Re: [arch-general] libtirpc from testing breaks login
On Thursday 01 November 2012 13:54:04 Jeff Van Dam wrote: > How did you determine which package was breaking logging in? Thank you. There were only 4 packages upgraded. This one seemed the best candidate. -- Arthur Titeica
[arch-general] libtirpc from testing breaks login
Hello, Just a heads up. It seems that the upgrade to libtirpc 0.2.2-3 from testing breaks systemd- logind/pam and logging in to the system is not possible except in rescue mode. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32308 -- Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] Strange pacman problem with conflicting dependencies
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 22:19:07 Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > Should be fixed at the next db sync. Thanks. I confirm the fix here. -- Arthur Titeica
[arch-general] Strange pacman problem with conflicting dependencies
Hi On a machine with a less frequent updating schedule (~once a month) I receive the following when doing pacman -Suy ->8- # pacman -Suy :: Synchronizing package databases... testing is up to date core is up to date extra is up to date community-testing is up to date community is up to date multilib-testing is up to date multilib is up to date archlinuxfr is up to date repo-ck is up to date :: Starting full system upgrade... warning: ffmpeg: ignoring package upgrade (20120509-1 => 1:0.11.1-1) :: Replace virtualbox-additions with community-testing/virtualbox-iso- additions? [Y/n] :: Replace virtualbox-modules with community-testing/virtualbox-host-modules? [Y/n] warning: x264: ignoring package upgrade (20120204-1 => 20120705-1) resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... error: unresolvable package conflicts detected error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) :: virtualbox-host-modules and virtualbox-modules are in conflict ->8- I didn't have any problems with the virtualbox replacements on another machine with daily updates. If necessary the debug pacman log may be found at http://pastebin.com/9nh5tp9t Thanks. -- Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)
2-07-07 19:21] Running 'pacman -S glibc' [2012-07-07 19:21] Generating locales... [2012-07-07 19:21] en_US.UTF-8... done [2012-07-07 19:21] en_US.ISO-8859-1... done [2012-07-07 19:21] Generation complete. [2012-07-07 19:21] upgraded glibc (2.16.0-2 -> 2.16.0-2) -- Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] usermove update
On Sunday 01 April 2012 22:41:00 Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> The recent updates of kmod, systemd and udev in testing moves
> /lib/{systemd,udev,modprobe.d,depmod.d} to /usr/. The old location
> will, for the time being, continue to work for config files (as well
> as udev rules and systemd unit files).
>
> However, helper programs installed to /lib/{systemd,udev} will have to
> be moved to /usr/lib. This has been done for all the official
> packages, but third-party packages will have to be updated.
Hi.
I just filled a bug report about the udev move:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29226
--
Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openvpn 2.2.0-1
On Sunday 15 May 2011 12:15:58 Arthur Titeica wrote: > On Saturday 14 May 2011 13:11:19 Thomas Bächler wrote: > > Upstream update, please sign off. > > IPV6 assignment doesn't work anymore for me and it did work with 2.1.4. > > I'm still investigating the cause but haven't found anything so far. > > From the log: > Options error: Unrecognized option or missing parameter(s) in [PUSH- > OPTIONS]:1: ifconfig-ipv6 (2.2.0) Sorry for the noise. It seems I had a /usr/local copy manually compiled and some modified rc.d scripts which did the trick for IPV6. Stable versions don't seem to have IPV6. -- Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] openvpn 2.2.0-1
On Saturday 14 May 2011 13:11:19 Thomas Bächler wrote: > Upstream update, please sign off. IPV6 assignment doesn't work anymore for me and it did work with 2.1.4. I'm still investigating the cause but haven't found anything so far. From the log: Options error: Unrecognized option or missing parameter(s) in [PUSH- OPTIONS]:1: ifconfig-ipv6 (2.2.0) -- Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] Dmenu vs. KMS
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 18:53:56 Stan wrote: > Hi, guys. > > Have some troubles with dmenu(4.2.1-1), stock kernel(2.6.38.4-1) and > perhaps xf86-video-ati(6.14.1-1): dmenu lags. Vertical listing is really > pain in the ass(latency ~1 sec) and with blob everything works just > fine. If anyone has the same here i'll post it to suckless's or x.org's > bugzilla. > > Device: Radeon HD4570 Mobile > > How to test: > o In attachments there is file named "test". > o Command: cat test | dmenu -l 10 > o Lags(or no lags) No lag here. Mobility Radeon HD 4500 with compositing KDE. -- Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing
On Sunday 24 April 2011 23:34:41 Ionut Biru wrote: > On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote: > > On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote: > >> All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano > >> pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in > >> testing. > > > > Sorry if missed out something but soprano 2.6.0-3 still requires redland- > > compat. From your message I understand it should come with redland as > > dependency so that libreoffice wouldn't complain... > > you should do a pacman -Syu. now redland-compat doesn't conflict with > redland anymore and can be installed along with it. Yes. I've tried that but it gives # pacman -S redland . error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. # pkgfile -s /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 local/redland-compat All that after many -Suy ;) http://www.archlinux.org/packages/testing/x86_64/redland-compat/ also shows usr/lib/librdf.so.0 -- Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing
On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote: > All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano > pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in > testing. Sorry if missed out something but soprano 2.6.0-3 still requires redland- compat. From your message I understand it should come with redland as dependency so that libreoffice wouldn't complain... -- Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3 + KDE 4 are both large disappointments.
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:50:41 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote: [flaming] I though KDE 4 was bad and bloated and that i couldn't get any worse... it seems i was wrong. Boy this new Gnome version is even more bloated and buggy then KDE 4 wich is quite the atchievement from the gnome team... Please stop calling KDE bloated. As a former Windows user I find both Gnome and KDE over simplistic and both lack some kind of bonding between various parts like Windows does. In that regard tough, KDE SC is doing much better than Gnome and I guess that's what the SC part means. What you may find bloated is the fact that the two major video card makers do a terrible job in supporting their over-heating-barely-2D-60euro-windows-only-cards and rely on the FOSS devs to build drivers for them. Both NVIDIA and AMD do a semi-lousy job with drivers in the Windows world and I don't expect better anytime soon. Add this to the fact that the kernel isn't exactly desktop optimized (stuff like let me move the mouse while I extract that damn 4G archive) and you'll probably get what feels like a slow system. Now what could a DE could do in this situation? I know that kwin does extensive checks in regards to video driver capabilities and maybe Gnome just isn't that far on this. That said, KDE SC with the free radeon driver in 2.6.38 is outperforming the catalyst driver with 2.6.37 in regards to desktop effects (I can't say anything about nouveau). IMHO! -- Arthur Titeica
Re: [arch-general] eigen version
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:34:04 Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 03/24/2011 10:09 AM, Arthur Titeica wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Since yesterday pacman -Syu complains about the eigen package. > > > > eigen: local (3.0.0-1) is newer than extra (2.0.15-1) > > > > Before I make any changes I thought I'd ask here maybe anyone knows > > what is going on. > > > > Thanks! > > eigen 3.0.0 was in testing for a short period and it was removed. > > just do pacman -S eigen to downgrade That went well. Thanks. -- Arthur Titeica PharmEc Software
Re: [arch-general] eigen version
On Thursday 24 March 2011 11:26:24 Cédric Girard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Jelle van der Waa
wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 10:09 +0200, Arthur Titeica wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Since yesterday pacman -Syu complains about the eigen
package.
> > >
> > > eigen: local (3.0.0-1) is newer than extra (2.0.15-1)
> > >
> > > Before I make any changes I thought I'd ask here maybe anyone
knows
> > > what is going on.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > Check the status of your mirror
http://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/
> > and switch to a good mirror and pacman -Syyu
>
> Well, eigen-2.0.15-1 does is the latest packaged version in [extra].
> Are you sure you haven't installed eigen-3.0.0-1 from another source?
pacman -Qi eigen gives what's bellow. I can't find a way to tell me the
source of the package.
Name : eigen
Version: 3.0.0-1
URL: http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
Licenses : GPL LGPL3
Groups : None
Provides : None
Depends On : fftw gsl
Optional Deps : None
Required By: avogadro
Conflicts With : None
Replaces : None
Installed Size : 3328.00 K
Packager : Andrea Scarpino
Architecture : any
Build Date : Mon 21 Mar 2011 08:25:13 PM EET
Install Date : Mon 21 Mar 2011 09:40:19 PM EET
Install Reason : Installed as a dependency for another package
Install Script : No
Description: A C++ template library for linear algebra: matrices,
vectors and related algorithms
--
Arthur Titeica
PharmEc Software
[arch-general] eigen version
Hello. Since yesterday pacman -Syu complains about the eigen package. eigen: local (3.0.0-1) is newer than extra (2.0.15-1) Before I make any changes I thought I'd ask here maybe anyone knows what is going on. Thanks! -- Arthur Titeica PharmEc Software
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-1
On Tuesday 22 March 2011 02:50:42 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On 03/22/2011 01:35 AM, Arthur Titeica wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:24:26 +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Marek Otahal > >> > >> wrote: > >>> On Monday 21 of March 2011 22:21:44 you wrote: > >>>> On Monday 21 of March 2011 22:09:22 Erik Johnson wrote: > >>>> > Touchpad scrolling stopped working for me with this kernel, for > >>>> > >>>> some odd > >>>> > >>>> > reason. > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> i had just the same weird issue, > >>>> for me, going to kde's systemsettings > mouse module fixes that. > >>>> see https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23330 > >>>> cheers, marek > >>> > >>> sorry, my mistake. so i can confirm that kernel 2.6.38 breaks the > >>> sidebar > >>> scrolling on synaptics touchpad. > >> > >> that's because there's some new multitouch code that has been merged, > >> you should be able to scroll with two fingers anywhere on the touchpad > >> now, this became the default behaviour. To get back the old style, > >> just add: > >> Option "VertEdgeScroll" "true" > >> to /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf (or whatever it is called on > >> your machine) > > > > I'm just curious. Where did you get this info from and how could a normal > > user know these things when they break? Maybe it's in a wiki somewhere or > > there's a arch kernel changelog? > > > > As for myself I spent one day looking for a solution and found it in > > ksynaptics (in AUR - this should really get in official repos ;) ). > > "man synaptics" gives you all the options. Will have to look into it someday. Maybe there's something about dragging locks. > Also, there is no ksynaptics. Sorry about that. It's kcm_touchpad. -- Arthur Titeica PharmEc Software
Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-1
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:24:26 +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Marek Otahal wrote: On Monday 21 of March 2011 22:21:44 you wrote: On Monday 21 of March 2011 22:09:22 Erik Johnson wrote: > Touchpad scrolling stopped working for me with this kernel, for some odd > reason. Hi, i had just the same weird issue, for me, going to kde's systemsettings > mouse module fixes that. see https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23330 cheers, marek sorry, my mistake. so i can confirm that kernel 2.6.38 breaks the sidebar scrolling on synaptics touchpad. that's because there's some new multitouch code that has been merged, you should be able to scroll with two fingers anywhere on the touchpad now, this became the default behaviour. To get back the old style, just add: Option "VertEdgeScroll" "true" to /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf (or whatever it is called on your machine) I'm just curious. Where did you get this info from and how could a normal user know these things when they break? Maybe it's in a wiki somewhere or there's a arch kernel changelog? As for myself I spent one day looking for a solution and found it in ksynaptics (in AUR - this should really get in official repos ;) ). -- Arthur Titeica
