Re: [algogeeks] Google Interview Question

2011-06-05 Thread Anurag Bhatia
I think what' required is that we compare digits -
eg.
18
187

Since last digit of second num > First digit of first number - 18718

48
482
Since last digit of second num < First digit of first number - 48482

--Anurag




On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Piyush Sinha  wrote:
> @Bhavesh...
>
> for the inputs 18,187.. apply your method..
> 18 -- 188
> 187-- 187
> 18187 -> ur method
> 18718 -> actual
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Bhavesh agrawal 
> wrote:
>>
>>  solution may be
>>
>> array ={ 3 ,21 ,9 ,93,17 ,178 ,1,101} (i think i have covered all
>> exceptions )
>> then ,change this array like 3 , 21222, 9, 93999, 17111, 17811,
>> 1 , 10111  ( make each number of 5 digit with rest digits same as Ist
>> digit )
>>  then sort this array
>> 9, 93999,3 21222, 17811,17111, 1, 10111
>>  and make it with actual numbers
>> 9,93,3,21,178,17,1,101        =     993321178171101
>> plz let me know if any case left...
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>
>
> --
> Piyush Sinha
> IIIT, Allahabad
> +91-8792136657
> +91-7483122727
> https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=10655377926
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] MS interview question

2011-06-05 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Have a look at this recursive soln in java -

Node convertList(Node head)
{
if(head ==null)
return null;

Node node = head;
Node next = node.next;
Node next2next = next.next;

next.next = node;
node.next = convertList(next2next);

return next;
}

This soln assumes even number of nodes in the list. The code is quite
self explanatory.

--Anurag


On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Anand  wrote:
> Given a linked list of the form, 1->2->3->4->5->6, convert it into the form
> 2->1->4->3->6->5. Note that the nodes need to be altered and not the data
> contained in them
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Array problem

2011-05-20 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Just need some clarification; sorry I joined the thread late. What are we
trying maximize? A[j] -A[i] such that i wrote:

> @ Piyush: Excellent Solution...It appears both Correct and O(n)...Good work
> !![?]
>
> Just a minor correction in your algo.[?]
>
> * while(B[i] * j++;
> must also check for J's bound as:
> **while ( j < ( sizeof(A)/sizeof(A[0]) )* && *B[i]  j++;
> Or it will crash when J goes out of bound and we try to reference C[j].
>
> Nywayz..thnx for the solution and algo !!
> *
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

<<363.gif>><<360.gif>>

Re: [algogeeks] Do you Think Allocating memory to 2D Array is easy ???

2011-04-29 Thread Anurag Bhatia
A small correction -

To access - arr[i][j] => get the memory location by m*i+j.


On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Anurag Bhatia  wrote:
> I have not written code in C for a while, so pardon any gaffes.
>
> Let us say the dimensions of the array to be created are m and n.
> To create the array - (int *)malloc(sizeof(int)*m*n);
> To access - arr[i][j] => get the memory location by n*i+j.
>
> --Anurag
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:00 PM, bittu  wrote:
>> Basically we have to implement  function  which allocates memory to a
>> two dimensional array. we have to Minimize the number of calls to
>> malloc and make sure that the memory is accessible by the notation
>> arr[i][j].
>>
>> .important part of the question is we have to implement the it using
>> single call to MALLOC..its strictly means only 1 time ?? so make sure
>> your not calling malloc more then 1 so lets make our hand dirty..??
>>
>> Please Read Question Carefully...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regrads
>> Shashank
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Do you Think Allocating memory to 2D Array is easy ???

2011-04-29 Thread Anurag Bhatia
I have not written code in C for a while, so pardon any gaffes.

Let us say the dimensions of the array to be created are m and n.
To create the array - (int *)malloc(sizeof(int)*m*n);
To access - arr[i][j] => get the memory location by n*i+j.

--Anurag



On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:00 PM, bittu  wrote:
> Basically we have to implement  function  which allocates memory to a
> two dimensional array. we have to Minimize the number of calls to
> malloc and make sure that the memory is accessible by the notation
> arr[i][j].
>
> .important part of the question is we have to implement the it using
> single call to MALLOC..its strictly means only 1 time ?? so make sure
> your not calling malloc more then 1 so lets make our hand dirty..??
>
> Please Read Question Carefully...
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regrads
> Shashank
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Re: Median of Binary Tree

2011-04-06 Thread Anurag Bhatia
@bittu: Can we modify the tree to store extra info?



On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:16 PM, bittu  wrote:
> @all try to understand the question as usual we have to do it in min.
> time & space complexity ..in mean Time O(n) & space o(1) At-most
> just tell em after doing in-order traversal where u will store the
> elements either in array or in set isn'tit  it will take O(n) extra
> space why not looks fro O(1) SPACE..IF M NOT CORRECT otherwise problem
> just become finding median in array which O(1) ..correct me if m
> wrong
>
> @Anurag wher u will store inorder of tree
>
>
> Thanks
> Shashank
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Re: Median of Binary Tree

2011-03-27 Thread Anurag Bhatia
You could do any order traversal to get the list of values. - O(n)
Apply the kth order statistic (where k = numNodes/2) to get the value - O(n)

Adjust the median depending on whether numNode is odd or even

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Balaji Ramani
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is one approach to it:
>
> 1) Go to the first node in inorder traversal. Let the pointer be LP.
> (Push the intermediate nodes to Lstack while doing this )
> 2) Go to the last node in inorder traversal. Let the pointer be RP.
> (Push the intermediate nodes to Rstack while doing this )
>
> while(LP->data < RP->data){
>   LP = inordersuccessor(LP,Lstack)
>   // gets inorder successor and modifies Lstack accordingly
>   RP = inorderpredecessor(RP,Rstack)
>   // gets inorder predecessor and modifies Rstack accordingly
>   Lprev = LP
>   Rprev = RP;
> }
>
> if(LP->data = RP->data){ // even number of elements
>   retrun LP->data;
> }else{
>   return Lprev->data + Rprev->data / 2
> }
>
> Time: O(n)
> Memory: 2 * O ( log n) average
>
> Thanks,
> Balaji.
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:17 PM, bittu  wrote:
>>
>> @all
>>
>> wake up geeks
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Shashank
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



[algogeeks] Amazon Online Test

2011-02-22 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Has anyone give any first round online test for Amazon? If yes, can
you please share details?

--Anurag

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Re: Microsoft Written Test Questions

2011-01-30 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Does anyone have details of whether the test was conducted on the
30th? If yes, which city?

--AB

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Rahul Menon  wrote:
> This time MS rather than conducting the written tests by itself has
> outsourced the procedure to MERITTRAC Services to be conducted to jan
> 30th, So unlike the regular 6 questions type written test , it will be
> replaced by MCQs which is the regular pattern of merittrac tests
> [think so] . From a bit googling I came to know that these people put
> lot of repeated questions and each time and if we can get questions
> from previously conducted tests of  MS , it can be very helpful.
>
> So the ones with experience with merritrac tests here ,can do a lot
> help,
>
> I would also like to know about the pattern or topics they usually
> test. And also sample questions
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rahul
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Frequently one of the Top Question Asked in Amazon

2011-01-30 Thread Anurag Bhatia
@bittu: Can you give and example?? I am unable to understand what a
spiral order is?

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:25 PM, bittu  wrote:
> Convert BT in to DLL such that DLL represents the Sprial order
> traversal of BT.
>
> "Inplace"
>
> its Written Test Question & They wants Exact Working Code...Not
> Approach..Be Clear..Try to provide best solutions
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Shashank " "The best way to escape from a problem is to solve it."
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Convert a Binary tree into spike.

2010-05-13 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Do a breadth first search on the tree and link all nodes at the same
level in the order that you process them

--Anurag

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:18 AM, vinayan c  wrote:
> Something like this
>                        1
>                2               3
>          4         5     6        7
>
>
>  1
>  |
>  2->3
>  |
>  4->5->6->7
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Marbles

2010-03-07 Thread Anurag Bhatia
@Rohit: Can you explain the solution? I was unable to understand why
the (n-1) and (k-1) instead of just n and k.

Thanks and regards,
Anurag Bhatia

On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Anil C R  wrote:
> yeah my bad :P...
> after all the time i struggled with DP :P
> Anil
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Find parent/grandparent relationship of nodes in binary tree in O(1) time

2010-02-05 Thread Anurag Bhatia
@Nirmal: Did you find a solution as yet?

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Nirmal  wrote:
> I found this problem in one of the interview form, that it is interesting to
> discuss
>
> Problem :
>
> There are two nodes given in a tree(not binary tree). Find whether one node
> is parent/grand parent of other.
> order should be O(1).
>
> You are allowed to do any amount of preprocessing 
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Coding Problems

2010-02-02 Thread Anurag Bhatia
www.projecteuler.net has some interesting problems.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:07 PM, sharad kumar  wrote:
> www.topcoder.com/tc
> www.spoj.pl
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Neeraj Singh <17.neera...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey fellas,
>>
>> I need to seek some advice from you all.
>>
>> I have recently developed strong interest in programming problems.
>> So, What is the best place I should start practicing my skills.
>>
>> It would be great if the effort is rewarding as well.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> TY
>> --
>> Neeraj
>> Ted Turner  - "Sports is like a war without the killing."
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] missing integers in an unsorted array

2010-01-31 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Sum of n numbers = n(n+1)/2
Traverse the array and add up all the numbers.
Subtract that from the sum of n numbers.

--Anurag

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Banoo  wrote:
> hi,
> can you help me solve the following problem?
>
> You are given an unsorted list of n-1 distinct integers from the range
> 1 to n. Write a linear-time algorithm to find the missing integer.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Add 2 long integers with digits represented by linked lists

2010-01-27 Thread Anurag Bhatia
If that is the representation, then the lists have to be reversed.
Otherwise the time goes up exponentially.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Algoose Chase  wrote:
> Condition:
> Can we do it keeping the original lists intact ? ie without reversing it.
> I mean , No recursion & no Reversing ... is it possible ?
>
> @kumar :
> 15234 is represented as  1->5->2->3->4
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:09 PM, saurabh gupta  wrote:
>>
>> perhaps you mean,
>> reverse each link list O(n+m).
>> then sum each node with carryover maintained.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Anurag Bhatia 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Let us take an example -
>>>
>>> Num 1 = 123456
>>> Num 2= 1234
>>> Link-1->Link-2->Link-3->Link-4->Link5->Link6
>>> Link-1->Link-2->Link-3->Link-4
>>>
>>> Add nodes into linkedlist 1 till either one of the list is not null.
>>> Make sure you process the carry in each iteration.
>>>
>>>
>>> --AB
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Algoose Chase 
>>> wrote:
>>> > conditions:
>>> > NO extra memory (@ stack or Heap) at all. No recursion.
>>> >
>>> > Any body has got any hint about how to get this done ?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> > Groups
>>> > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> > To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Add 2 long integers with digits represented by linked lists

2010-01-26 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Let us take an example -

Num 1 = 123456
Num 2= 1234
Link-1->Link-2->Link-3->Link-4->Link5->Link6
Link-1->Link-2->Link-3->Link-4

Add nodes into linkedlist 1 till either one of the list is not null.
Make sure you process the carry in each iteration.


--AB


On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Algoose Chase  wrote:
> conditions:
> NO extra memory (@ stack or Heap) at all. No recursion.
>
> Any body has got any hint about how to get this done ?
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.