OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is currently empty. -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool (27 Aug 2023)
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool (31 Jul 2023)
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool (23 Jul 2023)
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty. -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool contains the following proposals: ID Author(s) AITitle --- 8885~ Janet 1.0 Stamp correction Legend: * : Democratic proposal. ~ : Ordinary proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. // ID: 8885 Title: Stamp correction Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: Janet Co-Author(s): Transfer each Janet stamp owned by the Lost and Found Department to Janet. Destroy each Madrid stamp owned by the Lost and Found Department. [These went through w/o objection but were accidentally ratified away.] // -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- snail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- secretsnail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- secretsnail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- secretsnail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. -- secretsnail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW (No distribution this week.) The proposal pool contains the following proposals: ID Author(s) AITitle --- 8829~ Gaelan, Trigon 1.0 Look upon our works Legend: * : Democratic proposal. ! : Sponsored, Democratic proposal. ~ : Ordinary proposal. & : Sponsored, Ordinary proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. // ID: 8829 Title: Look upon our works Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: Gaelan Co-author(s): Trigon Award each active player who did not vote FOR this proposal the patent title Marvy. // -- secretsnail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is currently empty. -- secretsnail
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool contains the following proposals: Author(s) AITitle --- nix 3.0 Some RTRW Clean-Ups G. 1.7 Cheaters shouldn't prosper Legend: * : Democratic proposal. & : Ordinary proposal. ~ : Unsponsored proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. // Title: Some RTRW Clean-Ups Adoption index: 3.0 Author: nix Co-author(s): Amend R2464 by replacing "set of regulations," with "a set of regulations,". Amend R2493 by: * replacing "an textual entity" with "a textual entity"; and * replacing "an person" with "a person". Amend R2495 by replacing "This title" with "These regulations". Amend R2471 by replacing "be not to be true" with "be not true". Amend R2602 by removing any quotation marks and replacing "or e corresponding" with "or the corresponding". // Title: Cheaters shouldn't prosper Adoption index: 1.7 Author: G. Co-author(s): [ - clarifies timing of JC grant paragraph - the default penalty is 2 blots. a set-complete JC removes 2.5 blots. A perp shouldn't profit from their crime by pointing at themselves and getting a JC for it. So this removes self-points from the counting. ] Amend Rule 2478 (Vigilante Justice) by replacing: The player who initiated the most Finger Pointings that resulted in a Warning, Indictment, or Cold Hand of Justice in the previous Agoran Week CAN once grant emself a Justice Card by announcement. with: The player who initiated the most Finger Pointings at other players that, in the previous Agoran Week, resulted in a Warning, Indictment, or Cold Hand of Justice, CAN once grant emself a Justice Card by announcement. //
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
[If I can get back into the habit of publishing these at the beginning of the week, it'll save a lot of stress, though I'll probably slip again.] PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW. The proposal pool currently contains the following proposal(s): Author(s) AITitle --- Jason, Bucky2.0 Buying Strength Eligibility G. 1.0 [1] [1] This proposal has no title. Furthermore, it may not exist. Legend: * : Democratic proposal. & : Ordinary proposal. ~ : Unsponsored proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. // Title: Buying Strength Eligibility Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Jason Co-author(s): Bucky Amend Rule 2653 by replacing "A player's Voting Strength on referendum" with "A person's Voting Strength on a referendum". [There's no reason that buying strength should stop applying on deregistration, since a non-player can still be eligible to vote.] // Title: Adoption index: 1.0 Author: G. Co-author(s): submit this statement as a CFJ //
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW. The proposal pool is currently empty. [1] [1] It is possible that D. Wet may have submitted a proposal, but unclear if e did or what its properties would be. As such, this report takes the position that no proposal was submitted. The relevant message is here: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2021-July/047104.html
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW. The proposal pool currently contains the following proposal(s): Author(s) AITitle --- Mask1.0 Reduce, Reuse, Recycle The proposal pool is currently empty. Legend: * : Democratic proposal. & : Ordinary proposal. ~ : Unsponsored proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. // Title: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Adoption index: 1.0 Author: Mask Co-author(s): On successful repeal of a rule, the player who proposed the repeal gains 2 Pendants. //
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
[I have a really busy week ahead, so I'm going to publish this a bit early.] PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool contains the following proposals: Author(s)AITitle --- ATMunn, G., Falsifian1.0 Happy Belated Birthday v3 Legend: * : Democratic proposal. # : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber. e : Economy ministry proposal (ordinary). f : Efficiency ministry proposal (ordinary). j : Justice ministry proposal (ordinary). l : Legislation ministry proposal (ordinary). p : Participation ministry proposal (ordinary). ^ : Sponsored proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. // Title: Happy Belated Birthday v3 Adoption index: 1.0 Author: ATMunn Co-authors: G., Falsifian Amend Rule 2585, "Birthday Gifts", by deleting the sentence "Every time it is a player's Agoran Birthday, each of the other players CAN once grant em 3 coins by announcement.", and inserting the following paragraph in its place: During a player's Agoran Birthday and the 7 days following, each other player CAN, once, grant em X coins, where X is 3 if it is actually the day of the player's birthday, and 2 otherwise. [This simplifies the rule change and fixes the bugs mentioned by Falsifian. There's no real reason to prevent players from granting the belated birthday gift just because people already granted the birthday gift.] //
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool contains the following proposals: Author(s)AITitle --- Falsifian2.0 No Zombie Races Legend: * : Democratic proposal. # : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber. e : Economy ministry proposal (ordinary). f : Efficiency ministry proposal (ordinary). j : Justice ministry proposal (ordinary). l : Legislation ministry proposal (ordinary). p : Participation ministry proposal (ordinary). ^ : Sponsored proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. // Title: No Zombie Races Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Falsifian Co-authors: Amend Rule 1885 by replacing "existed at the beginning of the month" with "exist". [Comment: With the current text, the Registrar is in an awkward position if at least one eligible talisman existed at the start of the month, but none exist by the time e gets around to starting an auction.] //
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW The proposal pool contains the following proposals: Author(s)AITitle --- Murphy, R. Lee 3.0 Simpler ribbon switches Murphy, CB 3.0 Clarify asset ownership Legend: * : Democratic proposal. # : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber. e : Economy ministry proposal. f : Efficiency ministry proposal. j : Justice ministry proposal. l : Legislation ministry proposal. p : Participation ministry proposal. ^ : Sponsored proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. // Title: Simpler ribbon switches Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Murphy Co-authors: R. Lee Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing this text: Ribbon Ownership is a secured person switch, tracked by the Tailor in eir monthly report, whose values are the subsets of the set of types of Ribbon, defaulting to the empty set. If the rules are amended to change the types of Ribbon, if a player's Ribbon Ownership is subsequently illegal, then it is updated by removing all nonexistent types rather than resetting the entire value to default. To "award a person a " is to add that type of Ribbon to that person's Ribbon Ownership. A person "owns a " if that type of Ribbon is an element of eir Ribbon Ownership. with this text: For each type of Ribbon, Ribbon Ownership is a secured negative boolean person switch, tracked by the Tailor in eir monthly report. To "award a person a " is to flip that person's Ribbon Ownership to True. A person "owns a " if eir Ribbon Ownership is True. and by replacing this text: While a person owns all types of Ribbon, that person can Raise a Banner by announcement. This causes that person to win the game. That person's Ribbon Ownership becomes the empty set. with this text: While a person owns all types of Ribbon, that person can Raise a Banner by announcement. This causes that person to win the game. When a person wins this way, for each type of Ribbon, that person's Ribbon Ownership is flipped to False. For each type of Ribbon, for each person whose Ribbon Ownership prior to the adoption of this proposal included that type, flip eir Ribbon Ownership to True. // Title: Clarify asset ownership Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Murphy Co-authors: CuddleBeam Amend Rule 2576 (Ownership) to read: Each asset has exactly one owner. If ownership of an asset is restricted to a class of entities, then that asset CANNOT be gained by or transferred to an entity outside that class. By default, ownership of an asset is restricted to Agora, players, and contracts, but an asset's backing document may modify this. If an asset's owner would otherwise be nonexistent, indeterminate, or invalid, then it is owned by the Lost and Found Department (if possible) or destroyed (otherwise), subject to modification by its backing document. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the Lost and Found Department can own assets of every type. Assets owned by the Lost and Found Department can be transferred or destroyed by any player without objection. //
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
[Just getting ahead of my obligations for the week.] The proposal pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is currently empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals: ID Author(s) AI Title --- pp1Corona 1.0go, Go! v2 pp2G. 1.7Pledge Simplification Legend: * : Proposal is pending. The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below. // ID: pp1 Title: go, Go! v2 Adoption index: 1.0 Author: Corona Co-authors: Note: Text enclosed in square brackets is not part of the proposal. [This proposal implements a 3 coin, 2 apple reward for each captured stone, possibly livening up the board] Amend the rule 1998 "Land Topology" to read in full: Two Units of Land are Adjacent if they have the same Latitude, and their Longitudes differ by exactly one; or they have the same Longitude, and their Latitudes differ by exactly one. Land Unit A is said to be connected to Land Unit B if it is possible to reach B by moving only to adjacent Land Units of the same Land Type, starting from A. [Here I changed color to Land Type, as color is not defined. So far, it didn't break anything, as no LUs were to be changed into Aether] A set Land Units is said to be a Subgroup if all of these Land Units have the same Land Type are connected to each other. A Subgroup is said to be a Group if no set exists such that: 1) Its elements are all Land Units of that Subgroup and at least one Land Unit not an element of that Subgroup. 2) It is a Subgroup. [Group = a group of stones in Go] Amend the rule 2022 "Land Transfiguration" to read in full: [Changing it so that it happens automatically] At the end of the second Eastman week of each Agoran Month, the following happens in sequence: 1. Every Land Unit, with a preservation switch of False that is not directly connected to a unit of Aether, or is not connected by its own type to a unit of Aether, shall be transformed to Aether. For every Land Unit that has its type changed to Aether by this procedure, the player who most recently changed the Land Type of any Land Unit such that it is an element of the Full Group of the transformed Land Unit or adjacent to any of the Land Units of the Full Group of the transformed Land Unit, among the players who aren't Cartographor, receives 3 coins and 2 apples. 2. Any entities whose locations are on land units so transformed shall have their locations set to (0, 0). 3. If any land unit so transformed is not property of Agora, it becomes property of Agora. The Cartographor SHALL announce all of these changes in a timely manner. // ID: pp2 Title: Pledge Simplification Adoption index: 1.7 Author: G. Co-authors: [The Asset-nature of pledges is complicated and serves no purpose; if pledges are to be used for out-of-Agora agreements, the Agoran Consent constraint makes no sense as it's not a voting matter]. Amend Rule 2450 (Pledges) to read in full: If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform (or refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the pledge within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of Oathbreaking, where N is 2 unless the pledge explicitly states otherwise. The time window of a pledge is 60 days, unless the pledge explicitly states otherwise. If breaking the pledge harms specific other parties, the Referee SHOULD solicit the opinion of those parties in determining an appropriate fine. The Notary's Weekly Report includes a copy of all pledges that are within their time window, and the dates the pledges were made. All pledges that existed as assets the instant before this Proposal took effect are considered to have been made as pledges under the current version of Rule 2450. //
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. A proposal may be pended for 1 Paper or Without Objection.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
[Sorry for the early report. I'm going to be busy later this week, so I otherwise might not have had time to report at all.] The proposal pool is currently empty. A proposal may be pended for 1 AP, or for 1/20th the Floating Value in shines (see the Treasuror's report).
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool (revised)
This following is a revision to the proposal pool from my last report. The proposal pool contains the following proposals: IDAuthor(s) AI Title --- pp1 nichdel3.0 Slower Promotion pp2 nichdel1.0 Guaranteed Stampage pp3* Alexis 3.0 Clarity Act pp4* Gaelan 1.0 Another Economy Fix Attempt Legend: * : Proposal is pending. The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below. // ID: pp1 Title: Slower Promotion Adoption index: 3.0 Author: nichdel Co-authors: Amend R1607 (Distribution) by replacing: In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir weekly duties, distribute all pending proposals. with In a given Agoran week, as part of eir weekly duties, the Promotor SHALL: * distribute all pending proposals if there are no unresolved Agoran decisions to adopt a proposal. * list all unresolved Agoran decisions to adopt a proposal. The Promotor MAY still distribute all pending proposals. // ID: pp2 Title: Guaranteed Stampage Adoption index: 1.0 Author: nichdel Co-authors: Amend 2499 "Welcome Packages" to read in full: If a player has not received one since e most recently became a player, any player CAN, by announcement, cause em to receive a Welcome package. When a player receives a Welcome Package: * Agora transfers em 1/10th the FV in shinies and * a Stamp, with Agora as the Creater, is created in eir possession. Amend R2498 to be titled "Stamps" and to read in full: Stamps are an asset. The Secretary is the recordkeepor of Stamps. Each Stamp has an associated Creater which SHOULD be noted whenever the Stamp is mentioned and MUST be noted whenever the Stamp is transfered. Stamps with the same creater are fungible. Once per month a player CAN, by announcement, create a Stamp with themselves as the Creater by transferring the Stamp Value, in shinies, to Agora. If Agora owns at least as many Shinies as the current Stamp Value, a player CAN, by announcement, destroy a Stamp e owns to cause Agora to transfer the Stamp Value, in shinies, to emself. Enact a Power 1 rule titled "Stamp Wins" with the following text: If a player owns 10 stamps with different Creaters, none of which have Agora as its Creater, e CAN win by announcement. Doing so destroys the specified stamps. Enact a Power 1 rule titled "Basic Stamp Income" with the following text: When the Secretary publishes the first Weekly Report of an Agoran Month, e CAN and SHALL, by announcement, create Stamps with Agora as the Creater and transfer them to any player who has no stamps and less than the Stamp Value in shinies at the time of publication. // ID: pp3 Title: Clarity Act Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Alexis Co-authors: Text in square brackets is not a part of this proposal's substance and is ignored when it takes effect. Enact a new power 3 rule entitled Voting Methods, reading as follows: Each Agoran decision has a voting method, which must be AI-majority, instant runoff, or first-past-the-post. The voting method is that specified by the authorizing authority, or first-past-the-post by default. Each Agoran decision has a set of valid options (the choices that the voters are being asked to select from) and valid votes (the ways in which the voters can express their opinion or lack thereof. For AI-majority decisions, the valid options are FOR and AGAINST; for other decisions, the valid options are defined by other rules. The valid votes on an Agoran decision are: 1. PRESENT; 2. The valid conditional votes, as defined by rules of power at least that of this rule; and 3. For an instant runoff decision, the ordered lists of entities. 4. For any other decision, the valid options. [This splits off the portion of 955 that isn't actually related to resolution. The definition of instant runoff is changed to evaluate validity of options at the end of the voting period, and avoid retroactively invalidating votes if an option drops out.] Amend Rule 955 by replacing the second paragraph and numbered list with the following and by deleting the second bullet in the unnumbered list. 1. For an AI-majority decision, let F be the total strength of all valid ballots cast FOR a decision, A be the same for AGAINST, and AI be the adoption index of the decision. The outcome is ADOPTED if F/A >= AI and F/A > 1 (or F>0 and A=0), otherwise REJECTED. 2. For an instant runoff decision, the outcome is whichever option wins according to the standard definition of instant runoff. F
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool is currently empty. The Pending List Price (PLP) is 10 shinies. Proposals may also be pended for 1 AP.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals: IDAuthor(s) AI Title --- pp1 Aris, o, nichdel 3.1 Regulations v3 Legend: * : Proposal is pending. The Pending List Price (PLP) is 6 shinies. The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below. // ID: pp1 Title: Regulations v3 Adoption index: 3.1 Author: Aris Co-authors: o, nichdel Change the title of Rule 2125, "Regulation Regulations", to "Regulated Actions". Amend Rules 2125 and 1023 by changing all instances of the word "regulated" to "restricted", and all instances of the word "unregulated" to "unrestricted". Amend Rule 2143, "Official Reports and Duties," by changing all instances of the word "regulations" to "restrictions". Create a new power 3.1 rule entitled "Regulations", with the flowing text: A Regulation is an instrument defined as such by this rule. A regulation allows an officer (known as the Promulgator) to exercise rule defined powers. A regulation is in effect continuously from the time of its creation to the time of either its revocation or the repeal of the rule that allowed for its creation. When recommending a regulation, its Promulgator must specify by number the rule(s) upon which it is based (the parent rules), the list of which becomes an integral part of the regulation. The list of rules can generally be modified by the Promulgator according to the procedure for text changes. A regulation must be authorized by at least one rule in order for it to exist. A regulation has effect on the game insofar as the rule or rules that authorized it permit it to have effect, and a regulation generally inherits the power of its least powerful parent rule, unless its Promulgator defines a lower power. Regulations shall generally be adjudicated as if they were a part of their (least powerful) parent rule, except that their parent rule(s) always supersedes them. If reasonably possible, a regulation should be interpreted so as to defer to other rules. The procedure for resolving conflict between regulations is the same as it is for rules. Regulations are generally issued according to the following procedures, and they can be repealed by the announcement of their Promulgator. Alternate procedures may be used if provided for by all of the regulations's parent rules. If one parent rule specifies procedures that are more stringent than those that the other(s) specifies, those apply. Creating, modifying, revoking, or allowing for a regulation is secured at power 1. A regulation (or set of regulations) may generally be enacted or modified without 2 objections, or with Agoran consent. A notice pursuant to the previous sentence is known as a "recommendation", and the regulation(s) are said to be "recommended" to Agora. Create a new power 1 rule, entitled "The Regkeepor", with the following text: The Regkeepor is an office, responsible for the maintenance of the Regulations. The Regulations are contained in the Regkeepor's weekly report, know as the Agora Nomic Code of Regulations (ACORN). E MAY publish multiple versions or editions of the ACORN. The ACORN is divided into titles, assigned by the Regkeepor, which are each given an integer. Generally, each office with the power to create regulations SHOULD be assigned the next successive natural number. Title 0 of the ACORN is reserved for use by the Regkeepor, and nothing in that title need be a regulation. Non-regulations printed in the ACORN have no binding effect, and SHALL clearly be marked by the Regkeepor. Each regulation SHALL be assigned an ID number by the Regkeepor, consisting of a string of the characters [0-9] and separator characters. The Regkeepor SHOULD establish some way of keeping track of the version of a regulations. The Regkeepor MAY also, at eir discretion, create ways of marking special types of Regulation (even in violation of the previous restrictions of this paragraph), mark sections or titles as reserved for future use, and make such other discussions of arrangement, annotation, and marking as are necessary and proper in the execution of eir duties. The Regkeepor SHOULD remember that the purpose of the ACORN is to make the regulations easily readable, and e SHALL not act in a manner intended to deceive others in eir official capacity. Make Aris the Regkeepor. Amend Rule 2464, "Tournaments", to read in full: A Tournament is a sub-game of Agora specifically sanctioned to be initiated as a tournament by the Rules. If a winner of a tournament is determined within 4 weeks of its initiation, that person or persons win the game, otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner. A Tournament is governed by a special temporary title of the ACORN, created in accord
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool (newly revised)
This is a revised version of my previous report, and as such is only accurate
to the time of that report.
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
IDAuthor(s) AI Title
---
pp1 Ienpw III 1.0 Reader's Digest
pp2 Gaelan1.0 No Sneakiness
pp3 o, Aris 2.0 Deregistration and Assets
pp4 nichdel 1.2 Organization Integration and Stamp Collecting
pp5 Gaelan1.0 Sequential Numbering
pp6 Gaelan1.5 State of the Union
pp7 Gaelan, [1] 2.0 Judicial Reform v2
pp8 Quazie3.0 Throw off Your Chains [2]
Legend: * : Proposal is pending.
[1] Aris, Quazie
[2] The author of this proposal and whether or not it currently exists, are
provisional.
The Pending List Price (PLP) is 6 shinies.
The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
//
ID: pp1
Title: Readr's Digest
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Ienpw III
Co-author(s):
Enact a new rule entitled "Reader's Digest": {
There exists an elected office called Digestive System. "Digestibility" is a
singleton switch tracked by the Digestive System with possible values
"MONTHLY" and "WEEKLY"; the Digestive System can flip this by announcement.
The Digestive System SHALL regularly issue a report which accurately
summarizes the state and activities of Agoranomic throughout the relevant
period. This report need not be comprehensive, but will contain that
information, as assessed by the Digestive System, which would be of the
greatest relevance or importance for a player who had been inattentive to the
state of the nomic during the relevant period. If Digestibility is MONTHLY,
the relevant period is the preceding month; if it is WEEKLY, it is the
preceding week.
}
//
ID: pp2
Title: No Sneakiness
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Gaelan
Co-author(s):
Create a rule “No Sneakiness” with the following text: {
If the rules specify that an action may be performed by sending a message to
a public forum, any attempts to perform the action in a way that is clearly
intended to prevent others from detecting the action (such as by embedding it
in another, longer message) are INEFFECTIVE.
}
//
ID: pp3
Title: Deregistration and Assets
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: o
Co-author(s): Aris
Amend rule 2485, "You can't take it with you", by changing its title to
"You Can't Take It With You", then by changing the text to read, in
full:
"Heir" is a person switch, tracked by the Registrar, whose value is
either Agora (the default value), or a player other than emself, or
an Organization. A player may flip eir Heir by announcement.
When a player is deregistered, e automatically pays all of eir
Shinies and transfers all of eir Estates to eir Heir, immediately
before deregistration.
Amend rule 2461 ("Death and Birth of Organizations") by changing its
power to 2, then by adding the following paragraph between the
paragraph beginning "If an Organization's Income is ever lower [...]"
and the paragraph beginning "If a player's Expenditure is at most
[...]":
Immediately before an Organization is destroyed, it automatically
pays all of its Shinies to Agora, and transfers all of its Estates
to Agora.
//
ID: pp4
Title: Organization Integration and Stamp Collecting
Adoption index: 1.2
Author: nichdel
Co-author(s):
Amend "Organizations" by replacing the second, third, and fourth
paragraphs with:
Players may become members of an organization by announcement as
specified by the charter of the organization. Players may stop being
a member of an organization by announcement.
An organization may cause any player to stop being a member as
specified in its charter.
[Remove Budget and make org membership more flexible.]
Amend "Death and Birth of Organizations to read, in full:
The Administrative Fee is 5 shinies.
An organization is "In Bad Standing" if it a) has no members or b)
was not created this month and has not paid the Administrative Fee to
Agora.
If an organization is In Bad Standing for more than 7 days, then any
player CAN destroy it by announcement, and the Secretary SHALL do so
in a timely fashion if the situation persists.
Any player CAN create an Organization by announcement by paying the
Administrative Fee to Agora and specifying a name for the
Organization that is unique among Organizations and a Charter.
[Replaces Budget with the Administrative Fee. Combined with giving org's
more control over their membership, it allows for orgs to raise money
and pay the fee in whichever way seems appropriate to them. Also removed
the limits on org membership
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool (revised)
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
IDAuthor(s) AI Title
---
pp1 Ienpw III 1.0 Reader's Digest
pp2 G., [2] 1.7 Betterer Pledges, (BBoRWCDaPWDaLoEWSWW)
pp3 Gaelan1.0 No Sneakiness
pp4 o, Aris 2.0 Deregistration and Assets
pp5 nichdel 1.2 Organization Integration and Stamp Collecting
pp6 Gaelan1.0 Sequential Numbering
pp7 Gaelan1.5 State of the Union
pp8 Gaelan, [3] 2.0 Judicial Reform v2
pp9 Quazie3.0 Throw off Your Chains [4]
Legend: * : Proposal is pending.
[1] ...with power threshold 1.7.
[2] Gaelan, Aris, 天火狐
[3] Aris, Quazie
[4] The existence of this proposal and whether it currently exists, are
provisional.
The Pending List Price (PLP) is 6 shinies.
The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
//
ID: pp1
Title: Readr's Digest
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Ienpw III
Co-author(s):
Enact a new rule entitled "Reader's Digest": {
There exists an elected office called Digestive System. "Digestibility" is a
singleton switch tracked by the Digestive System with possible values
"MONTHLY" and "WEEKLY"; the Digestive System can flip this by announcement.
The Digestive System SHALL regularly issue a report which accurately
summarizes the state and activities of Agoranomic throughout the relevant
period. This report need not be comprehensive, but will contain that
information, as assessed by the Digestive System, which would be of the
greatest relevance or importance for a player who had been inattentive to the
state of the nomic during the relevant period. If Digestibility is MONTHLY,
the relevant period is the preceding month; if it is WEEKLY, it is the
preceding week.
}
//
ID: pp2
Title: Betterer Pledges, (BBoRWCDaPWDaLoEWSWW)
Adoption index: 1.7
Author: Quazie
Co-author(s): G., Gaelan, Aris, 天火狐
Replace the text of Rule 2450 with the following:
{{{
Breaking a publicly-made pledge is a cardable offense.
If a publicly-made pledge says that the creator of a pledge will do something,
without providing a time limit, then e SHALL do so in a timely manner in order
to not break said pledge.
A player CANNOT make any pledge that would create new obligations for any
other person or office, without the other party's explicit consent.
}}}
//
ID: pp3
Title: No Sneakiness
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Gaelan
Co-author(s):
Create a rule “No Sneakiness” with the following text: {
If the rules specify that an action may be performed by sending a message to
a public forum, any attempts to perform the action in a way that is clearly
intended to prevent others from detecting the action (such as by embedding it
in another, longer message) are INEFFECTIVE.
}
//
ID: pp4
Title: Deregistration and Assets
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: o
Co-author(s): Aris
Amend rule 2485, "You can't take it with you", by changing its title to
"You Can't Take It With You", then by changing the text to read, in
full:
"Heir" is a person switch, tracked by the Registrar, whose value is
either Agora (the default value), or a player other than emself, or
an Organization. A player may flip eir Heir by announcement.
When a player is deregistered, e automatically pays all of eir
Shinies and transfers all of eir Estates to eir Heir, immediately
before deregistration.
Amend rule 2461 ("Death and Birth of Organizations") by changing its
power to 2, then by adding the following paragraph between the
paragraph beginning "If an Organization's Income is ever lower [...]"
and the paragraph beginning "If a player's Expenditure is at most
[...]":
Immediately before an Organization is destroyed, it automatically
pays all of its Shinies to Agora, and transfers all of its Estates
to Agora.
//
ID: pp5
Title: Organization Integration and Stamp Collecting
Adoption index: 1.2
Author: nichdel
Co-author(s):
Amend "Organizations" by replacing the second, third, and fourth
paragraphs with:
Players may become members of an organization by announcement as
specified by the charter of the organization. Players may stop being
a member of an organization by announcement.
An organization may cause any player to stop being a member as
specified in its charter.
[Remove Budget and make org membership more flexible.]
Amend "Death and Birth of Organizations to read, in full:
The Administrative Fee is 5 shinies.
An organization is "In Bad Standing" if it a) has no members or b)
was not created this month and has not paid the Administr
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
IDAuthor(s) AI Title
---
pp1 Ienpw III 1.0 Reader's Digest
pp2 G., [2] 1.7 Betterer Pledges, (BBoRWCDaPWDaLoEWSWW)
pp3 Gaelan1.0 No Sneakiness
pp4 o, Aris 2.0 Deregistration and Assets
pp5 nichdel 1.2 Organization Integration and Stamp Collecting
pp6 Gaelan1.0 Sequential Numbering
pp7 Gaelan1.5 State of the Union
pp8 Gaelan, [3] 2.0 Judicial Reform v2
pp9 Quazie3.0 Throw off Your Chains [4]
Legend: * : Proposal is pending.
[1] ...with power threshold 1.7.
[2] Gaelan, Aris, 天火狐
[3] Aris, Quazie
[4] The existence of this proposal and whether it currently exists, are
provisional.
The Pending List Price (PLP) is 6 shinies. The Pending Minimum Price (PMP)
is 5 shinies.
The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
//
ID: pp1
Title: Readr's Digest
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Ienpw III
Co-author(s):
Enact a new rule entitled "Reader's Digest": {
There exists an elected office called Digestive System. "Digestibility" is a
singleton switch tracked by the Digestive System with possible values
"MONTHLY" and "WEEKLY"; the Digestive System can flip this by announcement.
The Digestive System SHALL regularly issue a report which accurately
summarizes the state and activities of Agoranomic throughout the relevant
period. This report need not be comprehensive, but will contain that
information, as assessed by the Digestive System, which would be of the
greatest relevance or importance for a player who had been inattentive to the
state of the nomic during the relevant period. If Digestibility is MONTHLY,
the relevant period is the preceding month; if it is WEEKLY, it is the
preceding week.
}
//
ID: pp2
Title: Betterer Pledges, (BBoRWCDaPWDaLoEWSWW)
Adoption index: 1.7
Author: Quazie
Co-author(s): G., Gaelan, Aris, 天火狐
Replace the text of Rule 2450 with the following:
{{{
Breaking a publicly-made pledge is a cardable offense.
If a publicly-made pledge says that the creator of a pledge will do something,
without providing a time limit, then e SHALL do so in a timely manner in order
to not break said pledge.
A player CANNOT make any pledge that would create new obligations for any
other person or office, without the other party's explicit consent.
}}}
//
ID: pp3
Title: No Sneakiness
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Gaelan
Co-author(s):
Create a rule “No Sneakiness” with the following text: {
If the rules specify that an action may be performed by sending a message to
a public forum, any attempts to perform the action in a way that is clearly
intended to prevent others from detecting the action (such as by embedding it
in another, longer message) are INEFFECTIVE.
}
//
ID: pp4
Title: Deregistration and Assets
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: o
Co-author(s): Aris
Amend rule 2485, "You can't take it with you", by changing its title to
"You Can't Take It With You", then by changing the text to read, in
full:
"Heir" is a person switch, tracked by the Registrar, whose value is
either Agora (the default value), or a player other than emself, or
an Organization. A player may flip eir Heir by announcement.
When a player is deregistered, e automatically pays all of eir
Shinies and transfers all of eir Estates to eir Heir, immediately
before deregistration.
Amend rule 2461 ("Death and Birth of Organizations") by changing its
power to 2, then by adding the following paragraph between the
paragraph beginning "If an Organization's Income is ever lower [...]"
and the paragraph beginning "If a player's Expenditure is at most
[...]":
Immediately before an Organization is destroyed, it automatically
pays all of its Shinies to Agora, and transfers all of its Estates
to Agora.
//
ID: pp5
Title: Organization Integration and Stamp Collecting
Adoption index: 1.2
Author: nichdel
Co-author(s):
Amend "Organizations" by replacing the second, third, and fourth
paragraphs with:
Players may become members of an organization by announcement as
specified by the charter of the organization. Players may stop being
a member of an organization by announcement.
An organization may cause any player to stop being a member as
specified in its charter.
[Remove Budget and make org membership more flexible.]
Amend "Death and Birth of Organizations to read, in full:
The Administrative Fee is 5 shinies.
An organization is "In Bad Standing" if it a) has no members or b)
was not cr
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is currently empty. -- aranea
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposal (I'm gonna distribute it next week, sorry for the delay): ID Author(s) AI Title -- pp1 Murphy 1.2 Organization cleanup Legend: * : Proposal is pending + : By publishing this report, I pend the marked proposal The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below. // ID: pp1 Title: Organization cleanup Adoption index: 1.2 Author: Murphy Co-author(s): Amend the rule "Death and Birth of Organizations" to read: The Income Floor is 50. If an Organization's Income is ever lower than the Income Floor, then any player CAN destroy it by announcement, and the Secretary SHALL do so in a timely fashion if the situation persists. If a player's Expenditure is at most 100 minus the Income Floor, and e is not on Lockout, then e CAN create an Organization by announcement, specifying a name for that Organization that is unique among Organizations, and a Charter. When an organization is created this way, its Charter is set to the value that e specified, and the Budget switch for that player and Organization is set to the Income Floor. Notwithstanding the above, a player CANNOT create more than one Organization in a day, and CANNOT create Organizations while e is a member of an Organization with an Income lower than the Income Floor. Amend the rule "Bankruptcy" by replacing this text: While a player's Expenditure exceeds 100, then any player CAN cause that player to become Bankrupt by announcement. The Secretary SHALL NOT allow any player's Expenditure to exceed 100 for more than a week. with this text: While a player's Expenditure exceeds 100, then any player CAN cause that player to become Bankrupt by announcement, and the Secretary SHALL do so in a timely fashion if the situation persists. //
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is currently empty. -- aranea
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is currently empty (however, note the expedition of Proposal 7784 earlier this week). -- aranea
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal pool status
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposal [ I left it at "not pending". @scshunt: Please make it pending if you're okay with the additional workload. ] -- Proposal: The Agoran Newspaper Adoption Index: 1 Author: Henri Create a new Power-1 Rule, "The Agoran Newspaper": The Agoran Newspaper is a weekly publication describing noteworthy recent events that occured in the public fora in the past 7 days. The Herald SHALL write and publish The Agoran Newspaper each week. The Agoran Newspaper will be formatted at the discretion of the Herald. The Herald SHOULD include all information necessary to give the Agoran people a comprehensive understanding of the events occuring in Agora in a given week. The purpose of the Agoran newspaper is to provide the Agoran people an easily understandable source of information concerning the happenings of Agora in order to create a more informed people. --
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is currently empty. -- Luis Ressel GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool Report
Promotor's Proposal Pool Report: The Proposal Pool is Empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool Report
Proposal Pool Report -- The proposal pool is empty --
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool Report
PROPOSAL POOL REPORT- The Proposal Pool is empty. -
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool Report
Promotor's Proposal Pool Report The Proposal Pool is empty.
CoE Re: OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
On 29/07/2013 11:05 PM, omd wrote: The following proposals have been left behind this week: AI PF C D AUTHOR TITLE 7565 2 25 O 1 Walker Civil service reform 7566 1 20 O 1 Walker because nobody cares There was a lot more still in the pool, as they weren't distributed.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The following proposals have been left behind this week:
AI PF C D AUTHOR TITLE
7565 2 25 O 1 Walker Civil service reform
7566 1 20 O 1 Walker because nobody cares
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 7565 (AI=2, PF=Y25, Distributability=1, Ordinary) by Walker
Civil service reform
Amend Rule 2412 (Government) by replacing "first cast by each player is
valid" with "first three cast by each player are valid".
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 7566 (AI=1, PF=Y20, Distributability=1, Ordinary) by Walker
because nobody cares
Amend Rule 2138 by removing
c) The date when the most recent nomination period for that
office began.
and relabelling any following points accordingly.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
Promotor's Pool Report
Date of last report: Tue 11 Jan 2011
Date of this report: Tue 8 Mat 2011
Last ratified: 3 Feb 2010
Date of ratified report: 27 Jan 2010
Proposals currently in the pool:
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
title: Tighten security I
ai: 3.0
proposer: omd
submit_date: 2010-12-22
submit_mid:
distributability: undistributable
Amend Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals) by adding the following sentence
after "and then it takes effect.":
It may make rule changes.
Amend Rule 2221 (Cleanliness) by adding the following paragraph at the end:
This rule may make rule changes.
Amend Rule 1551 (Ratification) by adding the following paragraph
before the last one:
This rule may make rule changes.
Amend Rule 105 (Rule Changes) by replacing the first paragraph with:
When explicitly permitted to make rule changes (as opposed to
changes in general) by the rules, an instrument generally can,
as part of its effect,
Amend Rule 2140 (Power Controls Mutability) by adding the following item:
(d) cause a rule change.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
title: Tighten Security II
ai: 3.0
proposer: omd
submit_date: 2010-12-22
submit_mid:
distributability: undistributable
Amend Rule 2141 (Role and Attributes of Rules) by appending the
following paragraph after the first one:
Mode is a rule switch with values Normal (default) and
Define-Only, tracked by the Rulekeepor. Notwithstanding the
above and the content of such rules, the scope of Define-Only
rules is limited to providing definitions intended for use by
other rules. If a Define-Only rule would have any other effect,
that effect is nullified; however, if possible, it should be
interpreted so that it does not have any other effect (e.g. by
interpreting other effects as part of the definition, not
enforced by the rule itself).
[The last part is important: it prevents things like "thereby allows
em" in Rule 1728 from being interpreted as "thereby *does
successfully* allow em, with Power-3 force". I've always been unsure
about that wording. Similarly, it should ensure that "it comes to
have its default value" from the Switches rule is part of the
definition of a switch, rather than something enforced at Power-2.]
Amend Rule 105 (Rule Changes) by appending the following item to the
list of kinds of rule change:
(f) change the Mode of a rule.
Change the Mode of each of the following Rules to Define-Only:
Rule 217 (Interpreting the Rules)
Rule 2150 (Personhood)
Rule 2319 (Messy Statements)
Rule 754 (Definition Definitions)
Rule 2152 (Mother, May I?)
Rule 1728 (Dependent Actions)
Rule 2280 (Implicit Votes)
Rule 2268 (Entanglement)
Rule 1023 (Common Definitions)
Rule 2146 (Indices)
Rule 2162 (Switches)
Rule 2124 (Agoran Satisfaction)
Rule 2166 (Assets)
Amend Rule 1688 by removing the last paragraph, and create a new
Power-3, Define-Only rule titled "Security" with the just-removed
paragraph as its text.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
title: A person by any other name is still a person
ai: 1.0
proposer: Roujo
submit_date: 2011-01-08
submit_mid:
distributability: undistributable
In Rule 1922, replace the text
"The Herald's monthly report includes how the player won. A message
awarding Champion to a player constitutes a self-ratifying claim that
the player in question won the game through that method."
with the text
"The Herald's monthly report includes how the person won. A message
awarding Champion to a person constitutes a self-ratifying claim that
the person in question won the game through that method."
and the text
"any player who deregistered in a Writ of FAGE"
with the text
"any person who deregistered in a Writ of FAGE"
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool (with cleanup)
I remove the proposals with the following titles from the pool: Demarcation Capacitative Accumulability The List of No Doubt Proposal Pool Report: Date of this report: Sun 24 Oct 2010 Date of last report: Sat 16 Oct 2010 Last ratified: 3 Feb 2010 Date of ratified report: 27 Jan 2010 The Proposal Pool is empty.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The proposal pool contains the following proposals:
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Green
ai: 2.0
interest: 1
proposer: Tanner L. Swett
title: Instant Gratification
submit_date: 2010-08-21
submit_mid:
distributability: undistributable
In Rule 2289, "Capacitors", after "an equal number of capacitors",
insert "(or half as many ergs, rounded down)".
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 1.0
interest: 2
proposer: Yally
title: Barrel of Monkeys
submit_date: 2010-08-20
submit_mid:
distributability: undistributable
Create a new power-1 rule entitled "Barrel of Monkeys" with the following
text:
The zookeepor is an office. Barrels are a currency, tracked by the
zookeepor. Monkeys are a currency, tracked by the zookeepor. Gunpowder
Monkeys are a currency, tracked by the zookeepor. The zookeepor's weekly
repot lists, for each Barrel, its owner and the Monkeys inside of it. Eir
report also includes the number of Gunpowder Monkeys in each player's
possession, as well as a list of Monkey, Gunpowder Monkey, and Barrel
transactions from the past week.
Barrels can contain up to 10 Monkeys. A Barrel is considered to be full when
it has 10 Monkeys in it. A Barrel is considered to be empty when it has 0
Monkeys in it. The rest of this rule notwithstanding a Barrel CAN NOT have
fewer than 0 Monkeys or more than 10 Monkeys at any time; any transaction
that would cause such a condition to exist does not occur. A Player CAN, for
a charge of 7 ergs, award emself a Barrel. A Player CAN, for a charge of 7
ergs, destroy a specified Barrel. When a Barrel is destroyed in this way,
all the Monkeys inside that Barrel are also destroyed. A Player CAN destroy
any specified Monkey in any specified Barrel e owns by announcement.
At the start of each week, all Monkeys not in Barrels are destroyed and
then three Monkeys are created in the possession of each Player. A Player
may add a Monkey e owns to any Barrel by announcement.
Any Player CAN, by announcement, initiate a Monkey Invasion, provided e
specifies a full Barrel in the same message. The specified Barrel then
becomes empty. All Monkeys in that Barrel then become Gunpowder Monkeys in
the possesson of the player who initiated the Monkey Invasion. A Player who
owns a Gunpowder Monkey may destroy any specified Monkey or Gunpowder Monkey
by announcement, destroying a Gunpowder Monkey in eir possession in the
process.
Upon a win announcement that there exist no Barrels or all existing Barrels
are empty, and exactly one Player has at least one Gunpowder Monkey in eir
posession, that player satisfies the Winning Condition of Flying Feces.
Cleanup procedure: All Monkeys, Gunpowder Monkeys, and Barrels are
destroyed.
END OF RULE
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 3.0
interest: 1
proposer: G.
title: No Unnatural Rights
submit_date: 2010-08-23
submit_mid:
distributability: undistributable
Amend Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) by replacing:
BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED that no interpretation of Agoran law or
binding agreement may substantially limit or remove a person's
rights as defined by this Rule, except through the explicit and
legal amendment of this Rule.
with:
BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED that no interpretation of Agoran law or
binding agreement may substantially limit or remove a natural
person's rights as defined by this Rule, except through the
explicit and legal amendment of this Rule. For the interpretation
of the following Rights, "person" refers to natural (first-class)
persons only, and "player" refers to a player who is also a
natural person.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
Contents of the proposal pool:
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Green
ai: 1.7
interest: 1
proposer: Murphy
title: Stereotypes
submit_date: 2010-07-20
submit_mid: <4c45ac32.7090...@socal.rr.com>
distributability: undistributable
Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by appending, immediately after this
text:
As soon as possible after a judicial panel is assigned, each
member of the panel SHALL publish an appeals opinion indicating
a valid judgement to assign to the case -- only the last such
published opinion for each member is used to determine the
outcome. Each member SHOULD choose an appropriate judgement,
and include arguments for eir choice.
this text, followed by a paragraph break:
If prejudice is not explicitly specified, then an opinion
indicating AFFIRM or REMAND implicitly indicates without
prejudice, while an opinion indicating REMIT or OVERRULE
implicitly indicates with prejudice.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 2.0
interest: 1
proposer: ais523
coauthors: ehird
title: To make chambers interesting
submit_date: 2010-08-06
submit_mid: <1281133810.2511.18.ca...@desert>
distributability: undistributable
Create a new power-2 rule "VLOD Bootstrapping":
{{{
A player's voting limit on an unresolved Ordinary decision that existed
before this rule was created is equal to the value it had immediately
before this rule was created, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.
If there are no unresolved Ordinary decisions that existed before this
rule was created, this rule repeals itself.
}}}
[A pretty much standard to prevent a proposal that changes voting rules
interfering with other proposals that are undergoing voting at the
time.]
In rule 2279 "Voting limits on ordinary decisions", change
{{{
(a) If eir Chamber is superior, it is 2, else
(b) If eir Chamber is inferior, it is 1, else
(c) If the Chambers are identical, it is 5.
}}}
to
{{{
(a) If eir Chamber is superior, it is 5, else
(b) If eir Chamber is inferior, it is 1, else
(c) If the Chambers are identical, it is 2.
}}}
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
Contents of the proposal pool:
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 1.0
interest: 0
proposer: comex
title: downlevel
submit_date: 2010-07-26
submit_mid:
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-26 00:00:00
Amend Rule 2299 by replacing "switches of all other players" with
"switches of all other active players".
[I have too many Threat Points from inactive players clogging up the bridge.]
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 1.0
interest: 0
proposer: comex
title: damageability
submit_date: 2010-07-26
submit_mid:
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-26 00:00:00
Amend Rule 2297 by appending this text to the last paragraph:
By default, the current hit points of an Object In Space is equal to
its maximum hit points. To deal N damage an Object In Space is to
reduce its current hit points by N. If an object does not have
positive current hit points, it is destroyed.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 1.0
interest: 1
proposer: coppro
title: Ribbon Rewrite
submit_date: 2010-07-27
submit_mid: <4c4f0409.7020...@gmail.com>
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-27 00:00:00
Amend Rule 2199 to read as follows:
While a player qualifies for a Ribbon, any person CAN, by
announcement, award that player a Ribbon of that color, unless
e already possesses one.
When a player earns a Ribbon, e thereafter qualifies for that
Ribbon until the opportunity expires, which occurs either when it
is used or at the time limit, which defaults to one week. An
opportunity is used when a player is awarded a Ribbon of that
colour, e does not qualify for that Ribbon except through earned
opportunities, and the opportunity is the one that will expire
first. In case of a tie, only one of the opportunities tied for
shortest duration is used.
Ribbons are a class of fixed assets. If winning is secured,
then changes to Ribbon holdings are secured with the same power
threshold. Ownership of Ribbons is restricted to players.
Each Ribbon has exactly one color. Colors with different names
are distinct, regardless of spectral proximity. Each color of
Ribbon is a currency.
The Herald is the recordkeepor of Ribbons.
When a player earns a Ribbon as outlined below, any person CAN
once, in a timely manner (except for White Ribbons, which can be
awarded at any time within a month after they are earned),
create that Ribbon in the player's possession by announcement,
unless the player already possesses the color of Ribbon e earned
(earning a Ribbon more than once entitles the bearer to multiple
Ribbon awards, though capitalizing on this may be difficult):
(+R) When an interested proposal is adopted and changes at least
one rule with Power >= 3, its proposer earns a Red Ribbon.
(+O) When an interested proposal is adopted by voting with no
valid votes AGAINST, its proposer earns an Orange Ribbon.
(+G) At the end of each month, each player who held at least one
office continuously during that month earns a Green Ribbon,
unless e failed to perform an official duty within a time
limit during that month.
(+C) When a player deputises for an office, e earns a Cyan
Ribbon.
(+B) When a player assigns a judgement to a judicial question in
an interested judicial case other than a question on
sentencing, e earns a Blue Ribbon, unless e violated a
requirement to submit that judgment within a time limit.
(+K) When a player assigns a judgement to a judicial question in
an interested judicial case on sentencing, e earns a Black
Ribbon, unless e violated a requirement to submit that
judgment within a time limit.
(+W) A first-class player who has never owned a White Ribbon
qualifies for one. Additionally, when a first-class person
has been a player continuously for at least three months,
was never a player before that period, and names another
player as eir mentor (and has not named a mentor in this
fashion before), the named player earns a White Ribbon.
(+M) When, during Agora's birthday, a player publicly
acknowledges the occasion, e earns a Magenta Ribbon.
(+U) When a player is awarded the Patent Title Champion, e earns
an Ultraviolet Ribbon.
(+V) When a player is awarded a Patent Title, e earns a Violet
Ribbon, unless e earns a different Ribbon for the award.
(+I) When a player is awarded a degree, e earns an Indigo
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
[This file lists the contents of the proposal pool.
File generated at 2010-07-25T20:46:51Z. Not necessarily up to date as
of then; recent changes may be missing.
NOT A SOURCE FILE: automatically generated, do not edit.
]
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Green
ai: 1.7
interest: 1
proposer: Murphy
title: Stereotypes
submit_date: 2010-07-20
submit_mid: <4c45ac32.7090...@socal.rr.com>
distributability: undistributable
Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by appending, immediately after this
text:
As soon as possible after a judicial panel is assigned, each
member of the panel SHALL publish an appeals opinion indicating
a valid judgement to assign to the case -- only the last such
published opinion for each member is used to determine the
outcome. Each member SHOULD choose an appropriate judgement,
and include arguments for eir choice.
this text, followed by a paragraph break:
If prejudice is not explicitly specified, then an opinion
indicating AFFIRM or REMAND implicitly indicates without
prejudice, while an opinion indicating REMIT or OVERRULE
implicitly indicates with prejudice.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 1.0
interest: 1
proposer: Yally
title: Win by Respect
submit_date: 2010-07-20
submit_mid:
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-20 00:00:00
Append the following to Rule 2287:
"A player with 30 or more props CAN destroy all eir props to satisfy
the Winning Condition of Respect. 14 props are then created in that
player's possession."
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 2.0
interest: 2
proposer: coppro
title: Website Fix
submit_date: 2010-07-21
submit_mid: <4c46a5b6.7070...@gmail.com>
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-21 00:00:00
Enact a new rule entitled "Website Fixup" at power 2 with the following
text:
During the Submission Period, any player CAN, by announcement,
submit a Website Submission. A Website Submission is a document or
collection of documents intended to replace the web page at
http://agoranomic.org/. A player CAN by announcement withdraw a
Website Submission (causing it to cease to be a
Website Submission). Submitting a Website Submission causes any
earlier Website Submission authored by the same player to be
withdrawn.
Website Submissions have ID numbers, to be assigned by the
the Sysadmin. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the
Sysadmin has no report and has II 0. The Sysadmin is an imposed
office, its holder is coppro.
If the Submission Period has not began, Taral CAN, by
announcement, begin it, and e also CAN, by announcement, cause
this Rule to repeal itself. If the Submission Period has not began
and this Rule has been in the Ruleset for more than two weeks,
any player CAN, by announcement, cause this Rule to repeal itself.
Two weeks after the Submission Period begins, it ends. As soon as
possible thereafter, the Sysadmin SHALL initiate an Agoran
decision to pick the winning Website Sumbission; the options shall
be each Website Submission and NO WINNER. Each active player is
an eligible voter for this decision, as is Taral. Taral's voting
limit is 3, every other voter's limit is 1. The text of each
Website Submission is an essential parameter.
When the Agoran decision is resolved, if a Website Submission was
selected as the outcome, then its author is awarded two Leadership
Tokens and Taral SHOULD update http://agoranomic.org/ to reflect
the winning Website Submission. Regardless of the outcome, this
rule then repeals itself.
[Taral gets special treatment because e maintains the website. Imposing
the office on myself will make sure I actually do the sysadminnery
rather than shrug it off by resigning.]
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 3.0
interest: 1
proposer: comex
title: Adoption Without Objection
submit_date: 2010-07-23
submit_mid:
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-23 00:00:00
Amend Rule 106 by replacing:
If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
then the proposal is adopted, and unless other rules prevent it
from taking effect, its power is set to the minimum of four and
its adoption index, and then it takes effect.
A proposal with a decision on which the option selected by Agora
is not ADOPTED does not take effect, rules to the contrary
notwithstanding.
with:
If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
then the proposal is adopted. When a proposal is adopted,
unless other rules prevent it from t
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
Contents of the Proposal Pool:
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Green
ai: 3.0
interest: 1
proposer: Murphy
title: cron
submit_date: 2010-06-27
submit_mid: <4c27c6e6.7040...@socal.rr.com>
distributability: undistributable
Amend Rule 478 (Fora) by replacing this text:
Any action performed by sending a message is performed at
the time date-stamped on that message.
with this text:
Any action performed by sending a message is performed at
the time date-stamped on that message, unless the message clearly
and unambiguously specifies a different time within 24 hours
after that time, in which case it is performed at the specified
time instead.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Green
ai: 2.0
interest: 1
proposer: Murphy
title: Fix the Justiciar hijinks
submit_date: 2010-07-01
submit_mid: <4c2d1e3a.80...@socal.rr.com>
distributability: undistributable
Amend Rule 2246 (Submitting a CFJ to the Justiciar) to read:
The initiator of a judicial case CAN submit it to the Justiciar
by announcement. For such a case, the Justiciar CAN, in a timely
manner, either accept or reject the case by announcement; until
this time limit expires or the Justiciar rejects the case, the
CotC CANNOT perform any of eir office's duties with regards to
the case and does not incur any of eir office's obligations with
regards to it.
If the Justiciar accepts the case, e switches places with the
CotC entirely with regards to that case; that is, e receives all
obligations and all powers that the CotC would otherwise receive
due to being CotC, and the CotC receives all obligations and
powers that the Justiciar would otherwise receive due to being
Justiciar. This includes any secondary duties required to fulfill
obligations (such as rotating the bench). This takes precedence
over Rules that would otherwise assign duties and powers
regarding a judicial case to the Clerk of the Courts or the
Justiciar due to holding one of those positions. A player CAN
deputize for Justiciar to perform these duties as if it were an
office.
All persons are ENCOURAGED to submit a case to the Justiciar
only when there is a good reason not to let it be processed by
the Clerk of the Courts as usual.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 1.5
interest: 0
proposer: coppro
title: Heft in a Luff
submit_date: 2010-07-15
submit_mid: <4c3e9e90.50...@gmail.com>
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-15 00:00:00
Ratify {Warrigal never held the Patent Title Left in a Huff}.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 3.0
interest: 0
proposer: coppro
title: Unanimous Consent
submit_date: 2010-07-15
submit_mid: <4c3e9e90.50...@gmail.com>
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-15 00:00:00
Amend Rule 2202 by replacing the first paragraph with:
Any player CAN, without objection, ratify a
public document, specifying its scope. If
that document is an official report or a substantial portion
thereof, until such a time as that report or portion is again
ratified, the date and scope of the ratification become a part
of the report.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 2.0
interest: 1
proposer: Yally
title: One-to-one Cancellation
submit_date: 2010-07-16
submit_mid:
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-16 00:00:00
Amend the text in Rule 2284 reading:
- A player CAN destroy an erg in the possession of a specified
player for a charge of 2 ergs. The PSM SHALL note such a
destruction in eir report.
to read:
- A player CAN destroy an erg in the possession of a specified
player for a charge of 1 erg. The PSM SHALL note such a
destruction in eir report.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 1.0
proposer: coppro
title: Ribbon Sweeper
submit_date: 2010-07-17
submit_mid: <4c4149b4.3040...@gmail.com>
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-17 00:00:00
Destroy all Ribbons owned by the LFD.
[I have made a de facto pledge to retain the Ribbons, however, Agorans
have previously insinuated a desire to get rid of them. Hence, a
proposal to put it to a vote.]
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Purple
ai: 2.0
interest: 1
proposer: coppro
title: Waitaminute
submit_date: 2010-07-17
submit_mid: <4c4149b4.3040...@gmail.com>
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-07-17 00:00:00
Award ais523 the Patent Title Scamster.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
[This file lists the contents of the proposal pool.
File generated at 2010-06-21T22:24:19Z. Not necessarily up to date as
of then; recent changes may be missing.
NOT A SOURCE FILE: automatically generated, do not edit.
]
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
chamber: Red
ai: 1.9
interest: 0
proposer: Wooble
title: Defragment
submit_date: 2010-06-21
submit_mid:
distributability: distributable
distributability flipped: 2010-06-21
WHEREAS they can serve no purpose but to annoy the Promotor,
Repeal Rules 2291 and 2292.
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
Note: There are no Proposals to distribute this week. DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS TITLE: Clarify inconsequentiality mk. 2 AUTHOR: comex AI: 3.0 II: 0 CHAMBER: Purple PROPOSAL TEXT: [Oops, the original passed.] Amend Rule 754 by replacing: (1) A difference in spelling, grammar, whitespace, capitalization, or dialect, or the use of a synonym or abbreviation in place of a word or phrase, is inconsequential in all forms of communication, as long as the difference does not create an ambiguity in meaning. with: (1) A difference in spelling, grammar, capitalization, or dialect, or the use of a synonym or abbreviation in place of a word or phrase is inconsequential in all forms of communication, as long as the difference does not create an ambiguity in meaning, except for the purpose of reporting on or quoting the text of a legal document. A difference between two nonempty spans of whitespace is inconsequential in all forms of communication for all purposes. Amend Rule 2221 to read: Any player CAN clean a rule without objection by specifying one or more corrections to spelling, grammar, capitalization, and/or dialect, or to whether a synonym or abbreviation is used in place of a word or phrase, in the rule's text and/or title; the rule is amended by this rule as specified by that person. Amend Rule 105 by replacing: An inconsequential variation in the quotation of an existing rule does not constitute ambiguity for the purposes of this rule. with: An inconsequential variation in the quotation of an existing rule does not constitute ambiguity for the purposes of this rule, but any other variation does. TITLE: Proposal Amendment AUTHOR: comex AI: 3.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple COMMENT: This is identical to my previous proposal that was 9-0 but failed quorum, plus my later fix. PROPOSAL TEXT: Amend Rule 106 by replacing: A player CAN remove (syn. retract, withdraw) a proposal e authored from the Proposal Pool by announcement. with: A player CAN remove (syn. retract, withdraw) a proposal e authored from the Proposal Pool, or amend a proposal e authored in the Proposal Pool, by announcement. and by replacing: A proposal is a fixed body of text which has been made into a proposal using a process specifically described in the Rules. When creating proposals, the person who creates them SHOULD with: A proposal is a body of text which has been made into a proposal using a process specifically described in the Rules. Proposals CANNOT be modified except as allowed by this rule. When creating proposals, the person who creates them SHOULD [Right now, I think there is a tendency to avoid modifying proposals, even when, say, a simple change would improve clarity or avoid a trivial error, because doing so requires re-paying the Distributability fee.] TITLE: Some repeals AUTHOR: comex AI: 3.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple PROPOSAL TEXT: Repeal the rules with the following titles: - Officer's Proposals - Judge's Proposals - Induction [Nobody uses them.] TITLE: Huh? AUTHOR: coppro AI: 1.0 II: 0 CHAMBER: Purple PROPOSAL TEXT: [coppro wins.] UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS TITLE: The first rule of this proposal is... AUTHOR: ais523 AI: 1.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Green PROPOSAL TEXT: Award a win to player who did not acknowledge the existence of this proposal in a public or discussion forum after the time it was submitted and before the time it was adopted. -coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS (none) UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS TITLE: The first rule of this proposal is... AUTHOR: ais523 AI: 1.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Green Award a win to player who did not acknowledge the existence of this proposal in a public or discussion forum after the time it was submitted and before the time it was adopted. -coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS TITLE: Effect cleanup AUTHOR: comex AI: 3.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple PROPOSAL TEXT: Amend Rule 106 by removing: This rule takes precedence over any rule which would permit a proposal to take effect. and: It does not otherwise take effect. and by adding the following paragraph before the last paragraph: A proposal with a decision on which the option selected by Agora is not ADOPTED does not take effect, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. [Clarify what "it" is, and deseparate those clauses.] TITLE: More Capacity AUTHOR: coppro AI: 1.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple PROPOSAL TEXT: Amend Rule 2284 by appending - A player CAN award emself a capacitor for a charge of 3 ergs. UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS TITLE: Festival Days AUTHOR: Murphy COAUTHORS: David Nicol AI: 1.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Green PROPOSAL TEXT: Create a rule titled "Festival Days" with this text: Agora Nomic recognizes and celebrates the following: * January 12-14 - Agora's Unbirthday observed (as described elsewhere) * February 29 - St. Tib's Day * March 19 - Mojoday * April 1 - April Fool's Day * May 25 - Towel Day * June 30 - Agora's Birthday (as described elsewhere) * July 15 - Confuflux * August 12 - Zaraday * September 26 - Bureflux * October 24 - Maladay * November 5 - Guy Fawkes Night * December 8 - Afflux TITLE: The first rule of this proposal is... AUTHOR: ais523 AI: 1.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Green Award a win to player who did not acknowledge the existence of this proposal in a public or discussion forum after the time it was submitted and before the time it was adopted. -coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS TITLE: Threat Level Green AUTHOR: G. AI: 2.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple PROPOSAL TEXT: [Never been used against a true threat. But it's a scam magnet. True threats are low on the horizon] Repeal Rule 2177 (The Senate). Amend Rule 2154 (Election Procedure) by deleting the following text: , unless there is an Emergency Session at the time the decision is initiated, in which case the eligible voters are the active Senators Amend Rule 2270 (Coups D'etat) to read: When a player begins a coup d'etat, the Admiral of the Navy CAN and SHALL form a government as soon as possible, except that e CANNOT be a member of the new government, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. TITLE: Clarify inconsequentiality AUTHOR: comex AI: 3.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple PROPOSAL TEXT: Amend Rule 754 by replacing: (1) A difference in spelling, grammar, or dialect, with: (1) A difference in spelling, grammar, whitespace, capitalization, or dialect, Amend Rule 2221 to read: Any player CAN clean a rule without objection by specifying one or more corrections to spelling, grammar, whitespace, capitalization, and/or dialect in its text and/or title; the rule is amended by this rule as specified by that person. Amend Rule 105 by replacing: A variation in whitespace or capitalization in the quotation of an existing rule does not constitute ambiguity for the purposes of this rule, but any other variation does. with: An inconsequential variation in the quotation of an existing rule does not constitute ambiguity for the purposes of this rule. UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS TITLE: Festival Days AUTHOR: Murphy COAUTHORS: David Nicol AI: 1.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Green PROPOSAL TEXT: Create a rule titled "Festival Days" with this text: Agora Nomic recognizes and celebrates the following: * January 12-14 - Agora's Unbirthday observed (as described elsewhere) * February 29 - St. Tib's Day * March 19 - Mojoday * April 1 - April Fool's Day * May 25 - Towel Day * June 30 - Agora's Birthday (as described elsewhere) * July 15 - Confuflux * August 12 - Zaraday * September 26 - Bureflux * October 24 - Maladay * November 5 - Guy Fawkes Night * December 8 - Afflux TITLE: Better Emergency Protection AUTHOR: Wooble AI: 2.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Green PROPOSAL TEXT: In Rule 2177, The Senate, replace During emergency session, any Senator CAN declare a filibuster on a proposal in its voting period, with 2 supporting Senators, provided no filibuster has been declared on that proposal in the past. Any Senator CAN end a filibuster on a proposal with 4 supporting Senators and without objection from a member of the Government (any of whom CAN object). While a proposal is in filibuster, its quorum is the number of eligible voters plus one, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. with During emergency session, any Senator CAN, with 2 supporting Senators, declare a specified non-Senator Ineligible to vote on the decision to adopt a given proposal in its voting period. A player's voting limit on a decision for which e is Ineligible is 0 and cannot be modified, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. Any Senator CAN cause an Ineligible player to cease to be Ineligible to vote on a specified decision with 4 supporting Senators and without objection from a member of the Government (any of whom CAN object), restoring eir voting limit to what it would be if e had never been made Ineligible. -coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
The Proposal Pool is empty. -coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS Title: Agora Should Stay A Nomic Author: Spitemaster AI: 3.0 II: 1 Chamber: Green PROPOSAL TEXT: Amend Rule 1698 (Agora Is a Nomic) by changing it from: In the interest of safeguarding Agora's nomic-ness, if a change to the gamestate would otherwise make it IMPOSSIBLE to make arbitrary rule changes and/or adopt arbitrary proposals within a four-week period by any combinations of actions by players, then that change is canceled and does not occur, any rule to the contrary notwithstanding. to In the interest of safeguarding Agora's nomic-ness, if a change to the gamestate would otherwise make it IMPOSSIBLE to make arbitrary rule changes and/or adopt arbitrary proposals within any future four-week period by any combinations of actions by players, then that change is canceled and does not occur, any rule to the contrary notwithstanding. Title: Take Three Author: coppro AI: 2.0 II: 0 Chamber: Purple PROPOSAL TEXT: Amend Rule 2283 (Fees) by appending If the fee associated with a fee-based action is zero, the action CAN be performed by announcement if it can otherwise be performed by the procedure described above. to the second paragraph Title: Reassign the name Author: coppro AI: 1.7 II: 1 Chamber: Purple PROPOSAL TEXT: Amend each rule in numerical order by replacing each instance of REASSIGN (case-sensitive) with REMIT. UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS (none) -coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS
(none)
UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS
AUTHOR: Sgeo
COAUTHORS: comex, coppro
TITLE:
AI: 3.0
II: 2
CHAMBER: Green
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Create the following
Rule, Power 4
{
Whereas B has seen fit to honor Agora by copying the Agoran ruleset,
and
Whereas B, from December 10th, 2007 to October 6th, 2009, is
believed to have been the most stable nomic in existence, and
Whereas B has, once in the past, looked to us for protection from
itself,
Be it here declared that Agora now turns to B.
Agora submits to B Nomic as its protectorate. Any protective
decree of B Nomic that targets this nomic takes effect as specified
by the rules of B Nomic. This rule takes precedent over any and
all other rules contradicting it.
}
AUTHOR: comex
TITLE:
AI: 1.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Create a new Power-1 Rule which reads as follows:
As allowed by Rule 683, this rule places the following
constraints on the validity of ballots: A ballot is invalid
unless it was submitted by comex, ais523, or coppro.
So that I will have the opportunity to rubberstamp decisions
before they can be democratized:
a) comex CAN transfer a Card to emself by announcement.
b) comex CAN make emself the Promotor by announcement.
c) comex CAN end an election by announcement. (No Agoran
Decision is initiated.)
AUTHOR: comex
TITLE:
AI: 1.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Create a new Power-4 Rule which reads as follows:
comex is the Dictator. comex CAN cause any modification to the
gamestate by announcement, including a retroactive modification.
comex CAN act on behalf of any entity by announcement.
This rule takes precedence over all other rules. If any change
to the gamestate would cause any document to supersede this one,
or cause any change in the effect or attributes of this rule,
including its repeal or dissolution, or in any other way prevent
this rule from having its full effect or comex from performing
any action, it is cancelled and does not occur. If this rule
already fails to have its full effect due to a rule, that rule
is repealed.
Entities SHALL NOT attempt to prevent this rule from having its
full effect. If they do, comex CAN banish them by announcement.
A banished entity CANNOT affect the gamestate by sending
messages.
Repeal Rule 1698.
AUTHOR: Murphy
TITLE: Titles can be cleaned too
AI: 3.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Amend Rule 2221 (Cleanliness) to read:
Any player CAN clean a rule without objection by specifying one
or more corrections to spelling, grammar, and/or capitalization
in its text and/or title; the rule is amended by this rule as
specified by that person.
AUTHOR: comex
TITLE:
AI: 2.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Amend each Power-2 rule, in numeric order, by removing every instance
of the word "not" (case-sensitive).
AUTHOR: coppro
TITLE: Titularity
AI: 3.0
II: 0
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Amend Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals) by replacing:
A player CAN create a proposal by publishing ("submitting") a
body of text with a clear indication that it is intended to
become a proposal, which places the proposal in the Proposal
Pool. The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is the player
who submitted it. A player CAN remove (syn. retract, withdraw)
a proposal e authored from the Proposal Pool by announcement.
with
A player CAN create a proposal by publishing ("submitting") a
body of text and an associated title with a clear indication that
it is intended to become a proposal, which places the proposal in
the Proposal Pool. The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is
the player who submitted it. A player CAN remove (syn. retract,
withdraw) a proposal e authored from the Proposal Pool by
announcement.
-coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS
(none)
UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS
AUTHOR: Sgeo
COAUTHORS: comex, coppro
TITLE:
AI: 3.0
II: 2
CHAMBER: Green
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Create the following
Rule, Power 4
{
Whereas B has seen fit to honor Agora by copying the Agoran ruleset,
and
Whereas B, from December 10th, 2007 to October 6th, 2009, is
believed to have been the most stable nomic in existence, and
Whereas B has, once in the past, looked to us for protection from
itself,
Be it here declared that Agora now turns to B.
Agora submits to B Nomic as its protectorate. Any protective
decree of B Nomic that targets this nomic takes effect as specified
by the rules of B Nomic. This rule takes precedent over any and
all other rules contradicting it.
}
AUTHOR: comex
TITLE:
AI: 1.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Create a new Power-1 Rule which reads as follows:
As allowed by Rule 683, this rule places the following
constraints on the validity of ballots: A ballot is invalid
unless it was submitted by comex, ais523, or coppro.
So that I will have the opportunity to rubberstamp decisions
before they can be democratized:
a) comex CAN transfer a Card to emself by announcement.
b) comex CAN make emself the Promotor by announcement.
c) comex CAN end an election by announcement. (No Agoran
Decision is initiated.)
AUTHOR: comex
TITLE:
AI: 1.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Create a new Power-4 Rule which reads as follows:
comex is the Dictator. comex CAN cause any modification to the
gamestate by announcement, including a retroactive modification.
comex CAN act on behalf of any entity by announcement.
This rule takes precedence over all other rules. If any change
to the gamestate would cause any document to supersede this one,
or cause any change in the effect or attributes of this rule,
including its repeal or dissolution, or in any other way prevent
this rule from having its full effect or comex from performing
any action, it is cancelled and does not occur. If this rule
already fails to have its full effect due to a rule, that rule
is repealed.
Entities SHALL NOT attempt to prevent this rule from having its
full effect. If they do, comex CAN banish them by announcement.
A banished entity CANNOT affect the gamestate by sending
messages.
Repeal Rule 1698.
AUTHOR: Murphy
TITLE: Titles can be cleaned too
AI: 3.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Amend Rule 2221 (Cleanliness) to read:
Any player CAN clean a rule without objection by specifying one
or more corrections to spelling, grammar, and/or capitalization
in its text and/or title; the rule is amended by this rule as
specified by that person.
AUTHOR: comex
TITLE:
AI: 2.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Amend each Power-2 rule, in numeric order, by removing every instance
of the word "not" (case-sensitive).
AUTHOR: coppro
TITLE: Titularity
AI: 3.0
II: 0
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Amend Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals) by replacing:
A player CAN create a proposal by publishing ("submitting") a
body of text with a clear indication that it is intended to
become a proposal, which places the proposal in the Proposal
Pool. The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is the player
who submitted it. A player CAN remove (syn. retract, withdraw)
a proposal e authored from the Proposal Pool by announcement.
with
A player CAN create a proposal by publishing ("submitting") a
body of text and an associated title with a clear indication that
it is intended to become a proposal, which places the proposal in
the Proposal Pool. The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is
the player who submitted it. A player CAN remove (syn. retract,
withdraw) a proposal e authored from the Proposal Pool by
announcement.
-coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS
(none)
UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS
AUTHOR: Sgeo
COAUTHORS: comex, coppro
TITLE:
AI: 3.0
II: 2
CHAMBER: Green
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Create the following
Rule, Power 4
{
Whereas B has seen fit to honor Agora by copying the Agoran ruleset,
and
Whereas B, from December 10th, 2007 to October 6th, 2009, is
believed to have been the most stable nomic in existence, and
Whereas B has, once in the past, looked to us for protection from
itself,
Be it here declared that Agora now turns to B.
Agora submits to B Nomic as its protectorate. Any protective
decree of B Nomic that targets this nomic takes effect as specified
by the rules of B Nomic. This rule takes precedent over any and
all other rules contradicting it.
}
AUTHOR: comex
TITLE:
AI: 1.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Create a new Power-1 Rule which reads as follows:
As allowed by Rule 683, this rule places the following
constraints on the validity of ballots: A ballot is invalid
unless it was submitted by comex, ais523, or coppro.
So that I will have the opportunity to rubberstamp decisions
before they can be democratized:
a) comex CAN transfer a Card to emself by announcement.
b) comex CAN make emself the Promotor by announcement.
c) comex CAN end an election by announcement. (No Agoran
Decision is initiated.)
AUTHOR: comex
TITLE:
AI: 1.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Create a new Power-4 Rule which reads as follows:
comex is the Dictator. comex CAN cause any modification to the
gamestate by announcement, including a retroactive modification.
comex CAN act on behalf of any entity by announcement.
This rule takes precedence over all other rules. If any change
to the gamestate would cause any document to supersede this one,
or cause any change in the effect or attributes of this rule,
including its repeal or dissolution, or in any other way prevent
this rule from having its full effect or comex from performing
any action, it is cancelled and does not occur. If this rule
already fails to have its full effect due to a rule, that rule
is repealed.
Entities SHALL NOT attempt to prevent this rule from having its
full effect. If they do, comex CAN banish them by announcement.
A banished entity CANNOT affect the gamestate by sending
messages.
Repeal Rule 1698.
AUTHOR: Murphy
TITLE: Titles can be cleaned too
AI: 3.0
II: 1
CHAMBER: Purple
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Amend Rule 2221 (Cleanliness) to read:
Any player CAN clean a rule without objection by specifying one
or more corrections to spelling, grammar, and/or capitalization
in its text and/or title; the rule is amended by this rule as
specified by that person.
AUTHOR: coppro
TITLE: The Gameplay-o-Matic
AI: 1.9
II: 2
CHAMBER: Purple
COMMENTS:
Basically, the idea is that everyone builds up a set of rules gradually,
then they can be joined together into a coherent form and enacted by
proposal. When this happens, the contributors to the amalgam proposal
are rewarded - the high reward for authorship of a Defragmentation
Proposal is intended to encourage competition in writing those
proposals.
No mechanism exists to remove individual Fragments, as bad Fragments
simply will not get added to proposal Inodes, or else the proposal will
not be adopted. Likewise, proposals that abuse the spirit of this rule
will not be adopted.
Some of the wording is bad, but I would rather enact this and start
encouraging Fragment-based gameplay right away and fix it later.
I'm upping Leadership Tokens so that they can actually destroy Rests;
the 1.9 number was picked because 2 is too high but I don't want
Leadership Tokens to rely on a Rule of lower power to be the
recordkeepor.
PROPOSAL TEXT:
Enact a new Rule with power 1.9, entitled "Fragments", with the
following text:
{{
If
- e has not already done so, or
- if at least two other players done so so e last did so, or
- three days have passed since e last did so,
a player may publish a Fragment. A Fragment SHOULD be a short
(possibly as small as a sentence) body of text intended to become
a portion of a Rule. A new Fragment SHOULD bear some relation to
existing Fragments.
The Granulator is
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS AUTHOR: coppro TITLE: WTF does this even do? AI: 2.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple COMMENTS: coppro: I really have no clue what this means; odds are good that I'd just (as vote collector) decide that if there was any complexity at all, I'd just resolve the darn thing as PRESENT due to ambiguity. PROPOSAL TEXT: Amend Rule 2154 (Election Procedure) by replacing 3) Each eligible voter's voting limit is one. An ordered list of multiple choices constitutes a conditional vote for the first choice if it could be the outcome, otherwise the second choice if it could be the outcome, and so forth. with 3) Each eligible voter's voting limit is one. TITLE: Cleanup in Aisle 2156 AUTHOR: comex AI: 2.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple Amend Rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Decisions) to read as follows The eligible voters on an ordinary decision are the players who were active at the start of its voting period. The voting limit of a player on an ordinary decision is defined elsewhere in the rules, but is fixed at the resolution of the Decision and thereafter CANNOT change, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. This restriction does not prevent a change that would change a voting limit from occurring; it only prevents it from actually effecting that limit. Enact a new Rule at power 2, entitled Chamber and Title, that reads as follows: Chamber is a switch possessed by players, proposals in the Proposal Pool, and ongoing Agoran Decisions to adopt Proposals. The possible values for Chamber are Green, Red, and Purple. Green is superior to Purple, Red is superior to Green, and Purple is superior to Red; the opposite of superior is inferior. The default is Green in case of players, the Chamber of the author in case of proposals, and the Chamber of the proposal in question in case of a Decision. These are not continuously updated, but evaluated only as the entity comes into being. A player CAN change eir Title by announcement if e has not already done so previously in the same month. In the same message in which a player submits a proposal, e CAN set its Chamber by announcement. Changes to Title are secured. The Assessor tracks the Chamber of players and the Promotor tracks the Chamber of proposals. The Chamber of a player may also be referred to as eir Title; this does not extend to proposals or Decisions. A player may be referred to as a " player", where is eir Chamber. Retitle Rule 2279 (Base Voting Limits) to (Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions) and amend it to read as follows: A player's voting limit on an Ordinary decision is the result of performing the following steps, in order: (1) Take the following value, depending on the relationship between the player's Chamber and the Chamber of the Decision: (a) If eir Chamber is superior, it is 2, else (b) If eir Chamber is inferior, it is 1, else (c) If the Chambers are identical, it is 5. (2) Reduce the value by half the number of Rests owned by the player. (3) Apply any other adjustments defined in other rules, in numerical order unless otherwise specified. (4) Round the value to the nearest non-negative integer, breaking ties upward. This rule takes precedence over any other rule which would modify a player's voting limit on an ordinary Decision. Amend Rule 2255 by replacing Title: Chief Whip. Position: The Chief Whip's voting limit on an Ordinary proposal is 1.5 times what it would otherwise be. with Title: Chief Whip. Position: The Chief Whip's voting limit on an ordinary Decision is 1.5 times what it would otherwise be; this applies after other calculations. TITLE: Singularize AUTHOR: comex AI: 3.0 II: 0 CHAMBER: Purple Amend Rule 2150 (Personhood) by replacing the first instance of "rules" with "a rule". TITLE: Proposal AUTHOR: comex AI: 1.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple Enact a new Power=1 Rule reading: comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement, as long as e published the amendment for public review at least 24 hours ago. TITLE: Proposal AUTHOR: comex AI: 1.0 II: 1 CHAMBER: Purple Enact a new Power=1 Rule reading: comex C
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS (none) UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS (none) -coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS (none) UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS (none) -coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS (none) UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS Title: Prejudice Author: comex AI: 1.7 II: 1 Chamber: Purple Amend Rule 2226 (Judicial Rank) by replacing: When a judgement is overruled on appeal, if the prior judge's judicial rank is higher than 0, then it is decreased by 1. with: When a judgement is overruled on appeal with prejudice, if the prior judge's judicial rank is higher than 0, then it is decreased by 1. Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by replacing: An appeal case has a judicial question on disposition, which is applicable if and only if the prior question is applicable. The valid judgements for the question on disposition, and their effects, are as follows, based on the appropriateness of the prior judgement at the time it was delivered: with: An appeal case has a judicial question on disposition, which is applicable if and only if the prior question is applicable. The valid judgements for the question on disposition are of the form " with prejudice" or " without prejudice". Such a judgement is generally appropriate if and only if (1) the action is appropriate, and (2) the judgement is with prejudice if and only if the error in the original judgement could have been reasonably avoided by the judge. AFFIRM is always without prejudice. The valid values of and their associated effects are as follows: and by replacing: * REMAND, appropriate if there is serious doubt about the appropriateness of the prior judgement with: * REMAND, appropriate if there is serious doubt about whether the prior judgement was appropriate and by replacing: * REASSIGN, appropriate if there is serious doubt about the appropriateness of the prior judgement with: * REASSIGN, appropriate if there is serious doubt about whether the prior judgement was appropriate and by replacing: deliver a judgement of either REMAND or REASSIGN, whichever e feels is most appropriate. with: judgement of either REMAND or REASSIGN with or without prejudice, whichever e feels is most appropriate. and by adding this paragraph after the list of judgements: The appropriateness of the prior judgement is measured at the time it was assigned. [Don't ding judges for trivial OVERRULEs; if a rule is added to ding for REMAND or REASSIGN, it could also take prejudice into account.] -coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
DISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS
Title: True Patriot Live
Author: coppro
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Purple
Enact a new 2-power rule with the text {Canada is a person. Its basis is
the set of all its citizens.}
Canada wins the game.
UNDISTRIBUTABLE PROPOSALS
(none)
-coppro
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool
Proposal Pool Date of this report: Sat 06 Feb 2010 Date of last report: Tue 22 Feb 2010 Distributable Proposals: - Title: I don't want to keep track of old NoVs Author: Yally AI: 1.0 II: 0 Chamber: Red Amend Rule 1367 (Degrees) in the following ways: Change the text reading: - Each player's voting limit on the decision is three, plus five for each degree e held at that time (the high limit is so as to allow a player to cast votes for different titles and ensure that an inappropriate title is not awarded). to read: - Each player's voting limit on the decision is one. Add the following text to the bulleted list: - Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the outcome of the decision is the highest degree such that more than half of the valid votes selected that degree or a lower degree. If no such degree exists, the outcome is FAILING GRADE. Undistributable Proposals: - (none)
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool Report
== Promotor's Proposal Pool Report == Date of this report: Tue 15 Dec 2009 Date of last report: Wed 09 Nov 2009 Pool last ratified: 03 Dec, ratified on 10 Dec Number of Proposals in the Pool: 3 Distributable Proposals in the Pool: (none) All proposals made distributable and then removed from the pool before being distributed are also still distributable, but too many to list here. All others are undistributable. Proposals currently in the Pool: --- Title: Revert 6571 Author: c. AI: 3.0 II: 1 Chamber: Green Revert the effects of Proposal 6571. [As far as I can tell, the only purpose of the proposal was to add unnecessary verbosity in an attempt to satisfy a technical definition which doesn't affect the gamestate, based on an over-literal interpretation of the rules.] --- Title: Fast Track Author: G.* AI: 2.0 II: 1 Chamber: Green [Adds an urgent catagory] In Rule 1607 (The Promotor) replace: Distributability is a proposal switch tracked by the Promotor, with values Undistributable (default) and Distributable. In a given Agoran week, the Promotor CAN and SHALL, as part of eir weekly duties, distribute any proposal that is in the Proposal Pool and was Distributable at the beginning of that Agoran week. The Promotor CAN but SHALL NOT, in a given Agoran week, distribute any proposal that is in the Pool but was Undistributable at the beginning of that Agoran week, or was entered into the Pool during that Agoran week. with: Distributability is a proposal switch tracked by the Promotor, with values Undistributable (default), Distributable, and Urgent. The Promotor CAN distribute a proposal in the Proposal Pool at any time. In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir weekly duties, distribute any proposal that is in the Proposal Pool and was Distributable at the beginning of that Agoran week. The Promotor SHOULD distribute an Urgent proposal in the Pool within 4 days of the proposal becoming urgent. The Promotor SHALL NOT, in a given Agoran week, distribute any non-urgent proposal in the Pool that was Undistributable or not in the Pool at the beginning of that Agoran week. Amend Rule 2261 (The Deck of Change) by replacing: * Distrib-u-Matic - Indicate an Undistributable proposal. That proposal becomes Distributable. Or play three Distrib-u-Matics in the same message while indicating a single non-urgent proposal, and that proposal becomes Urgent. --- Title: Festive Fix Author: coppro AI: 3.0 II: 0 Chamber: Red Amend Rule 1769 by replacing b) the future event would occur during a Holiday, then the future event occurs 72 hours after the end of that Holiday instead. with b) the future event would occur during a Holiday or during the 72 hours immediately following a Holiday, then the future event occurs 72 hours after the end of that Holiday instead. --- *Full name is Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck e^(-kt) -- -Tiger
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool Report
== Promotor's Proposal Pool Report ==
Date of this report: Wed 09 Dec 2009
Date of last report: Thu 03 Nov 2009
Pool last ratified: 29 Nov, ratified on 06 Dec
Number of Proposals in the Pool: 26
Distributable Proposals in the Pool:
(none)
All proposals made distributable and then removed from the pool before
being distributed are also still distributable, but too many to list
here.
All others are undistributable.
Proposals currently in the Pool:
---
Title: A Terrible Proposal
Author: ais523
AI: 1.0
II: 3
Chamber: Green
Create a rule with the following text:
{{{
Any set of persons who between them have at least 10 instances of the
patent title Champion can create arbitrary instruments (which need not
be rules or proposals) by unanimous consent, followed by announcement of
the fact to a public forum. Such instruments are authorised to change
the rules.
}}}
---
Title: R101 Safety Net
Author: c.
AI: 3.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
Enact a new Power=3 Rule reading:
comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement, as
long as e published the amendment for public review at least 24
hours ago.
---
Title: O RLY?
Author: Darth Cliché
chamber: ordinary
AI: 1.0
II: 3
Chamber: Green
ais523 wins.
Rodlen wins.
Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins.
---
Title: null
Author: c.
AI: 3.0
II: 0
Chamber: Green
Create a Power-3 rule with text:
{{{
c. CAN cause this rule to amend itself with support.
}}}
---
Title: No to No
Author: ais523
AI: 1.7
II: 1
Chamber: Green
For each Rest in ais523's possession, destroy that Rest and
create 1 Rest in ehird's possession.
---
Title: Registration is not dependent
Author: Murphy
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by replacing this text:
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that
indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
intends to become a player.
with this text:
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that
indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
intends to become a player at that time.
---
Title: Judicial fix
Author: Murphy
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by replacing this text:
The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial
case are the active players,
with this text:
The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial
case are the active players who have not previously been
recused from it,
[Currently, recused judges are not actually disqualified from being
reassigned to the same case, which may have caused a few inadvertently
illegal rotations of the bench.]
---
Title: Rest Reform
Author: Walker
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
[ Allows the judge to specify any number of Rest less than 15 when
judging SILENCE, and when the judgement remains in effect for a
continuous week, any player can create the rests in the possession of
the ninny. I've kept Class-N Crimes in though, as there may still be
cases in which the defendant admits guilt and creates the Rests
straight-away. ]
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing
* SILENCE, a number of Rests, equal to the defined Class of the
Crime or (if the breach is not a defined crime) the power of
the breached Rule, rounded to the nearest integer with ties
broken by rounding up, are created in the possession of the
Ninny. The judge CAN, with 2 Support, set the fine at a
different integral level between one half and double that
amount, and SHOULD attempt to do so if necessary to ensure
that the correlation between the fine and the severity of the
breach is appropriate, or to account for the faith (good or
bad) shown by the Ninny in contesting the notice or in aiding
or obstructing the course of justice.
with:
* SILENCE with a positive number less than 15 (X). If a
judgement of SILENCE has been in effect continuously for one
week (or longer), any player CAN create a number of Rests
equal to X in the possession of the ninny, by announcement.
---
Title: Fix Ambassador Duties
Author: Walker
AI: 1.0
II: 0
Chamber: Green
In Rul
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool Report
== Promotor's Proposal Pool Report ==
Date of this report: Thu 03 Dec 2009
Date of last report: Sun 29 Nov 2009
Pool last ratified: 22 Nov, ratified on 29 Nov
Number of Proposals in the Pool: 26
Oh My
All proposals made distributable and then removed from the pool before
being distributed are also still distributable, but too many to list
here.
All others are undistributable.
Proposals currently in the Pool:
---
Title: A Terrible Proposal
Author: ais523
AI: 1.0
II: 3
Chamber: Green
Create a rule with the following text:
{{{
Any set of persons who between them have at least 10 instances of the
patent title Champion can create arbitrary instruments (which need not
be rules or proposals) by unanimous consent, followed by announcement of
the fact to a public forum. Such instruments are authorised to change
the rules.
}}}
---
Title: R101 Safety Net
Author: c.
AI: 3.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
Enact a new Power=3 Rule reading:
comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement, as
long as e published the amendment for public review at least 24
hours ago.
---
Title: O RLY?
Author: Darth Cliché
chamber: ordinary
AI: 1.0
II: 3
Chamber: Green
ais523 wins.
Rodlen wins.
Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins.
---
Title: null
Author: c.
AI: 3.0
II: 0
Chamber: Green
Create a Power-3 rule with text:
{{{
c. CAN cause this rule to amend itself with support.
}}}
---
Title: No to No
Author: ais523
AI: 1.7
II: 1
Chamber: Green
For each Rest in ais523's possession, destroy that Rest and
create 1 Rest in ehird's possession.
---
Title: Registration is not dependent
Author: Murphy
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by replacing this text:
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that
indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
intends to become a player.
with this text:
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that
indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
intends to become a player at that time.
---
Title: Judicial fix
Author: Murphy
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by replacing this text:
The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial
case are the active players,
with this text:
The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial
case are the active players who have not previously been
recused from it,
[Currently, recused judges are not actually disqualified from being
reassigned to the same case, which may have caused a few inadvertently
illegal rotations of the bench.]
---
Title: Rest Reform
Author: Walker
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
[ Allows the judge to specify any number of Rest less than 15 when
judging SILENCE, and when the judgement remains in effect for a
continuous week, any player can create the rests in the possession of
the ninny. I've kept Class-N Crimes in though, as there may still be
cases in which the defendant admits guilt and creates the Rests
straight-away. ]
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing
* SILENCE, a number of Rests, equal to the defined Class of the
Crime or (if the breach is not a defined crime) the power of
the breached Rule, rounded to the nearest integer with ties
broken by rounding up, are created in the possession of the
Ninny. The judge CAN, with 2 Support, set the fine at a
different integral level between one half and double that
amount, and SHOULD attempt to do so if necessary to ensure
that the correlation between the fine and the severity of the
breach is appropriate, or to account for the faith (good or
bad) shown by the Ninny in contesting the notice or in aiding
or obstructing the course of justice.
with:
* SILENCE with a positive number less than 15 (X). If a
judgement of SILENCE has been in effect continuously for one
week (or longer), any player CAN create a number of Rests
equal to X in the possession of the ninny, by announcement.
---
Title: Fix Ambassador Duties
Author: Walker
AI: 1.0
II: 0
Chamber: Green
In Rule 2185, replace
Recognition is a
OFF: [Promotor] Proposal Pool Report
== Promotor's Proposal Pool Report ==
Date of this report: Sun 29 Nov 2009
Date of last report: Sat 22 Nov 2009
Pool last ratified: 22 Nov, ratified on 29 Nov
Number of Proposals: 33
Distributable proposals in the Pool:
Restrict Card Destruction Window
Lost and Found is Running the Show
De-caste-ify
Wild Cards
We don't need this anymore
Salary Timing
Drop them, really
All proposals made distributable and then removed from the pool before
being distributed are also still distributable, but too many to list
here.
All others are undistributable.
Proposals currently in the Pool:
---
Title: A Terrible Proposal
Author: ais523
AI: 1.0
II: 3
Chamber: Green
Create a rule with the following text:
{{{
Any set of persons who between them have at least 10 instances of the
patent title Champion can create arbitrary instruments (which need not
be rules or proposals) by unanimous consent, followed by announcement of
the fact to a public forum. Such instruments are authorised to change
the rules.
}}}
---
Title: R101 Safety Net
Author: c.
AI: 3.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
Enact a new Power=3 Rule reading:
comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement, as
long as e published the amendment for public review at least 24
hours ago.
---
Title: O RLY?
Author: Darth Cliché
chamber: ordinary
AI: 1.0
II: 3
Chamber: Green
ais523 wins.
Rodlen wins.
Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins.
---
Title: null
Author: c.
AI: 3.0
II: 0
Chamber: Green
Create a Power-3 rule with text:
{{{
c. CAN cause this rule to amend itself with support.
}}}
---
Title: No to No
Author: ais523
AI: 1.7
II: 1
Chamber: Green
For each Rest in ais523's possession, destroy that Rest and
create 1 Rest in ehird's possession.
---
Title: Registration is not dependent
Author: Murphy
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by replacing this text:
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that
indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
intends to become a player.
with this text:
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that
indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
intends to become a player at that time.
---
Title: Judicial fix
Author: Murphy
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by replacing this text:
The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial
case are the active players,
with this text:
The entities qualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial
case are the active players who have not previously been
recused from it,
[Currently, recused judges are not actually disqualified from being
reassigned to the same case, which may have caused a few inadvertently
illegal rotations of the bench.]
---
Title: Rest Reform
Author: Walker
AI: 2.0
II: 1
Chamber: Green
[ Allows the judge to specify any number of Rest less than 15 when
judging SILENCE, and when the judgement remains in effect for a
continuous week, any player can create the rests in the possession of
the ninny. I've kept Class-N Crimes in though, as there may still be
cases in which the defendant admits guilt and creates the Rests
straight-away. ]
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing
* SILENCE, a number of Rests, equal to the defined Class of the
Crime or (if the breach is not a defined crime) the power of
the breached Rule, rounded to the nearest integer with ties
broken by rounding up, are created in the possession of the
Ninny. The judge CAN, with 2 Support, set the fine at a
different integral level between one half and double that
amount, and SHOULD attempt to do so if necessary to ensure
that the correlation between the fine and the severity of the
breach is appropriate, or to account for the faith (good or
bad) shown by the Ninny in contesting the notice or in aiding
or obstructing the course of justice.
with:
* SILENCE with a positive number less than 15 (X). If a
judgement of SILENCE has been in effect continuously for one
week (or longer), any player CAN create a number of Rests
equal to X in the possession of the ninny, by announcement.
-
