. For example, if we can confirm that their approach (or related optional enhancements) is audited, secured, traceable, employee/subcontractor vetting/background checking, and includes appropriate notification of potential data breach, etc and that their program is also periodically third party audited (& ideally court case tested).. we're in a much better position. If/when they notify us of loss, we also would need full cooperation in related investigation efforts and confirming ultimate disposition. Your company's process would be appreciated. Thoughts?? Tnx's a bunch for your input. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
Re: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices
Or the US Marine Corp. "When it absolutely, positively has to be destroyed overnight" -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thorneycroft, Doug Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 12:34 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Disposition of Failed Storage Devices You might take a look at this site, their members specialize in totally destroying things like tapes and disk drives. (National Associating for information destruction) http://www.naidonline.org/ -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kauffman, Tom Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:57 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices Given the security group's position, I think your options are sledghammer or iron smelter. And you'll really need to put everything you've got into the sledgehammer, if you go that route. A thermal lance or oxygen cutting torch might also fill the requirements. I doubt you'll get anything in writing from either IBM or EMC that will be satisfactory. You'll also need to get quotes from both on how much the maintenance fees will increase if the failed media device is rendered non-salvageable before return. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lamb, Charles P. Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 11:07 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices Hi Our IT management is looking at implementing a process for disposition of failed storage devices. We have a hardware contract with both IBM and EMC. Our IT management is not sure that our data would be secured and deleted correctly. Here is an excerpt from our security group. >From my perspective, what we have from IBM/EMC so far isn't sufficient. My opinion is that in order for us to consider a vendor's approach suitable- there needs to be more focus on data breach law compliance support. For example, if we can confirm that their approach (or related optional enhancements) is audited, secured, traceable, employee/subcontractor vetting/background checking, and includes appropriate notification of potential data breach, etc and that their program is also periodically third party audited (& ideally court case tested).. we're in a much better position. If/when they notify us of loss, we also would need full cooperation in related investigation efforts and confirming ultimate disposition. Your company's process would be appreciated. Thoughts?? Tnx's a bunch for your input. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
Re: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices
You might take a look at this site, their members specialize in totally destroying things like tapes and disk drives. (National Associating for information destruction) http://www.naidonline.org/ -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kauffman, Tom Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:57 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices Given the security group's position, I think your options are sledghammer or iron smelter. And you'll really need to put everything you've got into the sledgehammer, if you go that route. A thermal lance or oxygen cutting torch might also fill the requirements. I doubt you'll get anything in writing from either IBM or EMC that will be satisfactory. You'll also need to get quotes from both on how much the maintenance fees will increase if the failed media device is rendered non-salvageable before return. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lamb, Charles P. Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 11:07 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices Hi Our IT management is looking at implementing a process for disposition of failed storage devices. We have a hardware contract with both IBM and EMC. Our IT management is not sure that our data would be secured and deleted correctly. Here is an excerpt from our security group. >From my perspective, what we have from IBM/EMC so far isn't sufficient. My opinion is that in order for us to consider a vendor's approach suitable- there needs to be more focus on data breach law compliance support. For example, if we can confirm that their approach (or related optional enhancements) is audited, secured, traceable, employee/subcontractor vetting/background checking, and includes appropriate notification of potential data breach, etc and that their program is also periodically third party audited (& ideally court case tested).. we're in a much better position. If/when they notify us of loss, we also would need full cooperation in related investigation efforts and confirming ultimate disposition. Your company's process would be appreciated. Thoughts?? Tnx's a bunch for your input. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TSM 5.4 client appears
The 5.4 TSM client is now on the IBM ftp site. It does appear to have the long awaited 'native' support for Intel based Macs. Hope it works. cheers, bob
Re: exporting scripts
>why not just create a profile on the Server with the scripts in it and then >create a subscription on the TSM-server you want the script on? This way >you can keep scripts neatly aligned with almost no administrative or manual >overhead, as changes are replicated automatically. Works well at our sites, >cross-platform an all the stuff you could stumble over with the macros! Hi Markus, I had thought about this some time back but my attempts to set it up were unsuccessful. Probably me not ever seeing it implemented. I'm sure support would help me out but if you have the commands and an order to run them I'd certainly give it another go. Also an FYI on the scripts macro implementation. If you have scripts already assigned with the same name the macro quits and fails to copy anything in. I was able to rename the scripts in the macro file and successfully import them all. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator SAIC M/S-G1b (858)826-4062 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices
Given the security group's position, I think your options are sledghammer or iron smelter. And you'll really need to put everything you've got into the sledgehammer, if you go that route. A thermal lance or oxygen cutting torch might also fill the requirements. I doubt you'll get anything in writing from either IBM or EMC that will be satisfactory. You'll also need to get quotes from both on how much the maintenance fees will increase if the failed media device is rendered non-salvageable before return. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lamb, Charles P. Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 11:07 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices Hi Our IT management is looking at implementing a process for disposition of failed storage devices. We have a hardware contract with both IBM and EMC. Our IT management is not sure that our data would be secured and deleted correctly. Here is an excerpt from our security group. >From my perspective, what we have from IBM/EMC so far isn't sufficient. My opinion is that in order for us to consider a vendor's approach suitable- there needs to be more focus on data breach law compliance support. For example, if we can confirm that their approach (or related optional enhancements) is audited, secured, traceable, employee/subcontractor vetting/background checking, and includes appropriate notification of potential data breach, etc and that their program is also periodically third party audited (& ideally court case tested).. we're in a much better position. If/when they notify us of loss, we also would need full cooperation in related investigation efforts and confirming ultimate disposition. Your company's process would be appreciated. Thoughts?? Tnx's a bunch for your input. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
Expired directories with DIRMC and restore
I ran a test backing up a directory structure with files and subdirectories to a reto=20 management class for the files and directories via DIRMC to a reto=0 management class. After the backup I deleted the data and re-ran the incremental backup to expire the objects from TSM. I confirmed the objects were now INACTIVE_VERSION in the backups table then ran expiration to purge from the DB (reto=0). Checking the backups table again I can see no directory objects existed, just the files. Next, I launched the GUI to test if I could expand the directory tree and restore the data. Both worked. Path preserved on the restore as well. So my confusion is, what is the directory structure for? I would have suspected I would not have been able to expand the tree in the GUI or restore the data to its original location. We are looking to mix long term data with short term data in our TSM servers and want to prevent all directory objects from being bound to the longest retention policy mgmtclass using the DIRMC option. This test was to see the implications of not having a directory structure, which surprisingly had no affect... Am I missing something? Thanks. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
Re: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices
You can buy a big degausser. Looks like a large-size microwave. Zap the disks before returning them. I think your hardware contract costs more because of that, but it's probably cheaper than a lawsuit! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lamb, Charles P. Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 11:07 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Disposition of Failed Storage Devices Hi Our IT management is looking at implementing a process for disposition of failed storage devices. We have a hardware contract with both IBM and EMC. Our IT management is not sure that our data would be secured and deleted correctly. Here is an excerpt from our security group. >From my perspective, what we have from IBM/EMC so far isn't sufficient. My opinion is that in order for us to consider a vendor's approach suitable- there needs to be more focus on data breach law compliance support. For example, if we can confirm that their approach (or related optional enhancements) is audited, secured, traceable, employee/subcontractor vetting/background checking, and includes appropriate notification of potential data breach, etc and that their program is also periodically third party audited (& ideally court case tested).. we're in a much better position. If/when they notify us of loss, we also would need full cooperation in related investigation efforts and confirming ultimate disposition. Your company's process would be appreciated. Thoughts?? Tnx's a bunch for your input.
Disposition of Failed Storage Devices
Hi Our IT management is looking at implementing a process for disposition of failed storage devices. We have a hardware contract with both IBM and EMC. Our IT management is not sure that our data would be secured and deleted correctly. Here is an excerpt from our security group. >From my perspective, what we have from IBM/EMC so far isn't sufficient. My opinion is that in order for us to consider a vendor's approach suitable- there needs to be more focus on data breach law compliance support. For example, if we can confirm that their approach (or related optional enhancements) is audited, secured, traceable, employee/subcontractor vetting/background checking, and includes appropriate notification of potential data breach, etc and that their program is also periodically third party audited (& ideally court case tested).. we're in a much better position. If/when they notify us of loss, we also would need full cooperation in related investigation efforts and confirming ultimate disposition. Your company's process would be appreciated. Thoughts?? Tnx's a bunch for your input.
SV: INCLUDE.DIR in SUN 5.10
Hi Remco, INCLUDE.DIR works fine in Linux, Mac and Windows. /C -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Remco Post Skickat: den 26 januari 2007 15:35 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Re: INCLUDE.DIR in SUN 5.10 Christian Svensson wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Has anyone realize that INCLUDE.DIR doesn't exist in TSM BA Client > version 5.3.4.4 for SUN Solaris 5.10? > It doesn't exist on any other platform either, it never has. > We have setup a generic INCLEXCL list for all UNIX boxes and everyone > can use it accept the SUN Servers where they can't use the lines > INCLUDE.DIR. The EXCLUDE.DIR works fine but not the INCLUDE.DIR. > > > > Any comments anyone? > use include and exclude.dir only for those dirs that don't have anything in them that wil get backed-up. > > > > > Best Regards/ Med vänlig hälsning Christian Svensson Product > Specialist > > Cristie Nordic AB Cell : +46-70-325 1577 Office: +46-8-718 4330 > Support : +44-1453-84 7009 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdiensten http://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 3000Fax. +31 20 668 3167 PGP Key fingerprint = 6367 DFE9 5CBC 0737 7D16 B3F6 048A 02BF DC93 94EC "I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams
Re: INCLUDE.DIR in SUN 5.10
Christian Svensson wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Has anyone realize that INCLUDE.DIR doesn't exist in TSM BA Client > version 5.3.4.4 for SUN Solaris 5.10? > It doesn't exist on any other platform either, it never has. > We have setup a generic INCLEXCL list for all UNIX boxes and everyone > can use it accept the SUN Servers where they can't use the lines > INCLUDE.DIR. The EXCLUDE.DIR works fine but not the INCLUDE.DIR. > > > > Any comments anyone? > use include and exclude.dir only for those dirs that don't have anything in them that wil get backed-up. > > > > > Best Regards/ Med vänlig hälsning Christian Svensson Product > Specialist > > Cristie Nordic AB Cell : +46-70-325 1577 Office: +46-8-718 4330 > Support : +44-1453-84 7009 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdiensten http://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 3000Fax. +31 20 668 3167 PGP Key fingerprint = 6367 DFE9 5CBC 0737 7D16 B3F6 048A 02BF DC93 94EC "I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams
INCLUDE.DIR in SUN 5.10
Hi Everyone, Has anyone realize that INCLUDE.DIR doesn't exist in TSM BA Client version 5.3.4.4 for SUN Solaris 5.10? We have setup a generic INCLEXCL list for all UNIX boxes and everyone can use it accept the SUN Servers where they can't use the lines INCLUDE.DIR. The EXCLUDE.DIR works fine but not the INCLUDE.DIR. Any comments anyone? Best Regards/ Med vänlig hälsning Christian Svensson Product Specialist Cristie Nordic AB Cell : +46-70-325 1577 Office: +46-8-718 4330 Support : +44-1453-84 7009 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: exporting scripts
I've never done any config manager stuff. is this as simple as: tsm1> set configman on tsm1>def profile scriptprof desc='tsm scripts' tsm1>def profassoc scriptprof scripts=* .. tsm2>def subscript scriptprof server=tsm1 This would require all changes and additions to scripts to be made on server tsm1, right? David >>> Markus Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/26/2007 2:30 AM >>> Hi Geoffrey, why not just create a profile on the Server with the scripts in it and then create a subscription on the TSM-server you want the script on? This way you can keep scripts neatly aligned with almost no administrative or manual overhead, as changes are replicated automatically. Works well at our sites, cross-platform an all the stuff you could stumble over with the macros! Regards, Markus -- Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail oder von Teilen dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. Wir haben alle verkehrsüblichen Maßnahmen unternommen, um das Risiko der Verbreitung virenbefallener Software oder E-Mails zu minimieren, dennoch raten wir Ihnen, Ihre eigenen Virenkontrollen auf alle Anhänge an dieser Nachricht durchzuführen. Wir schließen außer für den Fall von Vorsatz oder grober Fahrlässigkeit die Haftung für jeglichen Verlust oder Schäden durch virenbefallene Software oder E-Mails aus. Jede von der Bank versendete E-Mail ist sorgfältig erstellt worden, dennoch schließen wir die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit aus; sie kann nicht zu einer irgendwie gearteten Verpflichtung zu Lasten der Bank ausgelegt werden. __ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail or of parts hereof is strictly forbidden. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment of this message. We accept no liability for loss or damage caused by software viruses except in case of gross negligence or willful behaviour. Any e-mail messages from the Bank are sent in good faith, but shall not be binding or construed as constituting any kind of obligation on the part of the Bank.
Question
Hi List I have de little problem, i use tsm client 5.2.3.0 and tsm storage agent 5.2.3.0, the tsm server is identical version. The AIX Client (5.3 with Veritas FS, Veritas Cluster and volume shared) the slow transfer rate 7MB/s the backup or archive. If use volume no shared the transfer rate is entry 32MB/s and 42MB/s How solve the slow transfer rate to 42MB/s using volume shared??? Darcy Roberto Ganga Ponce Ingeniero de Sistemas IBM Certified Deployment Professional Tivoli Storage Manager Cientec Computación Presidente Riesco 5711 Piso 7 http://www.cientec.com email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tsm-database Volumes on zfs
Dear TSMers, we have tsm server 5.3.4.0 on solaris10 and already using zfs for all backup-diskPools and filepools on disk. We currently use the tsm-db-volumes ( define dbvol ) on UFS . Because we just got a new raid for the tsm-db we now want to use the new one with 'zfs' and move the tsmdb-volumes onto that. The question now is: are there any special things/settings to think about when using 'zfs' for the tsmdb-volumes instead of 'ufs' ? ... any caveats ? best regards and thanks in advance ! Rainer -- Rainer Wolf eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] kiz - Abt. Infrastruktur Tel/Fax: ++49 731 50-22482/22471 Universitaet Ulm wwweb:http://kiz.uni-ulm.de
Re: TSM and disk volumes of more than 1 TB...
Hi Iban,
>From http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts :
Volume, maximum sizePer 2004/05/27 IBM TechNote 1170255
("Maximum capacity of an ITSM disk
volume"), the maximum size of an ITSM
disk volume is 8 Terabytes (TB).
Arnaud
**
Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland,
CIT Department Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel/CH
Phone: +41 (61) 226 11 11, FAX: +41 (61) 226 17 01
Direct: +41 (61) 226 19 78
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ibán
Bernaldo de Quirós y Márquez
Sent: Friday, 26 January, 2007 17:52
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TSM and disk volumes of more than 1 TB...
Hi everyone,
Did anyone know if TSM could hold disk volumes of 1TB or more for a disk
STGPOOL ¿?
Thanks in advance,
Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós
Technical Specialist
TSM and disk volumes of more than 1 TB...
Hi everyone, Did anyone know if TSM could hold disk volumes of 1TB or more for a disk STGPOOL ¿? Thanks in advance, Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Technical Specialist
TSM and TS3200 tape library
Hello TSM consultants, my conf: TSM server 5.3.4 on Windows 2003 (HP server), TS3200 library with 1 LTO3 drive, SCSI. I installed IBM device drivers for the tape library and drives. IBM drivers were installed succesfully and I can see now in device manager two medium changers and two tape devices. Does it mean I must configure pathes to both libraries (medium changers) in TSM? I think there is only one medium changer in TS3200 but windows see two. Why? I've tried to configure only one library and both drives. Pathes were set correcly. Checkin command was succesfull but when I try to backup I get an error message "ANR0535W - insufficient mount points available to satisfy the request. " It seems that TSM can't manipulate with the changer.
